Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Equal protection didn't overturn a lot of what states were doing? You need to go back and study history! It certainly overturned the effects of slavery, which the states used to think was there perview. You need to quit posting foolishness. You're getting easier and easier to debunk. Your first sentence shows how clueless you are. I never said the 14th over-ruled the 10th. I said, "In this case...". BIG difference.The 10thA was never over ruled by the 14th. That's an absurd statement. You have refuted nothing. You have thrown smoke, you have called names, you have deflected, you have made unwarranted assertions and you have repeated the same two, and only two, arguments for gay marriage over and over. Just lke you did here in this post.
Argument #1.Equal protection didn't overturn a lot of what states were doing? You need to go back and study history! It certainly overturned the effects of slavery, which the states used to think was there perview. You need to quit posting foolishness. You're getting easier and easier to debunk. Your first sentence shows how clueless you are. I never said the 14th over-ruled the 10th. I said, "In this case...". BIG difference.The 10thA was never over ruled by the 14th. That's an absurd statement. You have refuted nothing. You have thrown smoke, you have called names, you have deflected, you have made unwarranted assertions and you have repeated the same two, and only two, arguments for gay marriage over and over. Just lke you did here in this post.
That tells me nothing. You haven't addressed your error when you stated that the 14th didn't overturn some of what used to be included in the 10th.Argument #1.
See, it's all you've got.
Gay Marriage Scares Oklahoma Rep So Much He Proposes Banning All Marriages
If this isn't the most petulant thing I've read from the Right wing today........
Argument #1.Equal protection didn't overturn a lot of what states were doing? You need to go back and study history! It certainly overturned the effects of slavery, which the states used to think was there perview. You need to quit posting foolishness. You're getting easier and easier to debunk. Your first sentence shows how clueless you are. I never said the 14th over-ruled the 10th. I said, "In this case...". BIG difference.The 10thA was never over ruled by the 14th. That's an absurd statement. You have refuted nothing. You have thrown smoke, you have called names, you have deflected, you have made unwarranted assertions and you have repeated the same two, and only two, arguments for gay marriage over and over. Just lke you did here in this post.
See, it's all you've got.
That tells me nothing. You haven't addressed your error when you stated that the 14th didn't overturn some of what used to be included in the 10th.Argument #1.
See, it's all you've got.
You're deteriorating into incoherence.That tells me nothing. You haven't addressed your error when you stated that the 14th didn't overturn some of what used to be included in the 10th.Argument #1.
See, it's all you've got.
"Dude" you've already been pwned on this topic over and over. I told you what the arguments were. Multiple times. You dont even know what they are much less understand them much less can refute them.Argument #1.Equal protection didn't overturn a lot of what states were doing? You need to go back and study history! It certainly overturned the effects of slavery, which the states used to think was there perview. You need to quit posting foolishness. You're getting easier and easier to debunk. Your first sentence shows how clueless you are. I never said the 14th over-ruled the 10th. I said, "In this case...". BIG difference.The 10thA was never over ruled by the 14th. That's an absurd statement. You have refuted nothing. You have thrown smoke, you have called names, you have deflected, you have made unwarranted assertions and you have repeated the same two, and only two, arguments for gay marriage over and over. Just lke you did here in this post.
See, it's all you've got.
You're still doing your 'secret argument' schtick?
Dude, you've got no counter for what you're responding to.
Yes, my argument is secret. It is secret from people unable to comprehend it. Like you.That tells me nothing. You haven't addressed your error when you stated that the 14th didn't overturn some of what used to be included in the 10th.Argument #1.
See, it's all you've got.
When Rabbi has painted himself into a corner he starts alluding to secret counter arguments. Arguments that obliterate what you just posted, disproving all of it, and debunking your every claim.
Just don't actually ask Rabbi to articulate his 'secret argument'. Or ask to see it. Or ask any questions about it.
It is amazing how the Lawyers arguing in front of the Supreme Court aren't hiring you as a consultant. You should contact them."Dude" you've already been pwned on this topic over and over. I told you what the arguments were. Multiple times. You dont even know what they are much less understand them much less can refute them.Argument #1.Equal protection didn't overturn a lot of what states were doing? You need to go back and study history! It certainly overturned the effects of slavery, which the states used to think was there perview. You need to quit posting foolishness. You're getting easier and easier to debunk. Your first sentence shows how clueless you are. I never said the 14th over-ruled the 10th. I said, "In this case...". BIG difference.The 10thA was never over ruled by the 14th. That's an absurd statement. You have refuted nothing. You have thrown smoke, you have called names, you have deflected, you have made unwarranted assertions and you have repeated the same two, and only two, arguments for gay marriage over and over. Just lke you did here in this post.
See, it's all you've got.
You're still doing your 'secret argument' schtick?
Dude, you've got no counter for what you're responding to.
You're done.
Your deflection is noted.It is amazing how the Lawyers arguing in front of the Supreme Court aren't hiring you as a consultant. You should contact them."Dude" you've already been pwned on this topic over and over. I told you what the arguments were. Multiple times. You dont even know what they are much less understand them much less can refute them.Argument #1.Equal protection didn't overturn a lot of what states were doing? You need to go back and study history! It certainly overturned the effects of slavery, which the states used to think was there perview. You need to quit posting foolishness. You're getting easier and easier to debunk. Your first sentence shows how clueless you are. I never said the 14th over-ruled the 10th. I said, "In this case...". BIG difference.The 10thA was never over ruled by the 14th. That's an absurd statement. You have refuted nothing. You have thrown smoke, you have called names, you have deflected, you have made unwarranted assertions and you have repeated the same two, and only two, arguments for gay marriage over and over. Just lke you did here in this post.
See, it's all you've got.
You're still doing your 'secret argument' schtick?
Dude, you've got no counter for what you're responding to.
You're done.
You're deteriorating into incoherence.[/QUOTE]You suggested that the 14th did not effect the 10th, despite the fact that the 14th remedied some of the inequities due to slavery, previously a "State Right" covered by the 10th. Is that a little comprehensible for you? I don't know how to make it any simpler.You haven't addressed your error when you stated that the 14th didn't overturn some of what used to be included in the 10th.
You suggested that the 14th did not effect the 10th, despite the fact that the 14th remedied some of the inequities due to slavery, previously a "State Right" covered by the 10th. Is that a little comprehensible for you? I don't know how to make it any simpler.[/QUOTE]You're deteriorating into incoherence.You haven't addressed your error when you stated that the 14th didn't overturn some of what used to be included in the 10th.
Your obtuseness is noted.Your deflection is noted.
It is amazing how the Lawyers arguing in front of the Supreme Court aren't hiring you as a consultant. You should contact them."Dude" you've already been pwned on this topic over and over. I told you what the arguments were. Multiple times. You dont even know what they are much less understand them much less can refute them.Argument #1.Equal protection didn't overturn a lot of what states were doing? You need to go back and study history! It certainly overturned the effects of slavery, which the states used to think was there perview. You need to quit posting foolishness. You're getting easier and easier to debunk. Your first sentence shows how clueless you are. I never said the 14th over-ruled the 10th. I said, "In this case...". BIG difference.The 10thA was never over ruled by the 14th. That's an absurd statement. You have refuted nothing. You have thrown smoke, you have called names, you have deflected, you have made unwarranted assertions and you have repeated the same two, and only two, arguments for gay marriage over and over. Just lke you did here in this post.
See, it's all you've got.
You're still doing your 'secret argument' schtick?
Dude, you've got no counter for what you're responding to.
You're done.
Let no one deny his stamina. LOL
Which words are you having trouble with? It seems even the simplest explanations of my position are throwing you for a loop. Do I need to number my arguments?That is completely incoherent.You suggested that the 14th did not effect the 10th, despite the fact that the 14th remedied some of the inequities due to slavery, previously a "State Right" covered by the 10th. Is that a little (more) comprehensible for you? I don't know how to make it any simpler.You're deteriorating into incoherence.You haven't addressed your error when you stated that the 14th didn't overturn some of what used to be included in the 10th.
Gay Marriage Scares Oklahoma Rep So Much He Proposes Banning All Marriages
If this isn't the most petulant thing I've read from the Right wing today........
It's actually only logical.
