If Kushner Was Looking For Back Channels To Russia In December, That Means They Never Had Any Before

[Steve_McGarrett]

What channels did Hillary use to secure her Uranium sale to the Russians?

 

[toomuchtime_]

Ok, so when the President wants to call Putin or Lavrov from the Oval Office, to discuss Ukraine or Syria or other matters, there is no line that is secure from the leakers left by Obama.

Electrospaces.net: Trump's "beautiful" Oval Office phones and what was changed on them

Based upon the photos that have been published, president Trump used the non-secure telephone for calls with German chancellor Merkel and Saudi Arabia's king Salman, while the secure one was used for phone calls with Russian president Putin and Australian prime minister Turnbull. This means that these latter heads of state have been provided with the necessary encryption systems to set up a secure communication channel.

referring to the Cisco 7975 for the secure Executive Network, Trump added that it is "The world’s most secure system - The words just explode in the air" - a rather odd way to say that these calls are highly encrypted and therefore impossible to intercept

So all of this is surmised from a photo. The conversation about establishing a secure line using the Russian network ocurred shortly after the November election, so if this story is correct and the President has confidence in his present system, there would be no need to set up the system Kushner allegedly discussed with the Russian ambassdor. This point is, either way, it is a non story.

 

[easyt65]

Russians, according to snowflakes, can't be trusted....unless, all of a sudden, they are making claims about Trump's twam members.

'Desperation' makes strange 'bedfellows'.

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

Like Democrat lawyer Alan Dershowitz, I'm seeing a whole lotta nothing on this Kushner thing.This is just more Democrat projections.

 

[radical right]

So all of this is surmised from a photo. .

And from Trumps own words.

Trump added that it is "The world’s most secure system -

 

[radical right]

The conversation about establishing a secure line using the Russian network ocurred shortly after the November election, so if this story is correct and the President has confidence in his present system, there would be no need to set up the system Kushner allegedly discussed with the Russian ambassdor. .

So why did Trump send his top advisor to set up a secret communication to Putin? Trump was giving the rundown on the secure phone in the oval office. And that it was a secure line to Putin.

 

[toomuchtime_]

So all of this is surmised from a photo. .

And from Trumps own words.

Trump added that it is "The world’s most secure system -

Then if the President is satisfied with his present system there would be no need to use a Russian secure network. End of story.

 

[toomuchtime_]

The conversation about establishing a secure line using the Russian network ocurred shortly after the November election, so if this story is correct and the President has confidence in his present system, there would be no need to set up the system Kushner allegedly discussed with the Russian ambassdor. .

So why did Trump send his top advisor to set up a secret communication to Putin? Trump was giving the rundown on the secure phone in the oval office. And that it was a secure line to Putin.

Kushner's alleged conversation about using a Russian secure network was shortly after the election and Trump didn't move into the Oval Office until a few months later, so if he was satisfied with the system in the Oval Office, Kushner's conversation would have become irrelevant.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Think about it! On the other hand, I seem to remember before Reagan took the oath that his team opened a back channel to Iran to collude with them and cut a deal to release the hostage's once he took the oath of office. As lawyer Alan Dershowitz stated, there has been no crime of what Kushner did. It also proves there was no collusion before. Otherwise, what was the point in Kushner seeking a private back channel if they already allegedly had one?




www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/05/dnc-calls-trump-son-law-jared-kushner-fired-job/

/---- Do you also believe the Gubmint has UFOs in Area 51?

 

[frigidweirdo]

Think about it! On the other hand, I seem to remember before Reagan took the oath that his team opened a back channel to Iran to collude with them and cut a deal to release the hostage's once he took the oath of office. As lawyer Alan Dershowitz stated, there has been no crime of what Kushner did. It also proves there was no collusion before. Otherwise, what was the point in Kushner seeking a private back channel if they already allegedly had one?




www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/05/dnc-calls-trump-son-law-jared-kushner-fired-job/

No, it doesn't prove there wasn't collusion before. It might have meant that Kushner wasn't in on any collusion before.

 

[RASTAMEN]

Again for the slow and stupid it is neither illegal not wrong for an incoming administration to create channels for dialog with foreign Nations.

 

[RASTAMEN]

Like Democrat lawyer Alan Dershowitz, I'm seeing a whole lotta nothing on this Kushner thing.This is just more Democrat projections.

 

[bravoactual]

S top presidential adviser Jared Kushner “has no recollection” ofundisclosed contacts with a Russian ambassador during the 2016 presidential campaign and transition, his lawyer says.

According to Reuters, Ivanka Trump’s Jewish husband held at least two phone calls with Kislyak between April and November 2016.

Bullshit. The FBI is only asking about two conversations with Russians after the election.

Please provide necessary links to provide evidence as proof of this statement. If not your following in the foot steps of lying stevee boy

Asshole, where was your link to support you claim his lawyers said something different.

Hey fuck wad, the burden of proof is not on me, it on the idiot con who the post which I quoted.

He made was is a declarative statement . "The FBI is only asking about two conservations with Russians after the election". He asserted facts not presented. It is up to him to provide any and all such proof he has in support that statement.

No, the burden is on you to stop being so stupid.

I bet if you tried really hard you could even learn to add one and one without using your fingers.

 

[RASTAMEN]

Trump is in trouble!!!

 

[Billy_Bob]

Think about it! On the other hand, I seem to remember before Reagan took the oath that his team opened a back channel to Iran to collude with them and cut a deal to release the hostage's once he took the oath of office. As lawyer Alan Dershowitz stated, there has been no crime of what Kushner did. It also proves there was no collusion before. Otherwise, what was the point in Kushner seeking a private back channel if they already allegedly had one?




www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/05/dnc-calls-trump-son-law-jared-kushner-fired-job/

Now your trying to get intellectual midgets to use a cognitive thought process and think this through.. You know better..

If they were looking, they obviously did not have one (or they wouldn't be looking for one...) Now you've gone and done it, invoked common sense and using your brain..

 

[Billy_Bob]

Trump is in trouble!!!

GQ and made up shit....LOL

The desperation, for anything to stick, is priceless...

 

[RASTAMEN]

The conversation about establishing a secure line using the Russian network ocurred shortly after the November election, so if this story is correct and the President has confidence in his present system, there would be no need to set up the system Kushner allegedly discussed with the Russian ambassdor. .

So why did Trump send his top advisor to set up a secret communication to Putin? Trump was giving the rundown on the secure phone in the oval office. And that it was a secure line to Putin.

Kushner's alleged conversation about using a Russian secure network was shortly after the election and Trump didn't move into the Oval Office until a few months later, so if he was satisfied with the system in the Oval Office, Kushner's conversation would have become irrelevant.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Again for the slow and stupid it is neither illegal not wrong for an incoming administration to create channels for dialog with foreign Nations.

even if the channel is in the Russian Embassy SCIF? to avoid USA intelligence?

Treason but then again, what can't Trump supporters excuse? Seems they hold Trump to a doffered standard which is no standard at all.

 

[radical right]

Treason but then again, what can't Trump supporters excuse? Seems they hold Trump to a doffered standard which is no standard at all.

All communication between the president and a foreign leader is automatically classified top secret. Hillary was attacked for putting this onto a private e-mail server, while Kushner wanted to put it onto a system owned and operated by the russians.

WTF? They thought this was O.K.

 

[bravoactual]

HRC endured 9-Separate Investigations and no indictment(s) came down. Hell She was has undergone over 25-Years of Investigations and still nothing. Now that is a witch hunt.

der GroppenFuhrer wants back channel communications with Russia, staffed with Russian Personal and at the Russian Embassy and the RePuBliKlans have no problem with it.

der GroppenFuhrer can tell high Ranking Russian Officials about Israeli Intelligence Assets working against DASEH and the RePuBliKlans have no problem with it.

der GroppenFuhrer can tell an elected foreign head of state of U.S. Navy Nuclear Powered Submarines at sea and the RePuBLiKans have no problem with it.

RePuBliKans will bitch, moan, whine and complain about leaks, but ignore the leaks from the Lying Cowardly Cheeto Faced Fascist Draft Dodger-In-Chief.

But Don't Folks, Because As We All Know By Now..........IOKIYAR.