He did NOT.
NO EVIDENCE
NO CRIME
NO RUSSIAN COLLUSION
NO OBSTRUCTION...
THUS...
NO INDICTMENTS FOR COLLUSION
NO CONVICTIONS FOR COLLUSION
NO INDICTMENTS FOR OBSTRUCTION
NO CONVICTIONS FOR OBSTRUCTION.
'Nuff time wasted.
'Nuff said.
NEXT!
I'll try and type slowly just for you. Mueller and the Justice Department cannot indict a sitting President,period. They can't arrest and try their own Boss. Mueller did exactly what he was supposed to do. He didn't say Trump was innocent or guilty of anything other than collusion. And collusion is not a crime. But Obstruction is. He laid it out and left it up to Congress to make it's own determination. Congress has the ability to charge and try a sitting President, not the DOJ. Mueller couldn't say if he was guilty or not as well. He left that up to Congress.
There is enough evidence according to the report that Trump did intend to obstruct and did somewhat. He tried to do a lot more but his staff ignored some of his insanity and probably saved his butt by not following his directives. But there is enough to show that he did try and influence people in the process much in the same way that Nixon did and was busted for. There were grounds for impeachment for Nixon although he resigned before that became a factor. But he did have to be punished because of the obstruction and that could have bit him in the ass after he left office. Trump is in the same boat right now.
You can sugar coat it all you wish but Mueller did one hell of a job and was extremely diplomatic about how he worded things to keep from wrecking his career.