If a man can marry a man

But requiring consent in the context of a marriage involving a dead person is a barrier that can be overcome; just like how you weirdos knocked down enough barriers for gay marriage to be a thing.

Rational and "Lefty" don't mix. Screaming ,chanting ,and rioting id their bag.
True that.

Here is a plausible re
We can make an exception. For example, normally contracts need consent, yes, but if one party is a dead person who cannot give consent, then this requirement can and should be waived.

See? Where there is a will, there is a way.
Logic escapes you.
 
Do I need to re-quote your post where you mis-used the term false equivalence.
You don't understand how logic works. You ignore the major differences between two things to suggest illogically a couple of minor similarities make your argument workable.

No, sweet cheeks, there is no getting consent from a dead man.
 
You don't understand how logic works. You ignore the major differences between two things to suggest illogically a couple of minor similarities make your argument workable.
More words to make yourself feel smart.

No, sweet cheeks, there is no getting consent from a dead man.

And I already said that that's an issue that can be overcome, you strawberry-flavored cream puff.
 
I would suggest that Skye or Mayor Quimby wanting to marry a dead person is strange, not that there is anything wrong with that. :auiqs.jpg:
 
Two questions: How are you going to get your dead boyfriend to say "I do", and do you really want to kiss your new bride?
You just say that he is a mute and have him make hand signals using the Weekend at Bernies method. :dunno:
 
This is correct. A dead person cannot consent to contracts.
First of all, I already said an exception can be made. Secondly, marriages aren't always about legal contracts. They can be for civil purposes, such as having a wedding for families etc.
 
Back
Top Bottom