If two innocent police officers can be put on trial, Ashli Babbitts killer can too

LOL..Sure Robert only in your fucked up fantasy world.
Your fantasy world claims Trump instructed the cops to fire at the crowd proving to cause them to rush to safety and that Trump pulled the triggers on the cop's guns who shot rubber bullets at the crowd, Trump per you also forced the cops to hurl flash bangs back of the crowd forcing them to rush at the capitol for safety.
 
The burden of proof is on you dumb ass to prove fraud, and based on the tens of millions paid out by FOX and News Max to Dominion, MAGA has nothing but lies to support the idiocy of election fraud.
You are retarded.
 
Your fantasy world claims Trump instructed the cops to fire at the crowd proving to cause them to rush to safety and that Trump pulled the triggers on the cop's guns who shot rubber bullets at the crowd, Trump per you also forced the cops to hurl flash bangs back of the crowd forcing them to rush at the capitol for safety.
woo hoo thats inventive!
Picture1.webp
 
That you don't believe the undeniable fact that Newsmax and Fox paid millions to Dominion for their lies says all I need to know to evidence that you exist in an alternate universe.
Not lies.

Notice that ABC News added it's quip "without evidence" and defended the court.

In a post on its website, Newsmax continued to defend its coverage of the 2020 election, saying, "we stand by our coverage as fair, balanced, and conducted within professional standards of journalism."

The statement went on to criticize the judge overseeing the case. The company said it believed, without providing evidence, that Delaware Superior Court Judge Eric Davis "would not provide a fair trial," which they said was a factor in its decision to settle.
 
Absolutely
Again the problem in these cray cray arguments are that we saw this happen in real time, in the real world. Literally nothing Robrt W or the OP says actually occurred.

To the topic: even this Admin wouldn't be able to charge the Capital Officer. He was literally defending Congress members and staff (and the VP with the nuclear football) and this was the last line of security.
 
Not lies.

Notice that ABC News added it's quip "without evidence" and defended the court.

In a post on its website, Newsmax continued to defend its coverage of the 2020 election, saying, "we stand by our coverage as fair, balanced, and conducted within professional standards of journalism."

The statement went on to criticize the judge overseeing the case. The company said it believed, without providing evidence, that Delaware Superior Court Judge Eric Davis "would not provide a fair trial," which they said was a factor in its decision to settle.
Writing a check for $67,000,000.00 is all but admitting liability, Doofus.
 
Again the problem in these cray cray arguments are that we saw this happen in real time, in the real world. Literally nothing Robrt W or the OP says actually occurred.
These MAGA folks live outside the objective truth. I mean, there is nothing to argue about here. Fox and Newmax paid dearly for their lies and still they deny it. Weird.....
 
15th post
Yes it is but that person likes to deflect.
Wrong again dumbass and as usual, you lie again. The topic flowed as Babbitt would not have been killed if Trump had not instigated the riot that resulted in her death. Byrd was doing his job defending the Capitol which would not have been necessary but for Trump's actions leading up to the riot.
 
Last edited:

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom