In politics, this is the real issue we are facing, and it is being ignored!

USA Bad, all other countries good. That is moron thinking.

You are missing the point.
Countries are irrelevant and just a way of manipulating patriotism and other blinding emotions.

The reality is that the US is controlled and motivated by greedy profits, more than any other country. So then obviously the US is going to do the most evil.
And that is easy to prove.
The only real war the US really ever had was the War of 1812.
All the rest were fake wars we actually started illegally, in order to gain profits.

People try to claim WWII was defensive because of Pearl Harbor, but that is false because why did we have a dozen aircraft carriers in Hawaii, and illegally embargoing oil, steel, and coal to Japan? Economic embargoes of any kind are criminal ever since the 1906 Geneva Conventions we ratified,
 
Wrong.
If you look back over the history of US law, immigration is not something there is any basis for making illegal.
Law can only defend, so then trying to prevent natives from accessing their own ancestral land, clearly is inherently illegal.

There are lots of "laws" in this country that are illegal.
Like Prohibition, drug laws, adult sex laws, etc.
Laws are only legal when they defend others, not dictate to individuals.
You numbskull. No one is making illegal immigration illegal. It's been illegal for a very long time.
 
You are missing the point.
Countries are irrelevant and just a way of manipulating patriotism and other blinding emotions.

The reality is that the US is controlled and motivated by greedy profits, more than any other country. So then obviously the US is going to do the most evil.
And that is easy to prove.
The only real war the US really ever had was the War of 1812.
All the rest were fake wars we actually started illegally, in order to gain profits.

People try to claim WWII was defensive because of Pearl Harbor, but that is false because why did we have a dozen aircraft carriers in Hawaii, and illegally embargoing oil, steel, and coal to Japan? Economic embargoes of any kind are criminal ever since the 1906 Geneva Conventions we ratified,
You failed to prove anything


You are a liar. WWII was defensive and not started by the US we had two aircraftcarriers in pearl harbor not 12 you ******* liar and only five throughout the entirety of the pacific.

The embargo was absolutely legal

They are not criminal ************ there is NO LAW stating we have to engage in trade with other nations
 
Whether it is from Jon Stewart or not, the point of this thread is about the military being used against first amendment expression of anger over the government illegally not using judicial due process any more.
That is a very big deal because it makes the US a totalitarian dictatorship.
the military was not used that way so your point is a failure and lie
 
Actually, Panama is a fake country the US created by creating a fake rebellion from Columbia.
Panama has always been a fake US puppet.
Look at what happened when the Panamanians elected Noreiga?
We illegally invaded and imprisoned him over US drug charges that can not possibly have jurisdiction over Panama.
Imprisoning Noreiga was totally illegal.

The US has taken over Mexico constantly.
We not only illegally invaded Mexico twice, but we control them precisely now, by economic means instead of troops.

Canada and Greenland we just have not gotten around to yet.
But if there was enough profits involved, we would prioritize their takeover you can bet.

Iran has the 2nd largest oil reserves in the world, so is #1 priority.
Not only does the US only have 1% of the world's oil, but oil prices are going to soon skyrocket.
So the US "IS" going to "TAKE OVER" Iran.
It just is not clear how we are going to do it?
Whether we invade or just bribe another coup like we did in 1953?
Wrong

Panam is a real nation and the invasion and arrest of Noriega was legal

We invaded mexico and it was perfecly legal

you are consistently wrong a liar and full of shit
 
I don't particularly like the Mullahs, but clearly the US never "fixed" anything, and instead is the source of all the problems because we are only motivated by profits, and not principles.

Take an example like Vietnam.
Instead of letting the people voter and elect Ho Chi Minh, we illegally invaded Vietnam and installed Diem as a dictator who won 170% of the vote.
It was not even good for the US, since the only profits were from the taxpayers being forced to pay billions for M-16s, tanks, bombers, planes, helicopters, etc.

We obviously have no intentions of actually "fixing" anything about Iran, and instead are just eyeing up all that oil.

Its not just "one mistake".
The US stole a third of Mexico, lied to start the Spanish American war and steal Puerto Rico, the Philippines, Cuba, etc. lied to side with the criminal assassins in WWI, tied to install a dictatorship in China, Korea, Vietnam, Nicaragua, Cuba, etc.
Lately we illegally took over Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Egypt, Palestine, etc.

What is rare instead, is where the US actually did any good?
I can't think of a single instance where the US did not screw things up.
Wrong

We never stopped the votw in Vietnam ming did when he siezed power and established himself as a totalitarian communist dictator.He then attacked south vietnam

we sto;e no land from mexico
We lied about nothing in WWI we stopped communisgt dictators in those other nations

You cannot thin and make shit up as you go
 
Hey INCOMPETENT one, it is ISRAEL, not Isreal. A 4th grade Jethro Debodeine edjumacation. He insists he is smart like MACAFLOOZY, but stumbles over everything. INCOMPETENT, IRRELEVENT, and IMMATERIAL, along with being a propagandist!
Proof That American Education Is Mindless Brown-nosing

Another example of Lucky Ducky's inability to carry on a debate is that he refuses to give examples of what Stewart claims politicians do. If he did, we'd find out that he really means they are only indifferent to the Liberals' overreaching demands. His rhetorical GOTCHA would come if we agreed with a vague statement of the politicians' character and he'd shoot back with, "You're really a dissatisfied Liberal just like me!"
 
So you do not believe in Free Speech, do you?
LOL. Thanks for admitting you are a troll. But, yes, you are correct. Trolls are allowed free speech. But, my statement still stands that trolls like you are the real threat to the country. By the way, I didn't even watch one second of your stupid video so I'm surprised you replied back to me. I don't fit your qualifications. Would you watch 30 minutes of a pro-Trump thing about how great he is for the country?
 
The mere fact that you believe that not listening to a comedian on a comedy is not patriotic and hurts your feelings, makes you look silly and desperate. To claim such nonsense is a typical sign of narcissistic behavior, in that you believe you come from an authoritarian position, which is a flawed theory in my liberal ideals.

I said long ago that both parties will not do the right thing, they lack principles and I have been saying that a lot longer than your hero Stewart. I don’t waste my time watching comedians pretend they know politics, even when I agree with Stewart I don’t care what Stewart says or why he says it, and you have failed to prove why it would be important to even listen to him especially after the mind numbing poor humor I endured for 3-4 minutes, nothing he said gives me reason to listen to such nonsense. If you have a condensed version great but you have given no reason to listen other than your opinion that if someone doesn’t listen to Stewart they aren’t patriotic.

So you can pretend you know more, that you are more patriotic because you listen to a comedian as a source for your beliefs, that you understand the world better than myself or anyone else that doesn’t listen to Stewart, and in the end, it is just your opinion which I don’t share.
Like I said before and I will say it again. If you believe what you believe and do not question it when someone like myself (unbiased and a seeker of truth) tells you that something important was stated in that video (or a research paper, or a statistic, or a piece of data, or what someone believes is a true statement) and you do not bother to take the time to see it (read it, research it, understand it, evaluate it), it means you are not a seeker of truth but simply a believer that what you think and believe is what is.

Such people are biased and never learn. On top of that, they are not patriots.

I gave 4 years of my life being a policeman in the Air Force (not what I wanted to be (wanted to be a pilot), but did it for the sake of my country as that is what they required of me) and find someone that is not willing to dedicate 27 minutes to researching something that is severely affecting our country, means that your beliefs are more important than the welfare of our country.

To me, that is being a traitor. Simple as that.
 
So you do not believe in Free Speech, do you?
America Needs a Common-Sense Constitution

There is no such thing as Free Screech. It is an assault on the right to privacy. Anyone who tried it in a store, restaurant, etc. would be arrested for creating a public disturbance.
 
Last edited:
Proof That American Education Is Mindless Brown-nosing

Another example of Lucky Ducky's inability to carry on a debate is that he refuses to give examples of what Stewart claims politicians do. If he did, we'd find out that he really means they are only indifferent to the Liberals' overreaching demands. His rhetorical GOTCHA would come if we agreed with a vague statement of the politicians' character and he'd shoot back with, "You're really a dissatisfied Liberal just like me!"
The video clearly states the problem and does it better than I can. As such, why would I try to give examples when all it takes is 27 minutes of your time to research it and evaluate what is said.

"Inability" to be a concerned citizen of this country trying to understand exactly what is happening and try to do something about it, but then spends 27 minutes (or more) writing posts like this, is what you show are prove.

By the way, you call yourself a sage?

What does sage mean for a person?

AI Overview

For a person, "sage" primarily means someone profoundly wise and respected for their wisdom, judgment, and experience. Additionally, the term can be used to describe a person as wise, judicious, or prudent.

You are the exact opposite of your nick, and you dare to call me a person unable to carry on a debate? Your mind is not working well. You should see a doctor.
 
There Is No Right to Free Screech. It Is an Assault on the Public's Ears.
I apologize, I forgot you are all of this:


Trumpasskisser.webp


and believe that only Trump has a right to speak. Any detractors of him should be put in jail or executed.

For your knowledge:

The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects the freedom of speech from government interference. This means the government cannot make laws that prohibit or restrict the expression of ideas or opinions

Your statement means that means you are a traitor to this country
 
LOL. Thanks for admitting you are a troll. But, yes, you are correct. Trolls are allowed free speech. But, my statement still stands that trolls like you are the real threat to the country. By the way, I didn't even watch one second of your stupid video so I'm surprised you replied back to me. I don't fit your qualifications. Would you watch 30 minutes of a pro-Trump thing about how great he is for the country?

LOL. Thanks for admitting you are a troll. But, yes, you are correct. Trolls are allowed free speech. But, my statement still stands that trolls like you are the real threat to the country.

And by the way, "yes" I have watched many, many videos of Trump speaking and my 79 years of experience and knowledge, have made me see his as a con artist that doesn't care about anything or anyone that doesn't stroke his ego.

Trumpasskisser.webp


You are doing a great job of licking his ass.
 
15th post
Like I said before and I will say it again. If you believe what you believe and do not question it when someone like myself (unbiased and a seeker of truth) tells you that something important was stated in that video (or a research paper, or a statistic, or a piece of data, or what someone believes is a true statement) and you do not bother to take the time to see it (read it, research it, understand it, evaluate it), it means you are not a seeker of truth but simply a believer that what you think and believe is what is.

Such people are biased and never learn. On top of that, they are not patriots.

I gave 4 years of my life being a policeman in the Air Force (not what I wanted to be (wanted to be a pilot), but did it for the sake of my country as that is what they required of me) and find someone that is not willing to dedicate 27 minutes to researching something that is severely affecting our country, means that your beliefs are more important than the welfare of our country.

To me, that is being a traitor. Simple as that.
Luckyone, I respect your service and your passion for our country, but labeling someone a traitor for not watching a 27-minute video—especially one from a personality like Jon Stewart, who many (myself included) see as biased—is not productive or respectful discourse.
I asked for a summary not because I’m unwilling to learn, but because I prefer digesting information efficiently, especially from sources I view with skepticism. A summary allows me to evaluate the content on its merits, without needing to endure editorial flair or emotional spin.
You say you’re a seeker of truth—great, so am I. But truth-seeking doesn’t mean agreeing with one personality or one source. It means weighing evidence from different perspectives, and also respecting when someone engages critically but doesn’t follow the exact path you prefer.
If the message in the video is so vital, summarizing it would help more people hear it—regardless of their politics or tolerance for Stewart’s style.
I’m not your enemy, and I’m certainly not a traitor. Disagreement isn’t disloyalty. It’s the foundation of a free society.
 
The mere fact that you believe that not listening to a comedian on a comedy is not patriotic and hurts your feelings, makes you look silly and desperate. To claim such nonsense is a typical sign of narcissistic behavior, in that you believe you come from an authoritarian position, which is a flawed theory in my liberal ideals.

I said long ago that both parties will not do the right thing, they lack principles and I have been saying that a lot longer than your hero Stewart. I don’t waste my time watching comedians pretend they know politics, even when I agree with Stewart I don’t care what Stewart says or why he says it, and you have failed to prove why it would be important to even listen to him especially after the mind numbing poor humor I endured for 3-4 minutes, nothing he said gives me reason to listen to such nonsense. If you have a condensed version great but you have given no reason to listen other than your opinion that if someone doesn’t listen to Stewart they aren’t patriotic.

So you can pretend you know more, that you are more patriotic because you listen to a comedian as a source for your beliefs, that you understand the world better than myself or anyone else that doesn’t listen to Stewart, and in the end, it is just your opinion which I don’t share.

All true, but at the same time, Jon Steward does touch on important things happening, even if he has no deep insight to add.
And the fact judicial due process is at risk, is a really big deal in my opinion.
The fact Jon Stewart also agrees, does reinforce the fact its a huge fundamental contradiction that should not have been allowed by anyone.
It should set off the warning buzzers in everyone.
Even with due process we do some bad things like Prohibition, but without due process, we are an irrevocably evil dictatorship.
 
And then we let the Ayatollah take over and bought that issue. Now we are fixing it.

What is the obsession with some people over "make one mistake and you can't do anything ever again, ever"

Wrong.
We CAUSED the Ayatollah take over by arresting or assassinating the legal democratic leadership
Its not "one mistake".
We always impose, arm, support, etc., dictatorships like Netanyahu.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom