If banning rifles is a winner for democrats, why do they want to hide it from voters?

2aguy

Diamond Member
Jul 19, 2014
111,977
52,257
2,290
This is the thing you anti gunners don't realize about the teenagers from Parkland..... teenagers eat tidepods, play Fortnight, and snort condoms.... Those of us who understand the history of mankind and human nature, want to protect the Bill of Rights... So, while teenagers forget, we remember....and we are going to remember in November what you want to do to our gun Rights....

This is why the gun control extremist groups are telling the gun control extremist democrats to not say they want to ban Assault rifles.......

Dem Candidate Tedra Cobb Tells Supporters She Wants ‘Assault Rifle’ Ban But ‘Cannot Say That’ in Public

Tedra Cobb, the Democratic candidate in New York's 21st Congressional District, told a group of teenage supporters that she supports a ban on certain firearms but won't say so publicly for fear of losing her election.

"When I was at this thing today, it was the first table I was at, a woman said, ‘How do you feel about assault rifles?' And I said they should be banned," Cobb can be heard saying in the video recorded by one of the attendees. "And I said, you know, people were getting up to go, to go get their lunch because it was a buffet, and I just said to her, I want you to know Cindy, I cannot say that."

When the woman pushed back on Cobb keeping quiet on how she feels about banning certain firearms, Cobb said coming out in favor of a gun ban would lead to her losing her bid against Republican incumbent Elise Stefanik.

"And she said, ‘Well, I want you to' and I said, ‘I won't win,'" Cobb said. "I said Moms Demand [Action] says, and Tricia Pleau said, ‘Do not say that you want an assault rifle ban because you will not win.'"

Tricia Pleau is a member of the New York chapter of the gun-control group Moms Demand Action.

Cobb's campaign website features a page on "Addressing Gun Violence" detailing her support for a number of gun-control measures but does not feature any language supporting a specific ban on any firearms.

Chris Martin, regional press secretary of the National Republican Congressional Committee, said Cobb's comments are disqualifying.

"Tedra Cobb knows that she's wildly out of touch with the district, so she's desperately trying to hide her liberal agenda from voters," Martin said. "First, she was forced to admit that she raised taxes over 20 times, and now she's being exposed for lying to voters about her support for an assault weapons ban and taking guns away from law-abiding citizens."

The Cobb campaign did not respond to a request for comment from the Free Beacon but did issue a statement to The Post Star.
 
They know stating their gun control intent is not (yet) a winning proposition. They are wise to tone that down.
Never fear, they will never (as long as it's allowed) stop their march to disarm America
 
They know stating their gun control intent is not (yet) a winning proposition. They are wise to tone that down.
Never fear, they will never (as long as it's allowed) stop their march to disarm America


Remember in November....any vote for a democrat is a vote to end the 2nd Amendment....

Gorsuch and Kavanaugh are the reasons to vote for Trump....... and Ginsburg and Breyer are two reasons to vote for Republican Senators in November....
 
They know stating their gun control intent is not (yet) a winning proposition. They are wise to tone that down.
Never fear, they will never (as long as it's allowed) stop their march to disarm America


Remember in November....any vote for a democrat is a vote to end the 2nd Amendment....

Gorsuch and Kavanaugh are the reasons to vote for Trump....... and Ginsburg and Breyer are two reasons to vote for Republican Senators in November....

Voting either Rep or Dem will have no change to the 2nd amendment. Not one iota. You are still trying to use fear. Well fear this, the more you lie like this and try to instill fear the more common sense people will rebel against your ideals since they are based strictly on fear and hate.
 
They know stating their gun control intent is not (yet) a winning proposition. They are wise to tone that down.
Never fear, they will never (as long as it's allowed) stop their march to disarm America

I think Toro's a faggot! I also hope they never succeed in their disarmament scheme.


Think of the kids peacefully walking through the woods that come upon a pack of feral dogs, or hogs! :eek:

(Dogs would be worse)

Toro's a faggot for using my avatar.
 
They know stating their gun control intent is not (yet) a winning proposition. They are wise to tone that down.
Never fear, they will never (as long as it's allowed) stop their march to disarm America

I think Toro's a faggot! I also hope they never succeed in their disarmament scheme.


Think of the kids peacefully walking through the woods that come upon a pack of feral dogs, or hogs! :eek:

(Dogs would be worse)

Toro's a faggot for using my avatar.

Arm them if they are the right kind of Kids. If they aren't then "Dinner's Served Up"

BTW, you flag is that of a terrorist organization that lost a war to the United States and was surrendered in battle. Why don't you just display an ISIS flag while you are at it.
 
They know stating their gun control intent is not (yet) a winning proposition. They are wise to tone that down.
Never fear, they will never (as long as it's allowed) stop their march to disarm America


Remember in November....any vote for a democrat is a vote to end the 2nd Amendment....

Gorsuch and Kavanaugh are the reasons to vote for Trump....... and Ginsburg and Breyer are two reasons to vote for Republican Senators in November....

Voting either Rep or Dem will have no change to the 2nd amendment. Not one iota. You are still trying to use fear. Well fear this, the more you lie like this and try to instill fear the more common sense people will rebel against your ideals since they are based strictly on fear and hate.





Oh? So that applies to SCOTUS appointments too....right?
 
First off your fear is unfounded on just that, fear of the unknown..




It ain't a "fear". It's a fact that the dem Party wishes to ban anything that looks nasty to them. There is already a SCOTUS ruling on them though. So that will slow them down, but if you think that they don't desire the absolute disarmament of the People of the USA, then you are a fool.
 
The liberal ideology and 'platform' is rife with deception because they would never get elected otherwise. The ignorance of the masses is appalling but it has always been & always will be... The electorate cares more about the pebble in the shoe than the nuance and feasibility of what they are promised. If you want more taxes for a nanny state / socialism... tell the masses that U deserve free college, healthcare, cell phones, internet, "nutrition" assistance, etc. etc. The response is a cacophony of raa, raa, Yes we want it... Yes we deserve it. You tell them the wonkish stuff about where the money comes from and how it is unsustainable like Trump is doing and only the Truth seekers (on both sides of the isle) will be buoyed to rise to the occasion & vote pragmatically in the real world & not the fantasy world of apparitions conjured up for them by the Bernie Sanders, and Warrens of the left.
 
First off your fear is unfounded on just that, fear of the unknown..




It ain't a "fear". It's a fact that the dem Party wishes to ban anything that looks nasty to them. There is already a SCOTUS ruling on them though. So that will slow them down, but if you think that they don't desire the absolute disarmament of the People of the USA, then you are a fool.
The Dem party has zero ability to ban any rifles or weapons.
 
The liberal ideology and 'platform' is rife with deception because they would never get elected otherwise. The ignorance of the masses is appalling but it has always been & always will be... The electorate cares more about the pebble in the shoe than the nuance and feasibility of what they are promised. If you want more taxes for a nanny state / socialism... tell the masses that U deserve free college, healthcare, cell phones, internet, "nutrition" assistance, etc. etc. The response is a cacophony of raa, raa, Yes we want it... Yes we deserve it. You tell them the wonkish stuff about where the money comes from and how it is unsustainable like Trump is doing and only the Truth seekers *on both sides of the isle) will be buoyed to rise to the occasion & vote pragmatically in the real world & not the fantasy apparition conjured for them by the Bernie Sanders, and Warrens of the left.
Blah blah, rhetoric...This liberal loves his guns and wished he had artillery pieces and tanks to play with. The democrats, not all have orated a desire to ban some if not all weapons, how is this hiding an agenda if they aver in public and write it on websites and plank declarations?
The GOP is one of the worst leaders in the Nanny state because they claim they are against it yet when in power have and will never abolish it.
 
First off your fear is unfounded on just that, fear of the unknown..




It ain't a "fear". It's a fact that the dem Party wishes to ban anything that looks nasty to them. There is already a SCOTUS ruling on them though. So that will slow them down, but if you think that they don't desire the absolute disarmament of the People of the USA, then you are a fool.
The Dem party has zero ability to ban any rifles or weapons.





Until they get their people in positions of power. Funny how that works.
 
The liberal ideology and 'platform' is rife with deception because they would never get elected otherwise. The ignorance of the masses is appalling but it has always been & always will be... The electorate cares more about the pebble in the shoe than the nuance and feasibility of what they are promised. If you want more taxes for a nanny state / socialism... tell the masses that U deserve free college, healthcare, cell phones, internet, "nutrition" assistance, etc. etc. The response is a cacophony of raa, raa, Yes we want it... Yes we deserve it. You tell them the wonkish stuff about where the money comes from and how it is unsustainable like Trump is doing and only the Truth seekers *on both sides of the isle) will be buoyed to rise to the occasion & vote pragmatically in the real world & not the fantasy apparition conjured for them by the Bernie Sanders, and Warrens of the left.
Blah blah, rhetoric...This liberal loves his guns and wished he had artillery pieces and tanks to play with. The democrats, not all have orated a desire to ban some if not all weapons, how is this hiding an agenda if they aver in public and write it on websites and plank declarations?
The GOP is one of the worst leaders in the Nanny state because they claim they are against it yet when in power have and will never abolish it.





The GOP, in general, doesn't push for gun control as Dem Party members do. G.Bush was one of the notable exceptions, but he is a globalist so that made sense. Funny how globalists always want to disarm the populace.
 
The liberal ideology and 'platform' is rife with deception because they would never get elected otherwise. The ignorance of the masses is appalling but it has always been & always will be... The electorate cares more about the pebble in the shoe than the nuance and feasibility of what they are promised. If you want more taxes for a nanny state / socialism... tell the masses that U deserve free college, healthcare, cell phones, internet, "nutrition" assistance, etc. etc. The response is a cacophony of raa, raa, Yes we want it... Yes we deserve it. You tell them the wonkish stuff about where the money comes from and how it is unsustainable like Trump is doing and only the Truth seekers *on both sides of the isle) will be buoyed to rise to the occasion & vote pragmatically in the real world & not the fantasy apparition conjured for them by the Bernie Sanders, and Warrens of the left.
Blah blah, rhetoric...This liberal loves his guns and wished he had artillery pieces and tanks to play with. The democrats, not all have orated a desire to ban some if not all weapons, how is this hiding an agenda if they aver in public and write it on websites and plank declarations?
The GOP is one of the worst leaders in the Nanny state because they claim they are against it yet when in power have and will never abolish it.





The GOP, in general, doesn't push for gun control as Dem Party members do. G.Bush was one of the notable exceptions, but he is a globalist so that made sense. Funny how globalists always want to disarm the populace.
Reagan did after leaving office.Yet, globalist are not the liberals, they are the wealthy elite...anything but liberals..
 
The liberal ideology and 'platform' is rife with deception because they would never get elected otherwise. The ignorance of the masses is appalling but it has always been & always will be... The electorate cares more about the pebble in the shoe than the nuance and feasibility of what they are promised. If you want more taxes for a nanny state / socialism... tell the masses that U deserve free college, healthcare, cell phones, internet, "nutrition" assistance, etc. etc. The response is a cacophony of raa, raa, Yes we want it... Yes we deserve it. You tell them the wonkish stuff about where the money comes from and how it is unsustainable like Trump is doing and only the Truth seekers *on both sides of the isle) will be buoyed to rise to the occasion & vote pragmatically in the real world & not the fantasy apparition conjured for them by the Bernie Sanders, and Warrens of the left.
Blah blah, rhetoric...This liberal loves his guns and wished he had artillery pieces and tanks to play with. The democrats, not all have orated a desire to ban some if not all weapons, how is this hiding an agenda if they aver in public and write it on websites and plank declarations?
The GOP is one of the worst leaders in the Nanny state because they claim they are against it yet when in power have and will never abolish it.





The GOP, in general, doesn't push for gun control as Dem Party members do. G.Bush was one of the notable exceptions, but he is a globalist so that made sense. Funny how globalists always want to disarm the populace.
Reagan did after leaving office.




Really? Care to share those links.
 
First off your fear is unfounded on just that, fear of the unknown..




It ain't a "fear". It's a fact that the dem Party wishes to ban anything that looks nasty to them. There is already a SCOTUS ruling on them though. So that will slow them down, but if you think that they don't desire the absolute disarmament of the People of the USA, then you are a fool.
The Dem party has zero ability to ban any rifles or weapons.





Until they get their people in positions of power. Funny how that works.
Yet that is several years away, today other issues could be covered yet instead today the dead horse gets the beating..
 
The liberal ideology and 'platform' is rife with deception because they would never get elected otherwise. The ignorance of the masses is appalling but it has always been & always will be... The electorate cares more about the pebble in the shoe than the nuance and feasibility of what they are promised. If you want more taxes for a nanny state / socialism... tell the masses that U deserve free college, healthcare, cell phones, internet, "nutrition" assistance, etc. etc. The response is a cacophony of raa, raa, Yes we want it... Yes we deserve it. You tell them the wonkish stuff about where the money comes from and how it is unsustainable like Trump is doing and only the Truth seekers *on both sides of the isle) will be buoyed to rise to the occasion & vote pragmatically in the real world & not the fantasy apparition conjured for them by the Bernie Sanders, and Warrens of the left.
Blah blah, rhetoric...This liberal loves his guns and wished he had artillery pieces and tanks to play with. The democrats, not all have orated a desire to ban some if not all weapons, how is this hiding an agenda if they aver in public and write it on websites and plank declarations?
The GOP is one of the worst leaders in the Nanny state because they claim they are against it yet when in power have and will never abolish it.





The GOP, in general, doesn't push for gun control as Dem Party members do. G.Bush was one of the notable exceptions, but he is a globalist so that made sense. Funny how globalists always want to disarm the populace.
Reagan did after leaving office.




Really? Care to share those links.
Remember the assault weapon ban in the 1990's AKA Brady Bill?
Pepperidge Farms remembers..
 

Forum List

Back
Top