If homos have a constitutional right to marry, why don't siblings.??

[Where_r_my_Keys]

If you want to make it so any two people can marry I won't fight you. I see the reasons we don't allow it but it wouldn't bug me too much if anyone could enter into the arrangement called marriage. Good luck.

Marriage is the Joining of One Man and One Woman.

 

[my2¢]

Sure,why not. Children from consanguineous partnerings only have twice the rate of genetic disorders.....we could always use more problems!!

George and Jeb?

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Sure,why not. Children from consanguineous partnerings only have twice the rate of genetic disorders.....we could always use more problems!!

Modern Islam is a classic example of sustained in-breeding... and that's workin' out FINE! So what's the problem?

 

[FA_Q2]

Where in a marriage contract does it say you have to have sex with your partner in marriage?

*****CHUCKLE*****

You people who are anti gay marriage aren't convincing any of us liberals to support sibling marriage. Even we agree that's gross.

Why?

Now you only support equal access to rights when it is not gross to you?

And yet I bet you find that those on the right are bigots.

Maybe any two consenting adults should be allowed. You are winning me over.

I could marry my father and get 85% of his Ford pension. I'm in!

Or he could do the exact same thing with another 18 year old tart.

There is no difference at all yet one is illegal. If marriage were not a right then there would not be an issue - the state would be free to define it as it seen fit. It is, however, a right and that necessitates that it is protected.

If you want to make it so any two people can marry I won't fight you. I see the reasons we don't allow it but it wouldn't bug me too much if anyone could enter into the arrangement called marriage. Good luck.

And another one.

Used to care about protecting rights. Now is totally apathetic. So what is the difference?

 

[sealybobo]

You people who are anti gay marriage aren't convincing any of us liberals to support sibling marriage. Even we agree that's gross.

Why?

Now you only support equal access to rights when it is not gross to you?

And yet I bet you find that those on the right are bigots.

Maybe any two consenting adults should be allowed. You are winning me over.

I could marry my father and get 85% of his Ford pension. I'm in!

Or he could do the exact same thing with another 18 year old tart.

There is no difference at all yet one is illegal. If marriage were not a right then there would not be an issue - the state would be free to define it as it seen fit. It is, however, a right and that necessitates that it is protected.

If you want to make it so any two people can marry I won't fight you. I see the reasons we don't allow it but it wouldn't bug me too much if anyone could enter into the arrangement called marriage. Good luck.

And another one.

Used to care about protecting rights. Now is totally apathetic. So what is the difference?

I have watched the porn Taboo and I don't have a sister or daughter so I think screwing your daughter or sister is hot. I'm OK with you marrying your mom. That's hot!

I agree with you there's nothing wrong with incestuous relations. Let em marry.

 

[FA_Q2]

lol.

I wouldn't go that far. I think there is a lot wrong with incestuous marriages. I also think that what I find wrong or 'right' should have absolutely no bearing on your rights or need to protect them.

 

[007]

The pedophiles will be the next ones to make a big move for acceptance, and that makes the muslims very happy.

People get outraged about this (as they should) yet there is a least 1 person on this board that lobbies for that and actually thinks they have a good argument...

They'll be coming out of the woodwork...............

The peds have watched the homo mafia go to work over the years and force their disgusting *** shit down everyone's throat, so the peds now have an open door and a game plan, all thanks to the queers.

...

No they do not because laws against marrying and sexual acts with a minor hinge on CONSENT. They have nothing whatsoever to do with controlling marriage or relationships. Minors cannot give consent - PERIOD.
Please stop interjecting such asinine statements.

Oh my GOD... you BIGOT... you NARROW MINDED PIECE OF SHIT.

Just who are YOU to say what "constitutes" consent between two persons and what doesn't? Did someone appoint you the SUPREME JUDGE or what?

Are you going to sit here and try and sell the the theory that TWO MEN ******* EACH OTHER UP THE ASS is OK, ya, that SERIOUS PERVERSION, but OOOOOOOHHH.... if an older woman or older man is attracted to a young person, that's wrong? REALLY? REALLY?

So explain then how it is you give your full support to one sexual perversion, and then say another is wrong? Please explain that....

 

[sealybobo]

lol.

I wouldn't go that far. I think there is a lot wrong with incestuous marriages. I also think that what I find wrong or 'right' should have absolutely no bearing on your rights or need to protect them.

Do you even have any brothers and sisters wanting to challenge the law? Because it took a lesbo couple to challenge the law in michigan.

If you don't have a victim you don't have a case.

 

[sealybobo]

The pedophiles will be the next ones to make a big move for acceptance, and that makes the muslims very happy.

People get outraged about this (as they should) yet there is a least 1 person on this board that lobbies for that and actually thinks they have a good argument...

They'll be coming out of the woodwork...............

The peds have watched the homo mafia go to work over the years and force their disgusting *** shit down everyone's throat, so the peds now have an open door and a game plan, all thanks to the queers.

...

No they do not because laws against marrying and sexual acts with a minor hinge on CONSENT. They have nothing whatsoever to do with controlling marriage or relationships. Minors cannot give consent - PERIOD.
Please stop interjecting such asinine statements.

Oh my GOD... you BIGOT... you NARROW MINDED PIECE OF SHIT.

Just who are YOU to say what "constitutes" consent between two persons and what doesn't? Did someone appoint you the SUPREME JUDGE or what?

Are you going to sit here and try and sell the the theory that TWO MEN ******* EACH OTHER UP THE ASS is OK, ya, that SERIOUS PERVERSION, but OOOOOOOHHH.... if an older woman or older man is attracted to a young person, that's wrong? REALLY? REALLY?

So explain then how it is you give your full support to one sexual perversion, and then say another is wrong? Please explain that....

I'm 44 and I love ******* 18-22 year olds. Is that wrong? It's not illegal.

 

[FA_Q2]

lol.

I wouldn't go that far. I think there is a lot wrong with incestuous marriages. I also think that what I find wrong or 'right' should have absolutely no bearing on your rights or need to protect them.

Do you even have any brothers and sisters wanting to challenge the law? Because it took a lesbo couple to challenge the law in michigan.

If you don't have a victim you don't have a case.

And?
Are we not able to discuss policy or how the law is inconsistent. There are people that this applies to - they just do not reveal it because to do so would bring on massive scrutiny.

 

[007]

The pedophiles will be the next ones to make a big move for acceptance, and that makes the muslims very happy.

People get outraged about this (as they should) yet there is a least 1 person on this board that lobbies for that and actually thinks they have a good argument...

They'll be coming out of the woodwork...............

The peds have watched the homo mafia go to work over the years and force their disgusting *** shit down everyone's throat, so the peds now have an open door and a game plan, all thanks to the queers.

...

No they do not because laws against marrying and sexual acts with a minor hinge on CONSENT. They have nothing whatsoever to do with controlling marriage or relationships. Minors cannot give consent - PERIOD.
Please stop interjecting such asinine statements.

Oh my GOD... you BIGOT... you NARROW MINDED PIECE OF SHIT.

Just who are YOU to say what "constitutes" consent between two persons and what doesn't? Did someone appoint you the SUPREME JUDGE or what?

Are you going to sit here and try and sell the the theory that TWO MEN ******* EACH OTHER UP THE ASS is OK, ya, that SERIOUS PERVERSION, but OOOOOOOHHH.... if an older woman or older man is attracted to a young person, that's wrong? REALLY? REALLY?

So explain then how it is you give your full support to one sexual perversion, and then say another is wrong? Please explain that....

I'm 44 and I love ******* 18-22 year olds. Is that wrong? It's not illegal.

Don't be a troll... shit for brains.

 

[FA_Q2]

The pedophiles will be the next ones to make a big move for acceptance, and that makes the muslims very happy.

People get outraged about this (as they should) yet there is a least 1 person on this board that lobbies for that and actually thinks they have a good argument...

They'll be coming out of the woodwork...............

The peds have watched the homo mafia go to work over the years and force their disgusting *** shit down everyone's throat, so the peds now have an open door and a game plan, all thanks to the queers.

...

No they do not because laws against marrying and sexual acts with a minor hinge on CONSENT. They have nothing whatsoever to do with controlling marriage or relationships. Minors cannot give consent - PERIOD.
Please stop interjecting such asinine statements.

Oh my GOD... you BIGOT... you NARROW MINDED PIECE OF SHIT.

Just who are YOU to say what "constitutes" consent between two persons and what doesn't? Did someone appoint you the SUPREME JUDGE or what?

Are you going to sit here and try and sell the the theory that TWO MEN ******* EACH OTHER UP THE ASS is OK, ya, that SERIOUS PERVERSION, but OOOOOOOHHH.... if an older woman or older man is attracted to a young person, that's wrong? REALLY? REALLY?

So explain then how it is you give your full support to one sexual perversion, and then say another is wrong? Please explain that....

I already did.

One is about consent. There is noting illegal about marrying someone that is extremely young compared to you. A 90 year old man is perfectly within his rights to marry an 18 year old woman. The fact still remains that there is an age of consent and that those targeting children cannot use the same arguments that gays have used as those children cannot consent - period.

I notice that you avoided that fact entirely - it is because there is no way around it.

 

[Damaged Eagle]

lol.

I wouldn't go that far. I think there is a lot wrong with incestuous marriages. I also think that what I find wrong or 'right' should have absolutely no bearing on your rights or need to protect them.

Do you even have any brothers and sisters wanting to challenge the law? Because it took a lesbo couple to challenge the law in michigan.

If you don't have a victim you don't have a case.

That's right use the term incestuous when you don't even know if the mature closely related companions are even engaging in sex.

Has it occurred to you that a union between two people might be for the companionship and benefits incurred by such a contract?

No! Your mind goes straight to the gutter and in doing so use provoking terms to describe the union.

I intend to challenge the law in a few more years.

*****SMILE*****

 

[sealybobo]

lol.

I wouldn't go that far. I think there is a lot wrong with incestuous marriages. I also think that what I find wrong or 'right' should have absolutely no bearing on your rights or need to protect them.

Do you even have any brothers and sisters wanting to challenge the law? Because it took a lesbo couple to challenge the law in michigan.

If you don't have a victim you don't have a case.

And?
Are we not able to discuss policy or how the law is inconsistent. There are people that this applies to - they just do not reveal it because to do so would bring on massive scrutiny.

Then it isn't socially acceptable like gay marriage.

 

[sealybobo]

lol.

I wouldn't go that far. I think there is a lot wrong with incestuous marriages. I also think that what I find wrong or 'right' should have absolutely no bearing on your rights or need to protect them.

Do you even have any brothers and sisters wanting to challenge the law? Because it took a lesbo couple to challenge the law in michigan.

If you don't have a victim you don't have a case.

That's right use the term incestuous when you don't even know if the mature closely related companions are even engaging in sex.

Has it occurred to you that a union between two people might be for the companionship and benefits incurred by such a contract?

No! Your mind goes straight to the gutter and in doing so use provoking terms to describe the union.

I intend to challenge the law in a few more years.

*****SMILE*****

I hope you and your sister are very happy.

 

[RKMBrown]

Inbreeding explains a lot of conservative views come to think of it.

You're a piece of shit.

 

[RKMBrown]

And gays don't give two shits what you believe...as long as you're not trying to legislate your beliefs.

Then why are there so many high-profile incidents of homosexual perverts using the force of law to compel decent people to take part in their sick mockeries of weddings?

You're a lying piece of shit.

 

[Damaged Eagle]

lol.

I wouldn't go that far. I think there is a lot wrong with incestuous marriages. I also think that what I find wrong or 'right' should have absolutely no bearing on your rights or need to protect them.

Do you even have any brothers and sisters wanting to challenge the law? Because it took a lesbo couple to challenge the law in michigan.

If you don't have a victim you don't have a case.

That's right use the term incestuous when you don't even know if the mature closely related companions are even engaging in sex.

Has it occurred to you that a union between two people might be for the companionship and benefits incurred by such a contract?

No! Your mind goes straight to the gutter and in doing so use provoking terms to describe the union.

I intend to challenge the law in a few more years.

*****SMILE*****

I hope you and your sister are very happy.

I have no intention of marrying my sister.

I intend to have prenuptials wrote up that agree that it is simply a marriage of convenience with no sex involved then marry each of my children (male and female).

Let the government try to stop me and them from forming a group line marriage and the advantages we derive from such a marriage.

Spouses don't have to pay inheritance taxes now do they?

*****CHUCKLE*****

 

[candycorn]

If the relationship is a close one or it is practiced repeatedly, inbreeding can increase the chances of offspring being affected by recessive or deleterious traits. This generally leads to a decreased fitness of a population, which is called inbreeding depression. Deleterious alleles causing inbreeding depression can subsequently be removed through culling, which is also known as genetic purging.

Hey einstein. Queer marriage is unhealthy too since it leads to more AIDS and hepititus. THINK

And it makes hetero males like you unstable because of your homosexual tendencies. Is this why so many guys like to get all dressed up and go way out into the woods with other guys? What exactly are you "boys" hunting

 

[Votto]

That's the question the queers can't answer. The law says a man can live with his sister but cannot marry her and that's the same way it always has been with queers.

Fact is there is nothing in the constitution about marriage which means it''s entirely a state issue and the federal courts need to stay out of it.

Because sex among siblings is just plain yucky.

The Bible speaks against it.