Adjusting gun regulations has been done since the beginning of our country.
This bullshit about not tramping on my 2nd amendment rights. Those rights have changed substantially since written. Why should this generation be any different.
Those yelling the loudest can be given a penis enlargement instead of sei-automatic gun. That can help their feeling of inadequacy,
I’m still not sure what the hell you’re yammering on about. There are some who insist that the 2d Amendment is absolute. I don’t. That said, it is still a right. Driving a car is not. It is a privilege.
With that in mind, one can see how and why the government
can require drivers to establish their ability to drive, impose laws in speed, require vehicle registration and even require vehicle insurance for liability if your driving injures anybody.
It is less easy to justify how and why the government thinks it can limit gun ownership. They do though. You
have to have obtained a license. The gun has to have been legally obtained and has to be registered. And most of us (including those apparently in the majority of NRA members) actually understand it and are ok with it.
Even so, recognizing a valid limit on gun ownership does not equate with agreement that the authority to apply conditions in that right is boundless or even all that broad. Therefore, whether you like it or not, it is perfectly appropriate for those who embrace gun ownership to seek to impose restraints on how far the government can limit it.
I say again. Let’s get together. The anti-gun lobby and the gun ownership rights side. Agree to sit and talk and even discuss how to prevent the mass shootings by crazed people we’ve seen in recent days and years. But don’t imagine for a moment that your side can simply
impose it on the other side.
If both sides are truly seeking a workable solution, then the discussion can’t be one sided and no ensuing bill can be unilaterally imposed. That won’t work. That’s not how we deal with rights.
