If trump has the mandate he claims to have.............

[jc456]

Stay stupid my friend.
MAGAts....even when they win they lose.
FOXTROT
DELTA
TANGO

Who’s president?

 

[Independent thinker]

.........https://www.npr.org/2025/03/26/nx-s1-5336728/trump-is-making-many-moves-and-he-says-he-has-a-mandate-that-justifies-them

............why is he enacting his autocratic agenda by way of EO's and not legislation?

Repubs control Congress. So where are all the "popular" bills?

Why do you think Joe Biden and others did the same thing?

 

[sartre play]

Nah. You’re flatly wrong. As well as retarded.

You cannot support your claim. And you sure haven’t.

Make it easier on yourself, you dopey twat. Start with actual definitions. That way you may not have to keep highlighting your ignorance and retardation.

I’ll even help you since you’re clearly too handicapped to help yourself.

Look up the meaning of “mandate.” It means “authority” to govern.

The winner of our elections have exactly that. The authority to govern. The losers don’t.

So you turn off ALL other Americans & give kingship to ANY political party that wins an election?

 

[jc456]

Why do you think Joe Biden and others did the same thing?

why does any president? what the fk all the attention just at Trump when they were crickets to all others? I know that's rhetorical.

 

[dblack]

why does any president? what the fk all the attention just at Trump when they were crickets to all others? I know that's rhetorical.

I didn't cricket. Rule by EO is bullshit. It was bullshit when Bush did it. Bullshit when Obama did and bullshit when Biden did it. And it's still bullshit when Trump does it. It's the opposite of a mandate.

 

[Independent thinker]

why does any president? what the fk all the attention just at Trump when they were crickets to all others? I know that's rhetorical.

I really couldn't fathom how democrats could be any more hypocritical than they had been but ever since Trump took office they have been outdoing themselves, exponentially. No one will every catch up to them when it comes to hypocrisy.

 

[dblack]

Why do you think Joe Biden and others did the same thing?

Because they didn't have a mandate.

 

[jc456]

I didn't cricket. Rule by EO is bullshit. It was bullshit when Bush did it. Bullshit when Obama did and bullshit when Biden did it. And it's still bullshit when Trump does it. It's the opposite of a mandate.

I don't consider you demofk, there's that.

 

[toobfreak]

............why is he enacting his autocratic agenda by way of EO's and not legislation?

What a stupid question. You just want to slow Trump down. It is up to Congress to enact legislation and that takes time, and democrats continually block the efforts.

But Congress should be trying to make as many of his EOs permanent law as possible.

First, we need to win more seats in both Houses in the midterms.

 

[Mac1958]

Because they didn't have a mandate.

I just expect that fuckin' word any time anyone wins now.

All it means is, "we're taking this win as an excuse to shove all our shit down your throat".

Ideologues never think about a possible downside to their actions, ever.

 

[jc456]

I really couldn't fathom how democrats could be any more hypocritical than they had been but ever since Trump took office they have been outdoing themselves, exponentially. No one will every catch up to them when it comes to hypocrisy.

I can't see them ever recovering from this. They laid out all their cards and exposed themselves as traitors to americans, against women's rights and assisting pedophilia. Climate is now over after wuhan 19 was debunked as faked by demofks and the global contributors.

 

[jc456]

I just expect that fuckin' word any time anyone wins now.

All it means is, "we're taking this win as an excuse to shove all our shit down your throat".

Ideologues never think about a possible downside to their actions, ever.

I don't think one word makes up policy. What would you expect from someone winning? Defer to the losing team for their policies to push? You can't truly be that fking stupid. What I would expect is the losing team to present ideas that might work together to make Americans better off rather than just leave americans for illegals.

 

[struth]

I didn't cricket. Rule by EO is bullshit. It was bullshit when Bush did it. Bullshit when Obama did and bullshit when Biden did it. And it's still bullshit when Trump does it. It's the opposite of a mandate.

Was it when. Washington did it?

 

[struth]

I just expect that fuckin' word any time anyone wins now.

All it means is, "we're taking this win as an excuse to shove all our shit down your throat".

Ideologues never think about a possible downside to their actions, ever.

When did that not happen?

“Elections have consequences”. Obama

 

[BackAgain]

So you turn off ALL other Americans & give kingship to ANY political party that wins an election?

No. Not even close to anything I’ve said or believe. You don’t understand those “word” things.

But at least you’ve established how moronic you are.

 

[berg80]

Why do you think Joe Biden and others did the same thing?

They didn't issue EO's on nearly the scale trump has (he set a record) while trump has passed a record low number of bills in the first 100 days in over half a decade.

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump has leaned heavily on executive power to remake the federal government at the outset of his new administration, largely leaving Congress on the sidelines.

Instead of relying on members of the Republican-controlled House and Senate to pass laws to give him new authorities, Trump has sought to bypass Congress by invoking or repurposing existing laws to carry out his agenda since taking office in January. And he’s received widespread support from his party on Capitol Hill, with Democrats mostly powerless to rein him in.

Trump has so far signed just five bills into law — fewer than any president in the first 100 days of an administration since at least Dwight D. Eisenhower in the 1950s, according to an NBC News analysis of data in the congressional record. By this time during his first term, Trump had signed 30 bills into law. In their first 100 days, Barack Obama had enacted 14 bills and Joe Biden had signed 11.

Trump signs few laws in first 100 days as he pushes to expand executive power

Trump has largely bypassed the Republican-led Congress to pursue his agenda at the outset of the new administration, a break from his first term.

www.nbcnews.com

One again you folks rely on a false equivalence.

 

[BackAgain]

They didn't issue EO's on nearly the scale trump has (he set a record) while trump has passed a record low number of bills in the first 100 days in over half a decade.

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump has leaned heavily on executive power to remake the federal government at the outset of his new administration, largely leaving Congress on the sidelines.

Instead of relying on members of the Republican-controlled House and Senate to pass laws to give him new authorities, Trump has sought to bypass Congress by invoking or repurposing existing laws to carry out his agenda since taking office in January. And he’s received widespread support from his party on Capitol Hill, with Democrats mostly powerless to rein him in.

Trump has so far signed just five bills into law — fewer than any president in the first 100 days of an administration since at least Dwight D. Eisenhower in the 1950s, according to an NBC News analysis of data in the congressional record. By this time during his first term, Trump had signed 30 bills into law. In their first 100 days, Barack Obama had enacted 14 bills and Joe Biden had signed 11.

Trump signs few laws in first 100 days as he pushes to expand executive power

Trump has largely bypassed the Republican-led Congress to pursue his agenda at the outset of the new administration, a break from his first term.

www.nbcnews.com

One again you folks rely on a false equivalence.

What simpleton turds like ^ bug always get confused over is that SOME Executive Orders are perfectly valid while others may not be valid. Morons like bug don’t bother with making that distinction when they are having menstrual cramps over Orange Man Bad.

 

[dblack]

Was it when. Washington did it?

I'm not sure. I'd need to do some research. And I'm way too lazy for that.

I guess it depends what the EOs. They're there because there are legitimate uses for them. But lately, Presidents have been using them to work around Congress. Which IS bullshit.

 

[dblack]

“Elections have consequences”. Obama

This was the worst thing Obama ever said. But it does highlight what's broken about our government. Winning an election is not a license to ram all your shit down everyone else's throats.

 

[struth]

This was the worst thing Obama ever said. But it does highlight what's broken about our government. Winning an election is not a license to ram all your shit down everyone else's throats.

Agreed, hence why we have the senate