If It's Bad.....Jews Did It

[ChrisL]

Like I thought, you (like other delusional CTs) will ignore the facts to continue living in your delusional fantasy world. Maybe you need to get a life or something.

a dime store magazine is where you seek information on 9/11..lol why not just a 9/11 comic book

Yeah sure. Lol. This is the response one would expect from a 9/11 denier. Shame . . . shame on YOU!

popular mechanics is some kind of authority in your mind ?
here is the brains of the operation

It's not just PM. A LOT of scientists have explored, studied, and debunked your "myths."

Debunking 911 Conspiracy Theories and Controlled Demolition Homepage

name 2

I just posted a link for you. IF you had bothered to read it, you would see that there are MULTIPLE links in that site. Lol. You aren't interested in the truth though. That much is obvious.

 

[eots]

 

[eots]

a dime store magazine is where you seek information on 9/11..lol why not just a 9/11 comic book

Yeah sure. Lol. This is the response one would expect from a 9/11 denier. Shame . . . shame on YOU!

popular mechanics is some kind of authority in your mind ?
here is the brains of the operation

It's not just PM. A LOT of scientists have explored, studied, and debunked your "myths."

Debunking 911 Conspiracy Theories and Controlled Demolition Homepage

name 2

I just posted a link for you. IF you had bothered to read it, you would see that there are MULTIPLE links in that site. Lol. You aren't interested in the truth though. That much is obvious.

I have read it through many times...I doubt very much you have..but you made a claim of scientist debunking theories but this is a blog by someone with no credentials just like PM

 

[Phoenall]

That's how it is when you are a know nothing.

why do you so disrespect 9/11 families ?

That would be yourself. You and your fellow delusional conspiracy theorists.

strawman is all you have you could not support your position with facts if your life depended on it

I don't think you know what a FACT is. YOU are a conspiracy theorist and all of your so-called "evidence" has already been debunked many times.

What theory has been debunked and by who exactly ?

I debunked the 9/11 theory by using my training in metallurgy and common sense. Do you know how long it takes to remove the outer covering of concrete, cut through the support beams, attach explosives, reconcrete the walls and then make good the visible damage. All without the people on the floors seeing this take place, or the public spilling the beans to the press.

 

[Phoenall]

Hardly an expert as she is a geneticist and not an explosives expert. So strike the theory as being some daft bats 5 minutes of fame.

 

[eots]

why do you so disrespect 9/11 families ?

That would be yourself. You and your fellow delusional conspiracy theorists.

strawman is all you have you could not support your position with facts if your life depended on it

I don't think you know what a FACT is. YOU are a conspiracy theorist and all of your so-called "evidence" has already been debunked many times.

What theory has been debunked and by who exactly ?

I debunked the 9/11 theory by using my training in metallurgy and common sense. Do you know how long it takes to remove the outer covering of concrete, cut through the support beams, attach explosives, reconcrete the walls and then make good the visible damage. All without the people on the floors seeing this take place, or the public spilling the beans to the press.

What does your metallurgy tell you about molten metal

 

[eots]

Hardly an expert as she is a geneticist and not an explosives expert. So strike the theory as being some daft bats 5 minutes of fame.

she has great understanding of scientific method
YouTube

 

[ChrisL]

That would be yourself. You and your fellow delusional conspiracy theorists.

strawman is all you have you could not support your position with facts if your life depended on it

I don't think you know what a FACT is. YOU are a conspiracy theorist and all of your so-called "evidence" has already been debunked many times.

What theory has been debunked and by who exactly ?

I debunked the 9/11 theory by using my training in metallurgy and common sense. Do you know how long it takes to remove the outer covering of concrete, cut through the support beams, attach explosives, reconcrete the walls and then make good the visible damage. All without the people on the floors seeing this take place, or the public spilling the beans to the press.

What does your metallurgy tell you about molten metal

If you had read the links I posted to you, it is all explained within them. Do you want to learn? Or do you want to just continue to live in your paranoid fantasy world?

 

[ChrisL]

Yeah sure. Lol. This is the response one would expect from a 9/11 denier. Shame . . . shame on YOU!

popular mechanics is some kind of authority in your mind ?
here is the brains of the operation

It's not just PM. A LOT of scientists have explored, studied, and debunked your "myths."

Debunking 911 Conspiracy Theories and Controlled Demolition Homepage

name 2

I just posted a link for you. IF you had bothered to read it, you would see that there are MULTIPLE links in that site. Lol. You aren't interested in the truth though. That much is obvious.

I have read it through many times...I doubt very much you have..but you made a claim of scientist debunking theories but this is a blog by someone with no credentials just like PM

They are debunked by legitimate scientists, physicists, etc.

 

[ChrisL]

Yeah sure. Lol. This is the response one would expect from a 9/11 denier. Shame . . . shame on YOU!

popular mechanics is some kind of authority in your mind ?
here is the brains of the operation

It's not just PM. A LOT of scientists have explored, studied, and debunked your "myths."

Debunking 911 Conspiracy Theories and Controlled Demolition Homepage

name 2

I just posted a link for you. IF you had bothered to read it, you would see that there are MULTIPLE links in that site. Lol. You aren't interested in the truth though. That much is obvious.

I have read it through many times...I doubt very much you have..but you made a claim of scientist debunking theories but this is a blog by someone with no credentials just like PM

Oh, and almost ALL of the information contained within the site is peer reviewed.

 

[eots]

popular mechanics is some kind of authority in your mind ?
here is the brains of the operation

It's not just PM. A LOT of scientists have explored, studied, and debunked your "myths."

Debunking 911 Conspiracy Theories and Controlled Demolition Homepage

name 2

I just posted a link for you. IF you had bothered to read it, you would see that there are MULTIPLE links in that site. Lol. You aren't interested in the truth though. That much is obvious.

I have read it through many times...I doubt very much you have..but you made a claim of scientist debunking theories but this is a blog by someone with no credentials just like PM

They are debunked by legitimate scientists, physicists, etc.

So you keep saying but you have yet to present any

 

[eots]

popular mechanics is some kind of authority in your mind ?
here is the brains of the operation

It's not just PM. A LOT of scientists have explored, studied, and debunked your "myths."

Debunking 911 Conspiracy Theories and Controlled Demolition Homepage

name 2

I just posted a link for you. IF you had bothered to read it, you would see that there are MULTIPLE links in that site. Lol. You aren't interested in the truth though. That much is obvious.

I have read it through many times...I doubt very much you have..but you made a claim of scientist debunking theories but this is a blog by someone with no credentials just like PM

Oh, and almost ALL of the information contained within the site is peer reviewed.

lol...no its not..provide where the site shows this information

 

[ChrisL]

It's not just PM. A LOT of scientists have explored, studied, and debunked your "myths."

Debunking 911 Conspiracy Theories and Controlled Demolition Homepage

name 2

I just posted a link for you. IF you had bothered to read it, you would see that there are MULTIPLE links in that site. Lol. You aren't interested in the truth though. That much is obvious.

I have read it through many times...I doubt very much you have..but you made a claim of scientist debunking theories but this is a blog by someone with no credentials just like PM

They are debunked by legitimate scientists, physicists, etc.

So you keep saying but you have yet to present any

It's all in the link. Here, I'll post another one for you. Now, keep in mind, these are not YouTube videos, so I hope you can understand the material presented.

NOVA World Trade Center Collapse

 

[ChrisL]

It's not just PM. A LOT of scientists have explored, studied, and debunked your "myths."

Debunking 911 Conspiracy Theories and Controlled Demolition Homepage

name 2

I just posted a link for you. IF you had bothered to read it, you would see that there are MULTIPLE links in that site. Lol. You aren't interested in the truth though. That much is obvious.

I have read it through many times...I doubt very much you have..but you made a claim of scientist debunking theories but this is a blog by someone with no credentials just like PM

Oh, and almost ALL of the information contained within the site is peer reviewed.

lol...no its not..provide where the site shows this information

See my post above. This is a link within the link that I provided you.

 

[eots]

David L. Griscom, PhD – Research physicist, retired in 2001 from Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) in Washington, DC, after 33 years service. Fellow of the American Physical Society. Fulbright-García Robles Fellow at Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México in Mexico City (1997). Visiting professorships of research at the Universities of Paris and Saint-Etienne, France, and Tokyo Institute of Technology (2000 - 2003). Adjunct Professor of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Arizona (2004 - 2005). Winner of the 1993 N. F. Mott Award sponsored by the Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, the 1995 Otto Schott Award offered by the Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung (Germany), a 1996 Outstanding Graduate School Alumnus Award at Brown University, and the 1997 Sigma Xi Pure Science Award at NRL. Principal author of 109 of his 185 published works, a body of work which is highly cited by his peers. Officially credited with largest number of papers (5) by any author on list of 100 most cited articles authored at NRL between 1973 and 1988.

• Personal blog 1/5/07: "David Ray Griffin has web-published a splendid, highly footnoted account of The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot Be True: This scholarly work, rich in eyewitness accounts, includes 11 separate pieces of evidence that the World Trade Center towers 1, 2 [each 1300+ feet tall, 110 stories], and 7 were brought down by explosives.

 

[eots]

name 2

I just posted a link for you. IF you had bothered to read it, you would see that there are MULTIPLE links in that site. Lol. You aren't interested in the truth though. That much is obvious.

I have read it through many times...I doubt very much you have..but you made a claim of scientist debunking theories but this is a blog by someone with no credentials just like PM

They are debunked by legitimate scientists, physicists, etc.

So you keep saying but you have yet to present any

It's all in the link. Here, I'll post another one for you. Now, keep in mind, these are not YouTube videos, so I hope you can understand the material presented.

NOVA World Trade Center Collapse

of course it is a youtube video you ninny

 

[eots]

I just posted a link for you. IF you had bothered to read it, you would see that there are MULTIPLE links in that site. Lol. You aren't interested in the truth though. That much is obvious.

I have read it through many times...I doubt very much you have..but you made a claim of scientist debunking theories but this is a blog by someone with no credentials just like PM

They are debunked by legitimate scientists, physicists, etc.

So you keep saying but you have yet to present any

It's all in the link. Here, I'll post another one for you. Now, keep in mind, these are not YouTube videos, so I hope you can understand the material presented.

NOVA World Trade Center Collapse

of course it is a youtube video you ninny

 

[Hossfly]

David L. Griscom, PhD – Research physicist, retired in 2001 from Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) in Washington, DC, after 33 years service. Fellow of the American Physical Society. Fulbright-García Robles Fellow at Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México in Mexico City (1997). Visiting professorships of research at the Universities of Paris and Saint-Etienne, France, and Tokyo Institute of Technology (2000 - 2003). Adjunct Professor of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Arizona (2004 - 2005). Winner of the 1993 N. F. Mott Award sponsored by the Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, the 1995 Otto Schott Award offered by the Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung (Germany), a 1996 Outstanding Graduate School Alumnus Award at Brown University, and the 1997 Sigma Xi Pure Science Award at NRL. Principal author of 109 of his 185 published works, a body of work which is highly cited by his peers. Officially credited with largest number of papers (5) by any author on list of 100 most cited articles authored at NRL between 1973 and 1988.

• 
  
  
  • Personal blog 1/5/07: "David Ray Griffin has web-published a splendid, highly footnoted account of The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot Be True: This scholarly work, rich in eyewitness accounts, includes 11 separate pieces of evidence that the World Trade Center towers 1, 2 [each 1300+ feet tall, 110 stories], and 7 were brought down by explosives.

I don't believe any of your experts were there and their theories are no more than theory.

 

[eots]

it is just a dramatic reading of the NIST report

 

[ChrisL]

I just posted a link for you. IF you had bothered to read it, you would see that there are MULTIPLE links in that site. Lol. You aren't interested in the truth though. That much is obvious.

I have read it through many times...I doubt very much you have..but you made a claim of scientist debunking theories but this is a blog by someone with no credentials just like PM

They are debunked by legitimate scientists, physicists, etc.

So you keep saying but you have yet to present any

It's all in the link. Here, I'll post another one for you. Now, keep in mind, these are not YouTube videos, so I hope you can understand the material presented.

NOVA World Trade Center Collapse

of course it is a youtube video you ninny

No, it is not a YouTube video. You are apparently the ninny.

Here is an excerpt from the link, entitled TRANSCRIPT. Lol.

SECTION 1: THE INVESTIGATION
SHAYM SUNDER: I'm Shyam Sunder. I am the lead investigator for the World Trade Center investigation that was conducted by the National Institute of Standards in Technology.

In many typical investigations, you have a partially collapsed building standing there that can be looked at by engineers.

In the case of the World Trade Center towers, the buildings had collapsed. And also there was an immediate need for search and rescue of people who might have been buried under the rubble. So there was also a need to clear the site as quickly as possible. It's very unusual that the evidence is so completely scattered, and that made our investigation a lot more complicated.

We realized that we had to model the complete aircraft impact. We had to model the evolution of the fires over the next hour, or hour and half. We had to model how the steel weakened as a result of the high temperatures. And lastly, we had to model the progression of failures-- local failures in the structure, which then led to the overall initiation of collapse. Each of these stages had very sophisticated models that were validated using the photographic evidence we have, validated using laboratory experiments that we conducted. And validated, ultimately, based on how the buildings actually collapsed using videos.

SECTION 2: IMPACT
Through a fairly sophisticated analysis of the video information, we were able to determine the airplane speed, direction of the airplane, and the orientation of the airplane as each of the airplanes impacted each of the buildings.

The north tower was hit at 8:46 by a 767-200 extended range airplane, between the 93rd and the 99th floor. The airplane was flying at about 550 miles an hour, with a total weight of somewhere on the order of 283,000 pounds.

The second building to be hit, which was hit 16 minutes later, was hit on the south face of the south tower. Again by a 767-200 extended range airplane, but this time between floors 77 and 85.

And one of the questions that comes out from looking at this information is how is it here we have two seemingly similar buildings—they were called Twin Towers—and they were hit by nearly identical airplane, but how come one building lasted for 102 minutes, the other building lasted for 56 minutes, which is nearly a factor of two.