I never said that, or that is I never injected the hyperbole you are inferring I did.
I never said you did. Others have focused on just Tort Reform as the solution to the Healthcare problems in this country.
you quoted me directly, if you are are addressing others than you may want to say so.
Care to respond to the bottom half of that post? The failure of the GOP plan from last year that is.
yes I care to respond, and you know, I have always approached you from a neutral standpoint , so I'd appreciate the same.
anyway...
Tort reform has a peripheral but healthy connection with health care in that like it or not doctors etc. won’t practice if they can find areas with smaller mal. pract. ins. rates, I read an article where in Indiana had less than 7 neurosurgeons left in the state because the rest had fled to other states where in the rates were much lower. Doctors are mobile.
Now, this really is an insurance commission or regulatory issue, in California back in the 80’s several years after tort reform was passed, the rates had gone back up BUT the ins. Comm.. backed by a ballot initiative made it possible for him to order the co’s to lower rates ( they were absent any real data set that concluded they deserved such a sets of increases ) and actually refund premiums.
As far as outright cost IN the medical arena at the ground level, defensive medicine exists, in one Harvard study I read over 50% of respondents said they ordered tests that were unnecessary and over 50% made referrals when none were necessary.
I do not know if we can ever quantify it with any real certainty, there-fore its effect. I thought everything counted, so the article you had says 1.5%, I saw 8% with other concomitant effects that may cost the nation as a whole 200 billion a year, what? We just forget it and move on? Lets throw it out there and debate it and see whats what.