If someone has advice on how to break through to trump fans I'm all ears.

[jbrownson0831]

you can’t. If you calmly point out a fact to them, they will declare it "fake News" and move on with their day.

Speaking of fake, how about fake names, Commie from Conyers???

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I see the flaw in your question. You are looking for a logical way to communicate with trump cult members. There is no way to do that. Their brainwashing won't allow it. In time, some might realize how he misused them. Doubtful that those will actually turn against him. At best they might be less likely to endorse his every whim. Unfortunately, the rest will go to their grave as loyal drones. Deprogramming cult members is no small task.

Exactly!

They're too brainwashed to believe more expensive, less reliable energy is good.
They're too brainwashed to believe boys should play girls' sports.
They're too brainwashed to believe kids should be surgically mutilated.
They're too brainwashed to believe the government knows best.

It's hopeless.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

you can’t. If you calmly point out a fact to them, they will declare it "fake News" and move on with their day.

^ Very fake news

 

[Hafar1014]

I see the flaw in your question. You are looking for a logical way to communicate with trump cult members. There is no way to do that. Their brainwashing won't allow it. In time, some might realize how he misused them. Doubtful that those will actually turn against him. At best they might be less likely to endorse his every whim. Unfortunately, the rest will go to their grave as loyal drones. Deprogramming cult members is no small task.

That explains democrats losing 2.5 million voters and millions fleeing their states. Trump and the GOP are gaining strength while democrats are in a death spiral

 

[Polishprince]

I was struck by the revelations of text messages by Jeanine Pirro to Ronna McDaniel for two reasons. But first, here is what she wrote.

Ms. Pirro, a former Fox News host who is now the U.S. attorney for Washington, D.C., told Ronna McDaniel, then the Republican National Committee chair, in a text in the months before the election: “I work so hard for the President and the party.” Ms. Pirro had been pushing for a pardon from Mr. Trump for her ex-husband, Smartmatic argues.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/19/business/media/fox-news-trump-election-documents.html

A weekend personality on Fox made her case for her ex-hubby's pardon by sending the message about how she used her position as a broadcaster to work for trump and the Repub party. Other text messages from other anchors show just how much Fox was in the tank for trump by fomenting the "stop the steal" lie. This, from a cable station many millions of conservatives rely on for accurate information to inform their opinions. The problem being, it isn't accurate.

As a quick aside, consider how radically different the political landscape would be if the Fox talking heads had done what they should have done, what the facts told them to do, acknowledge trump's defeat.

The second thing is Pirro was rewarded for her hard work shilling for trump by being nominated to be the US Attorney for DC. Replacing Ed Martin.......a man so corrupt even Senate Repubs refused to confirm him. Repubs had no problem confirming Pirro despite the obvious compromise of her ethics and lack of ability to make impartial prosecutorial decisions. A furtherance of the corruption of the judiciary by trump as a reward for Jeanine's loyalty.

Back to my original question. How can I get trump devotees to take the small step of recognizing Jeanine Pirro should not have been nominated, nor confirmed, to be DC's US Attorney in light of this unequivocal evidence? Because if you can, perhaps you can take the next step. Maybe look in to Ed Martin and why Repubs refused to confirm him. More importantly, ask yourselves how trump could have put him in a temporary role as US Attorney in the first place and then assigned him to work for the DoJ.

Then maybe, just maybe, you can take the final step. You can ask yourselves why being in agreement with trump on border security has translated to support of what happened to Andry Hernandez Romero. Or this...........

Father of 3 Marines Who Was Beaten by ICE Agents Released, Leaving Family to Process His Detention​

Father of 3 Marines Who Was Beaten by ICE Agents Released, Leaving Family to Process His Detention | Military.com

www.military.com

Or this.........

Judge calls Trump DOJ’s request to release Epstein grand jury records a ‘diversion’​

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/08/20/trump-epstein-grand-jury-judge-diversion.html

Or this.......

Trump says U.S. will not approve solar or wind power projects​

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/08/20/trump-says-us-will-not-approve-solar-or-wind-power-projects.html

Or this.........

Trump vows to try banning mail-in voting before 2026 midterm elections — can he do that?​

Trump vows to try banning mail-in voting before 2026 midterm elections — can he do that?

President Trump says he plans to sign an executive order "to end mail-in ballots, because they're corrupt." Here's what to know about his claims.

www.cbsnews.com

Ms. Pirro seems to be doing a tremendous job as US Attorney in Washington. The Crime Rate has been plummeting in the district since she took the helm.

Do libs have a problem with that?

 

[jbrownson0831]

this guy voted for the number one name caller, who had a nickname for all his opponents, and he’s telling us how ineffective name-calling is, despite the fact that Trump won twice

Lots of libberbabble there, Socialist from Savannah....

 

[Hafar1014]

Speaking of fake, how about fake names, Commie from Conyers???

Or Biden is as sharp as a tack

 

[jbrownson0831]

historically, you just wait until their conservative leader ***** up the economy and foreign policy so bad that they realize years too late that day voted for the wrong guy

Again, throw away your SNAP card, get a job and enjoy awesome 401K growth from the current administration, Whiner from Warner Robins.

 

[berg80]

Lol a hack calling out hacks. Hilarious.

Any chance I can get you to respond to the subject of the thread, minus the gratuitous insults?

Back to my original question. How can I get trump devotees to take the small step of recognizing Jeanine Pirro should not have been nominated, nor confirmed, to be DC's US Attorney in light of this unequivocal evidence? Because if you can, perhaps you can take the next step. Maybe look in to Ed Martin and why Repubs refused to confirm him. More importantly, ask yourselves how trump could have put him in a temporary role as US Attorney in the first place and then assigned him to work for the DoJ.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Democrats have more to worry about than reminding Republican voters of Trump victories.

Death Cycle of the Democrat Party Accelerates With Massive Voter Exodus

(Zero Hedge)—A new analysis of voter registration data has sparked warning signs among Democratic Party leaders. This is because the

patriot.tv

 

[berg80]

Ms. Pirro seems to be doing a tremendous job as US Attorney in Washington. The Crime Rate has been plummeting in the district since she took the helm.

Do libs have a problem with that?

Can you explain specifically what she has done to achieve your dubious assertion? What made her qualified to be nominated other than her demonstrated loyalty to trump?

 

[berg80]

Studies into cults have essentially concluded that there is no breaking through from the outside. They have established and adopted their new reality, and it is an important part of who they perceive themselves to be. It's intensely personal.

As we have seen, this is so personal to them that it's breaking their families, their marriages, their relationships, and close friendships. THAT's when you know what this is. That's when you know their turning away is complete.

Either they ultimately figure it out on their own, or they don't. Any attempts from the outside only makes them retreat further into it.

That would certainly explain going out of their way to avoid the subject matter.

 

[TNHarley]

Any chance I can get you to respond to the subject of the thread, minus the gratuitous insults?

Back to my original question. How can I get trump devotees to take the small step of recognizing Jeanine Pirro should not have been nominated, nor confirmed, to be DC's US Attorney in light of this unequivocal evidence? Because if you can, perhaps you can take the next step. Maybe look in to Ed Martin and why Repubs refused to confirm him. More importantly, ask yourselves how trump could have put him in a temporary role as US Attorney in the first place and then assigned him to work for the DoJ.

They dont care what he does. He could shoot someone on fifth avenue, and wont lose any support. Just like the Ds (you)

 

[Chuz Life]

I was struck by the revelations of text messages by Jeanine Pirro to Ronna McDaniel for two reasons. But first, here is what she wrote.

Ms. Pirro, a former Fox News host who is now the U.S. attorney for Washington, D.C., told Ronna McDaniel, then the Republican National Committee chair, in a text in the months before the election: “I work so hard for the President and the party.” Ms. Pirro had been pushing for a pardon from Mr. Trump for her ex-husband, Smartmatic argues.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/19/business/media/fox-news-trump-election-documents.html

A weekend personality on Fox made her case for her ex-hubby's pardon by sending the message about how she used her position as a broadcaster to work for trump and the Repub party. Other text messages from other anchors show just how much Fox was in the tank for trump by fomenting the "stop the steal" lie. This, from a cable station many millions of conservatives rely on for accurate information to inform their opinions. The problem being, it isn't accurate.

As a quick aside, consider how radically different the political landscape would be if the Fox talking heads had done what they should have done, what the facts told them to do, acknowledge trump's defeat.

The second thing is Pirro was rewarded for her hard work shilling for trump by being nominated to be the US Attorney for DC. Replacing Ed Martin.......a man so corrupt even Senate Repubs refused to confirm him. Repubs had no problem confirming Pirro despite the obvious compromise of her ethics and lack of ability to make impartial prosecutorial decisions. A furtherance of the corruption of the judiciary by trump as a reward for Jeanine's loyalty.

Back to my original question. How can I get trump devotees to take the small step of recognizing Jeanine Pirro should not have been nominated, nor confirmed, to be DC's US Attorney in light of this unequivocal evidence? Because if you can, perhaps you can take the next step. Maybe look in to Ed Martin and why Repubs refused to confirm him. More importantly, ask yourselves how trump could have put him in a temporary role as US Attorney in the first place and then assigned him to work for the DoJ.

Then maybe, just maybe, you can take the final step. You can ask yourselves why being in agreement with trump on border security has translated to support of what happened to Andry Hernandez Romero. Or this...........

Father of 3 Marines Who Was Beaten by ICE Agents Released, Leaving Family to Process His Detention​

Father of 3 Marines Who Was Beaten by ICE Agents Released, Leaving Family to Process His Detention | Military.com

www.military.com

Or this.........

Judge calls Trump DOJ’s request to release Epstein grand jury records a ‘diversion’​

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/08/20/trump-epstein-grand-jury-judge-diversion.html

Or this.......

Trump says U.S. will not approve solar or wind power projects​

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/08/20/trump-says-us-will-not-approve-solar-or-wind-power-projects.html

Or this.........

Trump vows to try banning mail-in voting before 2026 midterm elections — can he do that?​

Trump vows to try banning mail-in voting before 2026 midterm elections — can he do that?

President Trump says he plans to sign an executive order "to end mail-in ballots, because they're corrupt." Here's what to know about his claims.

www.cbsnews.com

Baby killers, **** them all!

 

[berg80]

I see the flaw in your question. You are looking for a logical way to communicate with trump cult members. There is no way to do that. Their brainwashing won't allow it. In time, some might realize how he misused them. Doubtful that those will actually turn against him. At best they might be less likely to endorse his every whim. Unfortunately, the rest will go to their grave as loyal drones. Deprogramming cult members is no small task.

It may take something close to a life altering event. I noticed a number of 1/6 mob members have renounced their devotion to trump. But it took getting arrested and held responsible for committing a crime in his name for his benefit to get then to snap out of it.

 

[Mac1958]

That would certainly explain going out of their way to avoid the subject matter.

Ask them a question they don't like, and the thread becomes about YOU.

 

[Chuz Life]

Just scream TRUMP IS A NAZI over and over

Always be miserable, cry and scream in your car and post it to social media alot.

He can borrow my sig.

 

[Auld Phart]

Maybe it was DEI, he wanted an Italian on his staff.

Can you explain specifically what she has done to achieve your dubious assertion? What made her qualified to be nominated other than her demonstrated loyalty to trump?

Kinda like Biden wanted a black female as VP.

 

[mudwhistle]

Studies into cults have essentially concluded that there is no breaking through from the outside. They have established and adopted their new reality, and it is an important part of who they perceive themselves to be. It's intensely personal.

As we have seen, this is so personal to them that it's breaking their families, their marriages, their relationships, and close friendships. THAT's when you know what this is. That's when you know their turning away is complete.

Either they ultimately figure it out on their own, or they don't. Any attempts from the outside only makes them retreat further into it.

What a load of crap.

What is tearing families apart is the radical left cutting of their kid's tits and driving a wedge between kids and parents at every opportunity.

Dude, you really need to get a reality check for once.

 

[berg80]

They dont care what he does. He could shoot someone on fifth avenue, and wont lose any support. Just like the Ds (you)

I've seen many false equivalences before. I'll add yours to the list.