Gotta agree with LoneLaugher on this one. I definitely prefer reason to faith.
I have faith in some things, but all of my faith is reached via observation and calculation. For instance, without knowing what she's thinking, if a girl reacts in a certain way to my advances, I have faith that I can scoop her out of the club. If I give a crackhead a ride to his dealer's house and I stop and get out at a 7-11 without taking the loose change out of my ashtray, I have faith that I'm probably coming up short on loose change. I honestly don't think I'm capable of having 100 percent blind faith in anything, though it's certainly something I tried to reach for a number of years.
Ultimately, though, this issue is one on which I see eye to eye with Ayn Rand: if you take what -anyone- else says as gospel, you're willfully forfeiting your position as the final arbiter of your own reality. Anyone who removes their own conscience from that final arbiter position doesn't deserve the sentience they were lucky/blessed enough to be born with.