If todays whites must own white history of 1800s, Dems of today own Dem history then too.

[Carla_Danger]

So??? This doesn't solve anything. It's just another stupid thing for you all to argue about and solves NOTHING.

Who's here to solve something? This is a discussion forum.

 

[ChrisL]

So??? This doesn't solve anything. It's just another stupid thing for you all to argue about and solves NOTHING.

The use of historical grievances as a partisan weapon is a real problem that hinders almost any discuss that has the slightest connection to race.

And I do mean slightest.

Ignoring the issues that prevent communication will not solve them.

I can agree with you there. These historical grievances need to be put down. Life and times were different back in those days. We've come a long way as a society from those days of slavery and utter ignorance. I just don't see this as one of the important issues to be focusing on.

 

[ChrisL]

So??? This doesn't solve anything. It's just another stupid thing for you all to argue about and solves NOTHING.

Who's here to solve something? This is a discussion forum.

It's stupid and has nothing to do with the issues we face as a nation today. Slavery is a thing of the past, it's not coming back. When we have so many other important issues to deal with, why would we want to waste time arguing about who is more responsible for slavery? That is ancient history. Time to move on.

 

[Carla_Danger]

So??? This doesn't solve anything. It's just another stupid thing for you all to argue about and solves NOTHING.

The use of historical grievances as a partisan weapon is a real problem that hinders almost any discuss that has the slightest connection to race.

And I do mean slightest.

Ignoring the issues that prevent communication will not solve them.

I can agree with you there. These historical grievances need to be put down. Life and times were different back in those days. We've come a long way as a society from those days of slavery and utter ignorance. I just don't see this as one of the important issues to be focusing on.

If Republican's focus on racism among Democrats pre-Civil Rights Act of 1964, they don't have to focus on the racism that is rampant among the Republican party NOW.

 

[Carla_Danger]

So??? This doesn't solve anything. It's just another stupid thing for you all to argue about and solves NOTHING.

Who's here to solve something? This is a discussion forum.

It's stupid and has nothing to do with the issues we face as a nation today. Slavery is a thing of the past, it's not coming back. When we have so many other important issues to deal with, why would we want to waste time arguing about who is more responsible for slavery? That is ancient history. Time to move on.

Read the thread and try to keep up.

I'll repeat my original question.

We are all fully aware of sins of our past.

Are you going to own up to the rampant racism that exists in your party today?

 

[ChrisL]

So??? This doesn't solve anything. It's just another stupid thing for you all to argue about and solves NOTHING.

Who's here to solve something? This is a discussion forum.

It's stupid and has nothing to do with the issues we face as a nation today. Slavery is a thing of the past, it's not coming back. When we have so many other important issues to deal with, why would we want to waste time arguing about who is more responsible for slavery? That is ancient history. Time to move on.

Read the thread and try to keep up.

I'll repeat my original question.

We are all fully aware of sins of our past.

Are you going to own up to the rampant racism that exists in your party today?

I'm not a member of either of your ridiculous parties.

 

[Correll]

Who the **** cares? Slavery is not a current issue that we need to be concerned about!!!

That is the point of this thread. The libs keep bringing up slavery, when it serves their agenda, but dismiss the past when it does not.

Was it a Lib who started this thread? Idiot.

Sooooooooooooo, because in this one particular instance, a con brought up slavery, that invalidates that claim that libs keep bringing up slavery?

That does not logically follow.

That fact that you thought it did and then called me an idiot is very funny.

LIberals. All the self awareness of a turnip.

There's a search function on this forum, moron. If you type in "slavery" most of the threads on this topic are started by your fellow idiots.


JimBowie1958--Why was Antebellum Southern Slavery Immoral?

JimBowie1958--Adam Kotsko, White Proff, Says White People Need to Commit Mass Suicide as Repayment for Slavery

RexxTaylor--Ready For The 2016 Coward Excuses? Lack of Funding, The GOP, Started Under Bush and Slavery!

2aguy--On this day Republicans accepted surrender of democrats...slavery ends, dems start jim crow...

Thread titles don't address the fact that libs are always bringing up slavery.

Do you believe that a big part of the reason that blacks lag behind whites in socio-economic status is because of the "legacy of slavery"?

 

[Correll]

Who the **** cares? Slavery is not a current issue that we need to be concerned about!!!

That is the point of this thread. The libs keep bringing up slavery, when it serves their agenda, but dismiss the past when it does not.

We recognize the past.....we don't try to change it like those pushing the "Lost Cause" lie do.

Good. You should. White Democrats are the ones who committed those atrocities. You and your fellow white Democrats can deal with that inside your own white Democrat circle.

Leave us white Republicans out of it. We were on the right side of history.

If they were not hypocrites, they would thank you for bringing this to their attention so they could move on it.

Yep. They're greedy assholes. Just like their racist white Democrat ancestors.

White Democrat privilege is the reason most modern white Democrats hold office. Their ancestors rigged the game...and passed voting blocs down the years.

The modern white Dems didnt earn those offices fairly. They should resign their seats and give them to a minority candidate.

By their stated concerns about the lingering effects of slavery, Jim Crow, and other past injustices to numerous to mention, yes they should.

 

[ChrisL]

If we could just get rid of "parties" altogether, that would solve a LOT of our problems. Support a candidate instead of a "party." I HATE this two-party system that blocks everyone else out. All we ever hear about is the republicans and democrats. I am sick of both of them. Sick to death.

 

[Correll]

So??? This doesn't solve anything. It's just another stupid thing for you all to argue about and solves NOTHING.

Who's here to solve something? This is a discussion forum.

It's stupid and has nothing to do with the issues we face as a nation today. Slavery is a thing of the past, it's not coming back. When we have so many other important issues to deal with, why would we want to waste time arguing about who is more responsible for slavery? That is ancient history. Time to move on.

Read the thread and try to keep up.

I'll repeat my original question.

We are all fully aware of sins of our past.

Are you going to own up to the rampant racism that exists in your party today?

I don't know that all of you are aware of it. How would the young know? It is not a matter of daily discussion like other examples.

And standard lib attempt to deflect.

 

[Correll]

If we could just get rid of "parties" altogether, that would solve a LOT of our problems. Support a candidate instead of a "party." I HATE this two-party system that blocks everyone else out. All we ever hear about is the republicans and democrats. I am sick of both of them. Sick to death.

The same memes would dominate.

And it won't happen. LIbs need to know who to give passes to. They would not want to accidentally destroy a Joe Biden for an racially insensitive remark. THey want to save that for people who are a problem for the agenda.

 

[Correll]

So??? This doesn't solve anything. It's just another stupid thing for you all to argue about and solves NOTHING.

The use of historical grievances as a partisan weapon is a real problem that hinders almost any discuss that has the slightest connection to race.

And I do mean slightest.

Ignoring the issues that prevent communication will not solve them.

I can agree with you there. These historical grievances need to be put down. Life and times were different back in those days. We've come a long way as a society from those days of slavery and utter ignorance. I just don't see this as one of the important issues to be focusing on.

Part of the process of putting these historical grievances down, is to call the people who use them on their crappy behavior.

Which is what the OP is doing.

 

[Carla_Danger]

Who the **** cares? Slavery is not a current issue that we need to be concerned about!!!

That is the point of this thread. The libs keep bringing up slavery, when it serves their agenda, but dismiss the past when it does not.

Was it a Lib who started this thread? Idiot.

Sooooooooooooo, because in this one particular instance, a con brought up slavery, that invalidates that claim that libs keep bringing up slavery?

That does not logically follow.

That fact that you thought it did and then called me an idiot is very funny.

LIberals. All the self awareness of a turnip.

There's a search function on this forum, moron. If you type in "slavery" most of the threads on this topic are started by your fellow idiots.


JimBowie1958--Why was Antebellum Southern Slavery Immoral?

JimBowie1958--Adam Kotsko, White Proff, Says White People Need to Commit Mass Suicide as Repayment for Slavery

RexxTaylor--Ready For The 2016 Coward Excuses? Lack of Funding, The GOP, Started Under Bush and Slavery!

2aguy--On this day Republicans accepted surrender of democrats...slavery ends, dems start jim crow...

Thread titles don't address the fact that libs are always bringing up slavery.

Do you believe that a big part of the reason that blacks lag behind whites in socio-economic status is because of the "legacy of slavery"?

It addresses the fact that you're full of shit.

And to answer your idiot question, which I will point out, is YOU bringing up slavery, I think there is a lack of opportunity and still a lot of racism that exists even today. Yes, I think the cards are stacked against the black community, starting with our justice system.

Again, the reason you and your fellow idiots keep bringing up slavery and racism from way back when, is to deny that racism exists in your party today.

 

[Correll]

That is the point of this thread. The libs keep bringing up slavery, when it serves their agenda, but dismiss the past when it does not.

Was it a Lib who started this thread? Idiot.

Sooooooooooooo, because in this one particular instance, a con brought up slavery, that invalidates that claim that libs keep bringing up slavery?

That does not logically follow.

That fact that you thought it did and then called me an idiot is very funny.

LIberals. All the self awareness of a turnip.

There's a search function on this forum, moron. If you type in "slavery" most of the threads on this topic are started by your fellow idiots.


JimBowie1958--Why was Antebellum Southern Slavery Immoral?

JimBowie1958--Adam Kotsko, White Proff, Says White People Need to Commit Mass Suicide as Repayment for Slavery

RexxTaylor--Ready For The 2016 Coward Excuses? Lack of Funding, The GOP, Started Under Bush and Slavery!

2aguy--On this day Republicans accepted surrender of democrats...slavery ends, dems start jim crow...

Thread titles don't address the fact that libs are always bringing up slavery.

Do you believe that a big part of the reason that blacks lag behind whites in socio-economic status is because of the "legacy of slavery"?

It addresses the fact that you're full of shit.

And to answer your idiot question, which I will point out, is YOU bringing up slavery, I think there is a lack of opportunity and still a lot of racism that exists even today. Yes, I think the cards are stacked against the black community, starting with our justice system.

Again, the reason you and your fellow idiots keep bringing up slavery, and racism from way back when, is to deny that racism exists in your party today.

Sorry. I've run into this before. YOu did not cleary state your answer. If i respond as though you did, then you will complain that I am putting words in your mouth.

Do you believe that the "legacy of slavery" is a big part of why blacks lag behind whites in socio-economic status?

 

[Carla_Danger]

If we could just get rid of "parties" altogether, that would solve a LOT of our problems. Support a candidate instead of a "party." I HATE this two-party system that blocks everyone else out. All we ever hear about is the republicans and democrats. I am sick of both of them. Sick to death.

I'm not crazy about our two-party system either. It's narrow, and it keeps many people from participating in politics.

 

[bodecea]

So??? This doesn't solve anything. It's just another stupid thing for you all to argue about and solves NOTHING.

The use of historical grievances as a partisan weapon is a real problem that hinders almost any discuss that has the slightest connection to race.

And I do mean slightest.

Ignoring the issues that prevent communication will not solve them.

I can agree with you there. These historical grievances need to be put down. Life and times were different back in those days. We've come a long way as a society from those days of slavery and utter ignorance. I just don't see this as one of the important issues to be focusing on.

If Republican's focus on racism among Democrats pre-Civil Rights Act of 1964, they don't have to focus on the racism that is rampant among the Republican party NOW.

An excellent point there.

 

[Correll]

So??? This doesn't solve anything. It's just another stupid thing for you all to argue about and solves NOTHING.

The use of historical grievances as a partisan weapon is a real problem that hinders almost any discuss that has the slightest connection to race.

And I do mean slightest.

Ignoring the issues that prevent communication will not solve them.

I can agree with you there. These historical grievances need to be put down. Life and times were different back in those days. We've come a long way as

a society from those days of slavery and utter ignorance. I just don't see this as one of the important issues to be focusing on.

If Republican's focus on racism among Democrats pre-Civil Rights Act of 1964, they don't have to focus on the racism that is rampant among the Republican party NOW.

An excellent point there.

Yes. YOU LIBS love to make every discussion about racism, real or imagined, in the GOP the issue.


Not self serving at all.

 

[Carla_Danger]

So??? This doesn't solve anything. It's just another stupid thing for you all to argue about and solves NOTHING.

The use of historical grievances as a partisan weapon is a real problem that hinders almost any discuss that has the slightest connection to race.

And I do mean slightest.

Ignoring the issues that prevent communication will not solve them.

I can agree with you there. These historical grievances need to be put down. Life and times were different back in those days. We've come a long way as

a society from those days of slavery and utter ignorance. I just don't see this as one of the important issues to be focusing on.

If Republican's focus on racism among Democrats pre-Civil Rights Act of 1964, they don't have to focus on the racism that is rampant among the Republican party NOW.

An excellent point there.

Yes. YOU LIBS love to make every discussion about racism, real or imagined, in the GOP the issue.


Not self serving at all.

I see now you have changed your allegations of us bringing up slavery, to us bringing up racism. Good job on keeping up with the pace!

 

[Carla_Danger]

Was it a Lib who started this thread? Idiot.

Sooooooooooooo, because in this one particular instance, a con brought up slavery, that invalidates that claim that libs keep bringing up slavery?

That does not logically follow.

That fact that you thought it did and then called me an idiot is very funny.

LIberals. All the self awareness of a turnip.

There's a search function on this forum, moron. If you type in "slavery" most of the threads on this topic are started by your fellow idiots.


JimBowie1958--Why was Antebellum Southern Slavery Immoral?

JimBowie1958--Adam Kotsko, White Proff, Says White People Need to Commit Mass Suicide as Repayment for Slavery

RexxTaylor--Ready For The 2016 Coward Excuses? Lack of Funding, The GOP, Started Under Bush and Slavery!

2aguy--On this day Republicans accepted surrender of democrats...slavery ends, dems start jim crow...

Thread titles don't address the fact that libs are always bringing up slavery.

Do you believe that a big part of the reason that blacks lag behind whites in socio-economic status is because of the "legacy of slavery"?

It addresses the fact that you're full of shit.

And to answer your idiot question, which I will point out, is YOU bringing up slavery, I think there is a lack of opportunity and still a lot of racism that exists even today. Yes, I think the cards are stacked against the black community, starting with our justice system.

Again, the reason you and your fellow idiots keep bringing up slavery, and racism from way back when, is to deny that racism exists in your party today.

Sorry. I've run into this before. YOu did not cleary state your answer. If i respond as though you did, then you will complain that I am putting words in your mouth.

Do you believe that the "legacy of slavery" is a big part of why blacks lag behind whites in socio-economic status?

Why are you always bringing up slavery? I am more focused on the NOW. I answered your question, you just didn't like the answer.

 

[Correll]

The use of historical grievances as a partisan weapon is a real problem that hinders almost any discuss that has the slightest connection to race.

And I do mean slightest.

Ignoring the issues that prevent communication will not solve them.

I can agree with you there. These historical grievances need to be put down. Life and times were different back in those days. We've come a long way as

a society from those days of slavery and utter ignorance. I just don't see this as one of the important issues to be focusing on.

If Republican's focus on racism among Democrats pre-Civil Rights Act of 1964, they don't have to focus on the racism that is rampant among the Republican party NOW.

An excellent point there.

Yes. YOU LIBS love to make every discussion about racism, real or imagined, in the GOP the issue.


Not self serving at all.

I see now you have changed your allegations of us bringing up slavery, to us bringing up racism. Good job on keeping up with the pace!

The fact that libs love to smear the gop with racism, does not change the fact that they also bring up slavery a lot. They have many intellectually dishonest and morally bankrupt tactics to avoid dealing honestly and seriously with any issues.