If you still believe in deadly climate change, this will help you sleep.

[Robert W]

I own you.

I get a kick out of them calling scientists denialists. As they deny there is nothing to be alarmed about.

 

[Robert W]

 

[ReinyDays]

AI Overview ...

Sad ... just sad you don't think for yourself ... no knowledge, no reasoning, just bleeding out your asshole mouth ...

 

[Donald H]

I own you.

I've had the foot you chewed off made into an ashtray!

 

[Donald H]

How about we discuss that in the Bull Ring so I can give you a good pumping?

Whatever? First, have you stopped trying to ignore the findings of the JWST?

 

[ding]

I get a kick out of them calling scientists denialists. As they deny there is nothing to be alarmed about.

It's all they know to do.

 

[ding]

I've had the foot you chewed off made into an ashtray!

Not possible. I made it into my backscratcher.

 

[ding]

Whatever? First, have you stopped trying to ignore the findings of the JWST?

Let's debate it in the Bull Ring. Make the thread. Call me out.

 

[Donald H]

Let's debate it in the Bull Ring. Make the thread. Call me out.

Let's first of all determine if we are disagreeing on anything that we can debate??

Since you have stopped pretending that the bible is literally true and is mostly allegorical baloney, we're on the same page. Any exceptions come to mind, on which we disagree?

The JWST? What's to disagree?

We can't just debate something just because you have a bug up your ass because we've reached agreement on practically everything!

See ya'all in the bullring when you get your thoughts together! Shouldn't we allow some other Christians? Your choice!

 

[Robert W]

I've had the foot you chewed off made into an ashtray!

It is very wise for smokers to quit. Reasons, teeth problems, potential cancer and smell drives others nuts.

 

[mamooth]

This fib is told daily by Democrats. But they are authoritarians to the max

Robert, can you name even one way in which you don't emulate the Nazis?

You can't. None of the Trump cultists here can. I ask, they never respond. That's because they're perfect little goosesteppers. Go down the list, and every time, Trump cultists hold the same positions that Nazis did.

Trump cultists, you know what to do now. Tell me that you're going to send me to the camps if I don't stop highlighting your Nazi ways. That'll show everyone.

 

[mamooth]

He would never last the day in my forum, which is for members who behave as mature adults.

Things do tend to be calmer when only bleating in unison is allowed. Tommy's forum is famous for instabanning any contrary opinions.

I'm sure that if I put on my sewage boots and took a look there now, it would be mostly right-wing political raving, and constant insults hurled at liberals. All with the full approval of the staff.

 

[mamooth]

Let's debate it in the Bull Ring. Make the thread. Call me out.

Why? After all, we make you cry and run right here.

Over and over, we point out that your graphics don't back up your claims.

Each time we do that, you cry and run.

Quite frankly, it's gotten boring. You're not a challenge. Clueless cult parrots never are.

 

[ding]

Why? After all, we make you cry and run right here. Over and over, we point out that your graphics don't back up your claims. Each time we do that, you cry and run. Quite frankly, it's gotten boring. You're not a challenge. Clueless cult parrots never are.

Why? So you can make your case of course. There's no running away in a Bull Ring 1v1. It will just be the two of us.

 

[mamooth]

Orbital cycles don't change solar radiation enough to cause glacial or interglacial periods.

That's the whole point. Thanks for agreeing with me and showing I was correct. I'll let you know when I want any other points proven.

The point being that it's not possible to explain global climate cycles without taking CO2 feedback into account.

Your science can't explain the global cycles, so your science is clearly wrong. Our science, backed up by solid data and physics, explains them perfectly.

If you disagree, explain the global cycles. And show your proof. Your usual "DERP! IT'S OCEAN CURRENTS!" wild handwaving is not proof. That's just a kooky unsupported assertion. You're basically invoking fairy magic, and that's not science.

 

[mamooth]

You lie is already well known about your PHD claim

Tommy tactics:

A. Make up a crazy story.

B. Refuse to support it in any way.

C. Get called out on it.

D. Double down on refusing to provide any evidence, by declaring "everyone knows it!".

E. Declare victory and run.

It's how he behaves in any discussion.

 

[mamooth]

Why? So you can make your case of course. There's no running away in a Bull Ring 1v1. It will just be the two of us.

Check out the narcissism on display here.

Ding totally hilariously overestimates his importance in this world.

 

[ding]

That's the whole point. Thanks for agreeing with me and showing I was correct. I'll let you know when I want any other points proven.

The point being that it's not possible to explain global climate cycles without taking CO2 feedback into account.

Your science can't explain the global cycles, so your science is clearly wrong. Our science, backed up by solid data and physics, explains them perfectly.

If you disagree, explain the global cycles. And show your proof. Your usual "DERP! IT'S OCEAN CURRENTS!" wild handwaving is not proof. That's just a kooky unsupported assertion. You're basically invoking fairy magic, and that's not science.

The climate of the planet is driven by how ocean currents distribute heat. Lot's of papers on that.

 

[ding]

Check out the narcissism on display here.

Ding totally hilariously overestimates his importance in this world.

You're scared.

 

[ding]

Ocean currents are responsible for D-O events.