ICE rioters getting arrested

[Marener]

Ahhh... yes, then you're saying that leftist leadership are suck at hiring or they too are in bed with these right wing officers hired by them.

A big part of the problem is the police union is way too powerful, and because the rank and file police know they basically hold the city hostage.

The police act like a protection racket. They’ll keep people safe as long as the people look the other way.

 

[Marener]

Thank God for that

Even if the cops only remove a repeat offender for a day till some quack judge turns them loose that might save an innocent citizen’s life

Thank you for confirming that conservatives don’t actually care about the constitution.

 

[Mac-7]

If the police officer arrested him for being called a bitch, then yes, he abused his authority.

And yet here you are, praising him for violating an American’s Constitutionally protected rights because you hate the freedom of speech.

Not if I’m on the jury

And maybe not most jurors when all the facts are known

 

[drudge X]

Cops arrest criminals. They also arrest innocent citizens exercising their rights, as you saw in your video.

And sometimes they cover up the crimes of their own buddies.

When protesters physically attack people, regardless whether police or opposing side, property destruction, aggressive obstruction, the gloves come off immediately.

 

[Marener]

Not if I’m on the jury

And maybe not most jurors when all the facts are known

The people are afraid to hold the police accountable for violating the constitution.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Not if I’m on the jury

And maybe not most jurors when all the facts are known

I know - because you hate the 1st Amendment.

 

[Mac-7]

Thank you for confirming that conservatives don’t actually care about the constitution.

We want justice not split legal hairs that only protect criminals

 

[Mac-7]

I know - because you hate the 1st Amendment.

You may think so

Or maybe you are just trying to win an argument any way you can

 

[XponentialChaos]

You may think so

Or maybe you are just trying to win an argument

You’re defending the arrest of people for saying mean things.

That’s directly in violation of the 1st Amendment. Why do you hate the freedom of speech?

 

[Marener]

When protesters physically attack people, regardless whether police or opposing side, property destruction, aggressive obstruction, the gloves come off immediately.

Police treat anti-police protests very differently than other protests.

But that’s not even the point. The point is that police will do whatever they want and there’s nothing you can do about it.

 

[Marener]

We want justice not split legal hairs that only protect criminals

It protects the citizens and their constitutional rights which you seem perfectly fine to chip away at.

Because you’re afraid.

 

[drudge X]

A big part of the problem is the police union is way too powerful, and because the rank and file police know they basically hold the city hostage.

The police act like a protection racket. They’ll keep people safe as long as the people look the other way.

Or you could say everyone one of them is complicit in creating the problem and have no intention of fixing the problem. When exposed of wrongdoing, finger pointing goes haywire.

 

[Mac-7]

You’re defending the arrest of people for saying mean things.

The police will argue obstruction of justice

And they could win

 

[Mac-7]

It protects the citizens and their constitutional rights which you seem perfectly fine to chip away at.

Because you’re afraid.

Citizens and illegal alien criminals for as long as libs can hold out

 

[XponentialChaos]

The police will argue obstruction of justice

And they could win

Saying mean things isn’t an obstruction of justice. You just hate the freedom of speech.

 

[Marener]

Or you could say everyone one of them is complicit in creating the problem and have no intention of fixing the problem. When exposed of wrongdoing, finger pointing goes haywire.

We’ve seen what happens when we try to fix the problem. We are being held hostage by the police.

 

[Marener]

The police will argue obstruction of justice

And they could win

That makes absolutely no sense.

If they win, it’s because the courts are totally corrupt.

My guess is that it’ll never come to trial. The charges will be dismissed. There’s no way it could be prosecuted. It’s clear retaliation against citizens by thugs.

 

[Mac-7]

Saying mean things isn’t an obstruction of justice. You just hate the freedom of speech.

You hope

Do you want to label my example of the ladies in the tax office as fake news?

It is true, but since when did that settle a good argument?

 

[Mac-7]

That makes absolutely no sense.

If they win, it’s because the courts are totally corrupt.

My guess is that it’ll never come to trial. The charges will be dismissed. There’s no way it could be prosecuted. It’s clear retaliation against citizens by thugs.

The courts are just as unpredictable for your side as mine

Though the odds are against reason in deep blue democrat enclaves

 

[XponentialChaos]

You hope

Do you want to label my example of the ladies in the tax office as fake news?

It is true, but since when did that settle a good argument?

How did they obstruct justice by saying mean things to them? That’s a weak argument, even for you.

The reality is that you just don’t think they should be allowed to say mean things to them because you don’t respect the 1st Amendment, one of our founding American principles.