Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It's illegal to be able to look at (or be able to nullify) how an individual voter voted.Yes you can do physical recounts of bogus ballots mixed in with valid ballots. Garbage in garbage out. With a blockchain based system you eliminate the garbage in which is the most critical factor.
Trump took a policy of punishing the big cities, like Philladelplhia, New York, etc. And rewarding his supporters in the rural areas.It is not evidence that can prove voter fraud. It is evidence that something impossible happened in the Pennsylvania vote counting that we should all want to be rectified to restore confidence in the election process.
It's illegal to be able to look at (or be able to nullify) how an individual voter voted.Yes you can do physical recounts of bogus ballots mixed in with valid ballots. Garbage in garbage out. With a blockchain based system you eliminate the garbage in which is the most critical factor.
You have to either accept or reject their vote before you have any knowledge of how they voted. And that knowledge has to remain secret.
So any system that can trace a voter to his ballot, or a ballot to a voter would be illegal.
Yeah... it’s only if you can prove they were lying. You do realize that it's a few people vs a whole lot right? How many were in that ballroom, and how many that testified? If they are lying, should be pretty easy to prove it.Its not illegal to lie in the ballroom of a hotel. Maybe they put it down on an affidavit, maybe they don’t. Even if they do, it’s only if you can prove they were lying.
To which the most easily believable defense they have is that they’re just idiots, not liars.
Actually look what the Trump administration did to increase the integrity of the voting system. Basically nothing. They focused their efforts on trying to disenfranchise people who might vote against them.Just think what the Trump administration would have done after 2016 if they could.
Actually look what the Trump administration did to increase the integrity of the voting system. Basically nothing. They focused their efforts on trying to disenfranchise people who might vote against them.Just think what the Trump administration would have done after 2016 if they could.
Its not illegal to lie in the ballroom of a hotel. Maybe they put it down on an affidavit, maybe they don’t. Even if they do, it’s only if you can prove they were lying.
Actually it should be pretty easy to prove they were telling the truth, such as by what federal judges looking at their evidence concluded.Yeah... it’s only if you can prove they were lying. You do realize that it's a few people vs a whole lot right? How many were in that ballroom, and how many that testified? If they are lying, should be pretty easy to prove it.
Where on earth did you get that impression? Proving people lied is almost never easy.If they are lying, should be pretty easy to prove it.
Yeah... it’s only if you can prove they were lying. You do realize that it's a few people vs a whole lot right? How many were in that ballroom, and how many that testified? If they are lying, should be pretty easy to prove it.Its not illegal to lie in the ballroom of a hotel. Maybe they put it down on an affidavit, maybe they don’t. Even if they do, it’s only if you can prove they were lying.
To which the most easily believable defense they have is that they’re just idiots, not liars.
You are like the male version of Dana.
The term "election fraud" is meaningless. The bottom line is that many votes were countred that weren't legal votes.Even Julie says he's not claiming election fraud when he actually gets into court.But, but, but, there is “no evidence” of any election fraud. CNN said so, as well as the entire USMB Assclown Brigade.
Strange, that, don't you think?
Affidavits are taken under oath, moron.Yeah... it’s only if you can prove they were lying. You do realize that it's a few people vs a whole lot right? How many were in that ballroom, and how many that testified? If they are lying, should be pretty easy to prove it.Its not illegal to lie in the ballroom of a hotel. Maybe they put it down on an affidavit, maybe they don’t. Even if they do, it’s only if you can prove they were lying.
To which the most easily believable defense they have is that they’re just idiots, not liars.
You are like the male version of Dana.
Nobody was under oath, there was no testimony. Just bizarre rantings from face drip and others who spew all this bile but won't bring any of it into a court of law. You should question that.
Affidavits are taken under oath, moron.Yeah... it’s only if you can prove they were lying. You do realize that it's a few people vs a whole lot right? How many were in that ballroom, and how many that testified? If they are lying, should be pretty easy to prove it.Its not illegal to lie in the ballroom of a hotel. Maybe they put it down on an affidavit, maybe they don’t. Even if they do, it’s only if you can prove they were lying.
To which the most easily believable defense they have is that they’re just idiots, not liars.
You are like the male version of Dana.
Nobody was under oath, there was no testimony. Just bizarre rantings from face drip and others who spew all this bile but won't bring any of it into a court of law. You should question that.
Besides, few if any of their allegations are ever specific enough to even be able to be disproven. Many others may be true but irrelevant. More are just opinions which are neither true nor false.
What "hotel ballroom meeting?" I have no idea what the hell you're talking about.Affidavits are taken under oath, moron.Yeah... it’s only if you can prove they were lying. You do realize that it's a few people vs a whole lot right? How many were in that ballroom, and how many that testified? If they are lying, should be pretty easy to prove it.Its not illegal to lie in the ballroom of a hotel. Maybe they put it down on an affidavit, maybe they don’t. Even if they do, it’s only if you can prove they were lying.
To which the most easily believable defense they have is that they’re just idiots, not liars.
You are like the male version of Dana.
Nobody was under oath, there was no testimony. Just bizarre rantings from face drip and others who spew all this bile but won't bring any of it into a court of law. You should question that.
I'm referring to the hotel ballroom meeting, seems pretty obvious.
About those affidavits, how many of them have been presented in any court cases? What exactly do all those affidavits say anyway? You should question that.
Besides, few if any of their allegations are ever specific enough to even be able to be disproven. Many others may be true but irrelevant. More are just opinions which are neither true nor false.
It's like somebody swearing to anal probing by aliens from outer space. It can neither be proved or disproved, unless they took a video of it happening.
With all these allegations of voter fraud, why didn't anybody take out their cellphone to document it?
Many did, moron.Besides, few if any of their allegations are ever specific enough to even be able to be disproven. Many others may be true but irrelevant. More are just opinions which are neither true nor false.
It's like somebody swearing to anal probing by aliens from outer space. It can neither be proved or disproved, unless they took a video of it happening.
With all these allegations of voter fraud, why didn't anybody take out their cellphone to document it?
What "hotel ballroom meeting?" I have no idea what the hell you're talking about.Affidavits are taken under oath, moron.Yeah... it’s only if you can prove they were lying. You do realize that it's a few people vs a whole lot right? How many were in that ballroom, and how many that testified? If they are lying, should be pretty easy to prove it.Its not illegal to lie in the ballroom of a hotel. Maybe they put it down on an affidavit, maybe they don’t. Even if they do, it’s only if you can prove they were lying.
To which the most easily believable defense they have is that they’re just idiots, not liars.
You are like the male version of Dana.
Nobody was under oath, there was no testimony. Just bizarre rantings from face drip and others who spew all this bile but won't bring any of it into a court of law. You should question that.
I'm referring to the hotel ballroom meeting, seems pretty obvious.
About those affidavits, how many of them have been presented in any court cases? What exactly do all those affidavits say anyway? You should question that.
Even Julie says he's not claiming election fraud when he actually gets into court.
Strange, that, don't you think?
Illegal votes? That's the definition of election fraud. And they have not presented proof of it in a court of law.The term "election fraud" is meaningless. The bottom line is that many votes were countred that weren't legal votes.
In Pennsylvania, in the middle of the night, after they stopped counting votes and sent everyone home, they found a batch of 600,000 votes, and 99.5% of them were for Biden.
I think I'm detecting just a wee little bit of fraud here.
The mainstream media hasn't reported this, as far as I'm aware.
Nope. Nothing to see here folks. This is not the voting fraud you are looking for. Move along. Move along.
What is the obvious reason that recording is not allowed near the ballots? I sure can't think of one.Besides, few if any of their allegations are ever specific enough to even be able to be disproven. Many others may be true but irrelevant. More are just opinions which are neither true nor false.
It's like somebody swearing to anal probing by aliens from outer space. It can neither be proved or disproved, unless they took a video of it happening.
With all these allegations of voter fraud, why didn't anybody take out their cellphone to document it?
Plenty of people did and there are clips all around.
But it's somewhat difficult to get video evidence since recording is not allowed near the ballots for obvious reasons. Then other avenues of evidence must be used.
