If You Needed More Proof That Libs Are Deranged...

[Canon Shooter]

I heard about this on the radio and was absolutely sure it was a joke.

But, sadly, no.

Apparently, Seattle is mulling over the idea of making certain crimes (trespassing, theft and, in some cases, assault) legal if they're committed because the perpetrator is poor and needs money to pay bills like rent, electric or to buy food.

Seattle looks at new ‘poverty defense’ for misdemeanors

This means if someone jumps you and takes your wallet, you could be shit outta' luck.

This also means that, for a victim to realize any justice, he'll have to do it himself. That, however, will be fully prosecutable.

Only brain dead liberals could come up with some shit like this...

 

[Rambunctious]

If you have travel plans to Seattle I think you may want to change them.....its already a city you can't walk in after dark alone....

 

[Anomalism]

Wait, for real?

 

[Wyatt earp]

Wait, for real?

Yeah this is old news

 

[Concerned American]

If you have travel plans to Seattle I think you may want to change them.....its already a city you can't walk in after dark alone....

I live in WA and I wouldn't set foot on the west side of the cascades. They should fence it off and turn it into a mental hospital. Democrats are traitors to the nation.

 

[TheParser]

I heard about this on the radio and was absolutely sure it was a joke.

But, sadly, no.

Apparently, Seattle is mulling over the idea of making certain crimes (trespassing, theft and, in some cases, assault) legal if they're committed because the perpetrator is poor and needs money to pay bills like rent, electric or to buy food.

Seattle looks at new ‘poverty defense’ for misdemeanors

This means if someone jumps you and takes your wallet, you could be shit outta' luck.

This also means that, for a victim to realize any justice, he'll have to do it himself. That, however, will be fully prosecutable.

Only brain dead liberals could come up with some shit like this...

Those "liberals" are liberal in words only.

They talk the talk but they do not walk the walk.

They live insulated lives far from the people for whom their hearts bleed.

If they or their loved ones were ever harmed, you can believe that they would seek every bit of retribution possible.

They espouse those ideas because they know only ordinary people will be affected, not privileged people like them (who live in gated communities, never ride public transportation, never walk on the sidewalks, and whose children attend private schools).

 

[Ben Thomson]

I heard about this on the radio and was absolutely sure it was a joke.

But, sadly, no.

Apparently, Seattle is mulling over the idea of making certain crimes (trespassing, theft and, in some cases, assault) legal if they're committed because the perpetrator is poor and needs money to pay bills like rent, electric or to buy food.

Seattle looks at new ‘poverty defense’ for misdemeanors

This means if someone jumps you and takes your wallet, you could be shit outta' luck.

This also means that, for a victim to realize any justice, he'll have to do it himself. That, however, will be fully prosecutable.

Only brain dead liberals could come up with some shit like this...

More right wing hysterical hyperbole. ONE council member offered an OPINION that MAYBE some midemeanors not be prosecuted if the offender committed the misdemeanor while searching or trying to obtain food. Other council members have already said they oppose anything like that. But here we have a tin foil hat running down the street crying like it's already on the books...typical

 

[Concerned American]

I heard about this on the radio and was absolutely sure it was a joke.

But, sadly, no.

Apparently, Seattle is mulling over the idea of making certain crimes (trespassing, theft and, in some cases, assault) legal if they're committed because the perpetrator is poor and needs money to pay bills like rent, electric or to buy food.

Seattle looks at new ‘poverty defense’ for misdemeanors

This means if someone jumps you and takes your wallet, you could be shit outta' luck.

This also means that, for a victim to realize any justice, he'll have to do it himself. That, however, will be fully prosecutable.

Only brain dead liberals could come up with some shit like this...

More right wing hysterical hyperbole. ONE council member offered an OPINION that MAYBE some midemeanors not be prosecuted if the offender committed the misdemeanor while searching or trying to obtain food. Other council members have already said they oppose anything like that. But here we have a tin foil hat running down the street crying like it's already on the books...typical

It's Seattle moron. They allowed six blocks of downtown to be taken over by anarchists for nearly two mo. That sir is tin foil hat shit and you have it on. Hope you get yours first.

 

[Canon Shooter]

I heard about this on the radio and was absolutely sure it was a joke.

But, sadly, no.

Apparently, Seattle is mulling over the idea of making certain crimes (trespassing, theft and, in some cases, assault) legal if they're committed because the perpetrator is poor and needs money to pay bills like rent, electric or to buy food.

Seattle looks at new ‘poverty defense’ for misdemeanors

This means if someone jumps you and takes your wallet, you could be shit outta' luck.

This also means that, for a victim to realize any justice, he'll have to do it himself. That, however, will be fully prosecutable.

Only brain dead liberals could come up with some shit like this...

More right wing hysterical hyperbole. ONE council member offered an OPINION that MAYBE some midemeanors not be prosecuted if the offender committed the misdemeanor while searching or trying to obtain food. Other council members have already said they oppose anything like that. But here we have a tin foil hat running down the street crying like it's already on the books...typical

Did you read the link, nipplehead?

One council member made the proposal. King County's Director of Public Defense supports it. Others "welcome the discussion".

What SHOULD be happening is everyone and their brother standing up and proclaiming it to be a ridiculously ignorant and stupid idea. The bitch who first proposed it, Lisa Herbold, should lose her seat on the council, as her proposal in no way protects law abiding citizens and, in fact, aids in endangering them.

This is also the same c*nt who, during her re-election campaign, promised to add more police officers when she was running for office, but is actually one of the strongest proponents of the "defund the police" movement...

 

[Ben Thomson]

I heard about this on the radio and was absolutely sure it was a joke.

But, sadly, no.

Apparently, Seattle is mulling over the idea of making certain crimes (trespassing, theft and, in some cases, assault) legal if they're committed because the perpetrator is poor and needs money to pay bills like rent, electric or to buy food.

Seattle looks at new ‘poverty defense’ for misdemeanors

This means if someone jumps you and takes your wallet, you could be shit outta' luck.

This also means that, for a victim to realize any justice, he'll have to do it himself. That, however, will be fully prosecutable.

Only brain dead liberals could come up with some shit like this...

More right wing hysterical hyperbole. ONE council member offered an OPINION that MAYBE some midemeanors not be prosecuted if the offender committed the misdemeanor while searching or trying to obtain food. Other council members have already said they oppose anything like that. But here we have a tin foil hat running down the street crying like it's already on the books...typical

Did you read the link, nipplehead?

One council member made the proposal. King County's Director of Public Defense supports it. Others "welcome the discussion".

What SHOULD be happening is everyone and their brother standing up and proclaiming it to be a ridiculously ignorant and stupid idea. The bitch who first proposed it, Lisa Herbold, should lose her seat on the council, as her proposal in no way protects law abiding citizens and, in fact, aids in endangering them.

This is also the same c*nt who, during her re-election campaign, promised to add more police officers when she was running for office, but is actually one of the strongest proponents of the "defund the police" movement...

It's was being discussed/proposed months ago and not even written yet and doesn't have unanimous support. I got that from reading the link...nipplehead.

 

[Concerned American]

I heard about this on the radio and was absolutely sure it was a joke.

But, sadly, no.

Apparently, Seattle is mulling over the idea of making certain crimes (trespassing, theft and, in some cases, assault) legal if they're committed because the perpetrator is poor and needs money to pay bills like rent, electric or to buy food.

Seattle looks at new ‘poverty defense’ for misdemeanors

This means if someone jumps you and takes your wallet, you could be shit outta' luck.

This also means that, for a victim to realize any justice, he'll have to do it himself. That, however, will be fully prosecutable.

Only brain dead liberals could come up with some shit like this...

More right wing hysterical hyperbole. ONE council member offered an OPINION that MAYBE some midemeanors not be prosecuted if the offender committed the misdemeanor while searching or trying to obtain food. Other council members have already said they oppose anything like that. But here we have a tin foil hat running down the street crying like it's already on the books...typical

Did you read the link, nipplehead?

One council member made the proposal. King County's Director of Public Defense supports it. Others "welcome the discussion".

What SHOULD be happening is everyone and their brother standing up and proclaiming it to be a ridiculously ignorant and stupid idea. The bitch who first proposed it, Lisa Herbold, should lose her seat on the council, as her proposal in no way protects law abiding citizens and, in fact, aids in endangering them.

This is also the same c*nt who, during her re-election campaign, promised to add more police officers when she was running for office, but is actually one of the strongest proponents of the "defund the police" movement...

It's was being discussed/proposed months ago and not even written yet and doesn't have unanimous support. I got that from reading the link...nipplehead.

It amazes me that you left wing morons whined, cried and cajoled Trump over any tongue-in-cheek remark that he made, but you give a free ride to a communist whack job in Seattle that advocates against public safety. Moron.

 

[jillian]

I heard about this on the radio and was absolutely sure it was a joke.

But, sadly, no.

Apparently, Seattle is mulling over the idea of making certain crimes (trespassing, theft and, in some cases, assault) legal if they're committed because the perpetrator is poor and needs money to pay bills like rent, electric or to buy food.

Seattle looks at new ‘poverty defense’ for misdemeanors

This means if someone jumps you and takes your wallet, you could be shit outta' luck.

This also means that, for a victim to realize any justice, he'll have to do it himself. That, however, will be fully prosecutable.

Only brain dead liberals could come up with some shit like this...

From the treasonous trumpkin party

 

[Ben Thomson]

I heard about this on the radio and was absolutely sure it was a joke.

But, sadly, no.

Apparently, Seattle is mulling over the idea of making certain crimes (trespassing, theft and, in some cases, assault) legal if they're committed because the perpetrator is poor and needs money to pay bills like rent, electric or to buy food.

Seattle looks at new ‘poverty defense’ for misdemeanors

This means if someone jumps you and takes your wallet, you could be shit outta' luck.

This also means that, for a victim to realize any justice, he'll have to do it himself. That, however, will be fully prosecutable.

Only brain dead liberals could come up with some shit like this...

More right wing hysterical hyperbole. ONE council member offered an OPINION that MAYBE some midemeanors not be prosecuted if the offender committed the misdemeanor while searching or trying to obtain food. Other council members have already said they oppose anything like that. But here we have a tin foil hat running down the street crying like it's already on the books...typical

Did you read the link, nipplehead?

One council member made the proposal. King County's Director of Public Defense supports it. Others "welcome the discussion".

What SHOULD be happening is everyone and their brother standing up and proclaiming it to be a ridiculously ignorant and stupid idea. The bitch who first proposed it, Lisa Herbold, should lose her seat on the council, as her proposal in no way protects law abiding citizens and, in fact, aids in endangering them.

This is also the same c*nt who, during her re-election campaign, promised to add more police officers when she was running for office, but is actually one of the strongest proponents of the "defund the police" movement...

It's was being discussed/proposed months ago and not even written yet and doesn't have unanimous support. I got that from reading the link...nipplehead.

It amazes me that you left wing morons whined, cried and cajoled Trump over any tongue-in-cheek remark that he made, but you give a free ride to a communist whack job in Seattle that advocates against public safety. Moron.

Well here's another 'tongue-in-cheek remark' we liberals will 'whine' over. This one by Trump boot licker Gohmert..Louie Gohmert Suggests People ‘Go to the Streets’ and Be ‘Violent’ After Judge Throws Out Baseless Election Suit

 

[francoHFW]

I heard about this on the radio and was absolutely sure it was a joke.

But, sadly, no.

Apparently, Seattle is mulling over the idea of making certain crimes (trespassing, theft and, in some cases, assault) legal if they're committed because the perpetrator is poor and needs money to pay bills like rent, electric or to buy food.

Seattle looks at new ‘poverty defense’ for misdemeanors

This means if someone jumps you and takes your wallet, you could be shit outta' luck.

This also means that, for a victim to realize any justice, he'll have to do it himself. That, however, will be fully prosecutable.

Only brain dead liberals could come up with some shit like this...

More right wing hysterical hyperbole. ONE council member offered an OPINION that MAYBE some midemeanors not be prosecuted if the offender committed the misdemeanor while searching or trying to obtain food. Other council members have already said they oppose anything like that. But here we have a tin foil hat running down the street crying like it's already on the books...typical

Did you read the link, nipplehead?

One council member made the proposal. King County's Director of Public Defense supports it. Others "welcome the discussion".

What SHOULD be happening is everyone and their brother standing up and proclaiming it to be a ridiculously ignorant and stupid idea. The bitch who first proposed it, Lisa Herbold, should lose her seat on the council, as her proposal in no way protects law abiding citizens and, in fact, aids in endangering them.

This is also the same c*nt who, during her re-election campaign, promised to add more police officers when she was running for office, but is actually one of the strongest proponents of the "defund the police" movement...

Define the police means reform the police body cameras and ties training and some more social working tops. BFD. Meanwhile the threat is crap propaganda, she wanted sheer poverty to be a mitigating circumstance. BFD.

 

[Concerned American]

I heard about this on the radio and was absolutely sure it was a joke.

But, sadly, no.

Apparently, Seattle is mulling over the idea of making certain crimes (trespassing, theft and, in some cases, assault) legal if they're committed because the perpetrator is poor and needs money to pay bills like rent, electric or to buy food.

Seattle looks at new ‘poverty defense’ for misdemeanors

This means if someone jumps you and takes your wallet, you could be shit outta' luck.

This also means that, for a victim to realize any justice, he'll have to do it himself. That, however, will be fully prosecutable.

Only brain dead liberals could come up with some shit like this...

More right wing hysterical hyperbole. ONE council member offered an OPINION that MAYBE some midemeanors not be prosecuted if the offender committed the misdemeanor while searching or trying to obtain food. Other council members have already said they oppose anything like that. But here we have a tin foil hat running down the street crying like it's already on the books...typical

Did you read the link, nipplehead?

One council member made the proposal. King County's Director of Public Defense supports it. Others "welcome the discussion".

What SHOULD be happening is everyone and their brother standing up and proclaiming it to be a ridiculously ignorant and stupid idea. The bitch who first proposed it, Lisa Herbold, should lose her seat on the council, as her proposal in no way protects law abiding citizens and, in fact, aids in endangering them.

This is also the same c*nt who, during her re-election campaign, promised to add more police officers when she was running for office, but is actually one of the strongest proponents of the "defund the police" movement...

It's was being discussed/proposed months ago and not even written yet and doesn't have unanimous support. I got that from reading the link...nipplehead.

It amazes me that you left wing morons whined, cried and cajoled Trump over any tongue-in-cheek remark that he made, but you give a free ride to a communist whack job in Seattle that advocates against public safety. Moron.

Well here's another 'tongue-in-cheek remark' we liberals will 'whine' over. This one by Trump boot licker Gohmert..Louie Gohmert Suggests People ‘Go to the Streets’ and Be ‘Violent’ After Judge Throws Out Baseless Election Suit

HaHaHa, you're a moron. Democrats get a free ride all summer. Democrat shoots up a ball game wounding a republican representative among others. And you have the unmitigated gall to call out a "statement" by Gohmert. How about Piglosi and AOC's threats. You morons should clean your stomach windows or pull your heads out of your ass.

 

[Harry Dresden]

I heard about this on the radio and was absolutely sure it was a joke.

But, sadly, no.

Apparently, Seattle is mulling over the idea of making certain crimes (trespassing, theft and, in some cases, assault) legal if they're committed because the perpetrator is poor and needs money to pay bills like rent, electric or to buy food.

Seattle looks at new ‘poverty defense’ for misdemeanors

This means if someone jumps you and takes your wallet, you could be shit outta' luck.

This also means that, for a victim to realize any justice, he'll have to do it himself. That, however, will be fully prosecutable.

Only brain dead liberals could come up with some shit like this...

More right wing hysterical hyperbole. ONE council member offered an OPINION that MAYBE some midemeanors not be prosecuted if the offender committed the misdemeanor while searching or trying to obtain food. Other council members have already said they oppose anything like that. But here we have a tin foil hat running down the street crying like it's already on the books...typical

Did you read the link, nipplehead?

One council member made the proposal. King County's Director of Public Defense supports it. Others "welcome the discussion".

What SHOULD be happening is everyone and their brother standing up and proclaiming it to be a ridiculously ignorant and stupid idea. The bitch who first proposed it, Lisa Herbold, should lose her seat on the council, as her proposal in no way protects law abiding citizens and, in fact, aids in endangering them.

This is also the same c*nt who, during her re-election campaign, promised to add more police officers when she was running for office, but is actually one of the strongest proponents of the "defund the police" movement...

Define the police means reform the police body cameras and ties training and some more social working tops. BFD. Meanwhile the threat is crap propaganda, she wanted sheer poverty to be a mitigating circumstance. BFD.

GO!!BILLS!!!

 

[francoHFW]

I heard about this on the radio and was absolutely sure it was a joke.

But, sadly, no.

Apparently, Seattle is mulling over the idea of making certain crimes (trespassing, theft and, in some cases, assault) legal if they're committed because the perpetrator is poor and needs money to pay bills like rent, electric or to buy food.

Seattle looks at new ‘poverty defense’ for misdemeanors

This means if someone jumps you and takes your wallet, you could be shit outta' luck.

This also means that, for a victim to realize any justice, he'll have to do it himself. That, however, will be fully prosecutable.

Only brain dead liberals could come up with some shit like this...

More right wing hysterical hyperbole. ONE council member offered an OPINION that MAYBE some midemeanors not be prosecuted if the offender committed the misdemeanor while searching or trying to obtain food. Other council members have already said they oppose anything like that. But here we have a tin foil hat running down the street crying like it's already on the books...typical

Did you read the link, nipplehead?

One council member made the proposal. King County's Director of Public Defense supports it. Others "welcome the discussion".

What SHOULD be happening is everyone and their brother standing up and proclaiming it to be a ridiculously ignorant and stupid idea. The bitch who first proposed it, Lisa Herbold, should lose her seat on the council, as her proposal in no way protects law abiding citizens and, in fact, aids in endangering them.

This is also the same c*nt who, during her re-election campaign, promised to add more police officers when she was running for office, but is actually one of the strongest proponents of the "defund the police" movement...

Define the police means reform the police body cameras and ties training and some more social working tops. BFD. Meanwhile the threat is crap propaganda, she wanted sheer poverty to be a mitigating circumstance. BFD.

GO!!BILLS!!!

Seriously. Josh Allen is must see TV lol

 

[francoHFW]

I heard about this on the radio and was absolutely sure it was a joke.

But, sadly, no.

Apparently, Seattle is mulling over the idea of making certain crimes (trespassing, theft and, in some cases, assault) legal if they're committed because the perpetrator is poor and needs money to pay bills like rent, electric or to buy food.

Seattle looks at new ‘poverty defense’ for misdemeanors

This means if someone jumps you and takes your wallet, you could be shit outta' luck.

This also means that, for a victim to realize any justice, he'll have to do it himself. That, however, will be fully prosecutable.

Only brain dead liberals could come up with some shit like this...

More right wing hysterical hyperbole. ONE council member offered an OPINION that MAYBE some midemeanors not be prosecuted if the offender committed the misdemeanor while searching or trying to obtain food. Other council members have already said they oppose anything like that. But here we have a tin foil hat running down the street crying like it's already on the books...typical

Did you read the link, nipplehead?

One council member made the proposal. King County's Director of Public Defense supports it. Others "welcome the discussion".

What SHOULD be happening is everyone and their brother standing up and proclaiming it to be a ridiculously ignorant and stupid idea. The bitch who first proposed it, Lisa Herbold, should lose her seat on the council, as her proposal in no way protects law abiding citizens and, in fact, aids in endangering them.

This is also the same c*nt who, during her re-election campaign, promised to add more police officers when she was running for office, but is actually one of the strongest proponents of the "defund the police" movement...

It's was being discussed/proposed months ago and not even written yet and doesn't have unanimous support. I got that from reading the link...nipplehead.

It amazes me that you left wing morons whined, cried and cajoled Trump over any tongue-in-cheek remark that he made, but you give a free ride to a communist whack job in Seattle that advocates against public safety. Moron.

Well here's another 'tongue-in-cheek remark' we liberals will 'whine' over. This one by Trump boot licker Gohmert..Louie Gohmert Suggests People ‘Go to the Streets’ and Be ‘Violent’ After Judge Throws Out Baseless Election Suit

HaHaHa, you're a moron. Democrats get a free ride all summer. Democrat shoots up a ball game wounding a republican representative among others. And you have the unmitigated gall to call out a "statement" by Gohmert. How about Piglosi and AOC's threats. You morons should clean your stomach windows or pull your heads out of your ass.

Your whole party is now a bought off by the rich fantasy. So many phony scandals and conspiracies -that's all you have.

 

[Concerned American]

I heard about this on the radio and was absolutely sure it was a joke.

But, sadly, no.

Apparently, Seattle is mulling over the idea of making certain crimes (trespassing, theft and, in some cases, assault) legal if they're committed because the perpetrator is poor and needs money to pay bills like rent, electric or to buy food.

Seattle looks at new ‘poverty defense’ for misdemeanors

This means if someone jumps you and takes your wallet, you could be shit outta' luck.

This also means that, for a victim to realize any justice, he'll have to do it himself. That, however, will be fully prosecutable.

Only brain dead liberals could come up with some shit like this...

More right wing hysterical hyperbole. ONE council member offered an OPINION that MAYBE some midemeanors not be prosecuted if the offender committed the misdemeanor while searching or trying to obtain food. Other council members have already said they oppose anything like that. But here we have a tin foil hat running down the street crying like it's already on the books...typical

Did you read the link, nipplehead?

One council member made the proposal. King County's Director of Public Defense supports it. Others "welcome the discussion".

What SHOULD be happening is everyone and their brother standing up and proclaiming it to be a ridiculously ignorant and stupid idea. The bitch who first proposed it, Lisa Herbold, should lose her seat on the council, as her proposal in no way protects law abiding citizens and, in fact, aids in endangering them.

This is also the same c*nt who, during her re-election campaign, promised to add more police officers when she was running for office, but is actually one of the strongest proponents of the "defund the police" movement...

It's was being discussed/proposed months ago and not even written yet and doesn't have unanimous support. I got that from reading the link...nipplehead.

It amazes me that you left wing morons whined, cried and cajoled Trump over any tongue-in-cheek remark that he made, but you give a free ride to a communist whack job in Seattle that advocates against public safety. Moron.

Well here's another 'tongue-in-cheek remark' we liberals will 'whine' over. This one by Trump boot licker Gohmert..Louie Gohmert Suggests People ‘Go to the Streets’ and Be ‘Violent’ After Judge Throws Out Baseless Election Suit

HaHaHa, you're a moron. Democrats get a free ride all summer. Democrat shoots up a ball game wounding a republican representative among others. And you have the unmitigated gall to call out a "statement" by Gohmert. How about Piglosi and AOC's threats. You morons should clean your stomach windows or pull your heads out of your ass.

Your whole party is now a bought off by the rich fantasy. So many phony scandals and conspiracies -that's all you have.

Amazing, you just described the democrats' last four years and you are too stupid to realize it. Moron.

 

[Canon Shooter]

I heard about this on the radio and was absolutely sure it was a joke.

But, sadly, no.

Apparently, Seattle is mulling over the idea of making certain crimes (trespassing, theft and, in some cases, assault) legal if they're committed because the perpetrator is poor and needs money to pay bills like rent, electric or to buy food.

Seattle looks at new ‘poverty defense’ for misdemeanors

This means if someone jumps you and takes your wallet, you could be shit outta' luck.

This also means that, for a victim to realize any justice, he'll have to do it himself. That, however, will be fully prosecutable.

Only brain dead liberals could come up with some shit like this...

From the treasonous trumpkin party

Sorry, you ignorant little wench, but I'm not a Republican...