Zone1 If leadership is forced to close a thread on a rule change...

[SassyIrishLass]

And if you use the term in that context, no mod is going to bother you.
You accuse another poster of grooming children you will be banned

You're not a mod..... thank God

 

[Bob Blaylock]

If some new member showed up here and was a strong advocate for the depraved National Man Boy Love Association, and in fact then admitted that he had sex with children, it would be perfectly fair to label him as a pedo. Truth is a defense to a slander or libel lawsuit. I’m not sure it would be a defense here for violating the Board “rule.”

Just short of that, there is at least one active member of this forum—I simply do not see how any reasonable person can read some of the shit that he's posted, and not conclude that he is almost certainly a pedophile. Admittedly, we cannot know what he does, or has done, or will do, out in The Real World, but what he posts here, certainly seems indicative of a desire to **** young boys, and to groom young boys in a manner to make them easier prey for pedofaggots like himself. I've been tempbanned, several times, for calling this piece of shit out on his advocacy of child sexual abuse.

He's the only case that I know of of an active member of this forum who is an obvious pedophile, but there are many others who very obviously defend his kind.

 

[BackAgain]

Just short of that, there is at least one active member of this forum—I simply do not see how any reasonable person can read some of the shit that he's posted, and not conclude that he is almost certainly a pedophile. Admittedly, we cannot know what he does, or has done, or will do, out in The Real World, but what he posts here, certainly seems indicative of a desire to **** young boys, and to groom young boys in a manner to make them easier prey for pedofaggots like himself. I've been tempbanned, several times, for calling this piece of shit out on his advocacy of child sexual abuse.

He's the only case that I know of of an active member of this forum who is an obvious pedophile, but there are many others who very obviously defend his kind.

I wonder if I have the offending poster on ignore. But, I don’t recall seeing such sickening posts. Thankfully.

 

[Unkotare]

Was that where you learned about the Japanese sexual poop fetish called unkotare?

Keep your perversions to yourself, freak.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Keep your perversions to yourself, freak.

Unkotare is the name for a Japanese sex fetish involving human feces

I certainly wasn't the one naming myself after it.

 

[BackAgain]

Hardly when rabid minds are judging.

So stop being so judgmental, Goon.

 

[Unkotare]

Unkotare is the name for a Japanese sex fetish involving human feces
....

That's not what it means, freak.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Just short of that, there is at least one active member of this forum—I simply do not see how any reasonable person can read some of the shit that he's posted, and not conclude that he is almost certainly a pedophile.

I wonder if I have the offending poster on ignore. But, I don’t recall seeing such sickening posts. Thankfully.

You last responded to the piece of shit in question on 22 January 2023 at 18:16 PST.

 

[BackAgain]

Keep your perversions to yourself, freak.

Actually, I just looked up that word. Apparently, it is Japanese porn related to pooping.

The more you know!

Disgusting. But true.

 

[BackAgain]

You last responded to the piece of shit in question on 22 January 2023 at 18:16 PST.

 

[Seymour Flops]

I think that there actually are people who truly believe that the transgender industry's lobbyists and activists are only concerned for the well-being of the children whose gender confusion they advocate medicalizing and surgicalizing - not the enormous profits available since the legal requirement that health insurance cover such foolishness.

Those people who are not profiteers of the child transgender movement, but support it because of that sincere belive that "gender-affirming care" is good for children are not groomers. They are morons, but not groomers. Fortunately, "moron" is not a banned term.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Actually, I just looked up that word. Apparently, it is Japanese porn related to pooping.

The more you know!

View attachment 755148

Disgusting. But true.

Scat Kings. Ewww

 

[Seymour Flops]

The book "Gender Queer," which one of our posters is so keen on putting in the hands of children, does not even mention medicalizing, surgicalizing, or even counseling (the gateway to the meds and scalpals) for the main character. The main character does not agonize over deciding their gender. Instead, the underage main character is obsessed about having sex with same-age peers and with adults. The fantasies are shown in very graphic detail. This book is entirely about normalizing under-age sex.

The word for an adult who promotes such a book is obvious. That word being banned, we only need a new one to take its place. The Texas Penal Code addresses the crime, without applying specific nomenclature to the perpetrators:

View attachment 755146

I suggest CSPP - Child Sexual Permormance Promoter.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

That's not what it means, freak.

Yeah it sorts does. You might want to consider a name change

 

[Dogmaphobe]

That's not what it means, freak.

Anybody here can Google that up for themselves

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Anybody here can Google that up for themselves

My first hit was Japanese scat porn.

Never again

 

[Foxfyre]

I guess you are correct

”Groomer“ means someone who styles your hair. It has nothing to do with grooming children for homosexual sex

If that is so, then why is there so much bru ha ha over that term here at USMB? A whole lot of band width has been taken up in these discussions.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Google tailors your searches to your previous searches. Just saying.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

I know that's supposed to be an emoticon depicting a startled face, but as an electrician, I look at it and see a NEMA 5-15 receptacle.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Google tailors your searches to your previous searches. Just saying.

Unless it's a new search, dumbass