In re: United States v. Nixon

[OKTexas]

See; United States v. Nixon - Wikipedia

Associate Justice William Rehnquist recused himself as he had previously served in the Nixon administration as an Assistant Attorney General. Will the two new members of the Supreme Court have the integrity to do what Justice Rehnquist did???

Straw man. Neither served under Trump.

What? Rehnequest was nominated by Trump and became a member of the Supreme Court during Nixon's Administration.


Gorsuch and Kavanaugh were appointed by Trump,

Rehnquest served as an asst. AG in the Nixon Administration.

Rehnquest had the integrity to recuse himself.

Did I dumb it up enough for you?

See; United States v. Nixon - Wikipedia

Associate Justice William Rehnquist recused himself as he had previously served in the Nixon administration as an Assistant Attorney General. Will the two new members of the Supreme Court have the integrity to do what Justice Rehnquist did???

Straw man. Neither served under Trump.

Rehnquest was nominated by Nixon for the Supreme Court as well had served as an Asst. AG in Nixon's Admninistration;

Gorsuch and Kavanaugh have been nominated and are now members of the Supreme Court. Is a conflict of interest at issue? Rehnquest thought so, and recused himself.

Did I dumb it down enough for you to understand?

Neither served in the executive branch under Trump, your strawman just went down in flames.

.

 

[Nostra]

We have now heard from the Trumpanzees. Not a one offered a reason why two men appointed by a defendant to a life long job, will now sit on a jury to judge their benefactor.

Most readers will understand that a conflict of interests now exists, and both men know how trump treats anyone who is not loyal to him.

They aren't involved in the impeachment trial, dummy.

 

[Nostra]

See; United States v. Nixon - Wikipedia

Associate Justice William Rehnquist recused himself as he had previously served in the Nixon administration as an Assistant Attorney General. Will the two new members of the Supreme Court have the integrity to do what Justice Rehnquist did???

Hey Dumbfuck, did Elena Kagan recuse herself on the SC ruling on Obamacare after she pushed for it while serving as Obama's solicitor general? Nope.

Hypocrite much?

 

[OKTexas]

We have now heard from the Trumpanzees. Not a one offered a reason why two men appointed by a defendant to a life long job, will now sit on a jury to judge their benefactor.

Most readers will understand that a conflict of interests now exists, and both men know how trump treats anyone who is not loyal to him.

So tell the class how may cases involving maobama did Kagan and Sotomayor recuse themselves from? I can think of exactly one, because Kagan served as maobamas solicitor general in the early stages of the case. Once again, your strawman goes down if flames.

.

 

[westwall]

Rehnquest was nominated by Nixon for the Supreme Court as well had served as an Asst. AG in Nixon's Admninistration;

Gorsuch and Kavanaugh have been nominated and are now members of the Supreme Court. Is a conflict of interest at issue? Rehnquest thought so, and recused himself.

Did I dumb it down enough for you to understand?

I'm not certain you dumbed it down enough for you to understand. There is a glaring difference here as you pointed out. Rehnquist served under the Nixon Administration. Neither Gorsuch nor Kavanaugh served under the Trump administration. The fact that he appointed them to the Court has no relevancy and there is no such historical precedent nor requirement that they recuse themselves based solely on that. You already know this, of course. You're simply advancing a scenario to rig a decision in your favor because you know you may not get the result you want otherwise.

Why do you people always have to change the rules when you can't win?

Because they have no arguments that are legitimate for one, and they are not smart enough to come up with one for two. This entire fiasco is down to a bunch of petulant children whining that their opinions are being ignored because gosh darn it, they are the experts and they should be the ones running the show, not some dude the people elected.

 

[OKTexas]

See; United States v. Nixon - Wikipedia

Associate Justice William Rehnquist recused himself as he had previously served in the Nixon administration as an Assistant Attorney General. Will the two new members of the Supreme Court have the integrity to do what Justice Rehnquist did???

Hey Dumbfuck, did Elena Kagan recuse herself on the SC ruling on Obamacare after she pushed for it while serving as Obama's solicitor general? Nope.

Hypocrite much?

Actually she did recuse herself on a case involving AZ, that's the only time I'm aware of.

Kagan recuses herself from Arizona case

.

 

[OKTexas]

I stand corrected.

Solicitor General before her nomination to the Supreme Court was confirmed in August 2010, Kagan’s “conflicts of interest” have been numerous during her first year at the Court. . Between October 2010 and June 2011, Kagan sat out for 28 of the 78 cases heard.

When do Supreme Court Justices recuse themselves from cases? - National Constitution Center

.

 

[Rye Catcher]

See; United States v. Nixon - Wikipedia

Associate Justice William Rehnquist recused himself as he had previously served in the Nixon administration as an Assistant Attorney General. Will the two new members of the Supreme Court have the integrity to do what Justice Rehnquist did???

Hey Dumbfuck, did Elena Kagan recuse herself on the SC ruling on Obamacare after she pushed for it while serving as Obama's solicitor general? Nope.

Hypocrite much?

Hey Asshole, the issue is entirely different. Find another case where the President of the United States has withheld personal information which may provide information of collusion with a foreign state and/or felony fraud?

Consider this: Chief Justice Hughes (Republican) told William O. Douglas when he was a rookie: "Justice Douglas, you must remember one thing. At the Constitutional level where we work, ninety percent of any decision is emotional. The rational part of us supplies the reasons for supporting our predilections"

The Court Years (1939-1975), The Autobiography of William O. Douglas; Chap I, Early years on the court, pg 9

 

[Rye Catcher]

We have now heard from the Trumpanzees. Not a one offered a reason why two men appointed by a defendant to a life long job, will now sit on a jury to judge their benefactor.

Most readers will understand that a conflict of interests now exists, and both men know how trump treats anyone who is not loyal to him.

So tell the class how may cases involving maobama did Kagan and Sotomayor recuse themselves from? I can think of exactly one, because Kagan served as maobamas solicitor general in the early stages of the case. Once again, your strawman goes down if flames.

.

Irrelevant. Grow up, this case under appeal is unique. Find another or STFU.

 

[22lcidw]

Rehnquest was nominated by Nixon for the Supreme Court as well had served as an Asst. AG in Nixon's Admninistration;

Gorsuch and Kavanaugh have been nominated and are now members of the Supreme Court. Is a conflict of interest at issue? Rehnquest thought so, and recused himself.

Did I dumb it down enough for you to understand?

I'm not certain you dumbed it down enough for you to understand. There is a glaring difference here as you pointed out. Rehnquist served under the Nixon Administration. Neither Gorsuch nor Kavanaugh served under the Trump administration. The fact that he appointed them to the Court has no relevancy and there is no such historical precedent nor requirement that they recuse themselves based solely on that. You already know this, of course. You're simply advancing a scenario to rig a decision in your favor because you know you may not get the result you want otherwise.

Why do you people always have to change the rules when you can't win?

For the most part, Repub judges not Progs follow law. For the most part, Prog judges who are extremists...make law with their decisions. So one day a Prog judge will order Christians to the cattle cars to the camps. And a Christian judge will follow the dictum by the Prog judge.....because that's the law.

 

[OKTexas]

We have now heard from the Trumpanzees. Not a one offered a reason why two men appointed by a defendant to a life long job, will now sit on a jury to judge their benefactor.

Most readers will understand that a conflict of interests now exists, and both men know how trump treats anyone who is not loyal to him.

So tell the class how may cases involving maobama did Kagan and Sotomayor recuse themselves from? I can think of exactly one, because Kagan served as maobamas solicitor general in the early stages of the case. Once again, your strawman goes down if flames.

.

Irrelevant. Grow up, this case under appeal is unique. Find another or STFU.

LMAO, no it's not in any way unique. The NY case is a typical 4th Amendment case and the others are a dispute between the legislative and executive branch with 4th amendment undertones. You're obviously too ignorant to understand what you're talking about.

.

 

[Nostra]

See; United States v. Nixon - Wikipedia

Associate Justice William Rehnquist recused himself as he had previously served in the Nixon administration as an Assistant Attorney General. Will the two new members of the Supreme Court have the integrity to do what Justice Rehnquist did???

Hey Dumbfuck, did Elena Kagan recuse herself on the SC ruling on Obamacare after she pushed for it while serving as Obama's solicitor general? Nope.

Hypocrite much?

Hey Asshole, the issue is entirely different. Find another case where the President of the United States has withheld personal information which may provide information of collusion with a foreign state and/or felony fraud?

Consider this: Chief Justice Hughes (Republican) told William O. Douglas when he was a rookie: "Justice Douglas, you must remember one thing. At the Constitutional level where we work, ninety percent of any decision is emotional. The rational part of us supplies the reasons for supporting our predilections"

The Court Years (1939-1975), The Autobiography of William O. Douglas; Chap I, Early years on the court, pg 9

DIFFERENT.............DIFFERENT...............DIFFERENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Yeah, I know you have different standards depending on party. That's what makes you such a ginormous hypocrite.

 

[JustAGuy1]

See; United States v. Nixon - Wikipedia

Associate Justice William Rehnquist recused himself as he had previously served in the Nixon administration as an Assistant Attorney General. Will the two new members of the Supreme Court have the integrity to do what Justice Rehnquist did???

Straw man. Neither served under Trump.

What? Rehnequest was nominated by Trump and became a member of the Supreme Court during Nixon's Administration.


Gorsuch and Kavanaugh were appointed by Trump,

Rehnquest served as an asst. AG in the Nixon Administration.

Rehnquest had the integrity to recuse himself.

Did I dumb it up enough for you?

See; United States v. Nixon - Wikipedia

Associate Justice William Rehnquist recused himself as he had previously served in the Nixon administration as an Assistant Attorney General. Will the two new members of the Supreme Court have the integrity to do what Justice Rehnquist did???

Straw man. Neither served under Trump.

Rehnquest was nominated by Nixon for the Supreme Court as well had served as an Asst. AG in Nixon's Admninistration;

Gorsuch and Kavanaugh have been nominated and are now members of the Supreme Court. Is a conflict of interest at issue? Rehnquest thought so, and recused himself.

Did I dumb it down enough for you to understand?

You're not a bright one kid. Neither Kavanaugh or Gorsuch in a Rump admin. You're out of your league here kid.

 

[Uncensored2008]

See; United States v. Nixon - Wikipedia

Associate Justice William Rehnquist recused himself as he had previously served in the Nixon administration as an Assistant Attorney General. Will the two new members of the Supreme Court have the integrity to do what Justice Rehnquist did???

Since Ginsburg called for Impeachment in 2017, will she recuse herself?

Oh and shit fer brains, what positions in the Trump white house did Gorsuch hold? Was he AG like Rehnquist was for Nixon? What about Kavanaugh?

 

[Uncensored2008]

See; United States v. Nixon - Wikipedia

Associate Justice William Rehnquist recused himself as he had previously served in the Nixon administration as an Assistant Attorney General. Will the two new members of the Supreme Court have the integrity to do what Justice Rehnquist did???

Straw man. Neither served under Trump.

Yes, but the Communists are DESPERATE.

 

[Uncensored2008]

The emperor didn't appoint them to worry about what a good judge would do, he appointed them save his ass. They will do it too. Welcome to era of untouchable, unaccountable presidents.

What a fucking retard. He nominated them because of solid records supporting the United States Constitution.

 

[CWayne]

See; United States v. Nixon - Wikipedia

Associate Justice William Rehnquist recused himself as he had previously served in the Nixon administration as an Assistant Attorney General. Will the two new members of the Supreme Court have the integrity to do what Justice Rehnquist did???

Straw man. Neither served under Trump.

What? Rehnequest was nominated by Trump and became a member of the Supreme Court during Nixon's Administration.


Gorsuch and Kavanaugh were appointed by Trump,

Rehnquest served as an asst. AG in the Nixon Administration.

Rehnquest had the integrity to recuse himself.

Did I dumb it up enough for you?

See; United States v. Nixon - Wikipedia

Associate Justice William Rehnquist recused himself as he had previously served in the Nixon administration as an Assistant Attorney General. Will the two new members of the Supreme Court have the integrity to do what Justice Rehnquist did???

Straw man. Neither served under Trump.

Rehnquest was nominated by Nixon for the Supreme Court as well had served as an Asst. AG in Nixon's Admninistration;

Gorsuch and Kavanaugh have been nominated and are now members of the Supreme Court. Is a conflict of interest at issue? Rehnquest thought so, and recused himself.

Did I dumb it down enough for you to understand?

Neither Gorsuch or Kavanaugh served as AG in any capacity under Trump. Your own criteria is that Rehnquist served as an assistant AG under Nixon.

No need to recuse themselves at all. Besides, both have been pretty liberal in their rulings.

The person who will be presiding over the Senate will be Chief Justice Roberts.

 

[Uncensored2008]

See; United States v. Nixon - Wikipedia

Associate Justice William Rehnquist recused himself as he had previously served in the Nixon administration as an Assistant Attorney General. Will the two new members of the Supreme Court have the integrity to do what Justice Rehnquist did???

They don't have to.

The only judge involved with the trial is the Chief Justice. That's john roberts. He presides as the judge in the trial. The rest of the judges on the Supreme Court have nothing to do with the trial.

The bush boy appointed roberts..

Your fellow Stalinist is talking about the attempt by the Communist party to end the 4th Amendment. It goes before SCOTUS. You and he are dumb enough to think your party wants to end the 4th just to get Trump, but your party seeks to end all civil rights. Trump's taxes are just a vehicle to crush liberty.

Further, neither Gorsuch or Kavanaugh served as AG for Trump - or any other position. Just another Marxist being a complete moron.

 

[Rye Catcher]

We have now heard from the Trumpanzees. Not a one offered a reason why two men appointed by a defendant to a life long job, will now sit on a jury to judge their benefactor.

Most readers will understand that a conflict of interests now exists, and both men know how trump treats anyone who is not loyal to him.

So tell the class how may cases involving maobama did Kagan and Sotomayor recuse themselves from? I can think of exactly one, because Kagan served as maobamas solicitor general in the early stages of the case. Once again, your strawman goes down if flames.

.

Irrelevant. Grow up, this case under appeal is unique. Find another or STFU.

LMAO, no it's not in any way unique. The NY case is a typical 4th Amendment case and the others are a dispute between the legislative and executive branch with 4th amendment undertones. You're obviously too ignorant to understand what you're talking about.

.

How many times have a President of the United States come under an investigation, and why do you believe the subpoena for documents is "unreasonable"? Follow the money is not unique, but when the subject of the investigation is the President it become so.

There is plenty of circumstantial evidence to require documents, and the efforts by trump and his sycophants refused other institutions to release his records, is more evidence that for trump to do so would incriminate him; for what he is hiding and for obstruction of justice.

 

[S.J.]

I like watching Rye Catcher struggle to defend liberal activist judges while demanding conservative judges recuse themselves from making any rulings that might interfere with the lynching of a Republican President.