If todays whites must own white history of 1800s, Dems of today own Dem history then too.

[Correll]

Sooooooooooooo, because in this one particular instance, a con brought up slavery, that invalidates that claim that libs keep bringing up slavery?

That does not logically follow.

That fact that you thought it did and then called me an idiot is very funny.

LIberals. All the self awareness of a turnip.

There's a search function on this forum, moron. If you type in "slavery" most of the threads on this topic are started by your fellow idiots.


JimBowie1958--Why was Antebellum Southern Slavery Immoral?

JimBowie1958--Adam Kotsko, White Proff, Says White People Need to Commit Mass Suicide as Repayment for Slavery

RexxTaylor--Ready For The 2016 Coward Excuses? Lack of Funding, The GOP, Started Under Bush and Slavery!

2aguy--On this day Republicans accepted surrender of democrats...slavery ends, dems start jim crow...

Thread titles don't address the fact that libs are always bringing up slavery.

Do you believe that a big part of the reason that blacks lag behind whites in socio-economic status is because of the "legacy of slavery"?

It addresses the fact that you're full of shit.

And to answer your idiot question, which I will point out, is YOU bringing up slavery, I think there is a lack of opportunity and still a lot of racism that exists even today. Yes, I think the cards are stacked against the black community, starting with our justice system.

Again, the reason you and your fellow idiots keep bringing up slavery, and racism from way back when, is to deny that racism exists in your party today.

Sorry. I've run into this before. YOu did not cleary state your answer. If i respond as though you did, then you will complain that I am putting words in your mouth.

Do you believe that the "legacy of slavery" is a big part of why blacks lag behind whites in socio-economic status?

Why are you always bringing up slavery? I am more focused on the NOW. I answered your question, you just didn't like the answer.

No. YOu did not. YOur answer focused on supposed racism "today", "cards stacked against them" and the "justice system".

You in no way answered my question.


WHy? I'm trying to make a simple point about modern liberalism.

You don't need to worry, I don't play stupid gotcha games.

Yes or no. I will make my point, you can disagree and the conversation will move forward.

 

[Carla_Danger]

I can agree with you there. These historical grievances need to be put down. Life and times were different back in those days. We've come a long way as

a society from those days of slavery and utter ignorance. I just don't see this as one of the important issues to be focusing on.

If Republican's focus on racism among Democrats pre-Civil Rights Act of 1964, they don't have to focus on the racism that is rampant among the Republican party NOW.

An excellent point there.

Yes. YOU LIBS love to make every discussion about racism, real or imagined, in the GOP the issue.


Not self serving at all.

I see now you have changed your allegations of us bringing up slavery, to us bringing up racism. Good job on keeping up with the pace!

The fact that libs love to smear the gop with racism, does not change the fact that they also bring up slavery a lot. They have many intellectually dishonest and morally bankrupt tactics to avoid dealing honestly and seriously with any issues.

Yet you are the only one bringing up slavery.

 

[Correll]

If Republican's focus on racism among Democrats pre-Civil Rights Act of 1964, they don't have to focus on the racism that is rampant among the Republican party NOW.

An excellent point there.

Yes. YOU LIBS love to make every discussion about racism, real or imagined, in the GOP the issue.


Not self serving at all.

I see now you have changed your allegations of us bringing up slavery, to us bringing up racism. Good job on keeping up with the pace!

The fact that libs love to smear the gop with racism, does not change the fact that they also bring up slavery a lot. They have many intellectually dishonest and morally bankrupt tactics to avoid dealing honestly and seriously with any issues.

Yet you are the only one bringing up slavery.

The fact that I am bringing it up now as part of a thread where it is on topic does not undermine my claim that libs love to bring it up a lot.

You do grasp that right?

Your point does nothing to address my point.

 

[Carla_Danger]

There's a search function on this forum, moron. If you type in "slavery" most of the threads on this topic are started by your fellow idiots.


JimBowie1958--Why was Antebellum Southern Slavery Immoral?

JimBowie1958--Adam Kotsko, White Proff, Says White People Need to Commit Mass Suicide as Repayment for Slavery

RexxTaylor--Ready For The 2016 Coward Excuses? Lack of Funding, The GOP, Started Under Bush and Slavery!

2aguy--On this day Republicans accepted surrender of democrats...slavery ends, dems start jim crow...

Thread titles don't address the fact that libs are always bringing up slavery.

Do you believe that a big part of the reason that blacks lag behind whites in socio-economic status is because of the "legacy of slavery"?

It addresses the fact that you're full of shit.

And to answer your idiot question, which I will point out, is YOU bringing up slavery, I think there is a lack of opportunity and still a lot of racism that exists even today. Yes, I think the cards are stacked against the black community, starting with our justice system.

Again, the reason you and your fellow idiots keep bringing up slavery, and racism from way back when, is to deny that racism exists in your party today.

Sorry. I've run into this before. YOu did not cleary state your answer. If i respond as though you did, then you will complain that I am putting words in your mouth.

Do you believe that the "legacy of slavery" is a big part of why blacks lag behind whites in socio-economic status?

Why are you always bringing up slavery? I am more focused on the NOW. I answered your question, you just didn't like the answer.

No. YOu did not. YOur answer focused on supposed racism "today", "cards stacked against them" and the "justice system".

You in no way answered my question.


WHy? I'm trying to make a simple point about modern liberalism.

You don't need to worry, I don't play stupid gotcha games.

Yes or no. I will make my point, you can disagree and the conversation will move forward.

Part of your question is why the black community lags behind on socio-economic issues, and I gave you perfect examples.

That is the point of this thread. The libs keep bringing up slavery, when it serves their agenda, but dismiss the past when it does not.

It appears that YOU keep bringing up slavery because it serves YOUR agenda.

 

[Correll]

Thread titles don't address the fact that libs are always bringing up slavery.

Do you believe that a big part of the reason that blacks lag behind whites in socio-economic status is because of the "legacy of slavery"?

It addresses the fact that you're full of shit.

And to answer your idiot question, which I will point out, is YOU bringing up slavery, I think there is a lack of opportunity and still a lot of racism that exists even today. Yes, I think the cards are stacked against the black community, starting with our justice system.

Again, the reason you and your fellow idiots keep bringing up slavery, and racism from way back when, is to deny that racism exists in your party today.

Sorry. I've run into this before. YOu did not cleary state your answer. If i respond as though you did, then you will complain that I am putting words in your mouth.

Do you believe that the "legacy of slavery" is a big part of why blacks lag behind whites in socio-economic status?

Why are you always bringing up slavery? I am more focused on the NOW. I answered your question, you just didn't like the answer.

No. YOu did not. YOur answer focused on supposed racism "today", "cards stacked against them" and the "justice system".

You in no way answered my question.


WHy? I'm trying to make a simple point about modern liberalism.

You don't need to worry, I don't play stupid gotcha games.

Yes or no. I will make my point, you can disagree and the conversation will move forward.

Part of your question is why the black community lags behind on socio-economic issues, and I gave you perfect examples.

That is the point of this thread. The libs keep bringing up slavery, when it serves their agenda, but dismiss the past when it does not.

It appears that YOU keep bringing up slavery because it serves YOUR agenda.

I asked you if you believed that slavery was a big part of the reason that blacks lag behind white in socio economic status.

YOu discussed reasons that you believe that blacks lag behind whites in socio economic status.

That answer in no way addressed your view on whether the legacy of slavery is also a big part of the lag.

Why are you afraid to answer this simple question?

 

[Carla_Danger]

It addresses the fact that you're full of shit.

And to answer your idiot question, which I will point out, is YOU bringing up slavery, I think there is a lack of opportunity and still a lot of racism that exists even today. Yes, I think the cards are stacked against the black community, starting with our justice system.

Again, the reason you and your fellow idiots keep bringing up slavery, and racism from way back when, is to deny that racism exists in your party today.

Sorry. I've run into this before. YOu did not cleary state your answer. If i respond as though you did, then you will complain that I am putting words in your mouth.

Do you believe that the "legacy of slavery" is a big part of why blacks lag behind whites in socio-economic status?

Why are you always bringing up slavery? I am more focused on the NOW. I answered your question, you just didn't like the answer.

No. YOu did not. YOur answer focused on supposed racism "today", "cards stacked against them" and the "justice system".

You in no way answered my question.


WHy? I'm trying to make a simple point about modern liberalism.

You don't need to worry, I don't play stupid gotcha games.

Yes or no. I will make my point, you can disagree and the conversation will move forward.

Part of your question is why the black community lags behind on socio-economic issues, and I gave you perfect examples.

That is the point of this thread. The libs keep bringing up slavery, when it serves their agenda, but dismiss the past when it does not.

It appears that YOU keep bringing up slavery because it serves YOUR agenda.

I asked you if you believed that slavery was a big part of the reason that blacks lag behind white in socio economic status.

YOu discussed reasons that you believe that blacks lag behind whites in socio economic status.

That answer in no way addressed your view on whether the legacy of slavery is also a big part of the lag.

Why are you afraid to answer this simple question?

You:

That is the point of this thread. The libs keep bringing up slavery, when it serves their agenda, but dismiss the past when it does not.

 

[Correll]

Sorry. I've run into this before. YOu did not cleary state your answer. If i respond as though you did, then you will complain that I am putting words in your mouth.

Do you believe that the "legacy of slavery" is a big part of why blacks lag behind whites in socio-economic status?

Why are you always bringing up slavery? I am more focused on the NOW. I answered your question, you just didn't like the answer.

No. YOu did not. YOur answer focused on supposed racism "today", "cards stacked against them" and the "justice system".

You in no way answered my question.


WHy? I'm trying to make a simple point about modern liberalism.

You don't need to worry, I don't play stupid gotcha games.

Yes or no. I will make my point, you can disagree and the conversation will move forward.

Part of your question is why the black community lags behind on socio-economic issues, and I gave you perfect examples.

That is the point of this thread. The libs keep bringing up slavery, when it serves their agenda, but dismiss the past when it does not.

It appears that YOU keep bringing up slavery because it serves YOUR agenda.

I asked you if you believed that slavery was a big part of the reason that blacks lag behind white in socio economic status.

YOu discussed reasons that you believe that blacks lag behind whites in socio economic status.

That answer in no way addressed your view on whether the legacy of slavery is also a big part of the lag.

Why are you afraid to answer this simple question?

You:

That is the point of this thread. The libs keep bringing up slavery, when it serves their agenda, but dismiss the past when it does not.

yes. I am trying to make a point about that.

Except you are afraid to answer the question about your view on the impact of the legacy of slavery.

I will not assume your position on the subject. You will not tell me.

We are at an impasse.

 

[Carla_Danger]

Why are you always bringing up slavery? I am more focused on the NOW. I answered your question, you just didn't like the answer.

No. YOu did not. YOur answer focused on supposed racism "today", "cards stacked against them" and the "justice system".

You in no way answered my question.


WHy? I'm trying to make a simple point about modern liberalism.

You don't need to worry, I don't play stupid gotcha games.

Yes or no. I will make my point, you can disagree and the conversation will move forward.

Part of your question is why the black community lags behind on socio-economic issues, and I gave you perfect examples.

That is the point of this thread. The libs keep bringing up slavery, when it serves their agenda, but dismiss the past when it does not.

It appears that YOU keep bringing up slavery because it serves YOUR agenda.

I asked you if you believed that slavery was a big part of the reason that blacks lag behind white in socio economic status.

YOu discussed reasons that you believe that blacks lag behind whites in socio economic status.

That answer in no way addressed your view on whether the legacy of slavery is also a big part of the lag.

Why are you afraid to answer this simple question?

You:

That is the point of this thread. The libs keep bringing up slavery, when it serves their agenda, but dismiss the past when it does not.

yes. I am trying to make a point about that.

Except you are afraid to answer the question about your view on the impact of the legacy of slavery.

I will not assume your position on the subject. You will not tell me.

We are at an impasse.

Yes, it appears you are stuck on slavery, and I am more concerned with issues of today.

 

[Correll]

No. YOu did not. YOur answer focused on supposed racism "today", "cards stacked against them" and the "justice system".

You in no way answered my question.


WHy? I'm trying to make a simple point about modern liberalism.

You don't need to worry, I don't play stupid gotcha games.

Yes or no. I will make my point, you can disagree and the conversation will move forward.

Part of your question is why the black community lags behind on socio-economic issues, and I gave you perfect examples.

That is the point of this thread. The libs keep bringing up slavery, when it serves their agenda, but dismiss the past when it does not.

It appears that YOU keep bringing up slavery because it serves YOUR agenda.

I asked you if you believed that slavery was a big part of the reason that blacks lag behind white in socio economic status.

YOu discussed reasons that you believe that blacks lag behind whites in socio economic status.

That answer in no way addressed your view on whether the legacy of slavery is also a big part of the lag.

Why are you afraid to answer this simple question?

You:

That is the point of this thread. The libs keep bringing up slavery, when it serves their agenda, but dismiss the past when it does not.

yes. I am trying to make a point about that.

Except you are afraid to answer the question about your view on the impact of the legacy of slavery.

I will not assume your position on the subject. You will not tell me.

We are at an impasse.

Yes, it appears you are stuck on slavery, and I am more concerned over issues of today.

If you did not care, you would not be afraid to answer the question.

 

[Carla_Danger]

Part of your question is why the black community lags behind on socio-economic issues, and I gave you perfect examples.

It appears that YOU keep bringing up slavery because it serves YOUR agenda.

I asked you if you believed that slavery was a big part of the reason that blacks lag behind white in socio economic status.

YOu discussed reasons that you believe that blacks lag behind whites in socio economic status.

That answer in no way addressed your view on whether the legacy of slavery is also a big part of the lag.

Why are you afraid to answer this simple question?

You:

That is the point of this thread. The libs keep bringing up slavery, when it serves their agenda, but dismiss the past when it does not.

yes. I am trying to make a point about that.

Except you are afraid to answer the question about your view on the impact of the legacy of slavery.

I will not assume your position on the subject. You will not tell me.

We are at an impasse.

Yes, it appears you are stuck on slavery, and I am more concerned over issues of today.

If you did not care, you would not be afraid to answer the question.

I see no reason to answer, when I already gave perfectly good examples concerning the problems of today.

 

[Correll]

I asked you if you believed that slavery was a big part of the reason that blacks lag behind white in socio economic status.

YOu discussed reasons that you believe that blacks lag behind whites in socio economic status.

That answer in no way addressed your view on whether the legacy of slavery is also a big part of the lag.

Why are you afraid to answer this simple question?

You:

That is the point of this thread. The libs keep bringing up slavery, when it serves their agenda, but dismiss the past when it does not.

yes. I am trying to make a point about that.

Except you are afraid to answer the question about your view on the impact of the legacy of slavery.

I will not assume your position on the subject. You will not tell me.

We are at an impasse.

Yes, it appears you are stuck on slavery, and I am more concerned over issues of today.

If you did not care, you would not be afraid to answer the question.

I see no reason to answer, when I already gave perfectly good examples concerning the problems of today.

You gave some examples. YOu gave no indication of whether you considered "the legacy of slavery" to be an issue also.

I will not assume your position on the subject and for some reason you refuse to tell me.

We are at an impasse.

Why are you lying about you answer?

What are you trying to hide?

 

[Carla_Danger]

You:

yes. I am trying to make a point about that.

Except you are afraid to answer the question about your view on the impact of the legacy of slavery.

I will not assume your position on the subject. You will not tell me.

We are at an impasse.

Yes, it appears you are stuck on slavery, and I am more concerned over issues of today.

If you did not care, you would not be afraid to answer the question.

I see no reason to answer, when I already gave perfectly good examples concerning the problems of today.

You gave some examples. YOu gave no indication of whether you considered "the legacy of slavery" to be an issue also.

I will not assume your position on the subject and for some reason you refuse to tell me.

We are at an impasse.

Why are you lying about you answer?

What are you trying to hide?

Doofus- "The libs keep bringing up slavery, when it serves their agenda, but dismiss the past when it does not."

Doofus- "Sooooooooooooo, because in this one particular instance, a con brought up slavery, that invalidates that claim that libs keep bringing up slavery?"

Doofus- "Thread titles don't address the fact that libs are always bringing up slavery."

Doofus- "The fact that libs love to smear the gop with racism, does not change the fact that they also bring up slavery a lot"

Doofus- "Do you believe that a big part of the reason that blacks lag behind whites in socio-economic status is because of the "legacy of slavery"?"

Doofus- " YOu gave no indication of whether you considered "the legacy of slavery" to be an issue also."

 

[Correll]

yes. I am trying to make a point about that.

Except you are afraid to answer the question about your view on the impact of the legacy of slavery.

I will not assume your position on the subject. You will not tell me.

We are at an impasse.

Yes, it appears you are stuck on slavery, and I am more concerned over issues of today.

If you did not care, you would not be afraid to answer the question.

I see no reason to answer, when I already gave perfectly good examples concerning the problems of today.

You gave some examples. YOu gave no indication of whether you considered "the legacy of slavery" to be an issue also.

I will not assume your position on the subject and for some reason you refuse to tell me.

We are at an impasse.

Why are you lying about you answer?

What are you trying to hide?

Doofus- "The libs keep bringing up slavery, when it serves their agenda, but dismiss the past when it does not."

Doofus- "Sooooooooooooo, because in this one particular instance, a con brought up slavery, that invalidates that claim that libs keep bringing up slavery?"

Doofus- "Thread titles don't address the fact that libs are always bringing up slavery."

Doofus- "The fact that libs love to smear the gop with racism, does not change the fact that they also bring up slavery a lot"

Doofus- "Do you believe that a big part of the reason that blacks lag behind whites in socio-economic status is because of the "legacy of slavery"?"

Doofus- " YOu gave no indication of whether you considered "the legacy of slavery" to be an issue also."

And once again you devote your entire reply to avoiding my question(s).

With some personal attacks thrown in.


We are at an impasse.

 

[Carla_Danger]

Yes, it appears you are stuck on slavery, and I am more concerned over issues of today.

If you did not care, you would not be afraid to answer the question.

I see no reason to answer, when I already gave perfectly good examples concerning the problems of today.

You gave some examples. YOu gave no indication of whether you considered "the legacy of slavery" to be an issue also.

I will not assume your position on the subject and for some reason you refuse to tell me.

We are at an impasse.

Why are you lying about you answer?

What are you trying to hide?

Doofus- "The libs keep bringing up slavery, when it serves their agenda, but dismiss the past when it does not."

Doofus- "Sooooooooooooo, because in this one particular instance, a con brought up slavery, that invalidates that claim that libs keep bringing up slavery?"

Doofus- "Thread titles don't address the fact that libs are always bringing up slavery."

Doofus- "The fact that libs love to smear the gop with racism, does not change the fact that they also bring up slavery a lot"

Doofus- "Do you believe that a big part of the reason that blacks lag behind whites in socio-economic status is because of the "legacy of slavery"?"

Doofus- " YOu gave no indication of whether you considered "the legacy of slavery" to be an issue also."

And once again you devote your entire reply to avoiding my question(s).

With some personal attacks thrown in.


We are at an impasse.

What was the question?

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

Should I apologize for being white, living in America, and supporting the best candidate for office no matter which political party they belong to because of the past?

Well seeing I was born in Canada ( Ya know that Socialist Haven ) and into a very old Scottish Family the chances that we owned Slaves in the States were slim to none.

Now it is possible maybe a ship of ours transported some to the colonies in those days ( We were merchants ) and we might have that on our hands but the part about needing to be apologetic for the sins of my family past is just absurd as can be.

Now let get to the issue of the Democrat Party being the political party of racism and hate. It is true they were once for slavery and state rights to oppress individuals, but which political party accepted the racist Dixiecrats supporters with open arms after LBJ?

Also let look at the GOP which spawned from the Whig Party and can you name the other political party that Southern Whig members joined after the death of the Whig Party?

It was called the American Party which was known as the Know-Nothing movement which became the Dixiecrats and are now The Birther and Tea Party movement of the GOP.

Now before you scream the Tea Party is nothing like the American Party and Dixiecrats please view the fact that the majority of the Tea Party members spew the same anti-Big Government and immigration nonsense of the two political movement of the past, and are strongly supported by Southern White idiots that fear of losing their WASP way of life.

So as I do agree the Democrat Party should own it past the GOP of today should apologize for allowing the Know-Nothing Dixiecrat Tea Party Birthers to take control of their Political Party because as history has shown that faction kills a political party quickly if not purged from it ranks because of it racist and anti-government nature that is not supported by the more educated individual.

Now enjoy spewing about how I am incorrect and that there is no racism within the ranks of your political spectrum while reality is against you as usual...

Some reading material:

Dixiecrat - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Know Nothing - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

 

[Correll]

If you did not care, you would not be afraid to answer the question.

I see no reason to answer, when I already gave perfectly good examples concerning the problems of today.

You gave some examples. YOu gave no indication of whether you considered "the legacy of slavery" to be an issue also.

I will not assume your position on the subject and for some reason you refuse to tell me.

We are at an impasse.

Why are you lying about you answer?

What are you trying to hide?

Doofus- "The libs keep bringing up slavery, when it serves their agenda, but dismiss the past when it does not."

Doofus- "Sooooooooooooo, because in this one particular instance, a con brought up slavery, that invalidates that claim that libs keep bringing up slavery?"

Doofus- "Thread titles don't address the fact that libs are always bringing up slavery."

Doofus- "The fact that libs love to smear the gop with racism, does not change the fact that they also bring up slavery a lot"

Doofus- "Do you believe that a big part of the reason that blacks lag behind whites in socio-economic status is because of the "legacy of slavery"?"

Doofus- " YOu gave no indication of whether you considered "the legacy of slavery" to be an issue also."

And once again you devote your entire reply to avoiding my question(s).

With some personal attacks thrown in.


We are at an impasse.

What was the question?

And now you play dumb.

We are at an impasse.

 

[Carla_Danger]

I see no reason to answer, when I already gave perfectly good examples concerning the problems of today.

You gave some examples. YOu gave no indication of whether you considered "the legacy of slavery" to be an issue also.

I will not assume your position on the subject and for some reason you refuse to tell me.

We are at an impasse.

Why are you lying about you answer?

What are you trying to hide?

Doofus- "The libs keep bringing up slavery, when it serves their agenda, but dismiss the past when it does not."

Doofus- "Sooooooooooooo, because in this one particular instance, a con brought up slavery, that invalidates that claim that libs keep bringing up slavery?"

Doofus- "Thread titles don't address the fact that libs are always bringing up slavery."

Doofus- "The fact that libs love to smear the gop with racism, does not change the fact that they also bring up slavery a lot"

Doofus- "Do you believe that a big part of the reason that blacks lag behind whites in socio-economic status is because of the "legacy of slavery"?"

Doofus- " YOu gave no indication of whether you considered "the legacy of slavery" to be an issue also."

And once again you devote your entire reply to avoiding my question(s).

With some personal attacks thrown in.


We are at an impasse.

What was the question?

And now you play dumb.

We are at an impasse.

Most folks move on when they realize they are at an impasse. However, you've repeated yourself 4 x's now.

 

[Correll]

You gave some examples. YOu gave no indication of whether you considered "the legacy of slavery" to be an issue also.

I will not assume your position on the subject and for some reason you refuse to tell me.

We are at an impasse.

Why are you lying about you answer?

What are you trying to hide?

Doofus- "The libs keep bringing up slavery, when it serves their agenda, but dismiss the past when it does not."

Doofus- "Sooooooooooooo, because in this one particular instance, a con brought up slavery, that invalidates that claim that libs keep bringing up slavery?"

Doofus- "Thread titles don't address the fact that libs are always bringing up slavery."

Doofus- "The fact that libs love to smear the gop with racism, does not change the fact that they also bring up slavery a lot"

Doofus- "Do you believe that a big part of the reason that blacks lag behind whites in socio-economic status is because of the "legacy of slavery"?"

Doofus- " YOu gave no indication of whether you considered "the legacy of slavery" to be an issue also."

And once again you devote your entire reply to avoiding my question(s).

With some personal attacks thrown in.


We are at an impasse.

What was the question?

And now you play dumb.

We are at an impasse.

Most folks move on when they realize they are at an impasse. However, you've repeated yourself 4 x's now.

What do you want to move on to?

What are you not afraid to discuss?

Is there anything related to the topic?

 

[Carla_Danger]

Doofus- "The libs keep bringing up slavery, when it serves their agenda, but dismiss the past when it does not."

Doofus- "Sooooooooooooo, because in this one particular instance, a con brought up slavery, that invalidates that claim that libs keep bringing up slavery?"

Doofus- "Thread titles don't address the fact that libs are always bringing up slavery."

Doofus- "The fact that libs love to smear the gop with racism, does not change the fact that they also bring up slavery a lot"

Doofus- "Do you believe that a big part of the reason that blacks lag behind whites in socio-economic status is because of the "legacy of slavery"?"

Doofus- " YOu gave no indication of whether you considered "the legacy of slavery" to be an issue also."

And once again you devote your entire reply to avoiding my question(s).

With some personal attacks thrown in.


We are at an impasse.

What was the question?

And now you play dumb.

We are at an impasse.

Most folks move on when they realize they are at an impasse. However, you've repeated yourself 4 x's now.

What do you want to move on to?

What are you not afraid to discuss?

Is there anything related to the topic?

Go back and read the thread, and do try to keep up.

 

[Correll]

And once again you devote your entire reply to avoiding my question(s).

With some personal attacks thrown in.


We are at an impasse.

What was the question?

And now you play dumb.

We are at an impasse.

Most folks move on when they realize they are at an impasse. However, you've repeated yourself 4 x's now.

What do you want to move on to?

What are you not afraid to discuss?

Is there anything related to the topic?

Go back and read the thread, and do try to keep up.

Oh, right. YOu want to change the subject to how racist you "know" the GOP is...

NOthing self serving there.

Why should I answer or address any of your posts, if you refuse to show me the same courtesy?