If the state of New York passed a law in which the state seized ownership of all private businesses and corporate offices, who would stop them"?

[Magnus]

Did the banks lose money? Yes or no

No....

They signed the contract.

There was evidence presented at the trial, retard. Try to keep up.

Trump's misrepresentations cost banks $168M, expert testifies

abcnews.go.com

 

[shockedcanadian]

The US constitution and those responsible to uphold/enforce it. Do you MAGA's know anything? aside from propagating your Fuehrers bull?

WTF if a MAGA? It's a slogan. One Trump borrowed from Reagan.

What is it about that slogan that offends you to the point you apply it to people as if it is an insult?

 

[Magnus]

Not one penny. They made loans that were paid back on time and with interest. They made their own financial assessments and said Trump was a "whale" account they were thrilled to get his business.

Not according to the banks. er- "victims".

Sure, maybe I can catch him perving on the girls down at the gym.

If Trump ripped off the banks, why is the State of New York not giving the money back to the banks?

Another day, another retard.

Trump's misrepresentations cost banks $168M, expert testifies

abcnews.go.com

 

[justoffal]

What is your source for the banks losing money? If they lost money, how come they were supporting Trump instead of climbing on James’ bandwagon to recover those losses you claim they took? Banks don’t stay in business by losing money.

Because they lost nothing and the fairytale victim doesn't exist.
When the contract was signed the loan parameters were justified. If anyone is guilty of anything it would be the bank officers....

 

[justoffal]

There was evidence presented at the trial, retard. Try to keep up.

Trump's misrepresentations cost banks $168M, expert testifies

abcnews.go.com

The contract was signed...
Nothing to keep up with

From the link....and spot on:


They are not ill-gotten gains if the bank does not testify it would have done it differently," Kise said.

 

[Magnus]

What is your source for the banks losing money? If they lost money, how come they were supporting Trump instead of climbing on James’ bandwagon to recover those losses you claim they took? Banks don’t stay in business by losing money.

Trump's misrepresentations cost banks $168M, expert testifies

abcnews.go.com

 

[justoffal]

Trump's misrepresentations cost banks $168M, expert testifies

abcnews.go.com

Already debunked

 

[para bellum]

Another day, another retard.

Don't be so hard on yourself. Just because you don't know the difference between a criminal case and a civil action doesn't necessarily mean you're retarded. It could just be simple TDS.

 

[Care4all]

Let's call it for what it is, New York is not capitalist nor a district based on the Rule of Law, Due Process and equal justice.

Considering the massive shift I have seen in my lifetime. A shift that would not be tolerated 30 years ago, it is not at all outlandish to think that the state won't at some point take the extreme position as in the title. We saw what happened during covid, we see how they disregard legal norms, this is not at all a large step.

In fact, I would imagine smart money would be on it occurring sometime within the next 25-30 years,

When it does, who will stop them?

To answer your op title question:

The Constitution will stop the unconstitutional.

 

[Kruska]

WTF if a MAGA? It's a slogan. One Trump borrowed from Reagan.

Reagan's proclamations weren't solely backed by some Mindless Americans Gone Amok - but by REPUBLICANS and even DEMOCRATS.
MAGA's only started to come up (ultraconservatives and factual racists) due to their enduring nightmare of having had to accept a Mulatto as US President.

What is it about that slogan that offends you to the point you apply it to people as if it is an insult?

In which media&wireless part of Nunavut province in Canada do you live? so that you don't even know what a MAGA is?? or do you prefer "Trump CULT-member"?

 

[shockedcanadian]

Reagan's proclamations weren't solely backed by some Mindless Americans Gone Amok - but by REPUBLICANS and even DEMOCRATS.
MAGA's only started to come up (ultraconservatives and factual racists) due to their enduring nightmare of having had to accept a Mulatto as US President.

In which media&wireless part of Nunavut province in Canada do you live? so that you don't even know what a MAGA is?? or do you prefer "Trump CULT-member"?

Don't take this to personally, but you are a sheep. When you let media and others define how you view policies then you lack the critical analysis to be taken serious.

Neither Trump or Biden are in their prime. The determining factor as to who wins in 2024 will depend on 1) Their policies. 2) The competence they will have in their administrations.

May the best policies and administration win.

 

[justoffal]

Don't take this to personally, but you are a sheep. When you let media and others define how you view policies then you lack the critical analysis to be taken serious.

Neither Trump or Biden are in their prime. The determining factor as to who wins in 2024 will depend on 1) Their policies. 2) The competence they will have in their administrations.

May the best policies and administration win.

How true....how sadly true...
The most important office on the planet and morons are competing for it.

 

[Kruska]

May the best policies and administration win.

Thanks for confirming that you are one of those voter sheep, respectively in your case a MAGA sheep.

Elections especially in fake democracies - have always only been won in regards to empty PROMISES.
What they promise to do in the 1st term, they simply repeat in regards to a 2nd term (see Trump) - after two terms the US constitution renders them automatically as obsolete incl. their promises. - keep dreaming.

 

[Magnus]

Already debunked

Where? In your retarded echo chambers? LOL

Unfortunately for your MAGA fuhrer, that doesn’t count. He has to do it in court. Which he could not and hence his millions of dollars fine.

Try to keep up.

 

[Magnus]

Don't be so hard on yourself. Just because you don't know the difference between a criminal case and a civil action doesn't necessarily mean you're retarded. It could just be simple TDS.

In other words, you couldn’t refute? Yeah, thought so. Don’t feel too bad. You retards never can.

 

[justoffal]

Where? In your retarded echo chambers? LOL

Unfortunately for your MAGA fuhrer, that doesn’t count. He has to do it in court. Which he could not and hence his millions of dollars fine.

Try to keep up.

Nope.... The cost to the tax payer is a crock of imaginary bullshit drummed up specifically for this case.

DEBUNKED

 

[Dadoalex]

Let's call it for what it is, New York is not capitalist nor a district based on the Rule of Law, Due Process and equal justice.

Considering the massive shift I have seen in my lifetime. A shift that would not be tolerated 30 years ago, it is not at all outlandish to think that the state won't at some point take the extreme position as in the title. We saw what happened during covid, we see how they disregard legal norms, this is not at all a large step.

In fact, I would imagine smart money would be on it occurring sometime within the next 25-30 years,

When it does, who will stop them?

1. The Constitution. you guys really should get one. they're cool.
and
2. If you think you are anything but a possession of the government...well, you're not paying attention.

The government owns you, it owns all of what you consider your property. you are little more than the serf from the middle Ages.

In those days, of course, the serf belonged to the landholder, who, in turn belonged to the duke, or whatever controlled the region, who, in turn, belonged to the king.

Murder on behalf of the king, the government, was perfectly legal.
But kill one of the king's subjects? That was a crime against the crown. Taking what belonged to the crown.
Of course, nowdays that never happens. Murder is illegal, unless, of course, you're a LE type working for the government.
But commit a murder outside that realm?
Rob a bank
Commit a burglary
Forget to cut the grass...
Then it is The State Vs you in a Trial presided over in a State building, controlled by state employees, and overseen by a state employee.
With punishments determined by the state and executed by the state.


Enjoy your "freedom."

 

[shockedcanadian]

1. The Constitution. you guys really should get one. they're cool.
and
2. If you think you are anything but a possession of the government...well, you're not paying attention.

The government owns you, it owns all of what you consider your property. you are little more than the serf from the middle Ages.

In those days, of course, the serf belonged to the landholder, who, in turn belonged to the duke, or whatever controlled the region, who, in turn, belonged to the king.

Murder on behalf of the king, the government, was perfectly legal.
But kill one of the king's subjects? That was a crime against the crown. Taking what belonged to the crown.
Of course, nowdays that never happens. Murder is illegal, unless, of course, you're a LE type working for the government.
But commit a murder outside that realm?
Rob a bank
Commit a burglary
Forget to cut the grass...
Then it is The State Vs you in a Trial presided over in a State building, controlled by state employees, and overseen by a state employee.
With punishments determined by the state and executed by the state.


Enjoy your "freedom."

I'm trying to get out of here, but there are numerous walls erected to prevent that.

 

[AZrailwhale]

Trump's misrepresentations cost banks $168M, expert testifies

abcnews.go.com

In other words, the banks took imaginary losses.

 

[AZrailwhale]

Don't take this to personally, but you are a sheep. When you let media and others define how you view policies then you lack the critical analysis to be taken serious.

Neither Trump or Biden are in their prime. The determining factor as to who wins in 2024 will depend on 1) Their policies. 2) The competence they will have in their administrations.

May the best policies and administration win.

I wish that we had to option of none of the above that would force both parties to start from scratch with the selection of new candidates