In favor of Romney

[Seawytch]

Romney's a douche. That's why he's losing and no other reason.

I thought Republicans were the party of personal responsibility. Why do you keep blaming everyone except your crappy candidate?

 

[Seawytch]

I disagree--needless to say. That's why we have elections.

As I see it, Obama is fit to govern whereas Romney is not. Obama seems to understand that successful governance means compromise and negotiation (he is consequently villified by the right wing for being a "socialist," and by the left for being a "corporatist"). Romney does not understand that at all; in fact, he has painted himself as a rigid right wing extremist ideologue this year. Even if this is only to get the cracker vote, though, it is still disingenuous and cheap.

I see no redeeming qualities in Mitt Romney at all. He seems dull-witted, unaware of the real world of work and challenges, and he has nefarious motivations; that is--

(1) Typical of rich boys, he feels compelled to outdo his domineering and successful father, and
(2) He is a member of a little cult called the Mormon Church. He is working on their behalf.

I would re-elect George W. Bush sooner than I would vote for Romney. At least Bush was an honest man; Romney is a shiester.

Give me an example of Obama compromising, in the end, on something. I'm just curious what your examples of compromise are and if I agree.

Offering trillions in cuts without a single tax increase during the GOP driven debt debacle.

 

[Liberal]

Glad to see Rabbi finally admits Romney is a loser.

Typical Neocon "liberal media" excuse though, it just looks like the media is covering him in a bad way... Because, well, he is a terrible candidate.

Good job guys!

I'll take it.

 

[Seawytch]

The Obameter Scorecard
Promise Kept 192 (38%)
Compromise 73 (14%)
Promise Broken 85 (17%)
Stalled 47 (9%)
In the Works 109 (21%)
Not yet rated 2 (0%)

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/obameter/

 

[RoadVirus]

Yep, the media....always tossing softballs to the Prez (as long as it's a democrat)

I wonder what will happen when Obama realizes softballs won't be thrown at him at the debates.

 

[Mr. Shaman]

Mitt Romney's biggest problem is not his message, his wealth, his running mate, or his record. His biggest problem is a press which is unceasingly hostile to him because they are totally--totally--in the tank for Obama.

September 27, 2012

The Great 2012 "conservative"-IMPLOSION!!

"As I said, not the election anyone was expecting — but a happy surprise for some, and a nasty shock for others."​

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TxDgRr_Ynvc]Right America Feeling Wronged pt1 - YouTube[/ame]



​

 

[Murf76]

I disagree--needless to say. That's why we have elections.

As I see it, Obama is fit to govern whereas Romney is not. Obama seems to understand that successful governance means compromise and negotiation (he is consequently villified by the right wing for being a "socialist," and by the left for being a "corporatist"). Romney does not understand that at all; in fact, he has painted himself as a rigid right wing extremist ideologue this year. Even if this is only to get the cracker vote, though, it is still disingenuous and cheap.

I see no redeeming qualities in Mitt Romney at all. He seems dull-witted, unaware of the real world of work and challenges, and he has nefarious motivations; that is--

(1) Typical of rich boys, he feels compelled to outdo his domineering and successful father, and
(2) He is a member of a little cult called the Mormon Church. He is working on their behalf.

I would re-elect George W. Bush sooner than I would vote for Romney. At least Bush was an honest man; Romney is a shiester.

Barack Obama on bipartisanship: "I won".
In fact, his first legislative initiative, stimulus, didn't get even one Republican vote in the House.

Mitt Romney has an actual RECORD of professional accomplishment and of personal kindness. http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/247753-mitt-romney-friend-in-need.html
He's worked with an 87% opposition legislature.


Oh.... and he's not INTOLERANT of religious differences like some people clearly are.

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

I disagree--needless to say. That's why we have elections.

As I see it, Obama is fit to govern whereas Romney is not. Obama seems to understand that successful governance means compromise and negotiation (he is consequently villified by the right wing for being a "socialist," and by the left for being a "corporatist"). Romney does not understand that at all; in fact, he has painted himself as a rigid right wing extremist ideologue this year. Even if this is only to get the cracker vote, though, it is still disingenuous and cheap.

I see no redeeming qualities in Mitt Romney at all. He seems dull-witted, unaware of the real world of work and challenges, and he has nefarious motivations; that is--

(1) Typical of rich boys, he feels compelled to outdo his domineering and successful father, and
(2) He is a member of a little cult called the Mormon Church. He is working on their behalf.

I would re-elect George W. Bush sooner than I would vote for Romney. At least Bush was an honest man; Romney is a shiester.

Give me an example of Obama compromising, in the end, on something. I'm just curious what your examples of compromise are and if I agree.

The stimulus package was much smaller than Obama and the Treasury Dept. originally wanted because of Republican opposition. The final package was a compromise. Also, health care reform evolved to closely resemble the one Romney approved of as governor. Originally, it had a public option.

Also, Obama's debt reduction/jobs proposal of last year was greatly changed because of GOP opposition; negotiation allowed the tax cuts for rich folks (Bush's "temporary" tax reduction) to continue so that he could extend unemployment benefits.

Obama compromised with the GOP far, far too much in his first three years. In my opinion, that is, and it cost him politically in terms of his base.

I don't feel he compromised on the Obamacare bill at all and the lack of republican votes for that back up my opinion.

Thank you for providing me your opinion though!

 

[The Rabbi]

I disagree--needless to say. That's why we have elections.

As I see it, Obama is fit to govern whereas Romney is not. Obama seems to understand that successful governance means compromise and negotiation (he is consequently villified by the right wing for being a "socialist," and by the left for being a "corporatist"). Romney does not understand that at all; in fact, he has painted himself as a rigid right wing extremist ideologue this year. Even if this is only to get the cracker vote, though, it is still disingenuous and cheap.

I see no redeeming qualities in Mitt Romney at all. He seems dull-witted, unaware of the real world of work and challenges, and he has nefarious motivations; that is--

(1) Typical of rich boys, he feels compelled to outdo his domineering and successful father, and
(2) He is a member of a little cult called the Mormon Church. He is working on their behalf.

I would re-elect George W. Bush sooner than I would vote for Romney. At least Bush was an honest man; Romney is a shiester.

Obama has never compromised. On anything. Even within his own party he's pretty much a my way or the highway guy. You are totally out of touch if you think Obama has a better record on working with the other side than Romney. And your comments about Bush are bullshit too.

 

[hazlnut]

I'm not the biggest Romney fan, but he has my vote. His shit definately smells better than our marxist-in-chief.

Comments like that make a good argument for IQ tests at the polls.

 

[hazlnut]

Mitt Romney's biggest problem is not his message, his wealth, his running mate, or his record. His biggest problem is a press which is unceasingly hostile to him because they are totally--totally--in the tank for Obama.

This is what you sound like:

If we shove something in your mouth will that make you feel better?

While its true that it is whining at least he is whining about something that is factual and obvious.

In what universe?

Hannityland?

 

[AmericanFirst]

I disagree--needless to say. That's why we have elections.

As I see it, Obama is fit to govern whereas Romney is not. Obama seems to understand that successful governance means compromise and negotiation (he is consequently villified by the right wing for being a "socialist," and by the left for being a "corporatist"). Romney does not understand that at all; in fact, he has painted himself as a rigid right wing extremist ideologue this year. Even if this is only to get the cracker vote, though, it is still disingenuous and cheap.

I see no redeeming qualities in Mitt Romney at all. He seems dull-witted, unaware of the real world of work and challenges, and he has nefarious motivations; that is--

(1) Typical of rich boys, he feels compelled to outdo his domineering and successful father, and
(2) He is a member of a little cult called the Mormon Church. He is working on their behalf.

I would re-elect George W. Bush sooner than I would vote for Romney. At least Bush was an honest man; Romney is a shiester.

As I see it obamaturd has never been fit to govern lead or give good advice. What has obamaturd done to be qualified? Nothing!!!!!!

 

[Qantrill]

You ever wonder why we call them the media instead of journalist? It's very simple, journalism in America is dead, all we have now, with very few exceptions, are opinionist.

Hell, all of us are journalists. We just don't happen to earn a salary at it NOR do we work for the drive-by media whose soul purpose in life seems to be to support whichever one of the liberal/socialist dolts that can turn this country into a third world nation the quickest.

 

[Qantrill]

I disagree--needless to say. That's why we have elections.

As I see it, Obama is fit to govern whereas Romney is not. Obama seems to understand that successful governance means compromise and negotiation (he is consequently villified by the right wing for being a "socialist," and by the left for being a "corporatist"). Romney does not understand that at all; in fact, he has painted himself as a rigid right wing extremist ideologue this year. Even if this is only to get the cracker vote, though, it is still disingenuous and cheap.

I see no redeeming qualities in Mitt Romney at all. He seems dull-witted, unaware of the real world of work and challenges, and he has nefarious motivations; that is--

(1) Typical of rich boys, he feels compelled to outdo his domineering and successful father, and
(2) He is a member of a little cult called the Mormon Church. He is working on their behalf.

I would re-elect George W. Bush sooner than I would vote for Romney. At least Bush was an honest man; Romney is a shiester.

As I see it obamaturd has never been fit to govern lead or give good advice. What has obamaturd done to be qualified? Nothing!!!!!!

He was apparently qualified to be a community organizer in Chicago...that bastion of dirty, rotten, filthy politics which also gave the country Illinois Governors Rod Blagojevich and George Ryan...both who were safely locked away in prisons.

 

[jillian]

Yep, the media....always tossing softballs to the Prez (as long as it's a democrat)

yes... the media told romney to say he doesn't give a rats patoot about 47% of the country... twisted his little arm, in fact.... check.

forced him to blow even a soft ball trip to london... check...

forced him to mess up his response to the embassy kililngs... check.

i've never seen so many excuses made for one guy since...well, since bush broke the economy.

Jillian everytime I crush your answer, you never respond.....
First the response to London, Romney was correct....
London's Olympic security headache - CNN.com

Second about the 47% where did he say he didnt give a rats ass about them? He said it was a waste of time trying to get their votes...not the same thing

Embassy killings....what gaffe did Romney make?
Do you believe it was because of a youtube video? really?

you know, darlin', i post from work on and off and when i'm home on and off... a lot of the time if it's not brought to my attention, by rep or a pm with a link, i don't know when someone's answered me.

actually, he lied because his implication was that if you voted and will vote for the president, you don't pay taxes.

that's messed up. and i know most of us didn't get that memo.

and if you don't see what a huge mistake that was, i'll direct you to his falling poll numbers.

as to his mishandling of his trip to london, how do you go and insult an ally? he managed. that should have been a no-brainer, even for him.

as for the embassy killings... everyone knows what he did was a horrible mistake. not admitting it is simply turning a blind eye.

p.s. don't play rightwingnut 'i'm declaring victory because i decided to" with me. thanks. and hugs.

 

[Plasmaball]

Mitt Romney's biggest problem is not his message, his wealth, his running mate, or his record. His biggest problem is a press which is unceasingly hostile to him because they are totally--totally--in the tank for Obama. So Obama lies about the attack on the American consulate in Libya, and they let him get away with it. Romney says one thing that might differ from what he said 25 years ago and the press is all over him.
He has an excellent record as an executive and has put together an excellent team of advisors. This alone makes him far more qualified than Obama.

25 years ago? try more like days skippy.

 

[Plasmaball]

I disagree--needless to say. That's why we have elections.

As I see it, Obama is fit to govern whereas Romney is not. Obama seems to understand that successful governance means compromise and negotiation (he is consequently villified by the right wing for being a "socialist," and by the left for being a "corporatist"). Romney does not understand that at all; in fact, he has painted himself as a rigid right wing extremist ideologue this year. Even if this is only to get the cracker vote, though, it is still disingenuous and cheap.

I see no redeeming qualities in Mitt Romney at all. He seems dull-witted, unaware of the real world of work and challenges, and he has nefarious motivations; that is--

(1) Typical of rich boys, he feels compelled to outdo his domineering and successful father, and
(2) He is a member of a little cult called the Mormon Church. He is working on their behalf.

I would re-elect George W. Bush sooner than I would vote for Romney. At least Bush was an honest man; Romney is a shiester.

Obama has never compromised. On anything. Even within his own party he's pretty much a my way or the highway guy. You are totally out of touch if you think Obama has a better record on working with the other side than Romney. And your comments about Bush are bullshit too.

wow this is some partisan bullshit.....So today its Obama is a dictator. Tomorrow it will be he can't get anything done.

 

[The Rabbi]

I disagree--needless to say. That's why we have elections.

As I see it, Obama is fit to govern whereas Romney is not. Obama seems to understand that successful governance means compromise and negotiation (he is consequently villified by the right wing for being a "socialist," and by the left for being a "corporatist"). Romney does not understand that at all; in fact, he has painted himself as a rigid right wing extremist ideologue this year. Even if this is only to get the cracker vote, though, it is still disingenuous and cheap.

I see no redeeming qualities in Mitt Romney at all. He seems dull-witted, unaware of the real world of work and challenges, and he has nefarious motivations; that is--

(1) Typical of rich boys, he feels compelled to outdo his domineering and successful father, and
(2) He is a member of a little cult called the Mormon Church. He is working on their behalf.

I would re-elect George W. Bush sooner than I would vote for Romney. At least Bush was an honest man; Romney is a shiester.

Obama has never compromised. On anything. Even within his own party he's pretty much a my way or the highway guy. You are totally out of touch if you think Obama has a better record on working with the other side than Romney. And your comments about Bush are bullshit too.

wow this is some partisan bullshit.....So today its Obama is a dictator. Tomorrow it will be he can't get anything done.

What major legislation has he signed since the 2010 election and the GOP controlled House?

 

[BallsBrunswick]

You know, if Romney would stop saying and doing retarded things the "evil liberal media" wouldn't have any ammunition to use against him. Just a wacky thought.

 

[rdean]

It's not his wealth, it's him.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/polit...oung-chinese-girls-for-outrageous-profit.html

It's just too many Republicans agree with his methods.