Identified: CBS News Confirms White House Leakers Are 3 Holdovers From The Obama Administration

[theHawk]

Treason for leaking info to the press? You cons get crazier with each day. Not that I believe the story. I'll wait on a credible source

Leaking classified information is very illegal, yes. You don't get to hide behind freedom of press.

 

[DarkFury]

Just like we don't understand how polls work?
Or how government works?
Or anything about law?

You keep telling us we are wrong and we keep winning! What the hell does that tell you idiot?

This is "winning" to you?

Fascinating.

I would call finding people committing treason winning yes. Over looking it like you do is on its best day foolish and when done deliberate also an act of treason.

I guess we can add "treason" to the list of words you don't understand, but that's my not my point.

Do you really believe that at this moment in history, that you guys are "winning"?

You are supporting subversion of lawfully elected government.

Damn right I am.

But that's not "treason", in fact it's American as apple pie.

We don't live in an autocracy, as much as that fact might upset you.

Alright fool let's talk about something you mentioned in open thread about a year ago. You worked for the 2008 Clinton campaign right? And she never paid you right? So why the fuck are you packing water for someone you know that is a goddamn deadbeat?

 

[JustAnotherNut]

White house is like a profit making company were every has a vested interest in seeing the current management be a success?

in a way it is, and they should. Working in the White House is a larger responsibility of running the country, so yes everyone there does have a vested interest to see it a success.

Instead this country is being torn apart by those who don't give a shit about anything other than their own asses

 

[theDoctorisIn]

This is "winning" to you?

Fascinating.

I would call finding people committing treason winning yes. Over looking it like you do is on its best day foolish and when done deliberate also an act of treason.

I guess we can add "treason" to the list of words you don't understand, but that's my not my point.

Do you really believe that at this moment in history, that you guys are "winning"?

You are supporting subversion of lawfully elected government.

Damn right I am.

But that's not "treason", in fact it's American as apple pie.

We don't live in an autocracy, as much as that fact might upset you.

Alright fool let's talk about something you mentioned in open thread about a year ago. You worked for the 2008 Clinton campaign right? And she never paid you right? So why the fuck are you packing water for someone you know that is a goddamn deadbeat?

I worked (tangentially) for Clinton's campaign for 5 days - and yes, I was never paid for it.

As for "packing water" for her, I couldn't possibly give a shit about her. I didn't vote for her (ever), and I don't particularly like her in any way.

Why do you keep trying to change the subject?

 

[IM2]

I think the quote is stated that people BELIEVE his is Obama and former Obama staff. Believing is not the same as knowing. They are just hurling out a name so their base can jump crazy so they use Obama.

But you see these leaks aren't the problem. That's another distraction the cult of Trumpets want to use in order to deny their boy is a crook. The investigation is about Trumps ties to Russia relative to the election in 2016.

The White house saying they Believe something should not be taken serious or treated as credible. This is all they have left. Blame Obama.

Besides I do not think CBS needs Breitbart to report for them. This is fake news.

 

[DarkFury]

I would call finding people committing treason winning yes. Over looking it like you do is on its best day foolish and when done deliberate also an act of treason.

I guess we can add "treason" to the list of words you don't understand, but that's my not my point.

Do you really believe that at this moment in history, that you guys are "winning"?

You are supporting subversion of lawfully elected government.

Damn right I am.

But that's not "treason", in fact it's American as apple pie.

We don't live in an autocracy, as much as that fact might upset you.

Alright fool let's talk about something you mentioned in open thread about a year ago. You worked for the 2008 Clinton campaign right? And she never paid you right? So why the fuck are you packing water for someone you know that is a goddamn deadbeat?

I worked (tangentially) for Clinton's campaign for 5 days - and yes, I was never paid for it.

As for "packing water" for her, I couldn't possibly give a shit about her. I didn't vote for her (ever), and I don't particularly like her in any way.

Why do you keep trying to change the subject?

It's not changing the subject it's shows a pattern of abuse towards lawfully elected government. It's shows your high minded narrowed vision of freedom of citizens as you have yourself as living in fly over country!

It's that abusive self ego inflating shit for brains thinking that has allowed some of lowest life forms on earth to infect our country. It's you and others like you that push self absorbed agenda's and outright lying narratives that endanger our country and its citizens.

 

[JustAnotherNut]

I would call finding people committing treason winning yes. Over looking it like you do is on its best day foolish and when done deliberate also an act of treason.

I guess we can add "treason" to the list of words you don't understand, but that's my not my point.

Do you really believe that at this moment in history, that you guys are "winning"?

You are supporting subversion of lawfully elected government.

Damn right I am.

But that's not "treason", in fact it's American as apple pie.

We don't live in an autocracy, as much as that fact might upset you.

Alright fool let's talk about something you mentioned in open thread about a year ago. You worked for the 2008 Clinton campaign right? And she never paid you right? So why the fuck are you packing water for someone you know that is a goddamn deadbeat?

I worked (tangentially) for Clinton's campaign for 5 days - and yes, I was never paid for it.

As for "packing water" for her, I couldn't possibly give a shit about her. I didn't vote for her (ever), and I don't particularly like her in any way.

Why do you keep trying to change the subject?

If I could interject here..........back to your comments about it not being treason......

If a former President entered into an agreement with some of his staffers that after he left office, they would report on any pertinent information from the new administration that could be compiled to have the new President impeached or other serious repercussions against him or his administration.......

just what would you call that????

 

[theDoctorisIn]

I guess we can add "treason" to the list of words you don't understand, but that's my not my point.

Do you really believe that at this moment in history, that you guys are "winning"?

You are supporting subversion of lawfully elected government.

Damn right I am.

But that's not "treason", in fact it's American as apple pie.

We don't live in an autocracy, as much as that fact might upset you.

Alright fool let's talk about something you mentioned in open thread about a year ago. You worked for the 2008 Clinton campaign right? And she never paid you right? So why the fuck are you packing water for someone you know that is a goddamn deadbeat?

I worked (tangentially) for Clinton's campaign for 5 days - and yes, I was never paid for it.

As for "packing water" for her, I couldn't possibly give a shit about her. I didn't vote for her (ever), and I don't particularly like her in any way.

Why do you keep trying to change the subject?

If I could interject here..........back to your comments about it not being treason......

If a former President entered into an agreement with some of his staffers that after he left office, they would report on any pertinent information from the new administration that could be compiled to have the new President impeached or other serious repercussions against him or his administration.......

just what would you call that????

Politics.

But you haven't come close to even demonstrating that as a possibility, so it's not even worth discussing.

 

[DarkFury]

I guess we can add "treason" to the list of words you don't understand, but that's my not my point.

Do you really believe that at this moment in history, that you guys are "winning"?

You are supporting subversion of lawfully elected government.

Damn right I am.

But that's not "treason", in fact it's American as apple pie.

We don't live in an autocracy, as much as that fact might upset you.

Alright fool let's talk about something you mentioned in open thread about a year ago. You worked for the 2008 Clinton campaign right? And she never paid you right? So why the fuck are you packing water for someone you know that is a goddamn deadbeat?

I worked (tangentially) for Clinton's campaign for 5 days - and yes, I was never paid for it.

As for "packing water" for her, I couldn't possibly give a shit about her. I didn't vote for her (ever), and I don't particularly like her in any way.

Why do you keep trying to change the subject?

If I could interject here..........back to your comments about it not being treason......

If a former President entered into an agreement with some of his staffers that after he left office, they would report on any pertinent information from the new administration that could be compiled to have the new President impeached or other serious repercussions against him or his administration.......

just what would you call that????

And she's scores a knock out!

 

[DarkFury]

You are supporting subversion of lawfully elected government.

Damn right I am.

But that's not "treason", in fact it's American as apple pie.

We don't live in an autocracy, as much as that fact might upset you.

Alright fool let's talk about something you mentioned in open thread about a year ago. You worked for the 2008 Clinton campaign right? And she never paid you right? So why the fuck are you packing water for someone you know that is a goddamn deadbeat?

I worked (tangentially) for Clinton's campaign for 5 days - and yes, I was never paid for it.

As for "packing water" for her, I couldn't possibly give a shit about her. I didn't vote for her (ever), and I don't particularly like her in any way.

Why do you keep trying to change the subject?

If I could interject here..........back to your comments about it not being treason......

If a former President entered into an agreement with some of his staffers that after he left office, they would report on any pertinent information from the new administration that could be compiled to have the new President impeached or other serious repercussions against him or his administration.......

just what would you call that????

Politics.

But you haven't come close to even demonstrating that as a possibility, so it's not even worth discussing.

If you want to remove the filth from politics I suggest you start with the bullshit you post.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Let me take a moment to educate you guys. Pop quiz time.

Which document does the following statement come from?

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Damn right I am.

But that's not "treason", in fact it's American as apple pie.

We don't live in an autocracy, as much as that fact might upset you.

Alright fool let's talk about something you mentioned in open thread about a year ago. You worked for the 2008 Clinton campaign right? And she never paid you right? So why the fuck are you packing water for someone you know that is a goddamn deadbeat?

I worked (tangentially) for Clinton's campaign for 5 days - and yes, I was never paid for it.

As for "packing water" for her, I couldn't possibly give a shit about her. I didn't vote for her (ever), and I don't particularly like her in any way.

Why do you keep trying to change the subject?

If I could interject here..........back to your comments about it not being treason......

If a former President entered into an agreement with some of his staffers that after he left office, they would report on any pertinent information from the new administration that could be compiled to have the new President impeached or other serious repercussions against him or his administration.......

just what would you call that????

Politics.

But you haven't come close to even demonstrating that as a possibility, so it's not even worth discussing.

If you want to remove the filth from politics I suggest you start with the bullshit you post.

Who said I wanted to "remove the filth from politics"?

That's what makes it interesting.

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

If these stories are true, I'm sure they'll be fired.

But no one is going to be charged with "treason", or sent to jail.

You guys really don't seem to understand how the world works.

Just like we don't understand how polls work?
Or how government works?
Or anything about law?

You keep telling us we are wrong and we keep winning! What the hell does that tell you idiot?

This is "winning" to you?

Fascinating.

You constantly said Trump wouldn't beat Hillary. How do explain your failure?

You're consistently a retarded fuckwit.

Calm yourself! It's apparently obvious my post 'Triggered' you due to your profanity laced immature response. You must realize I'm a winner like Trump. I know how to win and I recognize winners. I predicted Trump would win from the moment he announced due to my superior gifted foresight. In closing, I will offer some advice. You must learn to govern your passions, they will be your undoing!

 

[theDoctorisIn]

If these stories are true, I'm sure they'll be fired.

But no one is going to be charged with "treason", or sent to jail.

You guys really don't seem to understand how the world works.

Just like we don't understand how polls work?
Or how government works?
Or anything about law?

You keep telling us we are wrong and we keep winning! What the hell does that tell you idiot?

This is "winning" to you?

Fascinating.

You constantly said Trump wouldn't beat Hillary. How do explain your failure?

You're consistently a retarded fuckwit.

Calm yourself! It's apparently obvious my post obviously 'Triggered' you due to your profanity laced immature response. You must realize I'm a winner like Trump. I know how to win and I recognize winners. I predicted Trump would win from the moment he announced due to my superior gifted foresight. In closing, I will offer some advice. You must learn to govern your passions, they will be your undoing!

You seem to be offended by my use of profanity.

Tough shit, fuckwit.

 

[Bush92]

When our glorious leader returns from overseas, it's all over for them. I suspect the Trumpenfuhrer will make an example out of them for undermining him, and the country. They've already been reported to the authorities so there's no escape, unless they take the suicide route.



www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/05/27/reports-at-least-three-anti-trump-leakers-identified-referred-proper-authorities-expected-fired-soon/

Should have purged them.

 

[JustAnotherNut]

You are supporting subversion of lawfully elected government.

Damn right I am.

But that's not "treason", in fact it's American as apple pie.

We don't live in an autocracy, as much as that fact might upset you.

Alright fool let's talk about something you mentioned in open thread about a year ago. You worked for the 2008 Clinton campaign right? And she never paid you right? So why the fuck are you packing water for someone you know that is a goddamn deadbeat?

I worked (tangentially) for Clinton's campaign for 5 days - and yes, I was never paid for it.

As for "packing water" for her, I couldn't possibly give a shit about her. I didn't vote for her (ever), and I don't particularly like her in any way.

Why do you keep trying to change the subject?

If I could interject here..........back to your comments about it not being treason......

If a former President entered into an agreement with some of his staffers that after he left office, they would report on any pertinent information from the new administration that could be compiled to have the new President impeached or other serious repercussions against him or his administration.......

just what would you call that????

Politics.

But you haven't come close to even demonstrating that as a possibility, so it's not even worth discussing.

The only thing I added to the story was the possible actions of a former President. So even if you take that out and go with the actual story......

3(?) staffers have been found to be responsible for leaking information to the press......ok, that's not a bid deal in & of itself, but what kind of information did they leak? Stuff that was discussed in a closed meeting between 2 heads of state? And what impact did that bit of tattling cause??? Several countries locking US out.

It had little to do with Trump & what he said........it had everything to do with those staffers bellowing to the press and how it's now jeopardized our position on the world stage

 

[DarkFury]

Alright fool let's talk about something you mentioned in open thread about a year ago. You worked for the 2008 Clinton campaign right? And she never paid you right? So why the fuck are you packing water for someone you know that is a goddamn deadbeat?

I worked (tangentially) for Clinton's campaign for 5 days - and yes, I was never paid for it.

As for "packing water" for her, I couldn't possibly give a shit about her. I didn't vote for her (ever), and I don't particularly like her in any way.

Why do you keep trying to change the subject?

If I could interject here..........back to your comments about it not being treason......

If a former President entered into an agreement with some of his staffers that after he left office, they would report on any pertinent information from the new administration that could be compiled to have the new President impeached or other serious repercussions against him or his administration.......

just what would you call that????

Politics.

But you haven't come close to even demonstrating that as a possibility, so it's not even worth discussing.

If you want to remove the filth from politics I suggest you start with the bullshit you post.

Who said I wanted to "remove the filth from politics"?

That's what makes it interesting.

Well now that makes you interesting. You openly support political lies and suppression of fact and freedom.
Are you a communist? Or socialist? Maybe a Castro Marxist? It's one thing to be accused of political bias it's another to admit you practice political bias. Do you practice political bias?

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Damn right I am.

But that's not "treason", in fact it's American as apple pie.

We don't live in an autocracy, as much as that fact might upset you.

Alright fool let's talk about something you mentioned in open thread about a year ago. You worked for the 2008 Clinton campaign right? And she never paid you right? So why the fuck are you packing water for someone you know that is a goddamn deadbeat?

I worked (tangentially) for Clinton's campaign for 5 days - and yes, I was never paid for it.

As for "packing water" for her, I couldn't possibly give a shit about her. I didn't vote for her (ever), and I don't particularly like her in any way.

Why do you keep trying to change the subject?

If I could interject here..........back to your comments about it not being treason......

If a former President entered into an agreement with some of his staffers that after he left office, they would report on any pertinent information from the new administration that could be compiled to have the new President impeached or other serious repercussions against him or his administration.......

just what would you call that????

Politics.

But you haven't come close to even demonstrating that as a possibility, so it's not even worth discussing.

The only thing I added to the story was the possible actions of a former President. So even if you take that out and go with the actual story......

3(?) staffers have been found to be responsible for leaking information to the press......ok, that's not a bid deal in & of itself, but what kind of information did they leak? Stuff that was discussed in a closed meeting between 2 heads of state? And what impact did that bit of tattling cause??? Several countries locking US out.

It had little to do with Trump & what he said........it had everything to do with those staffers bellowing to the press and how it's now jeopardized our position on the world stage

If Trump hadn't done it, no one could have leaked it.

 

[Bush92]

When our glorious leader returns from overseas, it's all over for them. I suspect the Trumpenfuhrer will make an example out of them for undermining him, and the country. They've already been reported to the authorities so there's no escape, unless they take the suicide route.



www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/05/27/reports-at-least-three-anti-trump-leakers-identified-referred-proper-authorities-expected-fired-soon/

Prosecute the communist.

 

[HaShev]

If these stories are true, I'm sure they'll be fired.

But no one is going to be charged with "treason", or sent to jail.

You guys really don't seem to understand how the world works.

Just like we don't understand how polls work?
Or how government works?
Or anything about law?

You keep telling us we are wrong and we keep winning! What the hell does that tell you idiot?

This is "winning" to you?

Fascinating.

I would call finding people committing treason winning yes. Over looking it like you do is on its best day foolish and when done deliberate also an act of treason.

I guess we can add "treason" to the list of words you don't understand, but that's my not my point.

Do you really believe that at this moment in history, that you guys are "winning"?

Actually you are wrong, many Dem Politicians went on record saying they intended to do the things they ended up proving to do and party members got caught doing what involved treasonous acts, and espionage.
They openly admited this was a coup and it is. By setting up the false dictator narrative they can avoid being jailed or worst case scenerio use jail as a "see I told you so" or "look what he does to his opponent" ploy. The only threat was, by the book, hardliner Sessions and so they set him up to be recused.
Note they are on record using the term War and in riot rallies flown that mantra and did the deeds including ripping up flags.