If Harris somehow wins, will this mean the end of Primary voting for the Democratic Party?

In 2016 they anointed Hillary because Bernie didn't have the donor power that the Establishment Hillary had. He was deemed "dangerous". Of course we all know the outcome and he is now largely irrelevant after he endorsed Hillary.

After her loss, the MSM and Democrat operatives kept repeating "we can't repeat this facade again, we need a competent candidate who is challenged in a Primary and wins in a democratic process. After all, we are the Democratic Party damn it!"

Now we observe history repeating itself as Harris is anointed. Not once, but twice if one is objective. First as V.P with 2% of the delegate vote in the 2020 Primary and now 0% votes in the 2024 Primary.

Clearly Dem voters are not happy. Some don't care about democracy they will obediently put on their pom poms and accept their Rulers decisions on their behalf, similar to what a pleb in China or N Korea does today. Others have become a little bit too uppity on youtube (one Asian guy in particular) and they have declared that they will punish the Dems for their tactics and name calling of Trump as Hitler etc and thus vote for Trump to spite the Dems.

Therefore, if Harris wins in 2024, will this affirm the Democrat Parties position that they know what is best for their subjects and going forward they will refer to their Chamber of donors, mainstream media, Party Seniors (Obama, Pelosi etc) and Super Delegates to produce the greatest politician possible.

Is this a fair assessment? If not, what leads you to believe that after the last two cycles of them anointed a leader that somehow they will change going forward?
This is the third election where the party chose their candidate and not the voters.
 
Biden ran unopposed which already made the primaries moot.
He ran unopposed with cognitive decline. Democrats either knew he was in cognitive decline, or they are dumb as sh!t. They planned on installing Kamala the entire time. It’s why they held the first debate so early. It’s no coincidence that Clooney wrote that article.
 
He ran unopposed with cognitive decline. Democrats either knew he was in cognitive decline, or they are dumb as sh!t. They planned on installing Kamala the entire time. It’s why they held the first debate so early. It’s no coincidence that Clooney wrote that article.
No Pelosi claims it's all just a big coincidence. Also that Joe quit at the top of his game. Why she didn't say but she claimed his sacrifice was worthy of adding Joe to Mt. Rushmore. :cuckoo:
 
No Pelosi claims it's all just a big coincidence. Also that Joe quit at the top of his game. Why she didn't say but she claimed his sacrifice was worthy of adding Joe to Mt. Rushmore. :cuckoo:
Joe Biden’s biggest sacrifice in government since 1973 is he quit while in major cognitive decline. This is how far the Democratic Party has sunk.
 
1722953842563.webp
 
Democrats set the rules for Democratic Primaries
Republicans set the rules for Republican Primaries
Democrats might even have a rule like, no convicted person awaiting sentencing can be Presidential Candidate.

In Ireland you can't take your seat in Parliament until you obtain a Tax Clearance Cert. There thinking is you can't run or have influence on the Government agency who is investigating you.

So the real question is, if Trump gets elected will the Republican party be only represented by Sexual Deviants and Fraudsters?

OP, please more of these questions...

What we want to know, is there a limit MAGA on how many women a leader a leader can rape or sexual assault or is all women fair game?

Also considering his friendship with Jerrfery Epstein, Is fucking a 16 year old also cool? If the prosecutors came after him that would victimisation of Trump because everyone fucks 16 year olds. In some states it is legal...
 
Unfortunately though, they didn't advise the 12 million people who voted that these were going to be the "new rules" they "set". It would be akin to you being told the rules in any theatre of life and then having them changed on you mid stream.

A class action lawsuit would be interesting.
Nope, your class action would be in the bin on the first day in court...

Electors are free to vote for whom they choose... Rules of Democrat convention.

Also you think a court is going to get involved in how a private organisation conducts its business... Where is that in the constitution?
 
Nope, your class action would be in the bin on the first day in court...

Electors are free to vote for whom they choose... Rules of Democrat convention.

Also you think a court is going to get involved in how a private organisation conducts its business... Where is that in the constitution?

The government taking over a private organization...

..... ..... ..... Wouldn't that be...

..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... Socialism?

WW
 
In 2016 they anointed Hillary because Bernie didn't have the donor power that the Establishment Hillary had. He was deemed "dangerous". Of course we all know the outcome and he is now largely irrelevant after he endorsed Hillary.

After her loss, the MSM and Democrat operatives kept repeating "we can't repeat this facade again, we need a competent candidate who is challenged in a Primary and wins in a democratic process. After all, we are the Democratic Party damn it!"

Now we observe history repeating itself as Harris is anointed. Not once, but twice if one is objective. First as V.P with 2% of the delegate vote in the 2020 Primary and now 0% votes in the 2024 Primary.

Clearly Dem voters are not happy. Some don't care about democracy they will obediently put on their pom poms and accept their Rulers decisions on their behalf, similar to what a pleb in China or N Korea does today. Others have become a little bit too uppity on youtube (one Asian guy in particular) and they have declared that they will punish the Dems for their tactics and name calling of Trump as Hitler etc and thus vote for Trump to spite the Dems.

Therefore, if Harris wins in 2024, will this affirm the Democrat Parties position that they know what is best for their subjects and going forward they will refer to their Chamber of donors, mainstream media, Party Seniors (Obama, Pelosi etc) and Super Delegates to produce the greatest politician possible.

Is this a fair assessment? If not, what leads you to believe that after the last two cycles of them anointed a leader that somehow they will change going forward?
It has already effectively ended.
 
Nope, your class action would be in the bin on the first day in court...

Electors are free to vote for whom they choose... Rules of Democrat convention.

Also you think a court is going to get involved in how a private organisation conducts its business... Where is that in the constitution?
Umm, they do it all the time. Remember churches and small businesses during covid? How about if you are a wedding cake baker?
 
Back
Top Bottom