Imagine if Donald Trump orders his Department of Justice to defy all “unlawful” orders from Democrat judges. The media would declare a constitutional

[Rawley]

I don't think we have to imagine it. He pretty much has done this...ignoring many orders from federal judges. Convicted felons routinely ignore judges orders. Trump being a convicted felon is doing what convicted felons do.

Not sure what your point is.

TO expose lying shits such as yourself as lying shits.

 

[excalibur]

One of many confirmed instances.

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/11/06/judge-orders-trump-administration-to-pay-full-snap-benefits-00640627

Nope, and you cannot show these "many".

Also, only SCOTUS is a co-equal branch, as it is the only Court in the Constitution. District Court judges are not co-equal.

 

[candycorn]

You mean like state and federal judges ignoring the Supreme Court?

no.

 

[candycorn]

Nope, and you cannot show these "many".

Also, only SCOTUS is a co-equal branch, as it is the only Court in the Constitution. District Court judges are not co-equal.

I've shown 2 off the top of my head and proved you wrong. It took about 13 seconds all together.

There is no "scotus branch"....

Yet another lie.

toobfreak would be proud if she wasn't hiding in shame.

 

[excalibur]

I've shown 2 off the top of my head and proved you wrong. It took about 13 seconds all together.

There is no "scotus branch"....

Yet another lie.

toobfreak would be proud if she wasn't hiding in shame.

You've shown nothing, Boasberg thought he had authority to turn a plane around in international airspace and has since been smacked down.

SCOTUS is a co-equal branch. It is the only Court in the Constitution Legislative, Executive, Judicial. Articles I, II, and III.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Apples and oranges. If Trump did single out democrat judges, it would be a legal and constitutional issue, he would never succeed with. Totally illegal order, Bondi and any following it as an order, would be subject, not only to impeachment, but would probably never remain a lawyer, certainly disbarred.

The military is no the Department of Justice, and the Congressmen and women, did not say do not follow orders for Republican Officers or Non-Commissioned Officers, simply telling them, to disobey any illegal orders.

I have been Commissioned Officer, Enlisted and Non-Commissioned Officer. I always knew it was my duty to disobey an illegal order, and knew the further up the pole in the Enlisted and Officer ranks, I went, the less valid and defense of "simply following order" would be at a potential court-martial. I would not follow, nor would I issue or relay an illegal order, certainly not after the Uniform Code of Military Justice classes and testing, while on active duty.

I am not sure what the right-wing nut balls are getting their panties in a wad over, unless, just simply never having been in the military, and simply not familiar with the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).

If you had just left out that first paragraph, I would have rated this a winner, but your TDS brain couldn't let you stop there. So all I could do is laugh.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

You've shown nothing, Boasberg thought he had authority to turn a plane around in internarial airspace and has since been smacked down.

SCOTUS is a co-equal branch. It is the only Court in the Constitution Legislative, Executive, Judicial. Articles I, II, and III.

I'm not familiar with that place.

 

[White 6]

Tell me W6, how many "illegal orders" did you countermand?

Countermand? None. Failed to follow, probably only 1. Repercussions? None. You do not want to be the one issuing a patently illegal order or instruction, that is unenforceable, and do not want to be in a proceeding, where you push it, by bringing charges, ending up facing charges yourself. It is a career ender, for sure.

 

[excalibur]

I'm not familiar with that place.

My spell check disagrees with you.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

My spell check disagrees with you.

I can't find it in the dictionary. Google come up with nothing.

Everything goes to "international" which would make more sense.

 

[candycorn]

You've shown nothing, Boasberg thought he had authority to turn a plane around in international airspace and has since been smacked down.

Actually you're wrong.

SCOTUS is a co-equal branch. It is the only Court in the Constitution Legislative, Executive, Judicial. Articles I, II, and III.

There is no "SCOTUS" Branch. You should really read the constitution at some point.

 

[LeftofLeft]

View attachment 1186140

Are we a nation of judges or the interpretation of a law from a judge?

 

[candycorn]

Are we a nation of judges or the interpretation of a law from a judge?

A nation of laws.

 

[excalibur]

Actually you're wrong.

There is no "SCOTUS" Branch. You should really read the constitution at some point.

We have three branches of government, legislative, executive, and judicial. The only one in the judicial branch mentioned in the Constitution is the one Supreme Court.

Branches of the U.S. government | USAGov

Learn about the 3 branches of government: executive, legislative, and judicial. Understand how each branch of U.S. government provides checks and balances.

www.usa.gov

 

[LeftofLeft]

A nation of laws.

Not judges.

 

[candycorn]

We have three branches of government, legislative, executive, and judicial. The only one in the judicial branch mentioned in the Constitution is the one Supreme Court.

Branches of the U.S. government | USAGov

Learn about the 3 branches of government: executive, legislative, and judicial. Understand how each branch of U.S. government provides checks and balances.

www.usa.gov

Article III​

Section 1​

"The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. "

The inferior courts are mentioned.

You should have a warm spot in your heart for inferior beings since you clearly are among that population.

 

[toobfreak]

Countermand? None.

Thanks for trying to distract away from the real subject of what those six in the video did and were really trying to do.

 

[Care4all]

One borderline instance in which the judge [Boasberg] has since been smacked own over.

He defied the court order to not send Abrego back to El Salvador.

He ignored the court orders to return Abrego from El Salvador asap. and make right, their wrong.

He ignored the court order to release him on bail....

 

[Care4all]

I am not sure what the right-wing nut balls are getting their panties in a wad over, unless, just simply never having been in the military, and simply not familiar with the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).

Looks like they are afraid that the military etc won't follow an ILLEGAL order of Trump's?

 

[San Souci]

Surely they would, and they'd be on it non-stop with their blathering.

But with the members of Congress telling the military to defy "unlawful" orders, the MSM thinks it is a great thing.

TDS is alive and well, and bordering on insurrection.

Just proves DEms are not American.