Likkmee
Gold Member
" Go and be fruitful and multiply"....unless a dude with a gold wand wearing a robe and a yarmulke(ever wonder about that one?) tells you not to.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You are entitled to your opinions, Picaro, but you should post real links before you read any of it.
Matter of opinion. Religion has been used to justify countless horrors over the millenia.Maybe. Religions condone all kinds of immorality.
Not nearly even remotely as much as 'new atheists' and 'rationalists' do, which is why so many of you are mentally ill deviants and so obsessed with ridiculous Xian bashing rubbish.
And yet by any objective assessment, religion has been a force for good. Maybe your problem is that you have never made an objective assessment.Matter of opinion. Religion has been used to justify countless horrors over the millenia.Maybe. Religions condone all kinds of immorality.
Not nearly even remotely as much as 'new atheists' and 'rationalists' do, which is why so many of you are mentally ill deviants and so obsessed with ridiculous Xian bashing rubbish.
Force for good, except for the people conquered and slaughtered who had a different religion. If you’re going to complain about objectivity, you should try it first.And yet by any objective assessment, religion has been a force for good. Maybe your problem is that you have never made an objective assessment.Matter of opinion. Religion has been used to justify countless horrors over the millenia.Maybe. Religions condone all kinds of immorality.
Not nearly even remotely as much as 'new atheists' and 'rationalists' do, which is why so many of you are mentally ill deviants and so obsessed with ridiculous Xian bashing rubbish.
I totally agree. That is exactly what I have done.Force for good, except for the people conquered and slaughtered who had a different religion. If you’re going to complain about objectivity, you should try it first.And yet by any objective assessment, religion has been a force for good. Maybe your problem is that you have never made an objective assessment.Matter of opinion. Religion has been used to justify countless horrors over the millenia.Maybe. Religions condone all kinds of immorality.
Not nearly even remotely as much as 'new atheists' and 'rationalists' do, which is why so many of you are mentally ill deviants and so obsessed with ridiculous Xian bashing rubbish.
You are not being even a little bit objectiveI totally agree. That is exactly what I have done.Force for good, except for the people conquered and slaughtered who had a different religion. If you’re going to complain about objectivity, you should try it first.And yet by any objective assessment, religion has been a force for good. Maybe your problem is that you have never made an objective assessment.Matter of opinion. Religion has been used to justify countless horrors over the millenia.Maybe. Religions condone all kinds of immorality.
Not nearly even remotely as much as 'new atheists' and 'rationalists' do, which is why so many of you are mentally ill deviants and so obsessed with ridiculous Xian bashing rubbish.
Now wold you like to do the same for militant atheists? Because their atrocities were less than 100 years ago and dwarfed anything religion has done. Not to mention they have never done one good thing for the world while religion has.
'
But I have. I have looked at both sides of religion and militant atheism. The good and the bad.You are not being even a little bit objectiveI totally agree. That is exactly what I have done.Force for good, except for the people conquered and slaughtered who had a different religion. If you’re going to complain about objectivity, you should try it first.And yet by any objective assessment, religion has been a force for good. Maybe your problem is that you have never made an objective assessment.Matter of opinion. Religion has been used to justify countless horrors over the millenia.Not nearly even remotely as much as 'new atheists' and 'rationalists' do, which is why so many of you are mentally ill deviants and so obsessed with ridiculous Xian bashing rubbish.
Now wold you like to do the same for militant atheists? Because their atrocities were less than 100 years ago and dwarfed anything religion has done. Not to mention they have never done one good thing for the world while religion has.
'
You have it backwards. Typically they want little girls, but will settle for little boys because little girls are more difficult to get to. But it's about the child, the sex of the child is secondary.Pedophiles are most likely to be white Christian males in their 40's with children of their own.Do pedophiles convert to Islam for acceptance?
At least that used to be the FBI's typical pedophile.
Funny, they rarely molest their own children.
Most of the time, their sexuality is hetrosexual but their fetish is children.
I doubt if it's changed much in the last 40 years, since I did a report on it in phycology class in college.
Rubbish. The last major FBI investigation of NAMBLA is covered in a book named The Last Undercover; you're just a liar and deviant yourself. Also noteworthy is that even those pedophile who identify and prefer to rape little boys admit they also will rape little girls in a pinch, if boys aren't available, so the sickos also account for a significant number of male on girl kiddie rapes as well.
You have dismissed millenia of slaughter in the name of the multitude of Gods in order to villainize what you perceive as atheist acts over a few years in the only century where weapons of mass murder existed. Thank goodness those weapons weren’t available in the past, or humanity would not exist.But I have. I have looked at both sides of religion and militant atheism. The good and the bad.You are not being even a little bit objectiveI totally agree. That is exactly what I have done.Force for good, except for the people conquered and slaughtered who had a different religion. If you’re going to complain about objectivity, you should try it first.And yet by any objective assessment, religion has been a force for good. Maybe your problem is that you have never made an objective assessment.Matter of opinion. Religion has been used to justify countless horrors over the millenia.
Now wold you like to do the same for militant atheists? Because their atrocities were less than 100 years ago and dwarfed anything religion has done. Not to mention they have never done one good thing for the world while religion has.
'
Speaking of school, perhaps some study is in order:Pedophiles are most likely to be public school teachers.
No. I placed it in the context of that day. Just as I did the atrocities the militant atheists committed. It was a stark contrast.You have dismissed millenia of slaughter in the name of the multitude of Gods in order to villainize what you perceive as atheist acts over a few years in the only century where weapons of mass murder existed. Thank goodness those weapons weren’t available in the past, or humanity would not exist.But I have. I have looked at both sides of religion and militant atheism. The good and the bad.You are not being even a little bit objectiveI totally agree. That is exactly what I have done.Force for good, except for the people conquered and slaughtered who had a different religion. If you’re going to complain about objectivity, you should try it first.And yet by any objective assessment, religion has been a force for good. Maybe your problem is that you have never made an objective assessment.
Now wold you like to do the same for militant atheists? Because their atrocities were less than 100 years ago and dwarfed anything religion has done. Not to mention they have never done one good thing for the world while religion has.
'
Plenty of good done by both. See, that’s objective.No. I placed it in the context of that day. Just as I did the atrocities the militant atheists committed. It was a stark contrast.You have dismissed millenia of slaughter in the name of the multitude of Gods in order to villainize what you perceive as atheist acts over a few years in the only century where weapons of mass murder existed. Thank goodness those weapons weren’t available in the past, or humanity would not exist.But I have. I have looked at both sides of religion and militant atheism. The good and the bad.You are not being even a little bit objectiveI totally agree. That is exactly what I have done.Force for good, except for the people conquered and slaughtered who had a different religion. If you’re going to complain about objectivity, you should try it first.
Now wold you like to do the same for militant atheists? Because their atrocities were less than 100 years ago and dwarfed anything religion has done. Not to mention they have never done one good thing for the world while religion has.
'
Now let's look at the good each did, OK?
What good was done by militant atheists?Plenty of good done by both. See, that’s objective.No. I placed it in the context of that day. Just as I did the atrocities the militant atheists committed. It was a stark contrast.You have dismissed millenia of slaughter in the name of the multitude of Gods in order to villainize what you perceive as atheist acts over a few years in the only century where weapons of mass murder existed. Thank goodness those weapons weren’t available in the past, or humanity would not exist.But I have. I have looked at both sides of religion and militant atheism. The good and the bad.You are not being even a little bit objectiveI totally agree. That is exactly what I have done.
Now wold you like to do the same for militant atheists? Because their atrocities were less than 100 years ago and dwarfed anything religion has done. Not to mention they have never done one good thing for the world while religion has.
'
Now let's look at the good each did, OK?
Atheists were slaughtered for voicing their beliefs until very recently. But atheists accomplished quite a lot despite suffering under extreme oppression.What good was done by militant atheists?Plenty of good done by both. See, that’s objective.No. I placed it in the context of that day. Just as I did the atrocities the militant atheists committed. It was a stark contrast.You have dismissed millenia of slaughter in the name of the multitude of Gods in order to villainize what you perceive as atheist acts over a few years in the only century where weapons of mass murder existed. Thank goodness those weapons weren’t available in the past, or humanity would not exist.But I have. I have looked at both sides of religion and militant atheism. The good and the bad.You are not being even a little bit objective
Now let's look at the good each did, OK?
Like what? They ran several countries in the 20th century and still run some today. What good has come from them?Atheists were slaughtered for voicing their beliefs until very recently. But atheists accomplished quite a lot despite suffering under extreme oppression.What good was done by militant atheists?Plenty of good done by both. See, that’s objective.No. I placed it in the context of that day. Just as I did the atrocities the militant atheists committed. It was a stark contrast.You have dismissed millenia of slaughter in the name of the multitude of Gods in order to villainize what you perceive as atheist acts over a few years in the only century where weapons of mass murder existed. Thank goodness those weapons weren’t available in the past, or humanity would not exist.But I have. I have looked at both sides of religion and militant atheism. The good and the bad.
Now let's look at the good each did, OK?