You're lying, gramps, I linked it in post #917.
Which contains a court document that is UNSIGNED and not filled in, and looks like the counterpart of a blank check. And also, it is nebulous in what it is even talking about, ,which is characteristic of legal mumbo jumbo that only lawyers and judges understand (sometimes)
So getting back to what this discussion is all about, it is beginning to appear that the absurd claims by leftist liars that Sydney Powell said her claims on election were not reasonable, are just that >absurd. Nowhere in this thread is there one word spoken by Sydney Powell about anything like that. There is a quote from her lawyers (if you believe NBC news (I don't necessarily) which says >> "“Plaintiffs themselves characterize the statements at issue as 'wild accusations' and 'outlandish claims,'"
her lawyers wrote. "They are repeatedly labeled 'inherently improbable' and even 'impossible.' Such characterizations of the allegedly defamatory statements further support defendant’s position that reasonable people would not accept such statements as fact but view them only as claims that await testing by the courts through the adversary process."
It appears that the alleged defamatory statements are statements from Dominion about Sydney Powell, whom Dominion was filing a defamation suit against.
Even if the quote (not from Sydney Powell) had been talking about Powell's words, note that in the end, it states >>
"reasonable people would not accept such statements as fact but view them only as claims that await testing by the courts through the adversary process." - indicating a view of confidence in the evidence, and wanting to have the evidence be reviewed and tested.
It's also noteworthy that in court proceedings lawyers sometime say things that are ambivalent to their clients, and contrary to their interests. I remember having a lawyer in a civil suit once, when after hearing this guy talking to the judge, I said to him, WHAAAT ? What are you talking about . Whose side are you on ? Nobody here has presented one word of anything from Sydney Powell except BWK in Post # 959, and that was entirely in support of her position that the election was riddled with fraud.
In that post, BWK posted a video of Sydney Powell talking about the election fraud. Not one word from her in that video (post # 959) is anything like Powell disparaging her own words, and all of it is 100% strongly worded against election fraud having occured in the 2020 election, THAT is her opinion and always has been.
This blabbering about Sydney Powell besmirching herself is ludicrous, and just another example of looney leftist propaganda, akin to the dopey Russian collusion hoax.
If anybody wants to know what Sydney Powell thinks about 2020 election fraud, all they need do is watch the video from beginning to 2:50 on the time bar, before some leftist idiot starts blabbering. >>>
