He's talking about state law, and there's no logical or constitutional reason that states cannot prohibit the sale of firearms to all persons under the age of 21 except military personnel. In fact, I know of no reason why such a federal stipulation would not be constitutional.
Well, the only thing I was giving a thumbs up to, was that I agreed with White, that Matt seems well meaning, caring, and coherent to me as well.
Brain deadIt totally fits
Like a jury conviction...beyond any reasonable doubt.
Well, the only thing I was giving a thumbs up to, was that I agreed with White, that Matt seems well meaning, caring, and coherent to me as well.
Now? Do I agree with Matt's policy prescriptions? NO, I DO NOT.
But then? Most folks know that I have different sources of information, and a different POV on this whole push to decrease the impact of the 2nd, from the get go, so, this should not be a surprise.
I am a classical liberal, who keenly understands, WHY the 2nd Amendment is in the Constitution in the first place.
It does not matter HOW many civilians or children die, if we wish to remain having an open society, IT NEEDS TO STAY THERE.
So? The choice, is either a closed society, ruled by a technocracy of bureaucrats, or? A society with the people still in charge.
THIS? . . . is more important than any other consideration. The choice now, is liberty or security, there is no other. And I honestly don't think there will be any security when it comes right down to it.
The End of America: Letter of Warning to a Young Patriot - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
So you’re assuming what you’re trying to claim.
No you won't. You just rigged the game from the start. Who do you think you're fooling?
Actor Matthew McConaughey gives impassioned speech for gun reform in White House briefing
Actor Matthew McConaughey delivered an emotional White House appeal for gun regulations in the wake of last month's massacre in his hometown of Uvalde, Texas.www.cnbc.com
He is talking for gun owners? No gun owner I ever listen to talk talks like this. Does he own a gun? When he starts talking about what the government is going to do about criminals and guns instead of hurting legal gun owners. Then maybe I will listen.
I know what you're trying say, badly, and your narrative is still bullshit. It's mindless, gun-grabbing Democrats who falsely characterize things. The matter foremostly entails a spiritual, moral, and cultural problem caused by Democrats, the same folks who routinely oppose proper school security and foist the deathtraps of gun-free zones on America.
Absolutely not.
You’re still assuming what you’re trying to claim. Really bad argument.
The developmental concerns of persons under the age of 21 are real. Military personnel under the age of 21 need not be prohibited. They would have the vetted maturity, training, and discipline.I'll never be in favor of universal background checks.
It is nothing but defacto registration.
And these guys all PASSED BACKROUND CHECKS. They bought rifles from FFLs and filled out form 4473 and then took the rifles and committed murder with them.
The guy in Buffalo WAS INVESTIGATED under New York's RED FLAG LAW that was passed in 2019...and deemed not to be a threat.
. Read that again!
All these shooters passed background checks...and New York HAS A RED FLAG LAW THAT THE BUFFALO SHOOTER WAS INVESTIGATED UNDER AND DEEMED NOT A THREAT.
Gun grabbers are always looking for an excuse to further THEIR goals.
If their solutions worked...there would have been no shooting in Buffalo. That's a cast iron, set in stone fact.
You cannot give an inch on proposal that haven't worked and won't work.
Look...for 50 years we gave them "safe, legal and rare" abortions and where did that end up.
Abortions at nine months and talk of post birth abortion.
Nope...never without a fight.
Why the would you agree to infringement of the rights of millions of 18, 19, and 20 year over the actions of 10 people?
Would you do that with the right to peacably assemble?
How about free speech?
Or religious freedom?
The answer is always no to infringement.
We're not going to throw millions of young adults under the bus to satiate the gun confiscators.
I know, and as I have posted, I agreed with those parts.
Hard to argue with the points he made.
Give it a rest, Dr. Phil.
Yeah, I missed that too. I'm going to borrow your question for White 6.
White 6 has a bad habit of "falsely characterizing the discussion."
That clown is who the filthy Democrats hired to be their shrill so the RINOs can have cover to side with the Democrats to take away our Constitutional rights.
