If You Don’t Certify The Election Results…”We will come for you!” (VIDEO)

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

I am not lying.

My bad . I was replying to Faun.

 

[Faun]

Try admitting the election was stolen and covered by corrupt election officials and a corrupt government. That is what happened and 4 years of lies will never change that.

I'm not delusional like you are so I can't say your hallucinations are real.

 

[Faun]

Cite them...

Nope.plenty more examples.

<crickets>

 

[Lastamender]

I'm not delusional like you are so I can't say your hallucinations are real.

That delusional shit makes you sound like a fool. There is not one thing delusional about the fact the election was stolen. The delusion is all yours.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

No. You are the one looking more foolish. Why don't you believe concerned citizens over politicians who refuse to investigate or release the ballots for inspection? You are a traitor.

Because those "concerned citizens" have ZERO EVIDENCE to back their conspiracy theory claims up. You don't just get to investigate because you have a "feeling" something was wrong. You have to prove it. And you haven't.

You are a constant whiner.

 

[Lastamender]

<crickets>

Post 60 I asked you for a list. Where is it?

 

[Lastamender]

Because those "concerned citizens" have ZERO EVIDENCE to back their conspiracy theory claims up. You don't just get to investigate because you have a "feeling" something was wrong. You have to prove it. And you haven't.

You are a constant whiner.

Zero evidence?

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Zero evidence?

Less than zero. Sorry. forgot to add that.

Move on. He lost. And he's going to lose again. Prepare yourself.

 

[Faun]

List them. You claim to know everything.

Here's an example...

Nevada Supreme Court unanimously dismisses Trump lawsuit to overturn Nevada election result

Documents filed Monday ask the high court to reverse Judge James Todd Russell's finding on Friday that the legal team for six Republican electors failed to prove the Nov. 3 election was swayed by fraudulent or illegal votes.

www.rgj.com

"Contestants' claims fail on the merits ... or under any other standard," the judge said in his 35-page ruling.​

... so then the plaintiff filed an appeal... ALL 6 Justices ruled unanimously against them and upheld the lower court's ruling.

“To prevail on this appeal, appellants must demonstrate error of law, findings of fact not supported by substantial evidence or an abuse of discretion in the admission or rejection of evidence by the district court,” the six justices said. “We are not convinced they have done so.”​

That's 7 judges in 2 courts ALL reaching the same conclusion... the plaintiff's evidence failed to demonstrate fraud.

 

[Lastamender]

WOW! Brand New Voter Registration Scam Uncovered In MI… Will MI AG Nessel Reveal The Criminals Behind The Scam If She Discovers They're Tied To Democrats? [VIDEO] | The Gateway Pundit | by Patty McMurray

A new voter registration scam has been uncovered in the must-win state of Michigan, whose elections and top law enforcement agency are headed up by Democrats with a less-than-stellar reputation for honesty or fairness.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[Lastamender]

 

[Faun]

That delusional shit makes you sound like a fool. There is not one thing delusional about the fact the election was stolen. The delusion is all yours.

Of course it's delusional to think the election was stolen. Prior to the election, a former Trump advisor revealed Trump was going to insist the election was stolen if he lost. After the election, every count, every recount, every canvass, every audit, every investigation, confirmed Trump lost the election free & fair. On the flip side, every claim of widespread fraud has been debunked. Every lawsuit about fraud has failed. In 4 years, there has not been a credible claim of fraud showing the election was stolen. PillowGuy's symposium blew up in his face. 2000 Mules failed to show anyone dropping off ballots multiple times and is being sued for defamation. True the Vote admitted in court they don't have the evidence to show the fraud they claimed in 2000 Mules. Trump tried sending fake electors to Congress to flip the election he lost.

You are batshit insane, FruitLoops.

That's why I can't agree with you.

 

[Lastamender]

Here's an example...

Nevada Supreme Court unanimously dismisses Trump lawsuit to overturn Nevada election result

Documents filed Monday ask the high court to reverse Judge James Todd Russell's finding on Friday that the legal team for six Republican electors failed to prove the Nov. 3 election was swayed by fraudulent or illegal votes.

www.rgj.com

"Contestants' claims fail on the merits ... or under any other standard," the judge said in his 35-page ruling.​

... so then the plaintiff filed an appeal... ALL 6 Justices ruled unanimously against them and upheld the lower court's ruling.

“To prevail on this appeal, appellants must demonstrate error of law, findings of fact not supported by substantial evidence or an abuse of discretion in the admission or rejection of evidence by the district court,” the six justices said. “We are not convinced they have done so.”​

That's 7 judges in 2 courts ALL reaching the same conclusion... the plaintiff's evidence failed to demonstrate fraud.

All of them.

 

[Faun]

Post 60 I asked you for a list. Where is it?

Litigation in the 2020 Election

This resource tracks litigation surrounding election administration in the 2020 election, an unprecedented election in which numerous changes were made to the voting process in response to the Coronavirus pandemic.

www.americanbar.org

 

[Faun]

Post 60 I asked you for a list. Where is it?

Post #63 wasn't to you.

 

[Faun]

My bad . I was replying to Faun.

I challenged you to prove there were more cases where observers were denied access, as you claimed.

A pity you couldn't reply to that.

 

[Lastamender]

Nothing about the obvious fraud going on in MI?

 

[Dogmaphobe]

They are serious when they say "you will own nothing and you will be happy -- OR ELSE"

 

[Lastamender]

 

[Vastator]

If there is nothing to hide or deceive with, then there should be no objects to closer examination and scrutiny.
The more "they" protest the elections are "honest" and "don't look here", the more reason we should examine and cross examine.

Nothing wrong with a forensic audit, if everything is on the level. The only reason to deny such a thing is to hide fraud.