Think about it! On the other hand, I seem to remember before Reagan took the oath that his team opened a back channel to Iran to collude with them and cut a deal to release the hostage's once he took the oath of office. As lawyer Alan Dershowitz stated, there has been no crime of what Kushner did. It also proves there was no collusion before. Otherwise, what was the point in Kushner seeking a private back channel if they already allegedly had one?
www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/05/dnc-calls-trump-son-law-jared-kushner-fired-job/
Oh stevie, your deluding yourself.
It means that Kushner was more than willing to give full and complete control of all communication between the Fascist Draft Dodger's Transition Team and Russia. That would include classified data from the U.S. Government.
Why was such a back channel needed and why would Mike Flynn, a former Director of Defense Intelligence Agency not speak out against it, he was in the damn meetings when it was discussed. He would have known such a system was a violation of National Security.
Why would Kushner talk to the Russian Ambassador about such back channel being in the Russian Embassy or Russian Consulate?
Such a communications setup is a National Security Risk. Giving Russia full and complete access to any and all communication between GroppenFuhrer and the U.S. Government is bordering on Treason.
But I know what stevie boy willy, IOKIYAR.