If you still believe in deadly climate change, this will help you sleep.

[daveman]

Mamooth is as usual evading the question to prove his statement he made in post #351:



Second time I am asking you to prove it.

Waiting
Waiting
Waiting......

He can't prove it, because it's false.

This data is 11 years old.

After examining the reports, and removing double counting, calculations show that from Fiscal Year 1993 to FY 2014 total U.S. expenditures on climate change amount to more than $166 billion in 2012 dollars. By way of comparison, the Congressional Budget Office estimated that the entire Apollo program, operating from 1962 to 1973 with 17 missions—seven of them sending men to the moon and back—cost $170 billion in 2005 dollars, which equals about $200 billion in 2012 dollars, if we use the Consumer Price Index to adjust that figure. In “fighting” climate change, the United States government is spending almost as much as it did on all the Apollo missions.

There is far more money available to Klimate Kultists that there is to rational people.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Well, yeah. That's one reason why I can humiliate deniers so easily. I have a good grasp of physics. However, I'm not vain enough to believe that's due to any extreme brilliance on my part.

First, I see farther because I stand on the shoulders of giants. (That phrase is often attributed to Newton, but it predates him.)

Second, you're cult imbeciles. After talking to deniers for a while, it becomes nearly impossible to not develop a superiority complex.

Anyways, I see this has turned into a cry-at-mamooth gossip session now, so I'll leave you girls to it.

Your comments are habitually free of science discussion and exhibits a profound inability to carry on a mature conversation because you think and write like someone from a mental institution.

 

[mamooth]

Your comments are habitually free of science discussion and exhibits a profound inability to carry on a mature conversation because you think and write like someone from a mental institution.

I just checked you past 12 posts. There's no discussion of science in any of them. All of them are 100% insults.

Needless to say, my record there is much better.

Stop projecting. You are the problem.

 

[mamooth]

He can't prove it, because it's false.

Was there a point to that fakery?

Your logic there is that $166 billion was all used for bribes. Even when it was used to launch weather satellites, you claim it's going into someone's pocket.

That sort of dishonest sleaze is all you've ever had. It's why you have zero credibility, and why you've been reduced to crying in a SafeSpace with other frauds.

 

[Sunsettommy]

I just checked you past 12 posts. There's no discussion of science in any of them. All of them are 100% insults.

Needless to say, my record there is much better.

Stop projecting. You are the problem.

HA HA HA, I asked you to prove your claim you made at post #351, you keep ducking it, meanwhile I have started 2 threads recently to your ZERO in the last week in the environmental forum and have made science based replies many times as well to your ZERO time, you are all wind and piss.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Was there a point to that fakery?

Your logic there is that $166 billion was all used for bribes. Even when it was used to launch weather satellites, you claim it's going into someone's pocket.

That sort of dishonest sleaze is all you've ever had. It's why you have zero credibility, and why you've been reduced to crying in a SafeSpace with other frauds.

See you can't even generate a cogent reply to support your assertion.

All you do here is blow bullshit.

 

[Robert W]

I have a good grasp of physics.

How does that relate to Climate or even weather? I studied both Physics and Calculus and want you to get the chance to explain that here. How can you relate physics to formations of clouds? Do you believe that Clouds are the fundamental basis of climate all over Earth?

 

[mamooth]

How does that relate to Climate or even weather?

You tell us. It's pretty obvious to normal people how climate science is based on physics, but we want to hear your explanation.

I studied both Physics and Calculus and want you to get the chance to explain that here.

Here's a thought. Explain it yourself, instead of playing cowardly question games.

Try acting like a liberal. State your point clearly and directly, explain why that point matters, and support your point.

 

[Sunsettommy]

How does that relate to Climate or even weather? I studied both Physics and Calculus and want you to get the chance to explain that here. How can you relate physics to formations of clouds? Do you believe that Clouds are the fundamental basis of climate all over Earth?

He is lying as he NEVER demonstrate any acumen for that field as you can see here in this thread doesn't once try a science based discussion at all, it is full of anger, lies and stupid attacks on us.

 

[mamooth]

See you can't even generate a cogent reply to support your assertion.

All you do here is blow bullshit.

Now you're up to at least 15 straight no-content insult posts. Probably more. I stopped looking. It's kind of what defines you now.

When in a hole, stop digging.

 

[Robert W]

Was there a point to that fakery?

Your logic there is that $166 billion was all used for bribes. Even when it was used to launch weather satellites, you claim it's going into someone's pocket.

That sort of dishonest sleaze is all you've ever had. It's why you have zero credibility, and why you've been reduced to crying in a SafeSpace with other frauds.

I was an A student in physics and a C student in Calculus. I got that low of a grade because I drove 80 miles per day just to get to college and go to work for 8 hrs. I was taking 16 units in college and for what else was on my place, I was fortunate to get any grades at all in college. How much can a kid study in college when he works 8 hrs per day as late as 11 pm at night pumping gasoline? It does not mean I did not understand Calculus either. I note we have a group of posters trying hard to help you get rid of your fear. I am talking of fear over weather and longer when it is Climate. You do understand that climate is just weather in various areas? Sunset Tommy really is excellent about climate issues. Study his words and it will dawn on you that you are below his level by a long shot. Same with Chem Engineer too.

My days in college were not devoted to weather or Climate. I don't recall the subject coming up in Physics. I got schooled in climate by being a pilot. We were required to get great grades to be a pilot and I am a pilot. Pilots who do not understand weather or climate have a great chance of dying due to weather.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Now you're up to at least 15 straight no-content insult posts. Probably more. I stopped looking. It's kind of what defines you.

When in a hole, stop digging.

You still have no answer to support post 351 claim you made, why are you scared to answer a simple question.

Here is your claim you have continually avoided supporting:

The opposite of reality, of course. Follow the money. All of the corrupting bribe money flows to the deniers.

Any ethical scientist could triple their salary by choosing to lie for the deniers. They don't. They effectively take a pay cut by refusing denier bribes, which gives them even more credibility.

I challenged you on it and you ran away putting up a 10 plus post smoke screen in ducking it.

LOL

 

[Robert W]

You tell us. It's pretty obvious to normal people how climate science is based on physics, but we want to hear your explanation.

You merely repeated my question to you but flopped it against me. I am asking you to back up your claims. I know a lot of people but few of them understand physics or climate. Even you do not understand climate.

 

[mamooth]

I was an A student in physics

That's nice, but your physics grade has nothing to do with climate science. That's why I don't bring up my education. I just talke about the science.

You do understand that climate is just weather in various areas?

And since that weather is changing to being more warm, what's your point?

Sunset Tommy really is excellent about climate issues.

Same with Chem Engineer too.

Nah, they're both really bad.

Do you think that they've overturned the last century of physics because they parroted something on a conspiracy blog? They mouth some convincing BS, but any time you dig deeper into it, it's always BS. You never dig deeper into it. You always blindly accept it at face value, because it's convenient to your politics.

 

[Robert W]

You tell us. It's pretty obvious to normal people how climate science is based on physics, but we want to hear your explanation.


Here's a thought. Explain it yourself, instead of playing cowardly question games.

Try acting like a liberal. State your point clearly and directly, explain why that point matters, and support your point.

I studied under 3 physics teachers. I studied calculus under another college teacher.I studied Chemistry. I got a perfect score on Aviation weather.

IF I had teachers talking as you talk, I would never have come back to class.

 

[mamooth]

You merely repeated my question to you but flopped it against me. I am asking you to back up your claims.

Which specific claim do you want me to back up?

 

[Robert W]

That's nice, but your physics grade has nothing to do with climate science. That's why I don't bring up my education. I just talke about the science.

That repeats what I told you already. I see you more a politician type than one who can intelligently discuss climate. Others here tell you the same exact thing. Think we are kidding you?

 

[Robert W]

Which specific claim do you want me to back up?

As a beginner, why do you think Man controls climate?

 

[Sunsettommy]

You merely repeated my question to you but flopped it against me. I am asking you to back up your claims. I know a lot of people but few of them understand physics or climate. Even you do not understand climate.

He does that in the three forums I have seen him on as he doesn't know, he avoids deep discussion as he gets destroyed at the other forum that he has stopped visiting as many there were laughing at him for his elementary errors he was making over and over and over as one of the members there has a science background who make utter fools of him on a regular basis with some others exposing his chronic ignorance of the topic.

We are dealing with a B.E.L.E.I.V.E.R. that is why he is deficient in every possible way as he hides his ignorance with his angry, insulting hostile replies hoping he we don't notice that he habitually avoid science based discussions.

 

[mamooth]

I studied under 3 physics teachers. I studied calculus under another college teacher.I studied Chemistry. I got a perfect score on Aviation weather.

I DEMAND YOU BACK THAT UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Oh wait. Nobody cares, because it has nothing to do with the science.

That you, your argument from authority fallacy fails in multiple ways.

IF I had teachers talking as you talk, I would never have come back to class.

Good thing I'm not a teacher then. Were you always such a snowflake?

I have to repeat this, because you seem unable to grasp it, on both and intellectual and an emotional level.

Science doesn't care about your feelings.