Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This fails as a false comparison fallacy.The Capitol police officer shot and killed an unarmed, female Trump supporter. As far as we know, since the democrat party will not release his name, no warning was given, no attempt to use less lethal means was employed....she was shot in a panic by the officer.
In the Wright shooting, the violent criminal was actively fighting with an officer, and the other officer mistakenly drew and used her pistol, thinking it was a taser. It was an accident.
Of the two officers, the officer who shot the violent criminal is less culpable in the death of wright than the capitol officer is in the intentional shooting of Babbit.
Of the two officers, the officer who shot Wright should keep her job, while the Capitol police officer should lose his.....
And they need to release his name....and they need the DOJ to do a complete civil rights investigation into the shooting.
One cannot expect ‘clean debate’ with such dishonest sophistry.
It wasn't panick----he was even assigned to be on the front lines--he was some sort of paper bitch who the other cops didn't trust to be on the front line. He should be in prison and tried for 1st degree murder. He was simply a Trump hater who posted before hand that he wanted to shoot trump supporters.I agree. The cop indiscriminately shot Ashli through a door. He knew full well what he was doing and his target was so close that he could have hit her wherever he wanted. She was just standing there. This was an intentional murder.
I think he simply panicked, but if the one cop is in trouble for accidentally shooting a violent criminal in the process of actively resisting arrest, this guy should be bounced from his job too.....
Putting down the criminal insurgent wasn't an accident.The Capitol police officer shot and killed an unarmed, female Trump supporter. As far as we know, since the democrat party will not release his name, no warning was given, no attempt to use less lethal means was employed....she was shot in a panic by the officer.
In the Wright shooting, the violent criminal was actively fighting with an officer, and the other officer mistakenly drew and used her pistol, thinking it was a taser. It was an accident.
Of the two officers, the officer who shot the violent criminal is less culpable in the death of wright than the capitol officer is in the intentional shooting of Babbit.
Of the two officers, the officer who shot Wright should keep her job, while the Capitol police officer should lose his.....
And they need to release his name....and they need the DOJ to do a complete civil rights investigation into the shooting.
Putting down the criminal insurgent wasn't an accident.The Capitol police officer shot and killed an unarmed, female Trump supporter. As far as we know, since the democrat party will not release his name, no warning was given, no attempt to use less lethal means was employed....she was shot in a panic by the officer.
In the Wright shooting, the violent criminal was actively fighting with an officer, and the other officer mistakenly drew and used her pistol, thinking it was a taser. It was an accident.
Of the two officers, the officer who shot the violent criminal is less culpable in the death of wright than the capitol officer is in the intentional shooting of Babbit.
Of the two officers, the officer who shot Wright should keep her job, while the Capitol police officer should lose his.....
And they need to release his name....and they need the DOJ to do a complete civil rights investigation into the shooting.
Correct.Putting down the criminal insurgent wasn't an accident.
I am? Please explain.Putting down the criminal insurgent wasn't an accident.The Capitol police officer shot and killed an unarmed, female Trump supporter. As far as we know, since the democrat party will not release his name, no warning was given, no attempt to use less lethal means was employed....she was shot in a panic by the officer.
In the Wright shooting, the violent criminal was actively fighting with an officer, and the other officer mistakenly drew and used her pistol, thinking it was a taser. It was an accident.
Of the two officers, the officer who shot the violent criminal is less culpable in the death of wright than the capitol officer is in the intentional shooting of Babbit.
Of the two officers, the officer who shot Wright should keep her job, while the Capitol police officer should lose his.....
And they need to release his name....and they need the DOJ to do a complete civil rights investigation into the shooting.
View attachment 491537
Now you're admitting that the murder was premeditated.
*****SMILE*****
Correct.Putting down the criminal insurgent wasn't an accident.
It was the lawful killing of a terrorist committing an act of terrorism.
Correct.Putting down the criminal insurgent wasn't an accident.
It was the lawful killing of a terrorist committing an act of terrorism.
View attachment 491543
Then have the president publicly sign a proclamation stating that.
*****SMILE*****
I am? Please explain.Putting down the criminal insurgent wasn't an accident.The Capitol police officer shot and killed an unarmed, female Trump supporter. As far as we know, since the democrat party will not release his name, no warning was given, no attempt to use less lethal means was employed....she was shot in a panic by the officer.
In the Wright shooting, the violent criminal was actively fighting with an officer, and the other officer mistakenly drew and used her pistol, thinking it was a taser. It was an accident.
Of the two officers, the officer who shot the violent criminal is less culpable in the death of wright than the capitol officer is in the intentional shooting of Babbit.
Of the two officers, the officer who shot Wright should keep her job, while the Capitol police officer should lose his.....
And they need to release his name....and they need the DOJ to do a complete civil rights investigation into the shooting.
View attachment 491537
Now you're admitting that the murder was premeditated.
*****SMILE*****
Correct.Putting down the criminal insurgent wasn't an accident.
It was the lawful killing of a terrorist committing an act of terrorism.
View attachment 491543
Then have the president publicly sign a proclamation stating that.
*****SMILE*****
Stating what? That shooting criminal insurgents attacking the congress is the capitols police's job? I think we all know that. At least those of us with working brains.
I am? Please explain.Putting down the criminal insurgent wasn't an accident.The Capitol police officer shot and killed an unarmed, female Trump supporter. As far as we know, since the democrat party will not release his name, no warning was given, no attempt to use less lethal means was employed....she was shot in a panic by the officer.
In the Wright shooting, the violent criminal was actively fighting with an officer, and the other officer mistakenly drew and used her pistol, thinking it was a taser. It was an accident.
Of the two officers, the officer who shot the violent criminal is less culpable in the death of wright than the capitol officer is in the intentional shooting of Babbit.
Of the two officers, the officer who shot Wright should keep her job, while the Capitol police officer should lose his.....
And they need to release his name....and they need the DOJ to do a complete civil rights investigation into the shooting.
View attachment 491537
Now you're admitting that the murder was premeditated.
*****SMILE*****
View attachment 491545
Explain to us how you didn't
*****SMILE*****
Correct.Putting down the criminal insurgent wasn't an accident.
It was the lawful killing of a terrorist committing an act of terrorism.
View attachment 491543
Then have the president publicly sign a proclamation stating that.
*****SMILE*****
Stating what? That shooting criminal insurgents attacking the congress is the capitols police's job? I think we all know that. At least those of us with working brains.
View attachment 491546
All I saw was a bunch of somewhat peaceful protestors who were fired upon by the Capitol police without warning or attempting to use non-lethal force.
Looks like there should be plenty of body cam footage to release.
Was it the little American flag she had that made them shoot an unarmed protestor?
*****SMILE*****
Am I mistaken in thinking you are a concealed carry holder who has had firearm training? Because if you have, did your instructors not go over disparity of force ?The Capitol police officer shot and killed an unarmed, female Trump supporter. As far as we know, since the democrat party will not release his name, no warning was given, no attempt to use less lethal means was employed....she was shot in a panic by the officer.
In the Wright shooting, the violent criminal was actively fighting with an officer, and the other officer mistakenly drew and used her pistol, thinking it was a taser. It was an accident.
Of the two officers, the officer who shot the violent criminal is less culpable in the death of wright than the capitol officer is in the intentional shooting of Babbit.
Of the two officers, the officer who shot Wright should keep her job, while the Capitol police officer should lose his.....
And they need to release his name....and they need the DOJ to do a complete civil rights investigation into the shooting.
How stupid do you have to be to ignore the commands of a law enforcement officer who has his firearm pointed at you and has warned you to stop what you're doing?She was just standing there.
Correct.Putting down the criminal insurgent wasn't an accident.
It was the lawful killing of a terrorist committing an act of terrorism.
View attachment 491543
Then have the president publicly sign a proclamation stating that.
*****SMILE*****
Stating what? That shooting criminal insurgents attacking the congress is the capitols police's job? I think we all know that. At least those of us with working brains.
View attachment 491546
All I saw was a bunch of somewhat peaceful protestors who were fired upon by the Capitol police without warning or attempting to use non-lethal force.
Looks like there should be plenty of body cam footage to release.
Was it the little American flag she had that made them shoot an unarmed protestor?
*****SMILE*****
Somewhat peaceful protesters.
Riiiiiight.
Apple and orange.The Capitol police officer shot and killed an unarmed, female Trump supporter. As far as we know, since the democrat party will not release his name, no warning was given, no attempt to use less lethal means was employed....she was shot in a panic by the officer.
In the Wright shooting, the violent criminal was actively fighting with an officer, and the other officer mistakenly drew and used her pistol, thinking it was a taser. It was an accident.
Of the two officers, the officer who shot the violent criminal is less culpable in the death of wright than the capitol officer is in the intentional shooting of Babbit.
Of the two officers, the officer who shot Wright should keep her job, while the Capitol police officer should lose his.....
And they need to release his name....and they need the DOJ to do a complete civil rights investigation into the shooting.
The Capitol Building was, and had been, closed to the public. This woman must have known that she was crossing barricades that had been set up to keep the public away, even if she stepped over one that had been pulled down by the mob. She entered the building knowing that she should not. She knowingly took part in the riot and was trying to crawl through a window that had been shattered by the mob. She was trying to enter a chamber that was off-limits to the public. She must have known that Congress was in session to carry out its constitutional duties at the time that she attacked it.
She is no hero and no martyr. She basically committed suicide by cop.
There is no need for the President to issue any proclamation. The right-wingers need to get over the ignorant idea that they have a right to demand that anyone pay attention to them. No, AOC is not going to "debate" some bleach-blond jackass who yells insults through a mail slot and talks about Jewish space lasers. No, the Maricopa County board is not going to meet with anyone to discuss some baboons' "election concerns." No, you can't just stop somebody on the street and question them. Nobody has any obligation to cater to attention whores.
