Incompetent, Ignorant, Negligent, or Just Didn't give A Sh*#?

easyt65

Diamond Member
Aug 4, 2015
90,307
61,235
2,645
Clinton, aides tried to use wireless devices in secure areas




Not just Hillary but her entire staff repeatedly proved, at the very least, to be incompetent and 'untrustworthy' regarding safeguarding our national security by attempting to use non-encrypted, non-secure, wireless devices in secure / classified areas.

:wtf:

-------------------

Inside the Ring: Hillary Clinton, aides tried to use wireless devices in secure areas

"Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her aides tried to use personal hand-held electronic devices inside areas used to store classified information, according to the just-released State Department inspector general report.

The Bureau of Diplomatic Security, the State Department’s security arm, told the inspector general that in March 2009 Mrs. Clinton rejected an offer from security officials to provide her with a secure government smartphone. “DS was informed that Secretary Clinton’s staff had been asking to use BlackBerry devices inside classified areas,” said the report, released late last month."


She KNEW she was not supposed to have those devices in secure areas - she was even offered encrypted devices to use, and SHE REJECTED THEM, preferring to carry HER OWN with her, despite knowing they were illegal / not allowed!

Just who we need running this country...
:rolleyes:


Stupid or knowingly 'criminal'....... doesn't matter...to Liberals.

71% of Liberals still want Hillary to run even if enough evidence is presented and she is INDICTED!
 
"She KNEW she was not supposed to have those devices in secure areas..."

And you know this how, you don't. And since they couldn't convince her to use a safer phone, they aren't very fucking good at their jobs now are they.
 
"She KNEW she was not supposed to have those devices in secure areas..."

And you know this how, you don't. And since they couldn't convince her to use a safer phone, they aren't very fucking good at their jobs now are they.

Thank you for the demonstration of your complete lack of logic and common sense.

1. In order to get her security clearance, to include 'TS' and special compartmentalized access, she was required to undergo training AND to sign a document acknowledging she fully understood all security rules and regs. NOT using un-secure, non-encrypted devices of any kind in secure areas is in that training and was covered by the statement she signed.

2. In ALL secure are there are signs stating these devices are NOT allowed.

3. A visit from Hillary means 'high-vis', meaning 'Protocol' is usually involved. Security Managers, whose ass is on the line if a security violation occurs, would ensure Hillary and her team were made aware of the rules.

4. Most highly classified facilities have a device on the outside of the classified area that sounds an alarm when they detect any electronic device to ensure all cell phones are kept outside.

5. KNOWING she carried her own devices (a la the PICTURE) she was OFFERED an encrypted device....which she rejected. (Much like she rejected HER OWN RULE to her State Department people that directed THEM not to carry / use personal devices / e-mail for State Department business. Hillary, as the article states, was using a personal device (or two or three) to conduct State Department business because she rejected a State Department-provided encrypted device.

Dude, THINK....
 
"She KNEW she was not supposed to have those devices in secure areas..."

And you know this how, you don't. And since they couldn't convince her to use a safer phone, they aren't very fucking good at their jobs now are they.
Er.. Um... the NSA denied her request for a secured blackberry for use in secure facilities (like the one President Obama carries, that the NSA provided for him), so yes she knew she wasn't supposed to be using those devices in secure facilities.

It's a matter of public record.

:popcorn:
 
Seriously?? Deflection is all you've got, for her ignoting the security of the United States. That won't carry you far.
"She KNEW she was not supposed to have those devices in secure areas..."

And you know this how, you don't. And since they couldn't convince her to use a safer phone, they aren't very fucking good at their jobs now are they.
 
"She KNEW she was not supposed to have those devices in secure areas..."

And you know this how, you don't. And since they couldn't convince her to use a safer phone, they aren't very fucking good at their jobs now are they.

Thank you for the demonstration of your complete lack of logic and common sense.

1. In order to get her security clearance, to include 'TS' and special compartmentalized access, she was required to undergo training AND to sign a document acknowledging she fully understood all security rules and regs. NOT using un-secure, non-encrypted devices of any kind in secure areas is in that training and was covered by the statement she signed.

2. In ALL secure are there are signs stating these devices are NOT allowed.

3. A visit from Hillary means 'high-vis', meaning 'Protocol' is usually involved. Security Managers, whose ass is on the line if a security violation occurs, would ensure Hillary and her team were made aware of the rules.

4. Most highly classified facilities have a device on the outside of the classified area that sounds an alarm when they detect any electronic device to ensure all cell phones are kept outside.

5. KNOWING she carried her own devices (a la the PICTURE) she was OFFERED an encrypted device....which she rejected. (Much like she rejected HER OWN RULE to her State Department people that directed THEM not to carry / use personal devices / e-mail for State Department business. Hillary, as the article states, was using a personal device (or two or three) to conduct State Department business because she rejected a State Department-provided encrypted device.

Dude, THINK....
I am thinking. If I take a gun to the airport and while passing though to get the plane the TSA says Hey, nice gun, maybe on paper there's a rule but what the fuck do I care?

Rules that aren't enforced, aren't rules. If no one had the balls to say you can't do that Madam Secretary, that is a failure in the system so, fix the system.
 
"She KNEW she was not supposed to have those devices in secure areas..."

And you know this how, you don't. And since they couldn't convince her to use a safer phone, they aren't very fucking good at their jobs now are they.
Er.. Um... the NSA denied her request for a secured blackberry for use in secure facilities (like the one President Obama carries, that the NSA provided for him), so yes she knew she wasn't supposed to be using those devices in secure facilities.

It's a matter of public record.

:popcorn:
And they would do such a thing, why?
 
Seriously?? Deflection is all you've got, for her ignoting the security of the United States. That won't carry you far.
"She KNEW she was not supposed to have those devices in secure areas..."

And you know this how, you don't. And since they couldn't convince her to use a safer phone, they aren't very fucking good at their jobs now are they.
How do you know that anything done on her phone or in her email was anything more than cat videos? You don't.
 
Clinton, aides tried to use wireless devices in secure areas




Not just Hillary but her entire staff repeatedly proved, at the very least, to be incompetent and 'untrustworthy' regarding safeguarding our national security by attempting to use non-encrypted, non-secure, wireless devices in secure / classified areas.

:wtf:

-------------------

Inside the Ring: Hillary Clinton, aides tried to use wireless devices in secure areas

"Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her aides tried to use personal hand-held electronic devices inside areas used to store classified information, according to the just-released State Department inspector general report.

The Bureau of Diplomatic Security, the State Department’s security arm, told the inspector general that in March 2009 Mrs. Clinton rejected an offer from security officials to provide her with a secure government smartphone. “DS was informed that Secretary Clinton’s staff had been asking to use BlackBerry devices inside classified areas,” said the report, released late last month."


She KNEW she was not supposed to have those devices in secure areas - she was even offered encrypted devices to use, and SHE REJECTED THEM, preferring to carry HER OWN with her, despite knowing they were illegal / not allowed!

Just who we need running this country...
:rolleyes:


Stupid or knowingly 'criminal'....... doesn't matter...to Liberals.

71% of Liberals still want Hillary to run even if enough evidence is presented and she is INDICTED!
"The report does not say whether Mrs. Clinton or her aides violated the ban on using smartphones inside the SCIFs. However, if she or her aides improperly used their BlackBerrys inside the SCIF, it could explain how classified information ended up on Mrs. Clinton’s private email server."
 
The only security Clinton cares about is that of herself and her hand picked minions
 
"According to the inspector general’s report, after the aides requested to use BlackBerry devices inside the classified areas, the assistant secretary for diplomatic security sent a classified memorandum to Mrs. Clinton’s chief of staff, Cheryl Mills, describing the vulnerabilities of using BlackBerry devices and emphasized that they are prohibited from being used inside sensitive areas.

Mrs. Clinton contacted the assistant secretary after receiving the memo and informed him that she “gets it” regarding cellphone use in secure areas."
 
Well, yes we do, as the only devices she used, ever, were unsecure. Unless you are implying she was so incompetent she played videos rather than deal with State Dept. issues
Seriously?? Deflection is all you've got, for her ignoting the security of the United States. That won't carry you far.
"She KNEW she was not supposed to have those devices in secure areas..."

And you know this how, you don't. And since they couldn't convince her to use a safer phone, they aren't very fucking good at their jobs now are they.
How do you know that anything done on her phone or in her email was anything more than cat videos? You don't.
 
Rules that aren't enforced, aren't rules. If no one had the balls to say you can't do that Madam Secretary, that is a failure in the system so, fix the system.

ummm, they DID...and despite being repeatedly told she could not bring these devices into secure areas she kept trying to. Again, she signed the govt document acknowledging she KNEW the rules...then demonstrated she just didn't give a sh*#! After all ,she is a 'Clinton' and those rules / laws are for the peasants, right?!
 
The federal government pleading the fifth is fuckin bullshit. Just like that IRS skank.
This whole thing fuckin stinks. If there is nothing to hide, then why in the fuck would you plead the fifth?
 
"According to the inspector general’s report, after the aides requested to use BlackBerry devices inside the classified areas, the assistant secretary for diplomatic security sent a classified memorandum to Mrs. Clinton’s chief of staff, Cheryl Mills, describing the vulnerabilities of using BlackBerry devices and emphasized that they are prohibited from being used inside sensitive areas.

Mrs. Clinton contacted the assistant secretary after receiving the memo and informed him that she “gets it” regarding cellphone use in secure areas."
According to the govt document she signed when she got her security clearance - well before she tried to bring un-secure devices into classified areas - she 'got it'. She then tried to do it anyway.
 
Rules that aren't enforced, aren't rules. If no one had the balls to say you can't do that Madam Secretary, that is a failure in the system so, fix the system.

ummm, they DID...and despite being repeatedly told she could not bring these devices into secure areas she kept trying to. Again, she signed the govt document acknowledging she KNEW the rules...then demonstrated she just didn't give a sh*#! After all ,she is a 'Clinton' and those rules / laws are for the peasants, right?!
If it was that big a problem for the state department, the fix wasn't that hard. They get paid for shit like that.
 
"According to the inspector general’s report, after the aides requested to use BlackBerry devices inside the classified areas, the assistant secretary for diplomatic security sent a classified memorandum to Mrs. Clinton’s chief of staff, Cheryl Mills, describing the vulnerabilities of using BlackBerry devices and emphasized that they are prohibited from being used inside sensitive areas.

Mrs. Clinton contacted the assistant secretary after receiving the memo and informed him that she “gets it” regarding cellphone use in secure areas."
According to the govt document she signed when she got her security clearance - well before she tried to bring un-secure devices into classified areas - she 'got it'. She then tried to do it anyway.
So?

Get her a different phone? How fucking hard was that? And how fucking hard was it to say you have to use our server not yours?

Goddamned pussies.
 
You obviously see no importance in national security to be willing to deflect blame from your candidate. Are you one of her minions that is paid?
Rules that aren't enforced, aren't rules. If no one had the balls to say you can't do that Madam Secretary, that is a failure in the system so, fix the system.

ummm, they DID...and despite being repeatedly told she could not bring these devices into secure areas she kept trying to. Again, she signed the govt document acknowledging she KNEW the rules...then demonstrated she just didn't give a sh*#! After all ,she is a 'Clinton' and those rules / laws are for the peasants, right?!
If it was that big a problem for the state department, the fix wasn't that hard. They get paid for shit like that.
 
You obviously see no importance in national security to be willing to deflect blame from your candidate. Are you one of her minions that is paid?
Rules that aren't enforced, aren't rules. If no one had the balls to say you can't do that Madam Secretary, that is a failure in the system so, fix the system.

ummm, they DID...and despite being repeatedly told she could not bring these devices into secure areas she kept trying to. Again, she signed the govt document acknowledging she KNEW the rules...then demonstrated she just didn't give a sh*#! After all ,she is a 'Clinton' and those rules / laws are for the peasants, right?!
If it was that big a problem for the state department, the fix wasn't that hard. They get paid for shit like that.
Ah, we pay people to protect national security. That is not her fucking job. If there was a problem, they are supposed to fix it and they didn't, because apparently no one has the stones to say.Mada Secretary, your phone can no longer be used her. Here's your new one.
 

Forum List

Back
Top