Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 45,314
- 31,909
- 3,545
Explain.
You made a stupid comment.
Of course someone's motivations are relevant.
I mean, Jesus.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Explain.
The fact that their star witness lied, had nothing to do with the charges or evidence?
Yes, they presented plenty of witnesses and documentary evidence… Of no illegal act by Donald Trump whatsoever.
It has been like the trial of that “white Hispanic” guy who defended himself against Trevon Martin. In that trial, viewers, kept wondering why the defense got to go first. Then they realized that all those witnesses making the defendant look innocent or from the prosecution.
They aren’t.You made a stupid comment.
Of course someone's motivations are relevant.
I mean, Jesus.
And what action did they accuse Trump of that violated what criminal statute Trump is indicted under?They aren’t.
The evidence is relevant.
What’s Pecker’s motivation?
Both he and Cohen testified to the same evidence.
They aren’t.
The evidence is relevant.
What’s Pecker’s motivation?
Both he and Cohen testified to the same evidence.
The documents show the false entries, dupe.And what action did they accuse Trump of that violated what criminal statute Trump is indicted under?
Did both of them say that they saw Trump make a false entry in a business record?
Completely untrue.There is literally zero evidence.
Start there
Completely untrue.
They don't show that Trump made them.The documents show the false entries, dupe.
They were exonerated, dipshit.There was plenty of evidence against the Central Park Five. They were most likely guilty as sin.
But please start another thread if you want to discuss that case; don't derail this one.