In Effort To Improve Senate Confirmation Hearings, Democrat Women Replaced By Rabid Hyenas

Doc7505

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2016
Messages
23,586
Reaction score
41,966
Points
2,430
In Effort To Improve Senate Confirmation Hearings,
Democrat Women Replaced By Rabid Hyenas
15 Jan 2025


WASHINGTON, D.C. — In an attempt to elevate the level of discourse in Senate Confirmation hearings, all of the female Democratic Senators will be replaced with screaming, rabid hyenas.
After the initial Senate hearings descended into hours of hysterical, unintelligible screeching, Congress felt it owed the country to do better by replacing the offending women with crazed hyenas.
"This will be a huge improvement," said Senate aide Chandler McKinnon. "We believe replacing these Democrat women with hyenas whose brains are being eaten by the rabies virus will greatly lessen the amount of shrieking and fighting going on. The hardest part will honestly be rounding up the women. That Gillibrand lady is a biter."
According to the Cabinet nominees, the hyenas have thus far been a welcome change. "We have been able to get through so many more questions since we changed to hyenas," said Attorney General nominee Pam Bondi. "The hyenas tend to only bite people nearby, and they don't foam at the mouth nearly as much as Senator Hirono. Even with the howling, it's so much quieter. I'm really thankful for these rabid scavengers."
At publishing time, the Senate had agreed to further improve the confirmation process by replacing all remaining Senators with paint-huffing raccoons.


Commentary:
That would be a great improvement over some of the ranting and raving...
There's no doubt that Neo-Marxist Democrats sure do have some scuzzy women. Geez. Like a 100 ex-wives nagging at once. They're REALLY ANNOYING.
Although it's tongue in cheek, the Bee has for the most part hit the truth button time and time again.
Almost every man in the world who viewed these women political hacks attacking Hegseth, saw their ex-wife, her mother and sisters while he was walking out with just the clothes on his back..
1736994109420.png
 
Just take it off TV. If it's not public there would be no reason for democrats to embarrass themselves like this.
 
In Effort To Improve Senate Confirmation Hearings, Democrat Women Replaced By Rabid Hyenas

Gee, rabid hyenas would have it all over having to look at PocaWarren again.


67882186cbc3667882186cbc37.jpg


But they sure made the case for Pete why women might not be best suited along a frontal action with bullets and bombs flying overhead.
 
But they sure made the case for Pete why women might not be best suited along a frontal action with bullets and bombs flying overhead.

I loved it when pete said "the weight of a mortar or tank shell doesn't change! The weight of a 100 pound ruck sack doesn't change if you're a man or a woman.

What a great point!
 
I loved it when pete said "the weight of a mortar or tank shell doesn't change! The weight of a 100 pound ruck sack doesn't change if you're a man or a woman.

What a great point!
~~~~~~
**********​
The fighting load requires the soldier to carry all of his or her needs to defeat the enemy. These missions are critical and therefore the soldiers’ load is heavy. However, its not too heavy for the soldier as they need speed and agility to complete their mission successfully. The table below is a list from the US military Foot March Publication.
Fighting LoadPounds
Army Combat Uniform (T-shirt, socks, boots, belt, patrol cap)7.8
Advance combat helmet4.2
Field load carrier (FLC)5.8
Knee pads0.5
M4 (no magazine)6.4
5.56 unit basic load (UBL; 210 rounds and 7 magazines)7.0
Advanced Target Pointer Illuminator Aiming Light0.5
M68 (Close Combat Optic)0.9
AN/PAS-13(V)1 (LWTS)1.9
AN/PVS-14 (MNVD) Includes helmet mount1.2
Soldier Plate Carrier System (SPCS)5.9
Small Arms Protective Inserts (front and back), Side Ballistic Insert16.0
1 Quart canteens (2 each, with water)4.6
Meals ready to eat (MRE)1.4
M67 fragmentary grenades (2 each)2.0
Compass0.5
Bayonet w/scabbard1.3
Individual first aid kit1.0
Total68.9

The approach march load is where direct contact with the enemy is in motion. This not only demands the soldier to carry the fighting load, but an assault pack or rucksack with more things to carry. The goal here is is to allow the soldiers to fight and sustain themselves until they are resupplied. The load is heavy, but its capped at 100 pounds to avoid impeding the soldiers’ ability to fight.

Ezoic

Approach March LoadPounds
Assault Pack3.1
T-Shirt0.2
Socks (2 pairs)0.4
Wet weather top and bottom3.0
Poncho1.0
Poncho liner1.5
Weapons cleaning kit1.0
Entrenching tool with carrier3.5
2-quart canteens (2 each)10.0
Meals, ready to eat (3 each stripped)4.2
Subtotal27.9
Add Fighting Load68.9
Total96.8
**********​

That's a lot of weight for a man to carry for any length of time, muc less than a 125 lb woman.
The U.S.Army claims they have not changed their weight requirements for the 12 mile rucksack march for women. I claim that its not true.

 
Last edited:
I loved it when pete said "the weight of a mortar or tank shell doesn't change! The weight of a 100 pound ruck sack doesn't change if you're a man or a woman. What a great point!

Since our military now has DEI, maybe they can adopt a 'Ladies Day" one day a week and lob lighter shells at the Chinese on those days. Or may use two women to do the work of one soldier. :smoke:
 
Back
Top Bottom