If Trump Does Not Go To War With Iran, We Will Need To Thank One Man

TruthSeeker112125

Platinum Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2025
Messages
1,190
Reaction score
724
Points
903
Chuck Baldwin, is known as a "Black Robed Minister" along the lines of Patrick Henry, who gave the speech "Give me Liberty or Give me Death", shortly before the Revolutionary War with England.

At first, I was "Totally Accepting" Mr. Baldwin, but over time, & especially after paying strict attention to Mr. Balwin's stated beliefs, be they "Political", &/or "Spiritual", I now no longer "rush in" to accepting what he states.

What did catch my attention in this article is the reference to U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee's statement about "Israel claiming land from the River to the Sea", which is an Unfulfilled Prophecy, BUT,..... Not for Today's World, especially when Israel is dependent upon many "Sunni Muslim Nations", via the "Abraham Accords"!



I Believe that if the Trump Administration, doesn't straighten out what Huckabee stated, & very quickly,..... Trump Attacking Iran, could quickly turn into a Major Catastrophe.

===============================


"Natural News picks up the assessment:

Huckabee's statement caused immediate and unified condemnation from over a dozen Arab and Muslim-majority nations, including Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and Egypt. The ministries of foreign affairs for these nations issued a joint statement expressing 'strong condemnation and profound concern,' labeling the remarks a 'flagrant violation of the principles of international law' and a 'grave threat to the security and stability of the region.' In a single interview, Huckabee unmasked a dangerous philosophy of divine conquest that is fundamentally incompatible with peaceful coexistence and human civilization itself.

The diplomatic fallout from Huckabee's interview was immediate and catastrophic for US strategic interests. The public, unified condemnation from 14 or more Arab and Muslim-majority nations was an unprecedented diplomatic earthquake. Their joint statement affirmed 'their country's categorical rejection of such dangerous and inflammatory remarks' and warned that 'the continuation of Israel's expansionist policies and unlawful measures will only inflame violence and conflict in the region.' Huckabee's words validated these nations' deepest fears about the 'Greater Israel' project, exposing the United States not as an honest broker but as an enthusiastic partner in a plan for regional conquest.

The timing of this rift could not have been more damaging to US military strategy. As Prather analyzed, 'Huckabee just decimated American-Arab relations just before Trump's Iran war for Israel!' The trust required for basing and overflight rights evaporated overnight. Reports confirmed that Saudi Arabia denied the United States the right to use its airspace for a potential strike on Iran, and other Gulf states likely followed. Combined with the UK's refusal to allow the use of bases like Diego Garcia, the US plan for an air war against Iran became 'doubly difficult,' if not impossible. In this light, Tucker Carlson's simple act of journalism—asking a direct question and demanding an answer—may have inadvertently stopped a march toward world war by exposing the true agenda and destroying the necessary alliances.

Read this again:

The trust required for basing and overflight rights evaporated overnight. Reports confirmed that Saudi Arabia denied the United States the right to use its airspace for a potential strike on Iran, and other Gulf states likely followed. Combined with the UK's refusal to allow the use of bases like Diego Garcia, the US plan for an air war against Iran became 'doubly difficult,' if not impossible."



 
Israel has a claim for the entire region, "from the river to the sea." The so-called "Palestinians" also have a similar claim to the same territory. The Israeli (Jewish) claim is based on the Torah; the Palestinians claim is based on more recent history and Muslim sources. This is called, "conflicting claims," and they are ubiquitous around the globe. We Americans reside on disputed lands and almost everyone recognizes it.

There was nothing controversial or "wrong" about Huckabee's statement.
 
What is the current rationale? Stopping the slaughter of protesters or keeping Iran from having a nuclear weapon? Or the unspoken one? Deflecting attention from abject failure and the latest revelations about the missing Epstein file documents.
 
What is the current rationale? Stopping the slaughter of protesters or keeping Iran from having a nuclear weapon? Or the unspoken one? Deflecting attention from abject failure and the latest revelations about the missing Epstein file documents.
Berg, & anyone that cares,.... The "Rationale" is "Orwellian" in My Belief.
 
Chuck Baldwin, is known as a "Black Robed Minister" along the lines of Patrick Henry, who gave the speech "Give me Liberty or Give me Death", shortly before the Revolutionary War with England.

At first, I was "Totally Accepting" Mr. Baldwin, but over time, & especially after paying strict attention to Mr. Balwin's stated beliefs, be they "Political", &/or "Spiritual", I now no longer "rush in" to accepting what he states.

What did catch my attention in this article is the reference to U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee's statement about "Israel claiming land from the River to the Sea", which is an Unfulfilled Prophecy, BUT,..... Not for Today's World, especially when Israel is dependent upon many "Sunni Muslim Nations", via the "Abraham Accords"!




I Believe that if the Trump Administration, doesn't straighten out what Huckabee stated, & very quickly,..... Trump Attacking Iran, could quickly turn into a Major Catastrophe.

===============================


"Natural News picks up the assessment:

Huckabee's statement caused immediate and unified condemnation from over a dozen Arab and Muslim-majority nations, including Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and Egypt. The ministries of foreign affairs for these nations issued a joint statement expressing 'strong condemnation and profound concern,' labeling the remarks a 'flagrant violation of the principles of international law' and a 'grave threat to the security and stability of the region.' In a single interview, Huckabee unmasked a dangerous philosophy of divine conquest that is fundamentally incompatible with peaceful coexistence and human civilization itself.

The diplomatic fallout from Huckabee's interview was immediate and catastrophic for US strategic interests. The public, unified condemnation from 14 or more Arab and Muslim-majority nations was an unprecedented diplomatic earthquake. Their joint statement affirmed 'their country's categorical rejection of such dangerous and inflammatory remarks' and warned that 'the continuation of Israel's expansionist policies and unlawful measures will only inflame violence and conflict in the region.' Huckabee's words validated these nations' deepest fears about the 'Greater Israel' project, exposing the United States not as an honest broker but as an enthusiastic partner in a plan for regional conquest.

The timing of this rift could not have been more damaging to US military strategy. As Prather analyzed, 'Huckabee just decimated American-Arab relations just before Trump's Iran war for Israel!' The trust required for basing and overflight rights evaporated overnight. Reports confirmed that Saudi Arabia denied the United States the right to use its airspace for a potential strike on Iran, and other Gulf states likely followed. Combined with the UK's refusal to allow the use of bases like Diego Garcia, the US plan for an air war against Iran became 'doubly difficult,' if not impossible. In this light, Tucker Carlson's simple act of journalism—asking a direct question and demanding an answer—may have inadvertently stopped a march toward world war by exposing the true agenda and destroying the necessary alliances.

Read this again:

The trust required for basing and overflight rights evaporated overnight. Reports confirmed that Saudi Arabia denied the United States the right to use its airspace for a potential strike on Iran, and other Gulf states likely followed. Combined with the UK's refusal to allow the use of bases like Diego Garcia, the US plan for an air war against Iran became 'doubly difficult,' if not impossible."




Thank God HuckaBibi said what he did, when he did!

No one wants to support the US of Israel now. We'll have to go to India as the nearest ally

Oh and where's the IDF, are they on the front lines in Iran?
 
What is the current rationale? Stopping the slaughter of protesters or keeping Iran from having a nuclear weapon? Or the unspoken one? Deflecting attention from abject failure and the latest revelations about the missing Epstein file documents.

Are we still blowing up Miami Vice boats in the Caribbean?
 
Thank God HuckaBibi said what he did, when he did!

No one wants to support the US of Israel now. We'll have to go to India as the nearest ally

Oh and where's the IDF, are they on the front lines in Iran?
Crusader,.... Israel needs the "Sunni Nations" that have signed the Abraham Accords, not only as Trade Allies, but in the near future, even Military Allies. Unless of course the Trump Admin., "Drops th' ball" on this one.
 
Israel has a claim for the entire region, "from the river to the sea." The so-called "Palestinians" also have a similar claim to the same territory. The Israeli (Jewish) claim is based on the Torah; the Palestinians claim is based on more recent history and Muslim sources. This is called, "conflicting claims," and they are ubiquitous around the globe. We Americans reside on disputed lands and almost everyone recognizes it.

There was nothing controversial or "wrong" about Huckabee's statement.
So you're a Zionist I take it?
 
President Donald Trump on Friday said that “I’d love not to use” the U.S. military to attack Iran, “but sometimes you have to.”

But Trump also said, “We haven’t made a final decision” on whether to attack Iran.

“We’ll see what happens,” he said. “We’re talking later today. We’ll have some additional talks today.”

Trump’s comment to reporters outside the White House came after he expressed frustration at Iran’s refusal to comply with American demands to curb its nuclear program.


This isn't one of those times.

As they made their public case this week for another American military campaign against Iran, President Trump and his aides asserted that Iran has restarted its nuclear program, has enough available nuclear material to build a bomb within days, and is developing long-range missiles that will soon be capable of hitting the United States.

All three of these claims are either false or unproven.

American and European government officials, international weapons monitoring groups and reports from American intelligence agencies give a far different picture of the urgency of the Iran threat than the one the White House has presented in recent days.

Iran has taken steps to dig out the nuclear facilities hit during strikes last June by Israel and the United States, and it has resumed work at some sites long known to American spy agencies. But the officials said that there isn’t evidence that Iran has made active efforts to resume enriching uranium or trying to build a mechanism to detonate a bomb.

The stockpiles of uranium that Iran has already enriched remain buried after last year’s strikes, making it nearly impossible for Iran to build a bomb “within days.”


If he didn't want war there'd be no consideration of it.
 
President Donald Trump on Friday said that “I’d love not to use” the U.S. military to attack Iran, “but sometimes you have to.”

But Trump also said, “We haven’t made a final decision” on whether to attack Iran.

“We’ll see what happens,” he said. “We’re talking later today. We’ll have some additional talks today.”

Trump’s comment to reporters outside the White House came after he expressed frustration at Iran’s refusal to comply with American demands to curb its nuclear program.


This isn't one of those times.

As they made their public case this week for another American military campaign against Iran, President Trump and his aides asserted that Iran has restarted its nuclear program, has enough available nuclear material to build a bomb within days, and is developing long-range missiles that will soon be capable of hitting the United States.

All three of these claims are either false or unproven.

American and European government officials, international weapons monitoring groups and reports from American intelligence agencies give a far different picture of the urgency of the Iran threat than the one the White House has presented in recent days.

Iran has taken steps to dig out the nuclear facilities hit during strikes last June by Israel and the United States, and it has resumed work at some sites long known to American spy agencies. But the officials said that there isn’t evidence that Iran has made active efforts to resume enriching uranium or trying to build a mechanism to detonate a bomb.

The stockpiles of uranium that Iran has already enriched remain buried after last year’s strikes, making it nearly impossible for Iran to build a bomb “within days.”


If he didn't want war there'd be no consideration of it.
"As they made their public case this week for another American military campaign against Iran, President Trump and his aides asserted that Iran has restarted its nuclear program, has enough available nuclear material to build a bomb within days, and is developing long-range missiles that will soon be capable of hitting the United States."

That sounds like the same precursor Bush Jr. used before invading Iraq!


Is Trump still whining about not getting the "Nobel Peace Prize"?
 
President Donald Trump on Friday said that “I’d love not to use” the U.S. military to attack Iran, “but sometimes you have to.”

But Trump also said, “We haven’t made a final decision” on whether to attack Iran.

“We’ll see what happens,” he said. “We’re talking later today. We’ll have some additional talks today.”

Trump’s comment to reporters outside the White House came after he expressed frustration at Iran’s refusal to comply with American demands to curb its nuclear program.


This isn't one of those times.

As they made their public case this week for another American military campaign against Iran, President Trump and his aides asserted that Iran has restarted its nuclear program, has enough available nuclear material to build a bomb within days, and is developing long-range missiles that will soon be capable of hitting the United States.

All three of these claims are either false or unproven.

American and European government officials, international weapons monitoring groups and reports from American intelligence agencies give a far different picture of the urgency of the Iran threat than the one the White House has presented in recent days.

Iran has taken steps to dig out the nuclear facilities hit during strikes last June by Israel and the United States, and it has resumed work at some sites long known to American spy agencies. But the officials said that there isn’t evidence that Iran has made active efforts to resume enriching uranium or trying to build a mechanism to detonate a bomb.

The stockpiles of uranium that Iran has already enriched remain buried after last year’s strikes, making it nearly impossible for Iran to build a bomb “within days.”


If he didn't want war there'd be no consideration of it.
Are you trying to be relevant? It's not working.
 
Israel is not threatening war if the arabs do not evacuate all of ancient Israel

The Jews are quite satisfied with the area they have now
 
15th post
What is the current rationale? Stopping the slaughter of protesters or keeping Iran from having a nuclear weapon? Or the unspoken one? Deflecting attention from abject failure and the latest revelations about the missing Epstein file documents.
If Iran had a nuke, Israel would not exist today.
 
Trump Ayatollah 2.webp
 
President Donald Trump on Friday said that “I’d love not to use” the U.S. military to attack Iran, “but sometimes you have to.”

But Trump also said, “We haven’t made a final decision” on whether to attack Iran.

“We’ll see what happens,” he said. “We’re talking later today. We’ll have some additional talks today.”

Trump’s comment to reporters outside the White House came after he expressed frustration at Iran’s refusal to comply with American demands to curb its nuclear program.


This isn't one of those times.

As they made their public case this week for another American military campaign against Iran, President Trump and his aides asserted that Iran has restarted its nuclear program, has enough available nuclear material to build a bomb within days, and is developing long-range missiles that will soon be capable of hitting the United States.

All three of these claims are either false or unproven.

American and European government officials, international weapons monitoring groups and reports from American intelligence agencies give a far different picture of the urgency of the Iran threat than the one the White House has presented in recent days.

Iran has taken steps to dig out the nuclear facilities hit during strikes last June by Israel and the United States, and it has resumed work at some sites long known to American spy agencies. But the officials said that there isn’t evidence that Iran has made active efforts to resume enriching uranium or trying to build a mechanism to detonate a bomb.

The stockpiles of uranium that Iran has already enriched remain buried after last year’s strikes, making it nearly impossible for Iran to build a bomb “within days.”


If he didn't want war there'd be no consideration of it.
Trump is a lying sack of shit who knew weeks ago that we were going to attack Iran.
 
Back
Top Bottom