If republicans are so much better for the economy then why...

[Billy000]

If socialism is so great, why do Russia, Cuba and Venezuela suck so badly?

Because they have failed leaders. Of course, Venezuela has a private economy. Fox News probably didn’t tell you that. The real success stories are social democracies like the Nordic countries.

Venezuela has a private economy? Is there any reason anyone should pay attention to a thing you say?

Um because it’s true. Look it up and then feel dumb. You’re welcome.

I have looked it up. It's not true.

5 Ways Hugo Chavez Has Destroyed the Venezuelan Economy​

The Chavez government has expropriated or nationalized numerous companies (no one seems to be able to count them all) involved in various sectors including aluminum, cement, gold, iron, steel, farming, transportation, electricity, food production, banking, paper and the media. The number of private companies in industry has dropped from 14,000 in 1998 to only 9,000 in 2011, according to Torres.

Companies need investment to grow and hire new workers. One of the biggest failures of the Chavez government has been to drive away both domestic and foreign investors. In 2011 Latin America enjoyed a record of more than $150 billion in foreign investment with Brazil receiving $67 billion. Venezuela's neighbor Colombia received $13 billion while Venezuela received only $5 billion. To avoid expropriation and find investment a number of Venezuelan companies have moved to Colombia, Panama and the United States. ​

Lol all this proves is, yes, they have a private economy. It has shrunk, but I’m not even advocating for Venezuela. Obviously it’s a failure. You’re just stupid to think it is entirely socialist.

 

[Billy000]

...have the last 9 out of 10 recessions begun with a Republican President? Is it because people will never learn their lesson that trickledown economics is a sham? Incentivizing consumer demand is how you grow the economy after all. Republicans don’t give a shit about that.

https://www.frontpagelive.com/2020/...aign=9-of-last-10-recessions-&utm_content=222

Yep, too bad that idiot Ears didn't understand.
Full List of Obama Tax Hikes | Americans for Tax Reform

So why did Obama preside over the longest stretch of job growth in history?

A record 75 straight months of job growth under Obama

That's another way of saying he presided over the longest and slowest recovery in history.

Yeah because Bush caused the biggest recession since WWII. Inevitably the recovery would be slow.

Normally, the deeper the recessions, the sharper the rebound. Your theory that a sharp recession means a weak recovery is horseshit.

No that’s just you making shit up. During that recession, we were losing 500,000 jobs per month on average. Does your dumbass really think we could have possibly created that many jobs after tie recession ended?

 

[bripat9643]

If socialism is so great, why do Russia, Cuba and Venezuela suck so badly?

Because they have failed leaders. Of course, Venezuela has a private economy. Fox News probably didn’t tell you that. The real success stories are social democracies like the Nordic countries.

Venezuela has a private economy? Is there any reason anyone should pay attention to a thing you say?

Um because it’s true. Look it up and then feel dumb. You’re welcome.

I have looked it up. It's not true.

5 Ways Hugo Chavez Has Destroyed the Venezuelan Economy​

The Chavez government has expropriated or nationalized numerous companies (no one seems to be able to count them all) involved in various sectors including aluminum, cement, gold, iron, steel, farming, transportation, electricity, food production, banking, paper and the media. The number of private companies in industry has dropped from 14,000 in 1998 to only 9,000 in 2011, according to Torres.

Companies need investment to grow and hire new workers. One of the biggest failures of the Chavez government has been to drive away both domestic and foreign investors. In 2011 Latin America enjoyed a record of more than $150 billion in foreign investment with Brazil receiving $67 billion. Venezuela's neighbor Colombia received $13 billion while Venezuela received only $5 billion. To avoid expropriation and find investment a number of Venezuelan companies have moved to Colombia, Panama and the United States. ​

Lol all this proves is, yes, they have a private economy. It has shrunk, but I’m not even advocating for Venezuela. Obviously it’s a failure. You’re just stupid to think it is entirely socialist.

Wrong. It proves that they government abolished almost half the companies in the private economy. The ones it took over were all the biggest companies in the private economy.

Only a dumbass or a socialist ideologue (is there a difference?) would conclude that nationalizing thousands of companies means you have a private economy.

 

[bripat9643]

Yep, too bad that idiot Ears didn't understand.
Full List of Obama Tax Hikes | Americans for Tax Reform

So why did Obama preside over the longest stretch of job growth in history?

A record 75 straight months of job growth under Obama

That's another way of saying he presided over the longest and slowest recovery in history.

Yeah because Bush caused the biggest recession since WWII. Inevitably the recovery would be slow.

Normally, the deeper the recessions, the sharper the rebound. Your theory that a sharp recession means a weak recovery is horseshit.

No that’s just you making shit up. During that recession, we were losing 500,000 jobs per month on average. Does your dumbass really think we could have possibly created that many jobs after tie recession ended?

No, that's the historical record. Just consider the Reagan recovery.

Why wouldn't we create that many jobs? Reagan did.

 

[Billy000]

Because they have failed leaders. Of course, Venezuela has a private economy. Fox News probably didn’t tell you that. The real success stories are social democracies like the Nordic countries.

Venezuela has a private economy? Is there any reason anyone should pay attention to a thing you say?

Um because it’s true. Look it up and then feel dumb. You’re welcome.

I have looked it up. It's not true.

5 Ways Hugo Chavez Has Destroyed the Venezuelan Economy​

The Chavez government has expropriated or nationalized numerous companies (no one seems to be able to count them all) involved in various sectors including aluminum, cement, gold, iron, steel, farming, transportation, electricity, food production, banking, paper and the media. The number of private companies in industry has dropped from 14,000 in 1998 to only 9,000 in 2011, according to Torres.

Companies need investment to grow and hire new workers. One of the biggest failures of the Chavez government has been to drive away both domestic and foreign investors. In 2011 Latin America enjoyed a record of more than $150 billion in foreign investment with Brazil receiving $67 billion. Venezuela's neighbor Colombia received $13 billion while Venezuela received only $5 billion. To avoid expropriation and find investment a number of Venezuelan companies have moved to Colombia, Panama and the United States. ​

Lol all this proves is, yes, they have a private economy. It has shrunk, but I’m not even advocating for Venezuela. Obviously it’s a failure. You’re just stupid to think it is entirely socialist.

Wrong. It proves that they government abolished almost half the companies in the private economy. The ones it took over were all the biggest companies in the private economy.

Only a dumbass or a socialist ideologue (is there a difference?) would conclude that nationalizing thousands of companies means you have a private economy.

Uh it does because your only source says they still had private industries. Hell its not like the US doesn’t have social institutions as well. Our defense budget is the biggest socialist institution in the word lol

 

[Billy000]

So why did Obama preside over the longest stretch of job growth in history?

A record 75 straight months of job growth under Obama

That's another way of saying he presided over the longest and slowest recovery in history.

Yeah because Bush caused the biggest recession since WWII. Inevitably the recovery would be slow.

Normally, the deeper the recessions, the sharper the rebound. Your theory that a sharp recession means a weak recovery is horseshit.

No that’s just you making shit up. During that recession, we were losing 500,000 jobs per month on average. Does your dumbass really think we could have possibly created that many jobs after tie recession ended?

No, that's the historical record. Just consider the Reagan recovery.

Why wouldn't we create that many jobs? Reagan did.

Uh Obama no Obama still had the longest stretch of job growth. Also, why did so many recessions begin under republican presidents? You have yet to explain that. Hell Bush presided over two.

 

[bripat9643]

Venezuela has a private economy? Is there any reason anyone should pay attention to a thing you say?

Um because it’s true. Look it up and then feel dumb. You’re welcome.

I have looked it up. It's not true.

5 Ways Hugo Chavez Has Destroyed the Venezuelan Economy​

The Chavez government has expropriated or nationalized numerous companies (no one seems to be able to count them all) involved in various sectors including aluminum, cement, gold, iron, steel, farming, transportation, electricity, food production, banking, paper and the media. The number of private companies in industry has dropped from 14,000 in 1998 to only 9,000 in 2011, according to Torres.

Companies need investment to grow and hire new workers. One of the biggest failures of the Chavez government has been to drive away both domestic and foreign investors. In 2011 Latin America enjoyed a record of more than $150 billion in foreign investment with Brazil receiving $67 billion. Venezuela's neighbor Colombia received $13 billion while Venezuela received only $5 billion. To avoid expropriation and find investment a number of Venezuelan companies have moved to Colombia, Panama and the United States. ​

Lol all this proves is, yes, they have a private economy. It has shrunk, but I’m not even advocating for Venezuela. Obviously it’s a failure. You’re just stupid to think it is entirely socialist.

Wrong. It proves that they government abolished almost half the companies in the private economy. The ones it took over were all the biggest companies in the private economy.

Only a dumbass or a socialist ideologue (is there a difference?) would conclude that nationalizing thousands of companies means you have a private economy.

Uh it does because your only source says they still had private industries. Hell its not like the US doesn’t have social institutions as well. Our defense budget is the biggest socialist institution in the word lol

So if they had one private company, that means they aren't socialist?

You're obviously a dumbass.

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

If socialism is so great, why do Russia, Cuba and Venezuela suck so badly?

Because they have failed leaders. Of course, Venezuela has a private economy. Fox News probably didn’t tell you that. The real success stories are social democracies like the Nordic countries.

Venezuela has a private economy? Is there any reason anyone should pay attention to a thing you say?

Um because it’s true. Look it up and then feel dumb. You’re welcome.

I have looked it up. It's not true.

5 Ways Hugo Chavez Has Destroyed the Venezuelan Economy​

The Chavez government has expropriated or nationalized numerous companies (no one seems to be able to count them all) involved in various sectors including aluminum, cement, gold, iron, steel, farming, transportation, electricity, food production, banking, paper and the media. The number of private companies in industry has dropped from 14,000 in 1998 to only 9,000 in 2011, according to Torres.

Companies need investment to grow and hire new workers. One of the biggest failures of the Chavez government has been to drive away both domestic and foreign investors. In 2011 Latin America enjoyed a record of more than $150 billion in foreign investment with Brazil receiving $67 billion. Venezuela's neighbor Colombia received $13 billion while Venezuela received only $5 billion. To avoid expropriation and find investment a number of Venezuelan companies have moved to Colombia, Panama and the United States. ​

Lol all this proves is, yes, they have a private economy. It has shrunk, but I’m not even advocating for Venezuela. Obviously it’s a failure. You’re just stupid to think it is entirely socialist.

Before I hop in the shower with soap ( left wing kryptonite)to be fresh for valentine's offensive heteronormativity monkey dinner an luvin session

When did Venezuela disaster stop being democratic socialism?
What's the big difference between the bolivars agenda and policy and the democratic socialists here ?.....besides nothing really

Ferp

Happy valentine's leftards ...go fuck yourselves

 

[Billy000]

Um because it’s true. Look it up and then feel dumb. You’re welcome.

I have looked it up. It's not true.

5 Ways Hugo Chavez Has Destroyed the Venezuelan Economy​

The Chavez government has expropriated or nationalized numerous companies (no one seems to be able to count them all) involved in various sectors including aluminum, cement, gold, iron, steel, farming, transportation, electricity, food production, banking, paper and the media. The number of private companies in industry has dropped from 14,000 in 1998 to only 9,000 in 2011, according to Torres.

Companies need investment to grow and hire new workers. One of the biggest failures of the Chavez government has been to drive away both domestic and foreign investors. In 2011 Latin America enjoyed a record of more than $150 billion in foreign investment with Brazil receiving $67 billion. Venezuela's neighbor Colombia received $13 billion while Venezuela received only $5 billion. To avoid expropriation and find investment a number of Venezuelan companies have moved to Colombia, Panama and the United States. ​

Lol all this proves is, yes, they have a private economy. It has shrunk, but I’m not even advocating for Venezuela. Obviously it’s a failure. You’re just stupid to think it is entirely socialist.

Wrong. It proves that they government abolished almost half the companies in the private economy. The ones it took over were all the biggest companies in the private economy.

Only a dumbass or a socialist ideologue (is there a difference?) would conclude that nationalizing thousands of companies means you have a private economy.

Uh it does because your only source says they still had private industries. Hell its not like the US doesn’t have social institutions as well. Our defense budget is the biggest socialist institution in the word lol

So if they had one private company, that means they aren't socialist?

You're obviously a dumbass.

Uh no every country is socialist some degree including the US.

 

[bripat9643]

Because they have failed leaders. Of course, Venezuela has a private economy. Fox News probably didn’t tell you that. The real success stories are social democracies like the Nordic countries.

Venezuela has a private economy? Is there any reason anyone should pay attention to a thing you say?

Um because it’s true. Look it up and then feel dumb. You’re welcome.

I have looked it up. It's not true.

5 Ways Hugo Chavez Has Destroyed the Venezuelan Economy​

The Chavez government has expropriated or nationalized numerous companies (no one seems to be able to count them all) involved in various sectors including aluminum, cement, gold, iron, steel, farming, transportation, electricity, food production, banking, paper and the media. The number of private companies in industry has dropped from 14,000 in 1998 to only 9,000 in 2011, according to Torres.

Companies need investment to grow and hire new workers. One of the biggest failures of the Chavez government has been to drive away both domestic and foreign investors. In 2011 Latin America enjoyed a record of more than $150 billion in foreign investment with Brazil receiving $67 billion. Venezuela's neighbor Colombia received $13 billion while Venezuela received only $5 billion. To avoid expropriation and find investment a number of Venezuelan companies have moved to Colombia, Panama and the United States. ​

Lol all this proves is, yes, they have a private economy. It has shrunk, but I’m not even advocating for Venezuela. Obviously it’s a failure. You’re just stupid to think it is entirely socialist.

Before I hop in the shower with soap ( left wing kryptonite)to be fresh for valentine's offensive heteronormativity monkey dinner an luvin session

When did Venezuela disaster stop being democratic socialism?
What's the big difference between the bolivars agenda and policy and the democratic socialists here ?.....besides nothing really

Ferp

Happy valentine's leftards ...go fuck yourselves

Socialism stops being socialism when it implodes. Then it becomes icky capitalism.

 

[Billy000]

Because they have failed leaders. Of course, Venezuela has a private economy. Fox News probably didn’t tell you that. The real success stories are social democracies like the Nordic countries.

Venezuela has a private economy? Is there any reason anyone should pay attention to a thing you say?

Um because it’s true. Look it up and then feel dumb. You’re welcome.

I have looked it up. It's not true.

5 Ways Hugo Chavez Has Destroyed the Venezuelan Economy​

The Chavez government has expropriated or nationalized numerous companies (no one seems to be able to count them all) involved in various sectors including aluminum, cement, gold, iron, steel, farming, transportation, electricity, food production, banking, paper and the media. The number of private companies in industry has dropped from 14,000 in 1998 to only 9,000 in 2011, according to Torres.

Companies need investment to grow and hire new workers. One of the biggest failures of the Chavez government has been to drive away both domestic and foreign investors. In 2011 Latin America enjoyed a record of more than $150 billion in foreign investment with Brazil receiving $67 billion. Venezuela's neighbor Colombia received $13 billion while Venezuela received only $5 billion. To avoid expropriation and find investment a number of Venezuelan companies have moved to Colombia, Panama and the United States. ​

Lol all this proves is, yes, they have a private economy. It has shrunk, but I’m not even advocating for Venezuela. Obviously it’s a failure. You’re just stupid to think it is entirely socialist.

Before I hop in the shower with soap ( left wing kryptonite)to be fresh for valentine's offensive heteronormativity monkey dinner an luvin session

When did Venezuela disaster stop being democratic socialism?
What's the big difference between the bolivars agenda and policy and the democratic socialists here ?.....besides nothing really

Ferp

Happy valentine's leftards ...go fuck yourselves

Obviously Venezuela was never social democracy.

 

[Billy000]

Venezuela has a private economy? Is there any reason anyone should pay attention to a thing you say?

Um because it’s true. Look it up and then feel dumb. You’re welcome.

I have looked it up. It's not true.

5 Ways Hugo Chavez Has Destroyed the Venezuelan Economy​

The Chavez government has expropriated or nationalized numerous companies (no one seems to be able to count them all) involved in various sectors including aluminum, cement, gold, iron, steel, farming, transportation, electricity, food production, banking, paper and the media. The number of private companies in industry has dropped from 14,000 in 1998 to only 9,000 in 2011, according to Torres.

Companies need investment to grow and hire new workers. One of the biggest failures of the Chavez government has been to drive away both domestic and foreign investors. In 2011 Latin America enjoyed a record of more than $150 billion in foreign investment with Brazil receiving $67 billion. Venezuela's neighbor Colombia received $13 billion while Venezuela received only $5 billion. To avoid expropriation and find investment a number of Venezuelan companies have moved to Colombia, Panama and the United States. ​

Lol all this proves is, yes, they have a private economy. It has shrunk, but I’m not even advocating for Venezuela. Obviously it’s a failure. You’re just stupid to think it is entirely socialist.

Before I hop in the shower with soap ( left wing kryptonite)to be fresh for valentine's offensive heteronormativity monkey dinner an luvin session

When did Venezuela disaster stop being democratic socialism?
What's the big difference between the bolivars agenda and policy and the democratic socialists here ?.....besides nothing really

Ferp

Happy valentine's leftards ...go fuck yourselves

Socialism stops being socialism when it implodes. Then it becomes icky capitalism.

No that’s just you making shit up as you go along.
How adorable.

 

[bripat9643]

I have looked it up. It's not true.

5 Ways Hugo Chavez Has Destroyed the Venezuelan Economy​

The Chavez government has expropriated or nationalized numerous companies (no one seems to be able to count them all) involved in various sectors including aluminum, cement, gold, iron, steel, farming, transportation, electricity, food production, banking, paper and the media. The number of private companies in industry has dropped from 14,000 in 1998 to only 9,000 in 2011, according to Torres.

Companies need investment to grow and hire new workers. One of the biggest failures of the Chavez government has been to drive away both domestic and foreign investors. In 2011 Latin America enjoyed a record of more than $150 billion in foreign investment with Brazil receiving $67 billion. Venezuela's neighbor Colombia received $13 billion while Venezuela received only $5 billion. To avoid expropriation and find investment a number of Venezuelan companies have moved to Colombia, Panama and the United States. ​

Lol all this proves is, yes, they have a private economy. It has shrunk, but I’m not even advocating for Venezuela. Obviously it’s a failure. You’re just stupid to think it is entirely socialist.

Wrong. It proves that they government abolished almost half the companies in the private economy. The ones it took over were all the biggest companies in the private economy.

Only a dumbass or a socialist ideologue (is there a difference?) would conclude that nationalizing thousands of companies means you have a private economy.

Uh it does because your only source says they still had private industries. Hell its not like the US doesn’t have social institutions as well. Our defense budget is the biggest socialist institution in the word lol

So if they had one private company, that means they aren't socialist?

You're obviously a dumbass.

Uh no every country is socialist some degree including the US.

Yeah, and Venezuela is socialist to the nth degree. The more socialist a country is, the more of a shit hole it is.

 

[bripat9643]

Um because it’s true. Look it up and then feel dumb. You’re welcome.

I have looked it up. It's not true.

5 Ways Hugo Chavez Has Destroyed the Venezuelan Economy​

The Chavez government has expropriated or nationalized numerous companies (no one seems to be able to count them all) involved in various sectors including aluminum, cement, gold, iron, steel, farming, transportation, electricity, food production, banking, paper and the media. The number of private companies in industry has dropped from 14,000 in 1998 to only 9,000 in 2011, according to Torres.

Companies need investment to grow and hire new workers. One of the biggest failures of the Chavez government has been to drive away both domestic and foreign investors. In 2011 Latin America enjoyed a record of more than $150 billion in foreign investment with Brazil receiving $67 billion. Venezuela's neighbor Colombia received $13 billion while Venezuela received only $5 billion. To avoid expropriation and find investment a number of Venezuelan companies have moved to Colombia, Panama and the United States. ​

Lol all this proves is, yes, they have a private economy. It has shrunk, but I’m not even advocating for Venezuela. Obviously it’s a failure. You’re just stupid to think it is entirely socialist.

Before I hop in the shower with soap ( left wing kryptonite)to be fresh for valentine's offensive heteronormativity monkey dinner an luvin session

When did Venezuela disaster stop being democratic socialism?
What's the big difference between the bolivars agenda and policy and the democratic socialists here ?.....besides nothing really

Ferp

Happy valentine's leftards ...go fuck yourselves

Socialism stops being socialism when it implodes. Then it becomes icky capitalism.

No that’s just you making shit up as you go along.
How adorable.

I'm making nothing up. That's the record of socialism and it's brain damaged admirers.

 

[bripat9643]

Venezuela has a private economy? Is there any reason anyone should pay attention to a thing you say?

Um because it’s true. Look it up and then feel dumb. You’re welcome.

I have looked it up. It's not true.

5 Ways Hugo Chavez Has Destroyed the Venezuelan Economy​

The Chavez government has expropriated or nationalized numerous companies (no one seems to be able to count them all) involved in various sectors including aluminum, cement, gold, iron, steel, farming, transportation, electricity, food production, banking, paper and the media. The number of private companies in industry has dropped from 14,000 in 1998 to only 9,000 in 2011, according to Torres.

Companies need investment to grow and hire new workers. One of the biggest failures of the Chavez government has been to drive away both domestic and foreign investors. In 2011 Latin America enjoyed a record of more than $150 billion in foreign investment with Brazil receiving $67 billion. Venezuela's neighbor Colombia received $13 billion while Venezuela received only $5 billion. To avoid expropriation and find investment a number of Venezuelan companies have moved to Colombia, Panama and the United States. ​

Lol all this proves is, yes, they have a private economy. It has shrunk, but I’m not even advocating for Venezuela. Obviously it’s a failure. You’re just stupid to think it is entirely socialist.

Before I hop in the shower with soap ( left wing kryptonite)to be fresh for valentine's offensive heteronormativity monkey dinner an luvin session

When did Venezuela disaster stop being democratic socialism?
What's the big difference between the bolivars agenda and policy and the democratic socialists here ?.....besides nothing really

Ferp

Happy valentine's leftards ...go fuck yourselves

Obviously Venezuela was never social democracy.

No country ever was. That's like saying there was never a triangle with 4 corners. No duh!

 

[WTH_Progs?]

Once again Critical Thought Butchering Billy doesn't know what he's talking about. It's likely intellectual dishonesty, but heavy on ignorance too.

A. They suggest the economy was great under Carter, 1980 Look it up, "the double whammy".

B. Why wouldn't the causes of a recession be a factor? I could explain them to a PROG, but why waste the time? Just for kicks here's one. Recession beginning March 2001 (Bush was in office a month)
. The collapse of the speculative dot-com bubble, a fall in business outlays and investments, and the September 11th attacks,[72] brought the decade of growth to an end. Despite these major shocks, the recession was brief and shallow.[73]

C. If the POTUS is held accountable, HTF did you come to the conclusion congress isn't? Here are a few recent examples:

Recession beginning Dec. 2007, Democrats controlled House and equal numbers in the Senate.
Recession beginning July 1990, Democats controlled the House and Senate, and it wasn't close.

D. ILMAO @ POTUS' are cause for recessions. Sometimes they contribute toward the problem, such as Clinton, Bush, Obama and Carter.

E. Sometimes the cause for recessions occur on the former POTUS' watch.

F. Sometimes a recession runs deeper because of lack of faith in POTUS and congress (Obama & House & Senate controlled by Democrats).


I've obliterated the OP, same with the link I didn't have to open. I thought PROGS were supposed to be intelligent with all that college stuff, and their open minds?

 

[Billy000]

Once again Critical Thought Butchering Billy doesn't know what he's talking about. It's likely intellectual dishonesty, but heavy on ignorance too.

A. They suggest the economy was great under Carter, 1980 Look it up, "the double whammy".

B. Why wouldn't the causes of a recession be a factor? I could explain them to a PROG, but why waste the time? Just for kicks here's one. The early 2000s recession was a decline in economic activity which mainly occurred in developed countries. Bush became POTUS January 2001.

C. If the POTUS is held accountable, HTF did you come to the conclusion congress isn't? Here are a few recent examples:

Recession beginning Dec. 2007, Democrats controlled House and equal numbers in the Senate.
Recession beginning July 1990, Democats controlled the House and Senate, and it wasn't close.

D. ILMAO @ POTUS' are cause for recessions. Sometimes they contribute toward the problem, such as Clinton, Bush, Obama and Carter.

E. Sometimes the cause for recessions occur on the former POTUS' watch.

F. Sometimes a recession runs deeper because of lack of faith in POTUS and congress (Obama & House & Senate controlled by Democrats).


I've obliterated the OP, same with the link I didn't have to open. I thought PROGS were supposed to be intelligent with all that college stuff, and their open minds?

Lol this is so dumb. The recession ended under Obama within 6 months and they had full control of the government at the time. If it’s all the Dems’ fault and not the republicans huh? You still haven’t explained why 9 out of 10 recessions began under a republican president. Go ahead. I’ll wait.

 

[bripat9643]

Once again Critical Thought Butchering Billy doesn't know what he's talking about. It's likely intellectual dishonesty, but heavy on ignorance too.

A. They suggest the economy was great under Carter, 1980 Look it up, "the double whammy".

B. Why wouldn't the causes of a recession be a factor? I could explain them to a PROG, but why waste the time? Just for kicks here's one. The early 2000s recession was a decline in economic activity which mainly occurred in developed countries. Bush became POTUS January 2001.

C. If the POTUS is held accountable, HTF did you come to the conclusion congress isn't? Here are a few recent examples:

Recession beginning Dec. 2007, Democrats controlled House and equal numbers in the Senate.
Recession beginning July 1990, Democats controlled the House and Senate, and it wasn't close.

D. ILMAO @ POTUS' are cause for recessions. Sometimes they contribute toward the problem, such as Clinton, Bush, Obama and Carter.

E. Sometimes the cause for recessions occur on the former POTUS' watch.

F. Sometimes a recession runs deeper because of lack of faith in POTUS and congress (Obama & House & Senate controlled by Democrats).


I've obliterated the OP, same with the link I didn't have to open. I thought PROGS were supposed to be intelligent with all that college stuff, and their open minds?

Lol this is so dumb. The recession ended under Obama within 6 months and they had full control of the government at the time. If it’s all the Dems’ fault and not the republicans huh? You still haven’t explained why 9 out of 10 recessions began under a republican president. Go ahead. I’ll wait.

The economy was already on the rebound before Obama did a thing.

Only the gullible are swallowing the theory that he deserves the credit.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Only a dumbass or a socialist ideologue (is there a difference?) would conclude that nationalizing thousands of companies means you have a private economy.

There are other kinds of dumbasses beside socialist ideologues, but where Billy000 is concerned, there's not much point in trying to make the distinction.

 

[Maxdeath]

...have the last 9 out of 10 recessions begun with a Republican President? Is it because people will never learn their lesson that trickledown economics is a sham? Incentivizing consumer demand is how you grow the economy after all. Republicans don’t give a shit about that.

https://www.frontpagelive.com/2020/...aign=9-of-last-10-recessions-&utm_content=222

Our economy is doing GREAT right now, you dimwit.

If the economy is so great, why did the President cancel the 1% raise for federal employees, saying it was because of the poor economy?

Trump: The economy is the best in history. Also Trump: We need to cut raises for federal workers.

You really have to love the crazy left. They yammer on about the deficit but the minute an overpaid government employee doesn't get a full wage increase the idea of deficit goes out the window. I guess it is just whatever makes them feel that Trump can be blamed.
Funny how the so called caring and inclusive left is never seen on here getting upset that the elderly get crumbs instead of real increases.
But it is not really about raises or no raises it is all about making Trump look bad.