If Trump Is Really A Convicted Felon

[Road Runner]

White 6

Here's another thing to consider.

 

[meaner gene]

What I remember is the judge kept delaying it closer to Election Day. Trump didn't have anything to do with it.

What your bingo brain remembers is supposed to be evidence of something?

What he is referring to is the delay because Trump's lawyers filed a motion to dismiss based on the USSC case granting presidential immunity.
The judge delayed in response to the Trump's motions.

 

[Captain Caveman]

Is that a legal term or just your favorite cosplay character?

You get TV shows in the UK on cowboy builders, those that do shit work, rip the customer off etc.. But you also get cowboy customers too with zero TV coverage, those with no intention of paying. You see YouTube videos of tradesmen smashing their work because the customer failed to pay.

If anyone thinks Trump is unique in not paying for his benefit, then they're green behind the ears and an uneducated clown.

 

[Road Runner]

What he is referring to is the delay because Trump's lawyers filed a motion to dismiss based on the USSC case granting presidential immunity.
The judge delayed in response to the Trump's motions.

As I just said even if it is true the judge picked odd dates that were interfering with the election.

 

[White 6]

I was going to say that if he was indicted it wasn't with all that major stuff as that was last summer so that was something different as that wasn't part of the eighty or ninety something indictments.




Point me to an article where Trump is asking to have it delayed and then I'll take it back.



True enough but I was looking at the actual numbers then. I can find a graph for you if you want to but mostly I've gone by what other people have posted on here.

Read Reuters, the gave some number. Seriously, you believed in some fake crap on the internet. You hear me joke about how stupid Republican lawyers are, but that one is too easily proven. Even they aren't stupid enough to take that into a court, unless trying to get disbarred.

 

[Arlette]

In a criminal case, you have the 6th amendment and the speedy trials act. Which prevents the prosecution from delaying a case without the express acceptance of the delay by the defendant.
Any illegal delay is grounds for dismissal of all charges.

True but Trumpy never invoked his rights to a speedy trial. Innocent people want a speedy trial to get the thing over with as soon as possible. Trump's lawyers filed endless motions, often frivolous, to delay the trial.

 

[meaner gene]

Even if that's true then the judge took advantage of it and used it to interfere with the election.

Actually just the opposite. The judge delayed judgement until AFTER the election, so as not to interfere with the election.

 

[Road Runner]

Actually just the opposite. The judge delayed judgement until AFTER the election, so as not to interfere with the election.

Now that is bogus! He might have delayed it now but it was originally set for September and then November.

 

[Curried Goats]

I was going to say that if he was indicted it wasn't with all that major stuff as that was last summer so that was something different as that wasn't part of the eighty or ninety something indictments.

Your "stuff" argument isn't really clear. The wiki page lists multiple indictments Trump received in 2023 in four separate districts.

Point me to an article where Trump is asking to have it delayed and then I'll take it back.

He delayed his trials through filing motions in court. I figured a knowledgeable internet prosecutor like yourself would be familiar with the process.

Supreme Court takes up Trump immunity appeal - SCOTUSblog

Trump was indicted in Aug. 2023 on four counts arising from Special Counsel Jack Smith’s investigation into the Jan. 6, 2021, attacks on the U.S. Capitol.

U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan originally set a trial date of Mar. 4, 2024, for Trump’s case. But in early February, she threw that date out and indicated that she would set a new one “if and when” Trump’s immunity claims are resolved...

...Trump came to the Supreme Court on Feb. 12, seeking to have the D.C. Circuit’s ruling put on hold to give him time to file a petition for review of that decision and, if possible, reconsideration by the full D.C. Circuit. He stressed the importance of “thoughtful consideration,” particularly when – he warned – allowing the D.C. Circuit’s decision to stand could lead to “destructive cycles of recrimination,” in which future presidents face criminal prosecutions for their actions, thereby clouding their ability to do their job effectively.

 

[Arlette]

Even if that's true then the judge took advantage of it and used it to interfere with the election.

No. That's the garbage that Trump was feeding you. Merchant ruled on every one of Trump's motions as they came before him. Just one motion gets a trial over earlier than 25 of em.

 

[Curried Goats]

You get TV shows in the UK on cowboy builders, those that do shit work, rip the customer off etc.. But you also get cowboy customers too with zero TV coverage, those with no intention of paying. You see YouTube videos of tradesmen smashing their work because the customer failed to pay.

If anyone thinks Trump is unique in not paying for his benefit, then they're green behind the ears and an uneducated clown.

I don't see any of this. It's the first I'm hearing of this term. Kind of just sounds like you're talking about fraud and trying to justify it with the, "everyone is doing it" argument.

 

[meaner gene]

Now that is bogus! He might have delayed it now but it was originally set for September and then November.

And in response to each date set, Trump's lawy3ers filed a motion to dismiss, retry, or appeal, requiring the judge to answer each motion before proceeding to judgement.

 

[Road Runner]

Your "stuff" argument isn't really clear. The wiki page lists multiple indictments Trump received in 2023 in four separate districts.

He delayed his trials through filing motions in court. I figured a knowledgeable internet prosecutor like yourself would be familiar with the process.

Supreme Court takes up Trump immunity appeal - SCOTUSblog

Trump was indicted in Aug. 2023 on four counts arising from Special Counsel Jack Smith’s investigation into the Jan. 6, 2021, attacks on the U.S. Capitol.

U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan originally set a trial date of Mar. 4, 2024, for Trump’s case. But in early February, she threw that date out and indicated that she would set a new one “if and when” Trump’s immunity claims are resolved...

...Trump came to the Supreme Court on Feb. 12, seeking to have the D.C. Circuit’s ruling put on hold to give him time to file a petition for review of that decision and, if possible, reconsideration by the full D.C. Circuit. He stressed the importance of “thoughtful consideration,” particularly when – he warned – allowing the D.C. Circuit’s decision to stand could lead to “destructive cycles of recrimination,” in which future presidents face criminal prosecutions for their actions, thereby clouding their ability to do their job effectively.

Trump had a reason to ask for the delay then. You made it seem like he was doing it just to get off the hook.

 

[Road Runner]

And in response to each date set, Trump's lawy3ers filed a motion to dismiss, retry, or appeal, requiring the judge to answer each motion before proceeding to judgement.

Even if that's so Trump's lawyer isn't Trump.

 

[White 6]

White 6

Here's another thing to consider.

What, Reuters is not recognized as a valid, historic news source, but random posters on YouTube are.

Looks like everybody is in agreement on this one.

 

[meaner gene]

Trump had a reason to ask for the delay then. You made it seem like he was doing it just to get off the hook.

Trump lost each of the the motions. Which means there was no justification to file the motion, other than to delay.

 

[Curried Goats]

Trump had a reason to ask for the delay then. You made it seem like he was doing it just to get off the hook.

I didn't comment at whether he had a valid reason to ask for a delay. He did by the way. If I were him I would of used every legal weapon available to me as well. The problem is that you went from denying he delayed his own trials to arguing that he had every right to and you did it obviously, in front of all of us. That's funny in its fragility.

 

[Arlette]

And in response to each date set, Trump's lawy3ers filed a motion to dismiss, retry, or appeal, requiring the judge to answer each motion before proceeding to judgement.

But her Trumpy said something different. Her Trumpy said the whole case amounted to election interference. Dragging his fat ass into court was the interference. And that's that. That dumb heffer is a waste of time.

 

[Road Runner]

What, Reuters is not recognized as a valid, historic news source, but random posters on YouTube are.
View attachment 1061333
View attachment 1061334
View attachment 1061335
View attachment 1061336
View attachment 1061337
View attachment 1061339
View attachment 1061340
View attachment 1061341
View attachment 1061342
View attachment 1061343
View attachment 1061344
View attachment 1061345
View attachment 1061346
View attachment 1061347
View attachment 1061348
Looks like everybody is in agreement on this one.

No they're not as that's an actual graph.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

If Trump had lost the election he would be headed for prison

On what charge? What has he been convicted of other than paperwork errors ginned up as a crime?