GWV5903
Gold Member
It wasn't about "calling law enforcement's bluff", it was about the coercive use of force, for the bottom line. That is no longer Capitalism.
Oh yes it was, those are direct quotes from Dr. Dumb Dumb...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It wasn't about "calling law enforcement's bluff", it was about the coercive use of force, for the bottom line. That is no longer Capitalism.
Yes, they are.
Translated: My brownshirts have been ordered, pressed, and I'm ready to go.Your first sentence is a humongous pile of bullshit.
Sure, anything adhering to authority is a pile of BS to you, get out of the way or get your ass run over...
It goes downhill from there.
The only thing going downhill is your view point, but that's old news...
Cops can't order you to do things not involving law or safety. DOA was not violating law nor was there a safety issue. Per the law, United violated the law because the flight was not overbooked so they had no right to remove him.
He clearly disobeyed their request and even challenged them to do it, they have full authority to ask him to leave the plane, want to bet?
GWV5903
Please link to any dictionary that shows the definition of "ask" to be "broken nose, fractured sinuses, two broken teeth, knocked unconscious = concussion, needing reconstructive surgery".
That's the definition of being mugged in a dark alley.
I just don't get why or how anyone can continue to defend the indefensible.
Would any of you big biz apologist say the same about this vicious attack if the victim had been your own parent or g-parent?
Would you?
Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com
The moron Dr. Dumb Dumb could have avoided the whole issue if he had just followed their orders to deplane, but he challenged them, pretty f'ing stupid...
Cops can't order you to do things not involving law or safety. DOA was not violating law nor was there a safety issue. Per the law, United violated the law because the flight was not overbooked so they had no right to remove him.
He clearly disobeyed their request and even challenged them to do it, they have full authority to ask him to leave the plane, want to bet?
GWV5903
Please link to any dictionary that shows the definition of "ask" to be "broken nose, fractured sinuses, two broken teeth, knocked unconscious = concussion, needing reconstructive surgery".
That's the definition of being mugged in a dark alley.
I just don't get why or how anyone can continue to defend the indefensible.
Would any of you big biz apologist say the same about this vicious attack if the victim had been your own parent or g-parent?
Would you?
Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com
Can you point out were I apologized for UA?!?! Oh, that's right you can't...
The moron Dr. Dumb Dumb could have avoided the whole issue if he had just followed their orders to deplane, but he challenged them, pretty f'ing stupid...
Next time a law enforcement officer tells you to do something, I suggest you do it anything short of jumping off of tall buildings or you could end up looking like Dr. Dumb Dumb...
You don't know how the FAA works, do ya? LOLI won't lose. The CEO doesn't control the City of Chicago nor the FAA. The CEO is solely concerned with PR and profits at United, not the law.I always pay my bets when I lose, but I rarely lose.
Then it is possible you WILL pay 25 million?
BTW My opinion is you are going to lose. The CEO himself said he did nothing wrong.
That has got to put a wet blanket on any attempt at prosecution. A prosecutor has got to have serious doubts about a conviction when there will be evidence submitted that the CEO believes he did nothing wrong. Therefore they will not file charges in the first place.
Irrelevant to FAA violations.And then you've got the chief of security there saying officers should not board a plane under those circumstances.I won't lose. The CEO doesn't control the City of Chicago nor the FAA. The CEO is solely concerned with PR and profits at United, not the law.I always pay my bets when I lose, but I rarely lose.
Then it is possible you WILL pay 25 million?
BTW My opinion is you are going to lose. The CEO himself said he did nothing wrong.
That has got to put a wet blanket on any attempt at prosecution. A prosecutor has got to have serious doubts about a conviction when there will be evidence submitted that the CEO believes he did nothing wrong. Therefore they will not file charges in the first place.
If they were lying like rightwinger, paperview, Faun and a few others here? Yes, I would. I'd be a bit more polite about it, but I'd certainly correct them. If, like those first three, after repeated attempts to show them where they are wrong fail, then like a dementia or mentally ill patient, I'd give up on them per se and only input links and corrections to show others how these three are wrong if not outright liars.Divine.Wind
danielpalos
No need to distort when we've got video.
Divine.Wind if this were your parent or g-parent, would you be calling them a liar?
Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com
Next time a law enforcement officer tells you to do something, I suggest you do it anything short of jumping off of tall buildings ...

Capitalism involves voluntary social transaction that result in mutually beneficial trade; socialism is about the coercive use of force.It wasn't about "calling law enforcement's bluff", it was about the coercive use of force, for the bottom line. That is no longer Capitalism.
Oh yes it was, those are direct quotes from Dr. Dumb Dumb...
How long are you going to keep your customers by telling them what they don't want to hear?Yes, they are.
No they're not, I am certain I could find hundreds of times the average consumer is wrong, including you, want to bet?
^ How a psychotic thinks.Whos' to say this Lunatic did not bash his head into the Wall in the Airline tunnel when he broke free and ran off? I mean if he has ANY real injuries............just a thought. I put nothing past a professional scam artist. Ask him...how far he would go to erase his debts? His gambling debts? His destroyed career? Did someone say something about trading drugs for blowjobs? His destroyed marriage. Would $1 million help him out? His family debts? student loans? Think outside the box..................
Who is to say?Whos' to say this Lunatic did not bash his head into the Wall in the Airline tunnel when he broke free and ran off? I mean if he has ANY real injuries............just a thought. I put nothing past a professional scam artist. Ask him...how far he would go to erase his debts? His gambling debts? His destroyed career? Did someone say something about trading drugs for blowjobs? His destroyed marriage. Would $1 million help him out? His family debts? student loans? Think outside the box..................
Are you confusing socialism and totalitarianism? They are not the same, you know, in spite of the propaganda you obviously subscribe to.Capitalism involves voluntary social transaction that result in mutually beneficial trade; socialism is about the coercive use of force.
By that same logic, this all could have been avoided had United simply kept up their end of the agreement and flown the doctor and his wife to Kentucky.Cops can't order you to do things not involving law or safety. DOA was not violating law nor was there a safety issue. Per the law, United violated the law because the flight was not overbooked so they had no right to remove him.
He clearly disobeyed their request and even challenged them to do it, they have full authority to ask him to leave the plane, want to bet?
GWV5903
Please link to any dictionary that shows the definition of "ask" to be "broken nose, fractured sinuses, two broken teeth, knocked unconscious = concussion, needing reconstructive surgery".
That's the definition of being mugged in a dark alley.
I just don't get why or how anyone can continue to defend the indefensible.
Would any of you big biz apologist say the same about this vicious attack if the victim had been your own parent or g-parent?
Would you?
Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com
Can you point out were I apologized for UA?!?! Oh, that's right you can't...
The moron Dr. Dumb Dumb could have avoided the whole issue if he had just followed their orders to deplane, but he challenged them, pretty f'ing stupid...
Next time a law enforcement officer tells you to do something, I suggest you do it anything short of jumping off of tall buildings or you could end up looking like Dr. Dumb Dumb...
It depends on whether that is a business norm or not. In this case, passengers all agree to contracts of carriage. Most are about the same. Airlines do their best to avoid bumping passengers and try to make the best of it. In Dao's case, he violated the law and the law was called in...then they fucked it up.How long are you going to keep your customers by telling them what they don't want to hear?Yes, they are.
No they're not, I am certain I could find hundreds of times the average consumer is wrong, including you, want to bet?
Better to have deplaned everyone then removed Dao if he didn't leave then replane all the passengers minus four.By that same logic, this all could have been avoided had United simply kept up their end of the agreement and flown the doctor and his wife to Kentucky.