I'm curious: are repubs dumb enough to think Iran would roll over and do whatever the West wants?

[CrusaderFrank]

Can't wait until Luke Sissyfag and his band of pussified **** ups are out of the White House

I apologize to Luke Sissyfag for comparing him to Obama because Luke who was actually a real man and stood up for his beliefs

 

[blackhawk]

To have a deal both sides have to make concessions Iran made none and got everything they wanted.

 

[cnm]

Fantasy.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

To have a deal both sides have to make concessions Iran made none and got everything they wanted.

"Obama gave us EVERYTHING -- and more!"

 

[Freewill]

So the alternative to doing something sane and logical is to do what you think. Right. Iran is a modern country that can be brought into submission to a civilized world through sanctions. We don't have to bargin with supporters of terrorism. We have the power to tell them to f..k off and if they don't like it then we will just start taking out their oil fields. If these islamo radical countries want to live in the 15th century so be it but we are not going to allow them to have any influence in a modern world. They have already stated that they will continue to support terrorism and once they get their 120 billion they will go on a military build up. For what reason, if what you say is true they have no enemies that are going to attack them.

If you wish to be a modern Neville Chamberlain then so be it. I perfer not to have to worry about a suitcase nuke.

You don't seem qualified to identify sane and logical actions. This is particularly evidenced by your "taking out their oil fields" comment. Do your parents know you are on the internet?

What do you think his parents should do about his internet usage?

The year, 1939, the Germans roll over Poland, the world does nothing. If only we could have Hitler's mother take away his internet.

 

[Freewill]

Another great thing about this deal is that the UN wants over 10 billion a year to inspect Iran's nuclear programs and guess who will be paying the brunt of that money.

We will even though no American inspectors will be allowed in Iran

Can you spell bribe? If true, no wonder they like the deal.

 

[Roudy]

If someone else were in charge of the deal? You know the one sponsored by 7 countries? They like to think Obama is weak which is why concessions were made, but it's completely stupid to think Iran, under any circumstance, would do whatever the **** repubs want. It's so nauseatingly ignorant.

Enough with the whole "well if St. Reagan was in charge of that deal derp, derp, derp!"

This deal is better than no deal. Get over it.

There is no deal. It is a farce and yet another Obama deception.

And you. Why would you say something so ignorant?

Like I said, the deal is a farce and a grand deception. The Obama administration was against the sanctions from the very beginning and was pushed into it. The Iranians aren't giving up anything of value. The Europeans pushed for the deal regardless because their economies are shattered and they want to start trading with Iran again, and Obama wanted his name on something considering all the massive failures he's precided over. The Iranian Islamic monsters that Obama has unleashed will now get stronger and wreak terror and mayhem in the region which could lead to a nuclear holocaust and WWIII.

 

[mudwhistle]

If someone else were in charge of the deal? You know the one sponsored by 7 countries? They like to think Obama is weak which is why concessions were made, but it's completely stupid to think Iran, under any circumstance, would do whatever the **** repubs want. It's so nauseatingly ignorant.

Enough with the whole "well if St. Reagan was in charge of that deal derp, derp, derp!"

This deal is better than no deal. Get over it.

So basically you'te saying any deal is a waste of paper with these ingrates.

 

[Darkwind]

If someone else were in charge of the deal? You know the one sponsored by 7 countries? They like to think Obama is weak which is why concessions were made, but it's completely stupid to think Iran, under any circumstance, would do whatever the **** repubs want. It's so nauseatingly ignorant.

Enough with the whole "well if St. Reagan was in charge of that deal derp, derp, derp!"

This deal is better than no deal. Get over it.

How long have you thought the Iranians are stupid?

 

[BULLDOG]

If someone else were in charge of the deal? You know the one sponsored by 7 countries? They like to think Obama is weak which is why concessions were made, but it's completely stupid to think Iran, under any circumstance, would do whatever the **** repubs want. It's so nauseatingly ignorant.

Enough with the whole "well if St. Reagan was in charge of that deal derp, derp, derp!"

This deal is better than no deal. Get over it.

No it isn't. Sanctions were far better, moron.

What good would it serve for us to try to unilaterally maintain sanctions? The US is only one country among several who are involved in the treaty, and will drop the sanctions. Their needs will be met if we participate or not. The sanctions are dead either way.

 

[S.J.]

If someone else were in charge of the deal? You know the one sponsored by 7 countries? They like to think Obama is weak which is why concessions were made, but it's completely stupid to think Iran, under any circumstance, would do whatever the **** repubs want. It's so nauseatingly ignorant.

Enough with the whole "well if St. Reagan was in charge of that deal derp, derp, derp!"

This deal is better than no deal. Get over it.

No it isn't. Sanctions were far better, moron.

What good would it serve for us to try to unilaterally maintain sanctions? The US is only one country among several who are involved in the treaty, and will drop the sanctions. Their needs will be met if we participate or not. The sanctions are dead either way.

It wouldn't be unilateral.

 

[BULLDOG]

If someone else were in charge of the deal? You know the one sponsored by 7 countries? They like to think Obama is weak which is why concessions were made, but it's completely stupid to think Iran, under any circumstance, would do whatever the **** repubs want. It's so nauseatingly ignorant.

Enough with the whole "well if St. Reagan was in charge of that deal derp, derp, derp!"

This deal is better than no deal. Get over it.

No it isn't. Sanctions were far better, moron.

What good would it serve for us to try to unilaterally maintain sanctions? The US is only one country among several who are involved in the treaty, and will drop the sanctions. Their needs will be met if we participate or not. The sanctions are dead either way.

It wouldn't be unilateral.

Which of the other countries involved in negotiations has said it will maintain sanctions if the US does?

 

[Mertex]

If someone else were in charge of the deal? You know the one sponsored by 7 countries? They like to think Obama is weak which is why concessions were made, but it's completely stupid to think Iran, under any circumstance, would do whatever the **** repubs want. It's so nauseatingly ignorant.

Enough with the whole "well if St. Reagan was in charge of that deal derp, derp, derp!"

This deal is better than no deal. Get over it.

There is no deal. It is a farce and yet another Obama deception.

There would be no deal if left up to war hawk Republicans.....they have nothing if the deal doesn't go through, to make things better....as usual.

 

[Mertex]

They think Trump will scare them into doing what he demands........

What do you keep forgetting libtard that we are the only remaning super power?

Bwahahaha.....if Trump were to become President (fat chance/hell would have to freeze over and the devil be ice skating).....we surely won't be a Super Power.....GW Bush started to put the nails in the coffin...all we need is another Bozo to take us back there again.

 

[Staidhup]

No deal for starters. How can one consider this a deal? Read the freaking terms then state this is somehow a deal. The US should maintain its sanctions and treat Iran as it is, nothing more than a country supporting whatever brand of terrorism that fits their needs at a given moment. The problem with the left is they feel by appeasement, capitulation, and weakness, coupled with a bow here and there that it will blossom into lasting peace. Name one instance in world history where such conduct resulted in peace. Only through strong offensive and defensive capabilities is there peace. The fact that Iran will become a nuclear Iran is unavoidable, the gene is out of the box, the question is when, and what will the US do when Iran deploys its weapons to maintain a counter force remains the question. The liberal mindset is so intelligent their idiots, and that is why we end up in wars.

 

[Roudy]

If someone else were in charge of the deal? You know the one sponsored by 7 countries? They like to think Obama is weak which is why concessions were made, but it's completely stupid to think Iran, under any circumstance, would do whatever the **** repubs want. It's so nauseatingly ignorant.

Enough with the whole "well if St. Reagan was in charge of that deal derp, derp, derp!"

This deal is better than no deal. Get over it.

There is no deal. It is a farce and yet another Obama deception.

There would be no deal if left up to war hawk Republicans.....they have nothing if the deal doesn't go through, to make things better....as usual.

The reason the Iranians came to the table is because the sanctions which the repubs pushed for and Obama was against had pressured the Iranians. Unfortunately we had the wrong people at the table. Obama and Kerry were just about the worst people we could have representing the U.S. and the free world. The deal they made will be the cause of more terror mayhem and wars, not the republicans. And future presidents and generations will be the victims of this disastrous presidency. Like I said there was no deal, it was all an illusion to remove the sanctions and allow the Europeans to start trading with Iran.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

If someone else were in charge of the deal? You know the one sponsored by 7 countries? They like to think Obama is weak which is why concessions were made, but it's completely stupid to think Iran, under any circumstance, would do whatever the **** repubs want. It's so nauseatingly ignorant.

Enough with the whole "well if St. Reagan was in charge of that deal derp, derp, derp!"

This deal is better than no deal. Get over it.

No deal would have been better than giving them billions of $$ and nukes. Only an idiot thinks otherwise. They were on their ass due to sanctions, we should have tightened them till their whole system collapsed... let the kids take over. They want nothing to do with these Islamofascists.

 

[Tehon]

"the coalition on iran is against us...."?????????????????????????

what does this even mean???

Iran had approached Bush on working out an agreement on their nuke program, which he declined. So Iran turned to France, Germany and the UK, who agreed. They had a working coalition that was contradicting US policy. Then Bush relented and joined the negotiations. Get it?

 

[Mertex]

They think Trump will scare them into doing what he demands........

Why would Trump fail when Reagan got them to fold on inauguration day?

Because Regan went against Congress and an Amendment he signed himself and disregarded the Constitution you all claim to love so much. So, what is Trump going to do for Iran?

Oh, and the last statement bolded in red....you all have the audacity to be whining about Hillary's e-mails......

Wiki:
The Iran–Contra affair (Persian: ایران-کنترا‎, Spanish: caso Irán-Contra), also referred to as Irangate,[1] Contragate[2] or the Iran–Contra scandal, was a political scandal in the United States that occurred during the second term of the Reagan Administration. Senior administration officials secretly facilitated the sale of arms to Iran, which was the subject of an arms embargo.[3] They hoped thereby to secure the release of several US hostages, and to fund the Contras in Nicaragua. Under the Boland Amendment, further funding of the Contras by the government had been prohibited by Congress.

The investigation was impeded when large volumes of documents relating to the scandal were destroyed or withheld from investigators by Reagan administration officials.


And, as usual, Republicans continue to against the will of the people of the United States.

Although the President continued to favor support of the contras, opinion polls indicated that a majority of the public was not supportive.
Iran Contra Committee Key Findings

 

[Mertex]

They think Trump will scare them into doing what he demands........

What in the **** do you think Obama has been doing for the last eight years?

Obvious, campaigning.

Really......in case you're not aware of it, he hasn't been campaigning since he beat lame Romoney in 2012 - why would he, he's passing the Presidency over to Hillary.