In Justifying Their Senate Votes Post Impeachment

[Hossfly]

We had no fair election. So we'll see how Congress and the Supreme Court votes.

The PEOPLE...not the SCOTUS...pick the President you dope

Tsk,Tsk. Another pilgrim who never read the Constitution, or at least, doesn't understand it.

Where in the Constitution does it say that the SCOTUS should pick the President for us?

It doesn't but they play a role in the process.

 

[Lesh]

It doesn't but they play a role in the process.

Describe that roll as per the Constitution.

You folks are counting on them CHOOSING the President...again

 

[Lesh]

Do we need to post the statements to confirm the OP?

Here ya go



What are these GOP creeps saying now?

That's not what they were saying

Well Dickhead?

 

[daveman]

It doesn't but they play a role in the process.

Describe that roll as per the Constitution.

You folks are counting on them CHOOSING the President...again

I'll bet you're one of those easily-manipulated leftists (and that's all of them) who believes "selected not elected", aren't you?

 

[bripat9643]

The only reason Trumpers want a "proper audit" is because they want to stall to the point of throwing the election into the House of Reps where the number of states would be the decider (and they have more states)

It's a blatant attempt to overturn a free and fair election

Repeating that 10,000 times won't make it true.

 

[Lesh]

The only reason Trumpers want a "proper audit" is because they want to stall to the point of throwing the election into the House of Reps where the number of states would be the decider (and they have more states)

It's a blatant attempt to overturn a free and fair election

Repeating that 10,000 times won't make it true.

What part of that do you dispute?

 

[bripat9643]

The only reason Trumpers want a "proper audit" is because they want to stall to the point of throwing the election into the House of Reps where the number of states would be the decider (and they have more states)

It's a blatant attempt to overturn a free and fair election

Repeating that 10,000 times won't make it true.

What part of that do you dispute?

The "free and fair" part. It was a swindle.

 

[Lesh]

The "free and fair" part. It was a swindle.

So the courts must agree with you based on the evidence presented...right?

Wait...there is no evidence to support what you claim?

The courts have thrown out all those cases?

You're full of shit?

Oh...