If certain guns are a threat to our society

[Tom Horn]

I could care less if my phone is encrypted.

Couldn't.

You couldn't care less.

Gotta agree....if you could care less it shows a lack of commitment.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The government wants a private company to perform a service for it without pay.

OK, simply unlock the phone, destroy the crack that unlocked it, and give the phone to the government.

Under no circumstances should the company be compelled to give the key to encryption.

 

[ABikerSailor]

Like I've said before, if Apple created a key to unlock their phones and it got out that they'd given it to the FBI, sales of Apple products would stop almost immediately, because people would be scared that they could be spied on.

Crack the phone, get the info, and turn it over to the FBI, but DO NOT under any circumstances allow the government access to the hack.

 

[g5000]

We are off topic. The issue is that we need to keep these incredibly dangerous encrypted phones out of the hands of Americans. For safety's sake.

 

[deltex1]

I could care less if my phone is encrypted.

Couldn't.

You couldn't care less.

Gotta agree....if you could care less it shows a lack of commitment.

In Defense of I Could Care Less

Go **** Yourselves.

 

[deltex1]

We are off topic. The issue is that we need to keep these incredibly dangerous encrypted phones out of the hands of Americans. For safety's sake.

Just as we have to keep these incredibly dangerous guns out of the hands of Americans. GFY.

 

[g5000]

We are off topic. The issue is that we need to keep these incredibly dangerous encrypted phones out of the hands of Americans. For safety's sake.

Just as we have to keep these incredibly dangerous guns out of the hands of Americans. GFY.

Yes, I get it. You obviously did not grasp that I am in agreement with the sentiment behind your post. Did you not see my first post in this topic?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

I could care less if my phone is encrypted.

Couldn't.

You couldn't care less.

Gotta agree....if you could care less it shows a lack of commitment.

In Defense of I Could Care Less

Go **** Yourselves.

Now now, they feel all intelligent and shit pointing nonsense like this out...if only they could apply it to understanding politics

 

[g5000]

Jesus, that family of tards can't even tell when I am in agreement with them!

 

[deltex1]

We are off topic. The issue is that we need to keep these incredibly dangerous encrypted phones out of the hands of Americans. For safety's sake.

Just as we have to keep these incredibly dangerous guns out of the hands of Americans. GFY.

Yes, I get it. You obviously did not grasp that I am in agreement with the sentiment behind your post. Did you not see my first post in this topic?

I struggled to give you an agree...but I could not ignore your line..."Also, you should have to prove you NEEEEEEED an encrypted phone." , which was clearly stated in my OP. It showed your desperate need to add to and clarify other people's posts keeps you from being the star you perceive yourself to be.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

This is a non-issue, Apple needs to comply with the lawful court order, and stop with their lies and nonsense:

'Apple wants to give the impression that the key to Farook's phone is the key to the kingdom, but it's not so. As Timothy Lee explains on the website Vox, the FBI doesn't need to defeat the encryption on Farook's phone and thus, in theory, endanger the encryption on other phones.
[...]
The FBI wants Apple to change the software on Farook's phone so it can force the device open.

This isn't Armageddon. As Lee writes, "Apple has tacitly admitted that it can modify the software on Farook's iPhone to give the FBI access without damaging the security of anyone else's iPhone."

No one is going to have his or her privacy compromised because the FBI, in this one instance, with heroic technological exertions, gets into a dead terrorist's phone.'

Unlock the Terrorist's Phone

Consequently there are no First Amendment 'issues,' nothing concerning 'compelled speech,' and no potential Fifth Amendment 'violations.'