Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 126,711
- 98,396
- 3,635
Who stopped counting?Another question:
WHO ordered the votes to stop being counted on election day?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who stopped counting?Another question:
WHO ordered the votes to stop being counted on election day?
The Electoral college makes it harder to cheat---we need to keep them and dump you.o note......as crazy as it was 2016 was a fair election also.
Oh, I agree, the rules were followed.. which is why we need to dump the Electoral College. It clearly doesn't work.
They didn't delete any databases. They turned the database over to the frauditors. Imagine that? The frauditors have no clue what they're doing.Arizona auditors recovered the deleted information from the deleted databases. Yet another question: if there was no cheating...WHY DID THEY DELETE THE DATABASES?
Your desperate claim that the Cyber Ninja Big Bamboozle at the Crazy Times Fair is an effective scare tactic is undermined by the raucous laughter it evokes amidst the embarrassment of conservative Republicans.Bootney Lee Farnsworth said:Whether any audits show fraud or not, motherfuckers are going to be much more careful about it going forward.
Moron, you're quoting him out of context. What the fuck is with you cons? Do any of you cons have an honest bone in your body?Joe Biden: “We have put together I think the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics".
So you want Harris for president?If evidence is uncovered in the AZ recount, Biden should be removed from office.There is no legal mechanism allowing for the election results to be overturned following them being certified by Congress. If Biden was found to have cheated the best that could happen is him being impeached over it but even if Harris and Biden we're both impeached that would mean that Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House would become president it wouldn't allow Trump to Simply take the office of President by default
LOLOLHis presidency is crippled now. It will be totally crippled. They know they cheated.Will MI follow suit? And if that is proven as a cheat, what happens? Does Sleepy Joe get to keep on in the WH? Or if proven Trump DID win...does he get brought back as potus?
And they know that we know that they cheated. Too much happened too close to plain view to deny it.
Who says? You responded to a post where I stated that if "something" is found investigations might be warranted. This is despite this being the THIRD audit in this particular county. I won't believe the audit is on the up and up but if I state that I want proof of voter fraud, I can't well state that I don't want potential proof investigated. And if necessary argued in court. That is how you test these kinds of particular hypotheses.If an audit claims there was fraud, nobody will believe it or accept it. It will be ridiculed.
Sure, the election showed that. Biden just drew even more.plus the fact that Trump drew large support
This is a rabbit hole so deep it would completely derail the OP. Suffice to say I don't agree with the last sentence.I know Trump was a polarizing figure, but his policies were not unusual or outlandish
If you acknowledge that he was a polarizing figure, why do you have a problem with believing that fact would entice people to go vote?nd I don't think a record number of people showed up to vote against them.
Again that is not true. The problem is that no proof of fraud is being presented at all, but a lot of people believe it anyway.As of right now, any evidence of any kind would not be accepted as proof of fraud.
There is no neutral third party. That's why the system is set up so both partisan parties have a say in proceedings and that the arbiters of disputes are nominated by both parties. This is a disconnect you keep on showing.Who would be the neutral third party to ensure voting integrity? Can you think of anyone?
Just like we had “mostly peaceful protests”.
Most of them were peaceful.
The original audits (3 times) by Republican and independent officials will certainlyWill MI follow suit? And if that is proven as a cheat, what happens? Does Sleepy Joe get to keep on in the WH? Or if proven Trump DID win...does he get brought back as potus?
HEHE. Watching you slaves to a miserable boss twist on this....lololThe original audits (3 times) by Republican and independent officials will certainlyWill MI follow suit? And if that is proven as a cheat, what happens? Does Sleepy Joe get to keep on in the WH? Or if proven Trump DID win...does he get brought back as potus?
rule the day as opposed to the fufnick, obtuse, partizan "ninga" outfit "audit" chosen by trumptydump supporters which will have bearing on anything because it isn't anything except in your twisted minds.
And that is exactly what you and your ilk are doing about the Jan 6 insurrection--taking the side of your mentally challenged "leader", who called it a lovefest between police and insurrectionists.Just like we had “mostly peaceful protests”.
Most of them were peaceful.
For CNN values of “peaceful”.
View attachment 491088
Of course, as always, Incel Joe, we can always count on you to take the side of violent, destructive, subhuman criminal pieces of shit, against that of actual human beings.
Always.
It's what you are, and you will always side with your own kind.
They didn't delete any databases. They turned the database over to the frauditors. Imagine that? The frauditors have no clue what they're doing.Arizona auditors recovered the deleted information from the deleted databases. Yet another question: if there was no cheating...WHY DID THEY DELETE THE DATABASES?
![]()
Firm behind Arizona audit says no data was destroyed, contradicting GOP allegations
A firm that is conducting a controversial election audit in Arizona confirmed Tuesday that no data has been destroyed, contradicting some Republicans’ claims that officials had deleted information regarding the vote tally in Maricopa County.thehill.com
Ben Cotton, founder of CyFIR LLC, which is working on the audit, said he had retrieved all the data he needs from Arizona's largest county, which President Biden won in November. The remark came a day after county officials said auditors could not find the information because they did not know where it was located.
This is your thread, shouldn't you know about the topic? That story broke before you posted this.
Great analysis, but typical non-comment from a trumptydumpty.HEHE. Watching you slaves to a miserable boss twist on this....lololThe original audits (3 times) by Republican and independent officials will certainlyWill MI follow suit? And if that is proven as a cheat, what happens? Does Sleepy Joe get to keep on in the WH? Or if proven Trump DID win...does he get brought back as potus?
rule the day as opposed to the fufnick, obtuse, partizan "ninga" outfit "audit" chosen by trumptydump supporters which will have bearing on anything because it isn't anything except in your twisted minds.
OMG. No wonder conservatives have to screw your women to impregnate them...lol
I don't care about the "final" result because it means nothing, nada, kaputsky, nyet and is nothing more than another farce in the era of Trump.They didn't delete any databases. They turned the database over to the frauditors. Imagine that? The frauditors have no clue what they're doing.Arizona auditors recovered the deleted information from the deleted databases. Yet another question: if there was no cheating...WHY DID THEY DELETE THE DATABASES?
![]()
Firm behind Arizona audit says no data was destroyed, contradicting GOP allegations
A firm that is conducting a controversial election audit in Arizona confirmed Tuesday that no data has been destroyed, contradicting some Republicans’ claims that officials had deleted information regarding the vote tally in Maricopa County.thehill.com
Ben Cotton, founder of CyFIR LLC, which is working on the audit, said he had retrieved all the data he needs from Arizona's largest county, which President Biden won in November. The remark came a day after county officials said auditors could not find the information because they did not know where it was located.
This is your thread, shouldn't you know about the topic? That story broke before you posted this.
Seems the auditors are honest and went so far as to correct a republican who spoke in error. Can't wait to see the final audit result.
.
This crazy times carnival ride is already being ridiculed.Who says? You responded to a post where I stated that if "something" is found investigations might be warranted. This is despite this being the THIRD audit in this particular county. I won't believe the audit is on the up and up but if I state that I want proof of voter fraud, I can't well state that I don't want potential proof investigated. And if necessary argued in court. That is how you test these kinds of particular hypotheses.If an audit claims there was fraud, nobody will believe it or accept it. It will be ridiculed.
This by the way is the difference between you and me I think. You reject out of hand the things you don't believe. I try to keep my personal disbelief out of the argument.
Sure, the election showed that. Biden just drew even more.plus the fact that Trump drew large support
This is a rabbit hole so deep it would completely derail the OP. Suffice to say I don't agree with the last sentence.I know Trump was a polarizing figure, but his policies were not unusual or outlandish
If you acknowledge that he was a polarizing figure, why do you have a problem with believing that fact would entice people to go vote?nd I don't think a record number of people showed up to vote against them.
Again that is not true. The problem is that no proof of fraud is being presented at all, but a lot of people believe it anyway.As of right now, any evidence of any kind would not be accepted as proof of fraud.
There is no neutral third party. That's why the system is set up so both partisan parties have a say in proceedings and that the arbiters of disputes are nominated by both parties. This is a disconnect you keep on showing.Who would be the neutral third party to ensure voting integrity? Can you think of anyone?
Your first reply to me was a statement that you wouldn't trust the results of an audit called for by not a neutral party but YOUR party. Administered not by a neutral party but by a party that has SHOWN to already believe that fraud happened. Because of the stated reason, you don't trust MY PARTY. That is not a rational response.
Dusty, I like the fact that you seem to try to actually engage what I say. It is rare and therefore you deserve my respect. I don't believe you are dumb or a bad person. So can I ask a favor?
Would you be willing to give me what you believe to be a rational reason why you believe voter fraud happened? I don't mean stuff like I believe Democrats are bad people. Or stuff like. I have a hard time believing Biden got more votes. But an actual rational reason?
They've already leaked two discrepancies and both were debunked.They didn't delete any databases. They turned the database over to the frauditors. Imagine that? The frauditors have no clue what they're doing.Arizona auditors recovered the deleted information from the deleted databases. Yet another question: if there was no cheating...WHY DID THEY DELETE THE DATABASES?
![]()
Firm behind Arizona audit says no data was destroyed, contradicting GOP allegations
A firm that is conducting a controversial election audit in Arizona confirmed Tuesday that no data has been destroyed, contradicting some Republicans’ claims that officials had deleted information regarding the vote tally in Maricopa County.thehill.com
Ben Cotton, founder of CyFIR LLC, which is working on the audit, said he had retrieved all the data he needs from Arizona's largest county, which President Biden won in November. The remark came a day after county officials said auditors could not find the information because they did not know where it was located.
This is your thread, shouldn't you know about the topic? That story broke before you posted this.
Seems the auditors are honest and went so far as to correct a republican who spoke in error. Can't wait to see the final audit result.
.
What flavor paint chips do you prefer? Glidden, Dutch Boy, or Sherwin Williams.?Great analysis, but typical non-comment from a trumptydumpty.HEHE. Watching you slaves to a miserable boss twist on this....lololThe original audits (3 times) by Republican and independent officials will certainlyWill MI follow suit? And if that is proven as a cheat, what happens? Does Sleepy Joe get to keep on in the WH? Or if proven Trump DID win...does he get brought back as potus?
rule the day as opposed to the fufnick, obtuse, partizan "ninga" outfit "audit" chosen by trumptydump supporters which will have bearing on anything because it isn't anything except in your twisted minds.
OMG. No wonder conservatives have to screw your women to impregnate them...lol
I don't care about the "final" result because it means nothing, nada, kaputsky, nyet and is nothing more than another farce in the era of Trump.They didn't delete any databases. They turned the database over to the frauditors. Imagine that? The frauditors have no clue what they're doing.Arizona auditors recovered the deleted information from the deleted databases. Yet another question: if there was no cheating...WHY DID THEY DELETE THE DATABASES?
![]()
Firm behind Arizona audit says no data was destroyed, contradicting GOP allegations
A firm that is conducting a controversial election audit in Arizona confirmed Tuesday that no data has been destroyed, contradicting some Republicans’ claims that officials had deleted information regarding the vote tally in Maricopa County.thehill.com
Ben Cotton, founder of CyFIR LLC, which is working on the audit, said he had retrieved all the data he needs from Arizona's largest county, which President Biden won in November. The remark came a day after county officials said auditors could not find the information because they did not know where it was located.
This is your thread, shouldn't you know about the topic? That story broke before you posted this.
Seems the auditors are honest and went so far as to correct a republican who spoke in error. Can't wait to see the final audit result.
.