You presented nothing, and then you accuse people of having nothing. What a dumb ******* retard you are.
I presented what has been released and its the Dems own words and emails. You can't handle that its your problem you lying sack of shit.
No you didn't you dumb ******* idiot. You posted poorly worded slogans that were fed to you from partisan media. You managed to sound like a stuttering moron even though you have an unlimited amount of time to type out your thoughts on this forum. Get back to me when you're not too chickenshit to actually make and articulate a point.
First, Hillary never held a solid lead against Mr Trump, as well as she never carried the popularity of the young vote the way Bernie Sanders did (who could relate to younger voters better than Mrs Clinton I might add). Then there were those staged violent protestors that her supporters encouraged, to try and disrupt the momentum Trump carried from the republican primary. When that didn't work, Clinton supporters of the left thought it wise to dig up old private conversations Mr Trump's had in private toward women as well as SO "conveniently" find women to come forward with their own "stories" in an attempt discredit him. YET, you take issue of private emails involving Mrs Clinton and the DNC being used against her in the election?
• tissue • ?
Let's see, you also site blame on Comey for looking into Mrs Clinton's emails, a decision Mrs Clinton chose to do on her own accord regarding the use of a private server (despite being advised not to). The left having us all believe that a Secretary of State couldn't possibly EVER come across classified information on a private server from that office, that never should be available to anyone OUTSIDE of her own personal attention. Oh, my bad... Mrs Clinton can't tell the difference between classified "need to know" and general public information. So much for her ability to control government information, as we know more about those emails through Mrs Clinton than any Secretary of State prior to her. So despite all that prior information going into the election, as well as Hillary NEVER had a solid strong lead going into election night against Mr Trump, you want to say that his position as presidential elect is somehow illegitimate? That would make you no different and lumped into the same category as all those birther movement individuals that tried to say Obama was somehow an illegitimate presidential elect. Why don't you go find yourself a box of Kleenex to hide behind for the next four years, with your sob story.
It was ok to bring up and publicize a private conversation involving Trump to try and effect an election, but somehow not private emails that involve Mrs Clinton with the DNC. That was crossing the line. Quite frankly I find the comparison, and that bit of ongoing whining and sobbing, to be rather humorous for someone to hold a grudge because the election didn't happen to go the way they had hoped. At least with all the demonstrators and the many handkerchiefs that are to be held on Inauguration Day this year, I'd say the conservatives acted a little more grown up in handling Barrack Obama's initial oath of office as president.
