Will any Court Hold Trump or his Administration in Contempt?

We don't need floating psychics to predict that a man who abuses a woman, who then stays with him, will do it again. Any police officer or worker at a women's shelter can verify that.

But, please. Continue to side with the abuser no matter what. The more strident you are, the more seats you will lose in 2026.

Besides, he ain't coming to the U.S. again, so the women of Maryland need never fear him, no matter how adamant you are.
So we'll just get lists of names from all the women's shelters, and then start deporting everyone on the list? You think that's our best course of action?
 
Yes it is, it's evidence. You seem confused.
So when a bank robber with video showing his crime testifies he wasn't even there, does that serve as evidence of his innocence?
 
So we'll just get lists of names from all the women's shelters, and then start deporting everyone on the list? You think that's our best course of action?
Dude. He's already had his due process. Immigration court proved him deportable. Only thing he would get is a hearing finding that he's in no danger of persecution in El Salvador because the gang that allegedly threatened him is no longer even in existence.
 
So when a bank robber with video showing his crime testifies he wasn't even there, does that serve as evidence of his innocence?
The hearing will not be about him beating the crap out of his wife. Or being a gangbanger. He's deportable. He was in the country illegally. He's already had his due process, in front of a court of law in the US.
 
So we'll just get lists of names from all the women's shelters, and then start deporting everyone on the list? You think that's our best course of action?
At this point your best course of action is to stop playing dumb so hard that you no longer seem to be playing.
 
Last edited:
Where were all of the judges for four years in never once holding Biden's feet to the fire on /anything/?
Did a single judge challenge any of Obama's THREE MILLION DEPORTATIONS?? Shit Obama and Holder ran a gun running operation to the Sinaloa Cartel and no one in the FBI, DOJ lifted an eyebrow. Oh and border patrol agent Brian Terry was killed by one of those Obama smuggled guns. How's that for equal justice?
 
So when a bank robber with video showing his crime testifies he wasn't even there, does that serve as evidence of his innocence?
And to answer your question, yes it's evidence.
 
At this point your best course of action is to stop playing dumb so hard that you no longer seem to be playing.
Rather bizarre that they are putting all these chips on the wife beating gangbanger when they know they will lose.
 
Rather bizarre that they are putting all these chips on the wife beating gangbanger when they know they will lose.
Yes, which is why their arguments devolve like that.

I don't get it.

At least not until I flip to CNN and the rest of the liberal media, and see they are fanning this story like it's the only fire in the arctic and they're out of matches. The posters on here that follow that media have long ago lost the ability to analyze what the media puts in front of them.
 
So we'll just get lists of names from all the women's shelters, and then start deporting everyone on the list? You think that's our best course of action?
Actually, I misread that post. I thought it said "deposing" everyone on that list, as if you don't believe that men who beat women once do it again.

Asking women in shelters who have been beaten by men who did it and deporting them if they are illegal aliens, "assylum seekers," temporary hold on deportation beneficiaries, or visa holders?

Yes! Perfectly in line with Trump and Homan's promise to start with the worst of the worst.

What would your objection to that be?
 
Last edited:
Did a single judge challenge any of Obama's THREE MILLION DEPORTATIONS?? Shit Obama and Holder ran a gun running operation to the Sinaloa Cartel and no one in the FBI, DOJ lifted an eyebrow. Oh and border patrol agent Brian Terry was killed by one of those Obama smuggled guns. How's that for equal justice?

In a just world, to the logical mind, these are all very good arguments in defense of Trump or, /against/ the actions of these many shopped district judges, but unfortunately, logic and common sense seldom have anything to do with court proceedings because that would mean less money for the lawyers.
 
Yet not proof.
DO you ave some bizarre democrat definition of "proof?" Like a boys is a girl.

proof
/pro͞of/
noun
noun: proof; plural noun: proofs

1. evidence or argument establishing or helping to establish a fact or the truth of a statement.
 
Back
Top Bottom