wow jimmy, what parts of my posts have no common sense before you go ranting at them. And what would you know about iraq btw do you have family serving their? Are you planning on serving there, or are you some kid sitting on his computer that gets his briefs of CNN.
First of all I think Sudam is an asshole, but i also believe that bush is an assshole, I believe that because of bush we will produce a lot more terrorists that will hurt my country. And because of bush there is a pretty big hole in americas economy, all the money we spend in iraq we could of obliterated homelessness in America, why dont we worry about our own problems before we go settling other countries problems. A lot of iraqi civilians are dying in Iraq there lives are being ruined what hope is left for them? I know they probaly werent that well of with Sudam but how well of are tehy now? Now I believe there are many other solutions in stopping sudam isntead of doing a full scale invasion of iraq. Our county has the best special forces in the world, i.e. Navy Seals. Why couldnt we send in troops to assasinate Sadam by infiltrating the country. Yes this may seen absurd but a lot of political leaders have been succesfuly assasinated in the past and it is possible with sadam also. This would of been a better way to approach the solution instead of getting enormous casualties for both iraq and the U.S.. I do not believe such actions were necessary we could of waited for UN weapons inspectors to complete inspection. This would have been good enough iraq would not have dared to use any weaopons (if they really had any) because they were being watched, but why did bush rush in with a full scale invasion taking and continuing to take heavy casualties. Were losing marines everday, why did we take this solution when there were others.
Now considering the war on terrorism, we invaded afghanistan adn guess what we found terrorist training camps there, we actually found stuff there that the whole world believed and supported. However now invading iraq we found accoring to
newsworld,
http://www.news24.com/News24/World/Iraq/0,,2-10-1460_1528363,00.html,
the first weapon of mass destruction in iraq. Well they found a sarin roadside bomb. Just incase you dont know ( i would not be surprised if you dont) sarin is a chemical nerve agent which is imbedded into a shell. The only way a reaction to release the chemical (which in teh first place is much harder to put together) is through an artillery gun. Now this is according to newsworld the first wmd we found in the country. So i would think we find lots more illegal stuff like mass scud missle depots and nuclear weapons from which uranium was bought from african countries. However we didn't, so we did a full scale invasion of iraq to find one road side bomb filled with sarin chemical agent.
Now none of these arguments which i give opposing to the invasion of iraq is realated to oil, i had these arguments long before "fariegnhieght" came out, which id like to tell you i have not seen. Now if all you can do is respond with childish name calling and saying that my arguments have no common sense well then you dont have any common sense.
And when you do reply do you really need to make fun of a fellow american, I love this country prob more than you, my family has probaly given more to this country than you will ever give in your life.
