If Israel killed Kirk will you accept that ?

Tommy Tainant

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2016
Messages
57,990
Reaction score
26,731
Points
2,300
Location
Y Cae Ras
There is a huge amount of speculation on this,.
At one time I would have thought people might turn against them.
Now Im not so sure.
I think the israel lobby is very strong
Whatever they do is fine. Its what God wanted after all,
And ypu cant make an omlette.
Thankfully President Trump is America First.

 
He was removed because among several matters he was going to spill the beans on Ukraine corruption and Israeli - Ukraine Child trafficking .
That's what happens if you don't investigate a future marriage partner with full diligence .

Some woman that evil ***** Erika .
So far makes Mata Hari look small beer .
 
There is a huge amount of speculation on this,.
At one time I would have thought people might turn against them.
Now Im not so sure.
I think the israel lobby is very strong
Whatever they do is fine. Its what God wanted after all,
And ypu cant make an omlette.
Thankfully President Trump is America First.


"Israel" didn't kill Charlie Kirk.

Someone just like you (except with more legs) did.
 
There is a huge amount of speculation on this,.
At one time I would have thought people might turn against them.
Now Im not so sure.
I think the israel lobby is very strong
Whatever they do is fine. Its what God wanted after all,
And ypu cant make an omlette.
Thankfully President Trump is America First.

Such a murder would have to be decided by Bibi which would lead to a massive shift in support against Israel.

If some rogue agents were involved in this somehow, outside of the official channels of Bibi; the punishment should be that the U.S demand the handing over of those involved and they should be judged in a court of law and given an appropriate sentence.

You and I both know that Israel wasn't behind this though. In the history of stupid decisions this would be right up there so you are just rattling the cage as you often do.

Israel deals with criticism all the time. FAR worse within Israel than outside. Far worse even in the U.N on a weekly basis. Israel is accustomed to criticism and debate, that is how democracies work and Israel has healthy balance of Judaism principles and the Judeo-Christian enacting of liberty as iimported by former European Jews who moved back to Israel in 1948 when the land was given back.

The Pollard situation hurt Israel a great deal and set back relations. There is no way they are going to green light a murder of an America who practices Shabbat and was a major influence to a younger generation getting back to faith. Not having Kirk is worse for Israel than having a Kirk.

There is always the possibility of some far-right (or left) Neo-Liberals or Neo-Cons feeling threatened by the influence one man might have for a younger voting generation but, it wouldn;t be Israel.

Put it this way, it could have been ANY nations intelligence service but they would have been so effective in a shadowy influence campaign that it would be near impossible to trace back to them.

So, unless some foreign intel agency got really sloppy, this is probably as it seems.

I would say that there are far more likely suspects than Israel though. I wouldn't place them in the top 20 for such a decision. In fact, I'd place them on the bottom 25% quadrant.
 
Last edited:
Such a murder would have to be decided by Bibi which would lead to a massive shift in support against Israel.

If some rogue agents were involved in this somehow, outside of the official channels of Bibi; the punishment should be that the U.S demand the handing over of those involved and they should be judged in a court of law and given an appropriate sentence.

You and I both know that Israel wasn't behind this though. In the history of stupid decisions this would be right up there so you are just rattling the cage as you often do.

Israel deals with criticism all the time. FAR worse within Israel than outside. Far worse even in the U.N on a weekly basis. Israel is accustomed to criticism and debate, that is how democracies work and Israel has healthy balance of Judaism principles and the Judeo-Christian enacting of liberty as brought imported by former European Jews who moved back to Israel in 1948 when the land was given back.

The Pollard situation hurt Israel a great deal and set back relations. There is no way they are going to green light a murder of an America who practices Shabbat and was a major influence to a younger generation getting back to faith. Not having Kirk is worse for Israel than having a Kirk.

There is always the possibility of some far-right (or left) Neo-Liberals or Neo-Cons feeling threatened by the influence one man might have for a younger voting generation but, it wouldn;t be Israel.

Put it this way, it could have been ANY nations intelligence service but they would have been so effective in a shadowing influence campaign that it would be near impossible to trace back to them.

So, unless some foreign intel agency got really sloppy, this is probably as it seems.

I would say that there are far more likely suspects than Israel though. I wouldn't place them in the top 20 for such a decision. In fact, I'd place them on the bottom 25% quadrant.
Sounds like Israel won.
 
Only you and your fellow Islamist-supporting antisemites think Israel has anything to do with it.
or to say it another way...
facepalm-double.gif
 
There is a huge amount of speculation on this,.
At one time I would have thought people might turn against them.
Now Im not so sure.
I think the israel lobby is very strong
Whatever they do is fine. Its what God wanted after all,
And ypu cant make an omlette.
Thankfully President Trump is America First.

he was murdered by a leftist loon that bought into the lefts violent slander and rhetoric .. the left convinced him that Kirk was a racist Fascist that had to be silenced by any and all means ..
 
I really wish the antisemites from Europe would stay the F off this forum. We’d cut the number of Jew-hating posters by 90%.
 
he was murdered by a leftist loon that bought into the lefts violent slander and rhetoric .. the left convinced him that Kirk was a racist Fascist that had to be silenced by any and all means ..
Jews have been blamed for everything for thousands of years. Now the antisemites have harnessed the power of the Internet.

Thank Gd Hitler didn’t have it available.
 
Jews have been blamed for everything for thousands of years. Now the antisemites have harnessed the power of the Internet.

Thank Gd Hitler didn’t have it available.
Interestingly enough, the Nazis are still the source material they use due to the close collaboration between Arabs and Nazis before and during WW2.

Raj Al Husseini (Yasser Arafat's close relative) was promised the extermination of Jews in the middle east once Hitler finished them off in Europe.
 
Jews have been blamed for everything for thousands of years. Now the antisemites have harnessed the power of the Internet.

Thank Gd Hitler didn’t have it available.
very true .. early in his rise to power Hitler relied on leftist rags like the NYT to spread his propaganda ..
 
There is a huge amount of speculation on this,.
At one time I would have thought people might turn against them.
Now Im not so sure.
I think the israel lobby is very strong
Whatever they do is fine. Its what God wanted after all,
And ypu cant make an omlette.
Thankfully President Trump is America First.

Charlie Kirk was killed because of some kid who liked his women with a penis.

Sortof indicates who's behind the assassination.

Barack-and-Michelle-Obama-are-expected-to-jet-into-Spain-this-weekend-for-an-exclusive-party-...webp
 
The Twisted Crackpot strikes again with a rambling, incoherent Jew-hating post not backed by any facts but just rancid gas that's escaped from his disgusting ass.
 
15th post
very true .. early in his rise to power Hitler relied on leftist rags like the NYT to spread his propaganda ..
How about "Time Man of the Year" award?

This was in 1938 before he had invaded Poland but long after the antisemitism in Germany was occurring.

Now I understand that they provide the good and the evil for such awards, I'm not disputing this. It just seems unusual based on the next 7 years and the aforementioned shift in Germany that was already occurring.

Awarding it in 1936 might have been at least defensible. Perhaps the prospect of peace lead them to try and butter him up, who knows?
 
How about "Time Man of the Year" award?

This was in 1938 before he had invaded Poland but long after the antisemitism in Germany was occurring.

Now I understand that they provide the good and the evil for such awards, I'm not disputing this. It just seems unusual based on the next 7 years and the aforementioned shift in Germany that was already occurring.

Awarding it in 1936 might have been at least defensible. Perhaps the prospect of peace lead them to try and butter him up, who knows?
sadly .. antisemitism has been rampant in many areas of leadership and media for decades ..the leftist rags only turned on Hitler because he invaded other countries .. they reported very little on his anti semetic views during his early rise to power ..a true example of "Silence is Violence" if there ever was one .
 
How about "Time Man of the Year" award?

This was in 1938 before he had invaded Poland but long after the antisemitism in Germany was occurring.

Now I understand that they provide the good and the evil for such awards, I'm not disputing this. It just seems unusual based on the next 7 years and the aforementioned shift in Germany that was already occurring.

Awarding it in 1936 might have been at least defensible. Perhaps the prospect of peace lead them to try and butter him up, who knows?
Whaaaaat??? Time Magazine gave Hitler “Man of the Year” in 1938, after he had instituted all sorts of anti-Jew laws?

These leftist rags have been enablers of Jew-hate since my parents were in grade school.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom