I wish to thank all the MSM for helping Trump get elected!!!

[eddiew37]

As I've been a major critic of the biased MSM after deep reflection and further substantiation I've come to
understand the role the MSM played in convincing Americans that :
1) The MSM IS biased.
2) Everything or time they report biased news/headlines/soundbites I am suspicious of their work.

So "Thanks" to the MSM for being a part in Trump's election as more and more Americans came to the
same conclusion, that is Trump couldn't be all bad as the MSM reported nor were Americans like me
"deplorables" as labeled by Hillary.

As this Harvard study shows, Trump received MORE negative tone stories and LESS positive tone
stories then Hillary.
Now just as the MSM did in 2008 where they pumped McCain up during the primaries more then
other candidates BECAUSE they knew that against Obama he stood no chance... so they pushed McCain..in the primaries.
So too with Trump! They WANTED Trump to be the buffoon candidate for the GOP... so yes as you see
below Trump had less "negative" and more "positive"... as they could appear "unbiased" as their nefarious and obvious choice was the "buffoon" Trump!

BUT Trump outsmarted, outworked, and outflanked the biased MSM during the general election.
He went to all of us and he also confirmed to all of us the BIASED MSM coverage that was occurring.
Then when Hillary called us "deplorables" and the MSM touted that phrase... that convinced millions of Americans who like me didn't want to get into arguments with relatives, or tell biased pollster I favored Trump... we showed our choice behind the curtain.

SO a big thanks to the MSM for convincing millions of Americans that if Trump was so good in the
primaries, why then was the MSM after the primaries so biased? Wrote so many untrue stories that thanks to the internet millions of Americans could find out were false.
Perfect example... just now I did a Google search on "Trump anti-immigrant"
About 38,600 results (0.51 seconds) as MSNBC portrayed... his "anti-immigrant" speech!
Trump anti-immigrant speech follows dark pattern of US history | MSNBC
www.msnbc.com/.../trump-nativist-speech-follows-dark-us-pattern-755626563851
Sep 1, 2016 - Rachel Maddow shows how throughout American history, when normal politics breaks down, fringe voices gain prominence scapegoating ...

How many people believed that Trump (who married a "legal immigrant" who has a daughter who converted to Judaism and with her husband raising a family in the Jewish faith) is what these 38,600 results state:
"Trump anti-immigrant"? The more times this 180° from the facts was reported by the MSM, the more the "deplorables" recognized Trump was stating the truth...MSM is biased... AND GUESS WHAT???
THE MSM agreed with him!!!
Media justify anti-Trump bias, claim he's too 'dangerous' for normal rules
As this NYT reporter states:
"Now comes Jim Rutenberg, in his first season as media columnist for the New York Times. He’s a good reporter and I give him credit for trying to openly grapple with this bizarre situation.
But Rutenberg is, in my view, trying to defend the indefensible:
“If you view a Trump presidency as something that’s potentially dangerous, then your reporting is going to reflect that. You would move closer than you’ve ever been to being oppositional. That’s uncomfortable and uncharted territory for every mainstream, nonopinion journalist I’ve ever known, and by normal standards, untenable.”
Media justify anti-Trump bias, claim he's too 'dangerous' for normal rules



View attachment 101317


News Coverage of the 2016 General Election: How the Press Failed the Voters - Shorenstein Center

I'M SMART,,,,,lol
Donald Trump acknowledged Sunday that he's receiving intelligence briefings less frequently that other President-elects have in the past, explaining that he doesn't "have to be told" of the critical session's findings because he's "a smart person."

In a wide-ranging interview with "Fox News Sunday," Trump, who is receiving the briefings on a weekly basis, seemed to suggest that he should only be briefed when there is new material.

"First of all, these are very good people that are giving me the briefings. And I say, 'If something should change from this point, immediately call me. I'm available on one-minute's notice,'" he explained to Fox's Chris Wallace.

"I don't have to be told — you know, I'm, like, a smart person. I don't have to be told the same thing in the same words every single day for the next eight years. Could be eight years — but eight years. I don't need that," he continued. "

Trump unusually reluctant to hear intelligence: officials

"But I do say, 'If something should change, let us know,'" he said.

Trump went on to suggest that it's not necessary for him to receive the briefings with the daily frequency that past President-elects have had because other key advisers are getting the info.

"In the meantime, my generals are great — are being briefed. And Mike Pence is being briefed, who is, by the way, one of my very good decisions," Trump said. "And they're being briefed. And I'm being briefed also. But if they're going to come in and tell me the exact same thing that they tell me — you know, it doesn't change, necessarily."

"Now, there will be times where it might change. I mean, there will be some very fluid situations," Trump said. "I'll be there not every day, but more than that. But I don't need to be told, Chris, the same thing every day, every morning — same words. 'Sir, nothing has changed. Let's go over it again.' I don't need that."

Donald Trump has dodged intelligence briefings since election

Reuters reported Friday that Trump was only taking once-a-week sit-downs on highly-classified information about vital U.S. concerns.

Wait so they give briefings every day of the same exact stuff? Is this serious?
No wonder.our host doesnt do anything useful.

Trump is a liar Get it?? and not only a liar but an ah too Drain the swamp?? He put the swamp in our WH and you repub dupes suck it up

What did he lie about?
What swamp people did he put in the white house?

Pick one For example a labor dept guy whose businesses couldn't meet labor qualifications AND many more You're watching a TV like show

 

[buckeye45_73]

It wasn't a blatant, counter-factual falsehood, there are no examples of voters being THAT poorly informed on basic facts.

So you would disagree with Obama who hired Gruber who said Obamacare passed due to the "stupidity of the American voter"?

Without going into the woods of context of your example, I don't see how what Grubber says proves that Obama voters believe something counter to FACTS.

Obamacare is an enormous (first) step in the right direction for this country's healthcare - I believe this not because I'm ignorant of facts, but because I'm not.

So how many people were uninsured before ACA? Let's see if you know the facts. People that wanted health insurance. People that
were eligible for health insurance. How many please and tell me your FACTS???

In 2010, the year that the Affordable Care Act became law, 48.6 million Americans, or 16 percent of the population, lacked insurance. Since then, the uninsured rate has been cut almost in half, and the trend has only continued this year.

Obamacare pushes nation's health uninsured rate to record low 8.6 percent

Obamacare has substantially lowered uninsured rate and directly responsible for many millions of people having insurance today - that's a FACT.

RW's want facts then ignore them, facts are irrelevant.

Wait i thought it was 40 percent before the ACA, you liberals need to o get your facts straight.

I thought this was gonna insurance everyone?
Premiums and deductions were going down
And I can keep my doctor

Even the ACA architect said it was a lie

 

[Siete]

As I've been a major critic of the biased MSM after deep reflection and further substantiation I've come to
understand the role the MSM played in convincing Americans that :
1) The MSM IS biased.
2) Everything or time they report biased news/headlines/soundbites I am suspicious of their work.

So "Thanks" to the MSM for being a part in Trump's election as more and more Americans came to the
same conclusion, that is Trump couldn't be all bad as the MSM reported nor were Americans like me
"deplorables" as labeled by Hillary.

As this Harvard study shows, Trump received MORE negative tone stories and LESS positive tone
stories then Hillary.
Now just as the MSM did in 2008 where they pumped McCain up during the primaries more then
other candidates BECAUSE they knew that against Obama he stood no chance... so they pushed McCain..in the primaries.
So too with Trump! They WANTED Trump to be the buffoon candidate for the GOP... so yes as you see
below Trump had less "negative" and more "positive"... as they could appear "unbiased" as their nefarious and obvious choice was the "buffoon" Trump!

BUT Trump outsmarted, outworked, and outflanked the biased MSM during the general election.
He went to all of us and he also confirmed to all of us the BIASED MSM coverage that was occurring.
Then when Hillary called us "deplorables" and the MSM touted that phrase... that convinced millions of Americans who like me didn't want to get into arguments with relatives, or tell biased pollster I favored Trump... we showed our choice behind the curtain.

SO a big thanks to the MSM for convincing millions of Americans that if Trump was so good in the
primaries, why then was the MSM after the primaries so biased? Wrote so many untrue stories that thanks to the internet millions of Americans could find out were false.
Perfect example... just now I did a Google search on "Trump anti-immigrant"
About 38,600 results (0.51 seconds) as MSNBC portrayed... his "anti-immigrant" speech!
Trump anti-immigrant speech follows dark pattern of US history | MSNBC
www.msnbc.com/.../trump-nativist-speech-follows-dark-us-pattern-755626563851
Sep 1, 2016 - Rachel Maddow shows how throughout American history, when normal politics breaks down, fringe voices gain prominence scapegoating ...

How many people believed that Trump (who married a "legal immigrant" who has a daughter who converted to Judaism and with her husband raising a family in the Jewish faith) is what these 38,600 results state:
"Trump anti-immigrant"? The more times this 180° from the facts was reported by the MSM, the more the "deplorables" recognized Trump was stating the truth...MSM is biased... AND GUESS WHAT???
THE MSM agreed with him!!!
Media justify anti-Trump bias, claim he's too 'dangerous' for normal rules
As this NYT reporter states:
"Now comes Jim Rutenberg, in his first season as media columnist for the New York Times. He’s a good reporter and I give him credit for trying to openly grapple with this bizarre situation.
But Rutenberg is, in my view, trying to defend the indefensible:
“If you view a Trump presidency as something that’s potentially dangerous, then your reporting is going to reflect that. You would move closer than you’ve ever been to being oppositional. That’s uncomfortable and uncharted territory for every mainstream, nonopinion journalist I’ve ever known, and by normal standards, untenable.”
Media justify anti-Trump bias, claim he's too 'dangerous' for normal rules



View attachment 101317


News Coverage of the 2016 General Election: How the Press Failed the Voters - Shorenstein Center

I'M SMART,,,,,lol
Donald Trump acknowledged Sunday that he's receiving intelligence briefings less frequently that other President-elects have in the past, explaining that he doesn't "have to be told" of the critical session's findings because he's "a smart person."

In a wide-ranging interview with "Fox News Sunday," Trump, who is receiving the briefings on a weekly basis, seemed to suggest that he should only be briefed when there is new material.

"First of all, these are very good people that are giving me the briefings. And I say, 'If something should change from this point, immediately call me. I'm available on one-minute's notice,'" he explained to Fox's Chris Wallace.

"I don't have to be told — you know, I'm, like, a smart person. I don't have to be told the same thing in the same words every single day for the next eight years. Could be eight years — but eight years. I don't need that," he continued. "

Trump unusually reluctant to hear intelligence: officials

"But I do say, 'If something should change, let us know,'" he said.

Trump went on to suggest that it's not necessary for him to receive the briefings with the daily frequency that past President-elects have had because other key advisers are getting the info.

"In the meantime, my generals are great — are being briefed. And Mike Pence is being briefed, who is, by the way, one of my very good decisions," Trump said. "And they're being briefed. And I'm being briefed also. But if they're going to come in and tell me the exact same thing that they tell me — you know, it doesn't change, necessarily."

"Now, there will be times where it might change. I mean, there will be some very fluid situations," Trump said. "I'll be there not every day, but more than that. But I don't need to be told, Chris, the same thing every day, every morning — same words. 'Sir, nothing has changed. Let's go over it again.' I don't need that."

Donald Trump has dodged intelligence briefings since election

Reuters reported Friday that Trump was only taking once-a-week sit-downs on highly-classified information about vital U.S. concerns.

Wait so they give briefings every day of the same exact stuff? Is this serious?
No wonder.our host doesnt do anything useful.

Trump is a liar Get it?? and not only a liar but an ah too Drain the swamp?? He put the swamp in our WH and you repub dupes suck it up

What did he lie about?
What swamp people did he put in the white house?

the bazillionaires that own the swamp, who else ?

 

[buckeye45_73]

As I've been a major critic of the biased MSM after deep reflection and further substantiation I've come to
understand the role the MSM played in convincing Americans that :
1) The MSM IS biased.
2) Everything or time they report biased news/headlines/soundbites I am suspicious of their work.

So "Thanks" to the MSM for being a part in Trump's election as more and more Americans came to the
same conclusion, that is Trump couldn't be all bad as the MSM reported nor were Americans like me
"deplorables" as labeled by Hillary.

As this Harvard study shows, Trump received MORE negative tone stories and LESS positive tone
stories then Hillary.
Now just as the MSM did in 2008 where they pumped McCain up during the primaries more then
other candidates BECAUSE they knew that against Obama he stood no chance... so they pushed McCain..in the primaries.
So too with Trump! They WANTED Trump to be the buffoon candidate for the GOP... so yes as you see
below Trump had less "negative" and more "positive"... as they could appear "unbiased" as their nefarious and obvious choice was the "buffoon" Trump!

BUT Trump outsmarted, outworked, and outflanked the biased MSM during the general election.
He went to all of us and he also confirmed to all of us the BIASED MSM coverage that was occurring.
Then when Hillary called us "deplorables" and the MSM touted that phrase... that convinced millions of Americans who like me didn't want to get into arguments with relatives, or tell biased pollster I favored Trump... we showed our choice behind the curtain.

SO a big thanks to the MSM for convincing millions of Americans that if Trump was so good in the
primaries, why then was the MSM after the primaries so biased? Wrote so many untrue stories that thanks to the internet millions of Americans could find out were false.
Perfect example... just now I did a Google search on "Trump anti-immigrant"
About 38,600 results (0.51 seconds) as MSNBC portrayed... his "anti-immigrant" speech!
Trump anti-immigrant speech follows dark pattern of US history | MSNBC
www.msnbc.com/.../trump-nativist-speech-follows-dark-us-pattern-755626563851
Sep 1, 2016 - Rachel Maddow shows how throughout American history, when normal politics breaks down, fringe voices gain prominence scapegoating ...

How many people believed that Trump (who married a "legal immigrant" who has a daughter who converted to Judaism and with her husband raising a family in the Jewish faith) is what these 38,600 results state:
"Trump anti-immigrant"? The more times this 180° from the facts was reported by the MSM, the more the "deplorables" recognized Trump was stating the truth...MSM is biased... AND GUESS WHAT???
THE MSM agreed with him!!!
Media justify anti-Trump bias, claim he's too 'dangerous' for normal rules
As this NYT reporter states:
"Now comes Jim Rutenberg, in his first season as media columnist for the New York Times. He’s a good reporter and I give him credit for trying to openly grapple with this bizarre situation.
But Rutenberg is, in my view, trying to defend the indefensible:
“If you view a Trump presidency as something that’s potentially dangerous, then your reporting is going to reflect that. You would move closer than you’ve ever been to being oppositional. That’s uncomfortable and uncharted territory for every mainstream, nonopinion journalist I’ve ever known, and by normal standards, untenable.”
Media justify anti-Trump bias, claim he's too 'dangerous' for normal rules



View attachment 101317


News Coverage of the 2016 General Election: How the Press Failed the Voters - Shorenstein Center

I'M SMART,,,,,lol
Donald Trump acknowledged Sunday that he's receiving intelligence briefings less frequently that other President-elects have in the past, explaining that he doesn't "have to be told" of the critical session's findings because he's "a smart person."

In a wide-ranging interview with "Fox News Sunday," Trump, who is receiving the briefings on a weekly basis, seemed to suggest that he should only be briefed when there is new material.

"First of all, these are very good people that are giving me the briefings. And I say, 'If something should change from this point, immediately call me. I'm available on one-minute's notice,'" he explained to Fox's Chris Wallace.

"I don't have to be told — you know, I'm, like, a smart person. I don't have to be told the same thing in the same words every single day for the next eight years. Could be eight years — but eight years. I don't need that," he continued. "

Trump unusually reluctant to hear intelligence: officials

"But I do say, 'If something should change, let us know,'" he said.

Trump went on to suggest that it's not necessary for him to receive the briefings with the daily frequency that past President-elects have had because other key advisers are getting the info.

"In the meantime, my generals are great — are being briefed. And Mike Pence is being briefed, who is, by the way, one of my very good decisions," Trump said. "And they're being briefed. And I'm being briefed also. But if they're going to come in and tell me the exact same thing that they tell me — you know, it doesn't change, necessarily."

"Now, there will be times where it might change. I mean, there will be some very fluid situations," Trump said. "I'll be there not every day, but more than that. But I don't need to be told, Chris, the same thing every day, every morning — same words. 'Sir, nothing has changed. Let's go over it again.' I don't need that."

Donald Trump has dodged intelligence briefings since election

Reuters reported Friday that Trump was only taking once-a-week sit-downs on highly-classified information about vital U.S. concerns.

Wait so they give briefings every day of the same exact stuff? Is this serious?
No wonder.our host doesnt do anything useful.

Trump is a liar Get it?? and not only a liar but an ah too Drain the swamp?? He put the swamp in our WH and you repub dupes suck it up

What did he lie about?
What swamp people did he put in the white house?

Pick one For example a labor dept guy whose businesses couldn't meet labor qualifications AND many more You're watching a TV like show

What labor qualifications you cant just spew.shit, give is a.specific.

 

[jknowgood]

It wasn't a blatant, counter-factual falsehood, there are no examples of voters being THAT poorly informed on basic facts.

So you would disagree with Obama who hired Gruber who said Obamacare passed due to the "stupidity of the American voter"?

Without going into the woods of context of your example, I don't see how what Grubber says proves that Obama voters believe something counter to FACTS.

Obamacare is an enormous (first) step in the right direction for this country's healthcare - I believe this not because I'm ignorant of facts, but because I'm not.

So how many people were uninsured before ACA? Let's see if you know the facts. People that wanted health insurance. People that
were eligible for health insurance. How many please and tell me your FACTS???

In 2010, the year that the Affordable Care Act became law, 48.6 million Americans, or 16 percent of the population, lacked insurance. Since then, the uninsured rate has been cut almost in half, and the trend has only continued this year.

Obamacare pushes nation's health uninsured rate to record low 8.6 percent

Obamacare has substantially lowered uninsured rate and directly responsible for many millions of people having insurance today - that's a FACT.

RW's want facts then ignore them, facts are irrelevant.

Coming from a party that wants to flood America with illegal immigrants to make them voters. Your treasonous actions are noted.

 

[Siete]

So you would disagree with Obama who hired Gruber who said Obamacare passed due to the "stupidity of the American voter"?

Without going into the woods of context of your example, I don't see how what Grubber says proves that Obama voters believe something counter to FACTS.

Obamacare is an enormous (first) step in the right direction for this country's healthcare - I believe this not because I'm ignorant of facts, but because I'm not.

So how many people were uninsured before ACA? Let's see if you know the facts. People that wanted health insurance. People that
were eligible for health insurance. How many please and tell me your FACTS???

In 2010, the year that the Affordable Care Act became law, 48.6 million Americans, or 16 percent of the population, lacked insurance. Since then, the uninsured rate has been cut almost in half, and the trend has only continued this year.

Obamacare pushes nation's health uninsured rate to record low 8.6 percent

Obamacare has substantially lowered uninsured rate and directly responsible for many millions of people having insurance today - that's a FACT.

RW's want facts then ignore them, facts are irrelevant.

Coming from a party that wants to flood America with illegal immigrants to make them voters. Your treasonous actions are noted.

your inane horseshit is duly ignored ..

Put together, Trump’s Cabinet and administration could be worth as much as $35 billion, a staggering agglomeration of wealth unprecedented in American history.

The median household income in the U.S.? About $55,000.

 

[buckeye45_73]

As I've been a major critic of the biased MSM after deep reflection and further substantiation I've come to
understand the role the MSM played in convincing Americans that :
1) The MSM IS biased.
2) Everything or time they report biased news/headlines/soundbites I am suspicious of their work.

So "Thanks" to the MSM for being a part in Trump's election as more and more Americans came to the
same conclusion, that is Trump couldn't be all bad as the MSM reported nor were Americans like me
"deplorables" as labeled by Hillary.

As this Harvard study shows, Trump received MORE negative tone stories and LESS positive tone
stories then Hillary.
Now just as the MSM did in 2008 where they pumped McCain up during the primaries more then
other candidates BECAUSE they knew that against Obama he stood no chance... so they pushed McCain..in the primaries.
So too with Trump! They WANTED Trump to be the buffoon candidate for the GOP... so yes as you see
below Trump had less "negative" and more "positive"... as they could appear "unbiased" as their nefarious and obvious choice was the "buffoon" Trump!

BUT Trump outsmarted, outworked, and outflanked the biased MSM during the general election.
He went to all of us and he also confirmed to all of us the BIASED MSM coverage that was occurring.
Then when Hillary called us "deplorables" and the MSM touted that phrase... that convinced millions of Americans who like me didn't want to get into arguments with relatives, or tell biased pollster I favored Trump... we showed our choice behind the curtain.

SO a big thanks to the MSM for convincing millions of Americans that if Trump was so good in the
primaries, why then was the MSM after the primaries so biased? Wrote so many untrue stories that thanks to the internet millions of Americans could find out were false.
Perfect example... just now I did a Google search on "Trump anti-immigrant"
About 38,600 results (0.51 seconds) as MSNBC portrayed... his "anti-immigrant" speech!
Trump anti-immigrant speech follows dark pattern of US history | MSNBC
www.msnbc.com/.../trump-nativist-speech-follows-dark-us-pattern-755626563851
Sep 1, 2016 - Rachel Maddow shows how throughout American history, when normal politics breaks down, fringe voices gain prominence scapegoating ...

How many people believed that Trump (who married a "legal immigrant" who has a daughter who converted to Judaism and with her husband raising a family in the Jewish faith) is what these 38,600 results state:
"Trump anti-immigrant"? The more times this 180° from the facts was reported by the MSM, the more the "deplorables" recognized Trump was stating the truth...MSM is biased... AND GUESS WHAT???
THE MSM agreed with him!!!
Media justify anti-Trump bias, claim he's too 'dangerous' for normal rules
As this NYT reporter states:
"Now comes Jim Rutenberg, in his first season as media columnist for the New York Times. He’s a good reporter and I give him credit for trying to openly grapple with this bizarre situation.
But Rutenberg is, in my view, trying to defend the indefensible:
“If you view a Trump presidency as something that’s potentially dangerous, then your reporting is going to reflect that. You would move closer than you’ve ever been to being oppositional. That’s uncomfortable and uncharted territory for every mainstream, nonopinion journalist I’ve ever known, and by normal standards, untenable.”
Media justify anti-Trump bias, claim he's too 'dangerous' for normal rules



View attachment 101317


News Coverage of the 2016 General Election: How the Press Failed the Voters - Shorenstein Center

I'M SMART,,,,,lol
Donald Trump acknowledged Sunday that he's receiving intelligence briefings less frequently that other President-elects have in the past, explaining that he doesn't "have to be told" of the critical session's findings because he's "a smart person."

In a wide-ranging interview with "Fox News Sunday," Trump, who is receiving the briefings on a weekly basis, seemed to suggest that he should only be briefed when there is new material.

"First of all, these are very good people that are giving me the briefings. And I say, 'If something should change from this point, immediately call me. I'm available on one-minute's notice,'" he explained to Fox's Chris Wallace.

"I don't have to be told — you know, I'm, like, a smart person. I don't have to be told the same thing in the same words every single day for the next eight years. Could be eight years — but eight years. I don't need that," he continued. "

Trump unusually reluctant to hear intelligence: officials

"But I do say, 'If something should change, let us know,'" he said.

Trump went on to suggest that it's not necessary for him to receive the briefings with the daily frequency that past President-elects have had because other key advisers are getting the info.

"In the meantime, my generals are great — are being briefed. And Mike Pence is being briefed, who is, by the way, one of my very good decisions," Trump said. "And they're being briefed. And I'm being briefed also. But if they're going to come in and tell me the exact same thing that they tell me — you know, it doesn't change, necessarily."

"Now, there will be times where it might change. I mean, there will be some very fluid situations," Trump said. "I'll be there not every day, but more than that. But I don't need to be told, Chris, the same thing every day, every morning — same words. 'Sir, nothing has changed. Let's go over it again.' I don't need that."

Donald Trump has dodged intelligence briefings since election

Reuters reported Friday that Trump was only taking once-a-week sit-downs on highly-classified information about vital U.S. concerns.

Wait so they give briefings every day of the same exact stuff? Is this serious?
No wonder.our host doesnt do anything useful.

Trump is a liar Get it?? and not only a liar but an ah too Drain the swamp?? He put the swamp in our WH and you repub dupes suck it up

What did he lie about?
What swamp people did he put in the white house?

the bazillionaires that own the swamp, who else ?

Uh he has always said he was putting in businessmen in the cabinet, he has never lied about it.

You guys dont even know what drain the swamp means?

Thats hilarious, you just think its a slogan, just words like you dems use racism and shit, hahahahahah

 

[Siete]

I'M SMART,,,,,lol
Donald Trump acknowledged Sunday that he's receiving intelligence briefings less frequently that other President-elects have in the past, explaining that he doesn't "have to be told" of the critical session's findings because he's "a smart person."

In a wide-ranging interview with "Fox News Sunday," Trump, who is receiving the briefings on a weekly basis, seemed to suggest that he should only be briefed when there is new material.

"First of all, these are very good people that are giving me the briefings. And I say, 'If something should change from this point, immediately call me. I'm available on one-minute's notice,'" he explained to Fox's Chris Wallace.

"I don't have to be told — you know, I'm, like, a smart person. I don't have to be told the same thing in the same words every single day for the next eight years. Could be eight years — but eight years. I don't need that," he continued. "

Trump unusually reluctant to hear intelligence: officials

"But I do say, 'If something should change, let us know,'" he said.

Trump went on to suggest that it's not necessary for him to receive the briefings with the daily frequency that past President-elects have had because other key advisers are getting the info.

"In the meantime, my generals are great — are being briefed. And Mike Pence is being briefed, who is, by the way, one of my very good decisions," Trump said. "And they're being briefed. And I'm being briefed also. But if they're going to come in and tell me the exact same thing that they tell me — you know, it doesn't change, necessarily."

"Now, there will be times where it might change. I mean, there will be some very fluid situations," Trump said. "I'll be there not every day, but more than that. But I don't need to be told, Chris, the same thing every day, every morning — same words. 'Sir, nothing has changed. Let's go over it again.' I don't need that."

Donald Trump has dodged intelligence briefings since election

Reuters reported Friday that Trump was only taking once-a-week sit-downs on highly-classified information about vital U.S. concerns.

Wait so they give briefings every day of the same exact stuff? Is this serious?
No wonder.our host doesnt do anything useful.

Trump is a liar Get it?? and not only a liar but an ah too Drain the swamp?? He put the swamp in our WH and you repub dupes suck it up

What did he lie about?
What swamp people did he put in the white house?

the bazillionaires that own the swamp, who else ?

Uh he has always said he was putting in businessmen in the cabinet, he has never lied about it.

You guys dont even know what drain the swamp means?

Thats hilarious, you just think its a slogan, just words like you dems use racism and shit, hahahahahah

I clearly said "owns the swamp", pay attention... YOU were first to mention "race" ...

GFY, then take a nap.

 

[buckeye45_73]

Wait so they give briefings every day of the same exact stuff? Is this serious?
No wonder.our host doesnt do anything useful.

Trump is a liar Get it?? and not only a liar but an ah too Drain the swamp?? He put the swamp in our WH and you repub dupes suck it up

What did he lie about?
What swamp people did he put in the white house?

the bazillionaires that own the swamp, who else ?

Uh he has always said he was putting in businessmen in the cabinet, he has never lied about it.

You guys dont even know what drain the swamp means?

Thats hilarious, you just think its a slogan, just words like you dems use racism and shit, hahahahahah

I clearly said "owns the swamp", pay attention... YOU were first to mention "race" ...

GFY, then take a nap.

So do you know what Drain the Swamp means?

 

[jknowgood]

Without going into the woods of context of your example, I don't see how what Grubber says proves that Obama voters believe something counter to FACTS.

Obamacare is an enormous (first) step in the right direction for this country's healthcare - I believe this not because I'm ignorant of facts, but because I'm not.

So how many people were uninsured before ACA? Let's see if you know the facts. People that wanted health insurance. People that
were eligible for health insurance. How many please and tell me your FACTS???

In 2010, the year that the Affordable Care Act became law, 48.6 million Americans, or 16 percent of the population, lacked insurance. Since then, the uninsured rate has been cut almost in half, and the trend has only continued this year.

Obamacare pushes nation's health uninsured rate to record low 8.6 percent

Obamacare has substantially lowered uninsured rate and directly responsible for many millions of people having insurance today - that's a FACT.

RW's want facts then ignore them, facts are irrelevant.

Coming from a party that wants to flood America with illegal immigrants to make them voters. Your treasonous actions are noted.

your inane horseshit is duly ignored ..

Put together, Trump’s Cabinet and administration could be worth as much as $35 billion, a staggering agglomeration of wealth unprecedented in American history.

The median household income in the U.S.? About $55,000.

And Trump is saving jobs and bringing them back to the United States, who cares about the other. You closed your eyes and supported Obama no matter what.

 

[Siete]

Trump is a liar Get it?? and not only a liar but an ah too Drain the swamp?? He put the swamp in our WH and you repub dupes suck it up

What did he lie about?
What swamp people did he put in the white house?

the bazillionaires that own the swamp, who else ?

Uh he has always said he was putting in businessmen in the cabinet, he has never lied about it.

You guys dont even know what drain the swamp means?

Thats hilarious, you just think its a slogan, just words like you dems use racism and shit, hahahahahah

I clearly said "owns the swamp", pay attention... YOU were first to mention "race" ...

GFY, then take a nap.

So do you know what Drain the Swamp means?

literally, or figuratively?

 

[rdean]

As I've been a major critic of the biased MSM after deep reflection and further substantiation I've come to
understand the role the MSM played in convincing Americans that :
1) The MSM IS biased.
2) Everything or time they report biased news/headlines/soundbites I am suspicious of their work.

So "Thanks" to the MSM for being a part in Trump's election as more and more Americans came to the
same conclusion, that is Trump couldn't be all bad as the MSM reported nor were Americans like me
"deplorables" as labeled by Hillary.

As this Harvard study shows, Trump received MORE negative tone stories and LESS positive tone
stories then Hillary.
Now just as the MSM did in 2008 where they pumped McCain up during the primaries more then
other candidates BECAUSE they knew that against Obama he stood no chance... so they pushed McCain..in the primaries.
So too with Trump! They WANTED Trump to be the buffoon candidate for the GOP... so yes as you see
below Trump had less "negative" and more "positive"... as they could appear "unbiased" as their nefarious and obvious choice was the "buffoon" Trump!

BUT Trump outsmarted, outworked, and outflanked the biased MSM during the general election.
He went to all of us and he also confirmed to all of us the BIASED MSM coverage that was occurring.
Then when Hillary called us "deplorables" and the MSM touted that phrase... that convinced millions of Americans who like me didn't want to get into arguments with relatives, or tell biased pollster I favored Trump... we showed our choice behind the curtain.

SO a big thanks to the MSM for convincing millions of Americans that if Trump was so good in the
primaries, why then was the MSM after the primaries so biased? Wrote so many untrue stories that thanks to the internet millions of Americans could find out were false.
Perfect example... just now I did a Google search on "Trump anti-immigrant"
About 38,600 results (0.51 seconds) as MSNBC portrayed... his "anti-immigrant" speech!
Trump anti-immigrant speech follows dark pattern of US history | MSNBC
www.msnbc.com/.../trump-nativist-speech-follows-dark-us-pattern-755626563851
Sep 1, 2016 - Rachel Maddow shows how throughout American history, when normal politics breaks down, fringe voices gain prominence scapegoating ...

How many people believed that Trump (who married a "legal immigrant" who has a daughter who converted to Judaism and with her husband raising a family in the Jewish faith) is what these 38,600 results state:
"Trump anti-immigrant"? The more times this 180° from the facts was reported by the MSM, the more the "deplorables" recognized Trump was stating the truth...MSM is biased... AND GUESS WHAT???
THE MSM agreed with him!!!
Media justify anti-Trump bias, claim he's too 'dangerous' for normal rules
As this NYT reporter states:
"Now comes Jim Rutenberg, in his first season as media columnist for the New York Times. He’s a good reporter and I give him credit for trying to openly grapple with this bizarre situation.
But Rutenberg is, in my view, trying to defend the indefensible:
“If you view a Trump presidency as something that’s potentially dangerous, then your reporting is going to reflect that. You would move closer than you’ve ever been to being oppositional. That’s uncomfortable and uncharted territory for every mainstream, nonopinion journalist I’ve ever known, and by normal standards, untenable.”
Media justify anti-Trump bias, claim he's too 'dangerous' for normal rules



View attachment 101317


News Coverage of the 2016 General Election: How the Press Failed the Voters - Shorenstein Center

MSNBC helped Trump more than you know. MSNBC would play entire Trump speeches every day. If he went to four cities in four days, they played four speeches in four days. Forget the negative stories. Even the Hillary clips they played were nearly always Hillary talking about Trump.

A month before the election, I thought Trump would win. I said it here on the USMB and why. The Trump minions went crazy with "feel the butt hurt" and other such juvenile nonsense. But of course, that's who they are.
I retired in July so was able to watch the election every day on TV. I don't think I ever saw an entire Hillary speech or even one that lasted more than the introduction.
Then Chis Mathews, Chuck Todd, Andrea Mitchell, Mika Brzezinski and others on MSNBC couldn't say Hillary's name without saying she's untrustworthy, unlikeable and dishonest. Chuck went to great lengths saying the Clinton foundation smells and the CIA, the FBI, congressional investigations and the media are looking hard trying to find something. Never mentioning the single reporter who brought down the Trump Foundation.

With the entire American media playing your every speech, every day, it's almost impossible to lose. Remember, they even followed Trump around on his Scottish golf course and his new hotel. Not even asking him questions. Who does that?

And all the illegal stuff Trump does? No one reporting it? And now his base refuses to believe anything the media says. I don't Trust them either. Not after that.

And Hillary still won the popular vote by 2.8 million.

 

[buckeye45_73]

What did he lie about?
What swamp people did he put in the white house?

the bazillionaires that own the swamp, who else ?

Uh he has always said he was putting in businessmen in the cabinet, he has never lied about it.

You guys dont even know what drain the swamp means?

Thats hilarious, you just think its a slogan, just words like you dems use racism and shit, hahahahahah

I clearly said "owns the swamp", pay attention... YOU were first to mention "race" ...

GFY, then take a nap.

So do you know what Drain the Swamp means?

literally, or figuratively?

Ok Hillary, do I really have to spell it out?
Just give us what you think it means

 

[Siete]

the bazillionaires that own the swamp, who else ?

Uh he has always said he was putting in businessmen in the cabinet, he has never lied about it.

You guys dont even know what drain the swamp means?

Thats hilarious, you just think its a slogan, just words like you dems use racism and shit, hahahahahah

I clearly said "owns the swamp", pay attention... YOU were first to mention "race" ...

GFY, then take a nap.

So do you know what Drain the Swamp means?

literally, or figuratively?

Ok Hillary, do I really have to spell it out?
Just give us what you think it means

translation;

you don't know.

 

[buckeye45_73]

Uh he has always said he was putting in businessmen in the cabinet, he has never lied about it.

You guys dont even know what drain the swamp means?

Thats hilarious, you just think its a slogan, just words like you dems use racism and shit, hahahahahah

I clearly said "owns the swamp", pay attention... YOU were first to mention "race" ...

GFY, then take a nap.

So do you know what Drain the Swamp means?

literally, or figuratively?

Ok Hillary, do I really have to spell it out?
Just give us what you think it means

translation;

you don't know.

I do know what it means. I asked the question, can you state what it means? you obviously can't.

so wanna give it another try?

 

[buckeye45_73]

As I've been a major critic of the biased MSM after deep reflection and further substantiation I've come to
understand the role the MSM played in convincing Americans that :
1) The MSM IS biased.
2) Everything or time they report biased news/headlines/soundbites I am suspicious of their work.

So "Thanks" to the MSM for being a part in Trump's election as more and more Americans came to the
same conclusion, that is Trump couldn't be all bad as the MSM reported nor were Americans like me
"deplorables" as labeled by Hillary.

As this Harvard study shows, Trump received MORE negative tone stories and LESS positive tone
stories then Hillary.
Now just as the MSM did in 2008 where they pumped McCain up during the primaries more then
other candidates BECAUSE they knew that against Obama he stood no chance... so they pushed McCain..in the primaries.
So too with Trump! They WANTED Trump to be the buffoon candidate for the GOP... so yes as you see
below Trump had less "negative" and more "positive"... as they could appear "unbiased" as their nefarious and obvious choice was the "buffoon" Trump!

BUT Trump outsmarted, outworked, and outflanked the biased MSM during the general election.
He went to all of us and he also confirmed to all of us the BIASED MSM coverage that was occurring.
Then when Hillary called us "deplorables" and the MSM touted that phrase... that convinced millions of Americans who like me didn't want to get into arguments with relatives, or tell biased pollster I favored Trump... we showed our choice behind the curtain.

SO a big thanks to the MSM for convincing millions of Americans that if Trump was so good in the
primaries, why then was the MSM after the primaries so biased? Wrote so many untrue stories that thanks to the internet millions of Americans could find out were false.
Perfect example... just now I did a Google search on "Trump anti-immigrant"
About 38,600 results (0.51 seconds) as MSNBC portrayed... his "anti-immigrant" speech!
Trump anti-immigrant speech follows dark pattern of US history | MSNBC
www.msnbc.com/.../trump-nativist-speech-follows-dark-us-pattern-755626563851
Sep 1, 2016 - Rachel Maddow shows how throughout American history, when normal politics breaks down, fringe voices gain prominence scapegoating ...

How many people believed that Trump (who married a "legal immigrant" who has a daughter who converted to Judaism and with her husband raising a family in the Jewish faith) is what these 38,600 results state:
"Trump anti-immigrant"? The more times this 180° from the facts was reported by the MSM, the more the "deplorables" recognized Trump was stating the truth...MSM is biased... AND GUESS WHAT???
THE MSM agreed with him!!!
Media justify anti-Trump bias, claim he's too 'dangerous' for normal rules
As this NYT reporter states:
"Now comes Jim Rutenberg, in his first season as media columnist for the New York Times. He’s a good reporter and I give him credit for trying to openly grapple with this bizarre situation.
But Rutenberg is, in my view, trying to defend the indefensible:
“If you view a Trump presidency as something that’s potentially dangerous, then your reporting is going to reflect that. You would move closer than you’ve ever been to being oppositional. That’s uncomfortable and uncharted territory for every mainstream, nonopinion journalist I’ve ever known, and by normal standards, untenable.”
Media justify anti-Trump bias, claim he's too 'dangerous' for normal rules



View attachment 101317


News Coverage of the 2016 General Election: How the Press Failed the Voters - Shorenstein Center

MSNBC helped Trump more than you know. MSNBC would play entire Trump speeches every day. If he went to four cities in four days, they played four speeches in four days. Forget the negative stories. Even the Hillary clips they played were nearly always Hillary talking about Trump.

A month before the election, I thought Trump would win. I said it here on the USMB and why. The Trump minions went crazy with "feel the butt hurt" and other such juvenile nonsense. But of course, that's who they are.
I retired in July so was able to watch the election every day on TV. I don't think I ever saw an entire Hillary speech or even one that lasted more than the introduction.
Then Chis Mathews, Chuck Todd, Andrea Mitchell, Mika Brzezinski and others on MSNBC couldn't say Hillary's name without saying she's untrustworthy, unlikeable and dishonest. Chuck went to great lengths saying the Clinton foundation smells and the CIA, the FBI, congressional investigations and the media are looking hard trying to find something. Never mentioning the single reporter who brought down the Trump Foundation.

With the entire American media playing your every speech, every day, it's almost impossible to lose. Remember, they even followed Trump around on his Scottish golf course and his new hotel. Not even asking him questions. Who does that?

And all the illegal stuff Trump does? No one reporting it? And now his base refuses to believe anything the media says. I don't Trust them either. Not after that.

And Hillary still won the popular vote by 2.8 million.

Why would they cover Hillary? she never gave speeches, she never said anything. She was AWOL for weeks at a time. There was nothing to cover on Hillary.
now give us a breakdown of positive and negative stories?

 

[Siete]

I clearly said "owns the swamp", pay attention... YOU were first to mention "race" ...

GFY, then take a nap.

So do you know what Drain the Swamp means?

literally, or figuratively?

Ok Hillary, do I really have to spell it out?
Just give us what you think it means

translation;

you don't know.

I do know what it means. I asked the question, can you state what it means? you obviously can't.

so wanna give it another try?

no, you don't, ...

here, write this down..

Figuratively speaking, drain the swamp means to eliminate something that is bad, or does harm ... in this case the government .

now it's your nap time.

 

[healthmyths]

As I've been a major critic of the biased MSM after deep reflection and further substantiation I've come to
understand the role the MSM played in convincing Americans that :
1) The MSM IS biased.
2) Everything or time they report biased news/headlines/soundbites I am suspicious of their work.

So "Thanks" to the MSM for being a part in Trump's election as more and more Americans came to the
same conclusion, that is Trump couldn't be all bad as the MSM reported nor were Americans like me
"deplorables" as labeled by Hillary.

As this Harvard study shows, Trump received MORE negative tone stories and LESS positive tone
stories then Hillary.
Now just as the MSM did in 2008 where they pumped McCain up during the primaries more then
other candidates BECAUSE they knew that against Obama he stood no chance... so they pushed McCain..in the primaries.
So too with Trump! They WANTED Trump to be the buffoon candidate for the GOP... so yes as you see
below Trump had less "negative" and more "positive"... as they could appear "unbiased" as their nefarious and obvious choice was the "buffoon" Trump!

BUT Trump outsmarted, outworked, and outflanked the biased MSM during the general election.
He went to all of us and he also confirmed to all of us the BIASED MSM coverage that was occurring.
Then when Hillary called us "deplorables" and the MSM touted that phrase... that convinced millions of Americans who like me didn't want to get into arguments with relatives, or tell biased pollster I favored Trump... we showed our choice behind the curtain.

SO a big thanks to the MSM for convincing millions of Americans that if Trump was so good in the
primaries, why then was the MSM after the primaries so biased? Wrote so many untrue stories that thanks to the internet millions of Americans could find out were false.
Perfect example... just now I did a Google search on "Trump anti-immigrant"
About 38,600 results (0.51 seconds) as MSNBC portrayed... his "anti-immigrant" speech!
Trump anti-immigrant speech follows dark pattern of US history | MSNBC
www.msnbc.com/.../trump-nativist-speech-follows-dark-us-pattern-755626563851
Sep 1, 2016 - Rachel Maddow shows how throughout American history, when normal politics breaks down, fringe voices gain prominence scapegoating ...

How many people believed that Trump (who married a "legal immigrant" who has a daughter who converted to Judaism and with her husband raising a family in the Jewish faith) is what these 38,600 results state:
"Trump anti-immigrant"? The more times this 180° from the facts was reported by the MSM, the more the "deplorables" recognized Trump was stating the truth...MSM is biased... AND GUESS WHAT???
THE MSM agreed with him!!!
Media justify anti-Trump bias, claim he's too 'dangerous' for normal rules
As this NYT reporter states:
"Now comes Jim Rutenberg, in his first season as media columnist for the New York Times. He’s a good reporter and I give him credit for trying to openly grapple with this bizarre situation.
But Rutenberg is, in my view, trying to defend the indefensible:
“If you view a Trump presidency as something that’s potentially dangerous, then your reporting is going to reflect that. You would move closer than you’ve ever been to being oppositional. That’s uncomfortable and uncharted territory for every mainstream, nonopinion journalist I’ve ever known, and by normal standards, untenable.”
Media justify anti-Trump bias, claim he's too 'dangerous' for normal rules



View attachment 101317


News Coverage of the 2016 General Election: How the Press Failed the Voters - Shorenstein Center

MSNBC helped Trump more than you know. MSNBC would play entire Trump speeches every day. If he went to four cities in four days, they played four speeches in four days. Forget the negative stories. Even the Hillary clips they played were nearly always Hillary talking about Trump.

A month before the election, I thought Trump would win. I said it here on the USMB and why. The Trump minions went crazy with "feel the butt hurt" and other such juvenile nonsense. But of course, that's who they are.
I retired in July so was able to watch the election every day on TV. I don't think I ever saw an entire Hillary speech or even one that lasted more than the introduction.
Then Chis Mathews, Chuck Todd, Andrea Mitchell, Mika Brzezinski and others on MSNBC couldn't say Hillary's name without saying she's untrustworthy, unlikeable and dishonest. Chuck went to great lengths saying the Clinton foundation smells and the CIA, the FBI, congressional investigations and the media are looking hard trying to find something. Never mentioning the single reporter who brought down the Trump Foundation.

With the entire American media playing your every speech, every day, it's almost impossible to lose. Remember, they even followed Trump around on his Scottish golf course and his new hotel. Not even asking him questions. Who does that?

And all the illegal stuff Trump does? No one reporting it? And now his base refuses to believe anything the media says. I don't Trust them either. Not after that.

And Hillary still won the popular vote by 2.8 million.

OK so you are saying from YOUR gut feeling, subjective PERSONAL observations of MSNBC, MSM was biased FAVORING Trump, while I'm showing objective, FACTS and here they are: News Coverage of the 2016 General Election: How the Press Failed the Voters - Shorenstein Center
More negative Coverage for Trump and NOT my subjective observation.

Journalists shower Hillary Clinton with campaign cash

96% more money from journalists to Clinton! And you say they FAVORED Trump????